USATODAY article on the Tour

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

CosmoKramer

Rock n' Roll Doggie
Joined
Aug 19, 2004
Messages
3,325
The below link is to a new article on Usatoday.com regarding U2's current tour and what they are going to do in the near future. I also find the comments interesting because they are typically from non-U2 fans and in turn, U2 bashers. I have read comments from conservatives that say "U2 are liberal assholes who hate America" and comments from Liberals that write "U2 are hypocrites for their carbon foot print and Bono is an asshole...LOL They just can win sometimes.....


U2 turns 360 stadium tour into attendance-shattering sellouts - USATODAY.com
 
It seems like this article is saying that the 3rd leg of the tour will begin on May 30th in Mexcio City and continue through June and July. They probably are taking so much time off to finish SOA and prepare to really shake the tour up.
 
i actually bought the paper today, its a pretty good article that makes a point of pointing out what a success this tour really is. Thats a far cry from the last stadium tour, as noted.
 
A good article, although it focuses so much on the cost and scope of the tour and nothing on, for example, the plight of Burma, e.t.c.
 
i don't read those comments as they come from wanna-be fascist, fear-mongering, naive, 16th century, ultra conservative, masturbating, 18 year olds who don't know what's good for them.

they should try to get out of their house or suburb for once. Take a trip to Montreal and watch Bleu Nuit




:wink:
 
i don't read those comments as they come from wanna-be fascist, fear-mongering, naive, 16th century, ultra conservative, masturbating, 18 year olds who don't know what's good for them.

they should try to get out of their house or suburb for once. Take a trip to Montreal and watch Bleu Nuit
:wink:

In fairness, there are an equal number of "liberals" that bash them for not giving enough to charity or their carbon foot print. Now they haven't written that they are in fact "liberals" but you can tell by their argument (typically against U2) if they are "liberals" or "conservatives". I say this of course jokingly as I do fall more into one of those categories more so than the other, but it comes down to this:

If they write anything about U2 being communist bastards who hate America, its from a Conservative. If they write anything about U2 being hypocritical assholes who will pollute the earth and ask for money from average people but dont give enough of their own money to help out the poor, then its from a liberal....:lol: Now I dont like talking about politics because people get really worked up, so even though these are some of the actual comments being made....I really dont know (or care) if they are conservatives or liberals, I am only guessing.
 
in canada, liberals are supposed to be middle of the road, love to spend on themselves, fine with paying their share of taxes for the betterment of society and themselves(ie, free walk-in healthcare, no fee ambulance, government pension fund). :shrug:

tree huggers are typically Green or NDP (Union lovers) and left to far left.

those dufus americans can't shake their stigma, that's why I suggested they take a trip to Montreal, and get a load off
 
i'm tempted to write this is large bold print because it bears repeating all the time.

U2 do not champion the cause of global warming, carbon footprints etc like other bands do. they were not involved with live earth, and their only active work with Greenpeace was Stop Sellafield in the very early 90s (if i recall correctly). Why the fuck does this complete lack of involvement in the climate change lobby make them hypocrites when they take a tour like 360 on the road? They've quietly said they'll buy carbon credits to offset the tour and haven't said anything else.

completely aside to the point on the thread, but still. i'm just going to link to this post every time the topic comes up now.
 
Oh everyone knows that if you argue for the reduction of emissions and for stopping global warming then it absolves you of any other hypocritical stances you have or inaction on your part for other causes. So these so called activists do their best work on spamming every article they can find like this, as if the 360 tour is even a drop in the bucket in the emissions scheme, go out and change legislation/fight oil lobbies if that's your pet cause, it might seem hopeless but it's a lot more effective than being obnoxious on an article that is about MUSIC COMPOSITION/ENTERTAINMENT. Shut up.
 
people are always going to be complaining about something, it's human nature... Bono makes it pretty easy though, that comment he makes about still being able to own his house at the end of the day? :doh:

I understand what he's saying but that is too easy to criticize.
 
In fairness, there are an equal number of "liberals" that bash them for not giving enough to charity or their carbon foot print. Now they haven't written that they are in fact "liberals" but you can tell by their argument (typically against U2) if they are "liberals" or "conservatives". I say this of course jokingly as I do fall more into one of those categories more so than the other, but it comes down to this:

If they write anything about U2 being communist bastards who hate America, its from a Conservative. If they write anything about U2 being hypocritical assholes who will pollute the earth and ask for money from average people but dont give enough of their own money to help out the poor, then its from a liberal....:lol: Now I dont like talking about politics because people get really worked up, so even though these are some of the actual comments being made....I really dont know (or care) if they are conservatives or liberals, I am only guessing.

