mikal
Blue Crack Addict
do casual fans know the song "Electrical Storm"?
Again, no shit. I even said that in the post you quoted....Since I go to muliple shows, I would love to hear different songs. Yet, I UNDERSTAND their logic for playing what they do, and I don't see any point to bitch about it....(Your above post would be fine by me)
In you post above you mention four songs, yet list three.
And please explain how the "Casual Fan" excuse has been "debunked"
Can you please state, in a complete sentence, what you think the exact sub-debate was? I'm serious...
As I've said many times, you have to wait a few shows for the "standard setlist" to gel/materialize. All the power to U2 if they actually do start varying the set the way you're presently suggesting... but that's not what we're asking for, nor is it likely (unless they were influenced by my amazing thread).
U2 doesn't have to vary their setlist every night - That's not what's being asked for... they just need to know that there is a greater number of songs from which to draw than they seem to realize...
So why complain after one show?
And to repost your own comment from the first post:
Each tour since Popmart, they have increased the total number of songs that make up the "pool". The last tour, had the highest number of "pool songs" since at least Lovetown. So I'm not sure you are arguing a valid point.
I could care less about your "sub-debates" the overall point was that setlist are much more varied now than then and you helped him prove that point.
I thank you. And, I'm serious.
Maybe that's the problem... you're using "pool" in one way, I'm using it in another.
Also, was discussing after one show because it's, more or less, going to be that... it's like calling an election.
You are correct sir, thank you.Isn't it I couldn't care less... wouldn't that make more sense?
But you helped prove "my side" so I thanked you.Don't say you're "serious" in thanking me, because you're obviously not... I'm debating one side, you're on the other...
Says the person who just helped prove the other side...I asked you kindly to explain your point... just seeking clarification so as to keep some coherence in our arguments. I'm still not sure you know what you're arguing...
do casual fans know the song "Electrical Storm"?
They played 60 different songs last tour. More than any other tour in their history.
Only if it appears on U218 (aka The Definitive Collection For Casual Fans).
You make no sense. What other "pool" would we use? They played 60 different songs last tour. More than any other tour in their history.
You sir, are a troll. I'm done.
Pfan, I like your idea.
However:
That kinda says it all as far as actual variety goes.
Oh, and in case anybody didn't catch it:
They played MORE unique songs last tour than in any of their previous tours.
[/thread]
During the Boy tour, U2 played 20 different songs. During Vertigo, they played like 60. Therefore, variation has increased... this is your argument?
Ever wonder why they sometimes compare things "per capita" instead of in terms of absolute numbers?
Yes but there's a lot of fault in using percentages as well because for the most part setlists stay the same length so Boy would read as they used 100% of their catalogue, JT they used 50%, and so on and so on... You're back to semantics.
Why don't we get back to your original point which is that you think the majority in the stands right now, know the majority of their catalog, and most of us don't believe that to be true. Am I correct in understanding your original premise?
People have come along and agreed with me...
How's tonight's setlist then? Honestly, if you think they should have cut the staples out of tonight's set? I'd call that a bit much.
It's more of the trend that I'm trying to analyze... it's a bit early for that.
But, I think that WOWY, Streets, Pride, SBS, and One every night is far too much.
I think some of the lesser "greatest hits" could also be switched up without affecting fan appreciation (in fact, I think it'd go up).
No complaints as far as NLOTH tracks go...
So further switching out to reduce the 5 staples that you listed? Not only is that unrealistic, I think it's rather selfish. Not everyone has seen U2 20 times. Even fewer have heard all the bootlegs. Many people would love to see those 5 songs and 5 more of the other 'overplayed' songs.
Really I'm not sure what the point of this thread is, given how early in the tour it is. If U2 keeps up the way they have, seems to me that this tour will feature the least number of 'warhorses' of any U2 tour, ever.
The people that are agreeing with you represent maybe 0.01% (if not less lol) of the entire U2 fanbase. Noone in the mainstream complains because U2 keeps playing Streets, WOWY, Pride, etc.
So further switching out to reduce the 5 staples that you listed? Not only is that unrealistic, I think it's rather selfish. Not everyone has seen U2 20 times. Even fewer have heard all the bootlegs. Many people would love to see those 5 songs and 5 more of the other 'overplayed' songs.
Really I'm not sure what the point of this thread is, given how early in the tour it is. If U2 keeps up the way they have, seems to me that this tour will feature the least number of 'warhorses' of any U2 tour, ever.
The people that are agreeing with you represent maybe 0.01% (if not less lol) of the entire U2 fanbase. Noone in the mainstream complains because U2 keeps playing Streets, WOWY, Pride, etc.
I am a diehard/know all the songs/love the rare ones/listen to the bootlegs every version possible kind of girl.
And I know damn well that I want those staples in my U2 show. Yes, they may not look too exciting on paper (or screen, rather). But there is a certain energy when those songs get played. You KNOW everybody knows them. Everybody can sing along. Everybody feels the love. These are the songs that made U2 the hit and worldwide success.
Also, With or Without You is my favorite song of all time, and I know I would feel a huge empty gap if it was not played. Say what you like, and yes, it may not be played as well as it has been in the past, but it does not deserve to be retired. That song is beautiful and means the world to me, and I'd like to hear it no matter how it sounds.
I don't mean this to sound rude at all, but I feel like U2 staples are awesome at every show.
Yes, they may not look too exciting on paper (or screen, rather). But there is a certain energy when those songs get played.
I'm not twisting anything, and no, my initial question was not direct, it was quite clearly rhetorical. You then listed 5 staples and said that it would be too much for them to play them every night. This thread and the others like it are what is tired and ridiculous. Let the band play whatever damn songs they feel like. Has it ever occurred to you that maybe they actually like playing them? <--rhetorical, btw.