phommel pointed this out in another thread:
With the majority of the songs being post-2000, there's no way you can call the 360 show a greatest hits concert!
This says it all right here.
Its not a greatest hits show in the least bit, and it is much less a greatest hits show than The Who or AC DC or The Police trot out. I have talked to people who are not fans that have seen 360 and they have told me that the set list sucked, they were lost the whole time, and that people pay to hear the hits and that's it. I disagreed, but that is what a lot of people think, casual fans as well.
The problem is not that they play 2000s material, its a full decade of 3 enormous U2 albums. It is the fact that they, as we have all talked about, lean so heavily on ATYCLB when its the oldest of the 3 and it does not fit the stage set at all for the most part. The problem is not that U2 plays 80s material, they should, but no need to lean so heavily on the big hits from JT and UF and completely neglect album cuts or anything pre 1984.
The set list needs:
-BD and Walk On only for ATYCLB nightly, In A Little While a rare surprise.
-COBL, Vertigo for Bomb, sometimes a surprise of Original or Love and Peace.
-A second encore of Pop and other 90s material.
-Some deep cuts from JT and UF on occasion.
-Gloria, OOC, I Will Follow, Electric Co and 2 Hearts- play 1 of these per night.
-Maybe need to extend to 26-27 songs to do what I mentioned above, but there is more time off now and Bono's voice has not even sounded tired yet this tour.