Great post :up:

personally i hate politics, and i hate that things always seem to end up "political" around this message board.
 
hey read this one from the Raleigh News and Observer. Not too good of tippers after pulling in 5 million bucks at the show....

33 buck tip on $277 tab and it was delivered...... I hope someone sends them an autograph photo or a couple of shirts.

Restaurant cooks up 'cue for U2
RALEIGH Debbie Holt was ready to close Cooper's BBQ for the day when she got a call. From U2.
Well, from U2's private jet services coordinator, a man she knows only as Maurice.
Holt, who co-owns the landmark Raleigh barbecue joint with her husband, Randy, was shocked early Saturday evening when she got a call from Maurice, requesting enough food for 25 people: barbecue, pork rinds, five fried chickens, pig skins, ribs, cole slaw, hush puppies.
The band was 30 minutes away from landing at RDU and then dashing to its performance at Carter-Finley Stadium, but could she please have the food ready for them at 10:50 p.m. sharp, just before the band's scheduled departure?
Why, yes, Holt said calmly.
The band had heard all about Cooper's, Maurice said, and they were hoping to get some of what they'd heard was the nation's best barbecue before they left town. Would she take a credit card?
Nope. Cooper's doesn't take credit cards, Holt said. The cost of the order would be $276.77, including a $50 delivery fee.
Maurice said he'd check to see if there was enough cash on the plane and call her back. A few minutes later, he called back, still airborne, and said the food mission was a go. He hung up, and Holt screamed.
"I had to be a grown-up on the phone, but I haven't been grown up since," she said.
Holt and her husband scrambled to cook everything fresh and fried to perfection. Randy Holt and cook Chess Smith heated the chopped, Eastern-style barbecue and made sure the hush puppies were properly greased.
"We close at 6 every day," said Holt, who once managed the restaurant for an owner who bought it from the founder of the place, the late Clyde Cooper. "But when U2 calls you, you do what you have to do, honey."
They threw in fresh banana pudding for good measure.
Debbie Holt and her 14-year-old daughter, Ashley, took their van to the private lot at RDU where U2's jet was waiting.
"I screamed like a little girl," she said.
The pair was escorted by eight security guards into the back of the jet, near ovens and kitchen space. They worked in the tight confines of the jet while the band was roaring through the final moments of their stadium show.
Debbie Holt was still holding on to a pan when guitarist Dave "The Edge" Evans appeared, fresh from the show, standing six inches in front of her. He was the only band member they met.
"He said, 'Hi, how are you? Did you bring me food?' I lost it when I saw him," she said. "If I would've known he would move that close, I would've kissed him."
The Edge and staff members tore into the pork skins and loved the banana pudding, said Holt, who has co-owned the restaurant with her husband since the summer of 2008.
This isn't the only time Cooper's, which opened on New Year's Day in 1938, has seen celebrity attention. The Rolling Stones, Pat Benatar, Joan Jett and the Allman Brothers have visited the restaurant, Debbie Holt said. Just last week, Clay Aiken dropped by for a bite, she said.
Holt and her daughter left the jet after about 20 minutes. Maurice handed them $300. Not much of a tip.
"But U2 is something else, honey," Debbie Holt said. "I don't care, and I've been a crazy woman ever since. I'd much rather serve them than go to the concert
 
Maybe he works for Cooper's BBQ and he's trying a new advertising scheme :shrug:

Well guess what, I've eaten there and it's overrated.
 
all they had was cash, so im guessing they were lucky to have enough money to pay for all of that food plus the "tip"

if the bbq place took credit cards then it should have been a different story. But hey, rich people are supposed to pay more than everyone else for dinner, right?
 
But hey, rich people are supposed to pay more than everyone else for dinner, right?

$33 isn't quite 15% of the tab without the delivery fee, so I hardly call that paying more than everyone else for dinner. Perhaps they tack on the delivery fee because many people don't tip much for delivered food, in which case the "tip" (tip & delivery fee combined) is 32.3% which doesn't seem bad to me. Of course they also worked an extra five hours to prepare and deliver the order.

But the restaurant owner isn't complaining, so it shouldn't be a big deal. I guess if you run a restaurant and want a big tip on a delivery order, this info will allow you to comfortably say no to an order from U2. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom