Upcoming Films of Disinterest

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
You guys are biased as fans, Spirited Away would absolutely not touch the kind of money Finding Nemo made. Miyazaki's fans in America are mostly anime fans, the style just does not have mainstream acceptance here. But we'll probably just go back and forth on this as usual.

Obviously not, but you're kidding yourself on the anime comment and being entirely dismissive of a film based simply on what country it came from.
 
lazarus said:
I didn't say it would have made as much as Pixar's most successful films. But could it have done Wall-E money? Sure.

The most successful foreign language film of all time, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon (200+ mil), made half as much as Wall-E (managing a paltry 500+ mil). No, a Miyazaki film is highly unlikely to make as much as even the most esoteric Pixar film stateside. That's just the way it is. And I don't think powerhour is being "dismissive" of Ghibli films for stating this. It's not as if we're talking about quality here anyway, just marketing appeal. Sure, Totoro is cute, but cultural barriers limit the immediacy on occasion, and I find that the English translation of films like Ponyo tends to water down the surreal quality of those films, so to a degree they're a compromised product anyway. Japanese children's films cannot and will not have commercial dominance in an American market, and that's really quite alright. Anyone with the inclination can find them if they so desire, and those who are too lazy to provide their children with higher quality entertainment than Dreamworks fare probably wouldn't appreciate them in the first place.

For the record, I do adore Pixar and I feel that those panicking or gloating over the shittiness of Cars 2 are acting rashly. While it does appear that Pixar's creativity is trending downwards with 3 sequels scheduled in the span of 4 films, one of them happened to be very strong (not Spirited Away strong, but I pity those who give a fuck), and I have enough faith in the quality of Monsters Inc's characters to expect an alright film to result from the sequel. And, since their last three original ideas all resulted in extremely good films, arguably the most creative run in their entire filmography, I have no reason to expect less of Brave. This is a really shitty period for Pixar, relatively speaking, and the result will be a solid year of iconoclastic backlash. Once the hits and critical fellation resume, however, it will be as difficult/irrational to fault them as ever for doing what they do well, even if it is more limited than American critics like to believe.

Looking through their output to date, I like just about every one of their films, and see legitimate artistry in several. That's the best I can reasonably expect from a studio of their commercial standing, so I have little room to complain. My expectations from Ghibli are considerably different, and they have also delivered.
 
Disney distributed those negative reviews for Bad Teacher, nefariously

Also, let's not forget, even at their absolute worst, Pixar still provided us with the finest mainstream popcorn-muncher of the week:

20p3k1c.png
 
The most successful foreign language film of all time, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon (200+ mil), made half as much as Wall-E (managing a paltry 500+ mil). No, a Miyazaki film is highly unlikely to make as much as even the most esoteric Pixar film stateside.

I don't know what numbers you're looking at, but Crouching Tiger only made $125 million in the U.S. That Wall-E total is worldwide, not domestic. It only made about $220 million here, which is on the lower side for the Pixar stuff.

And I do feel that with the right promotion, Spirited Away could have reached that number. I think it has a fairly wide demographic, and if its similarity to Alice in Wonderland had been played up, who knows? If Crouching Tiger could break $100 million I don't think it's a challenge when you factor in the child/parent audience. I think it's the greatest children's film and the greatest animated film ever made, and I think that Oscar win is a testament to how strongly people who did see it felt about it. Disney spent jack shit trying to secure that award while pumping money into their own product, and it still won.
 
The fact that a Taiwanese revisionist wuxia film (a slightly niche market generally in the west, you might say) can still manage to make as much as Crouching Tiger did when receiving the right critical and promotional attention should stand as a testament to how wildly successful any Ghibli film could be in the west if Disney actually gave a shit. Seeing as how the potential market for them is just as wide if not moreso than most homeland Disney products, and how universal in artistry and content most of them are.
 
True, and despite some of the Shinto imagery that Western audiences wouldn't be familiar with, it's not like the characters are drawn to look specifically Asian or anything.

Also, this was the number one grossing film OF ALL TIME in Japan. Not just any old successful film.
 
I don't know what numbers you're looking at, but Crouching Tiger only made $125 million in the U.S. That Wall-E total is worldwide, not domestic. It only made about $220 million here, which is on the lower side for the Pixar stuff.

Sorry, those were the worldwide numbers, which aren't terribly relevant, though the claim that it made half as much as Wall-E stateside is still just about right even after the adjustments.

I recall the promotional push here for Crouching Tiger being absolutely massive when it came out, but that might be revisionist history. I was like 9; a lot of things seemed larger to me then.

But Pixar is silly! It is silly to like Pixar!

Pixar owes me a piece of driftwood for Cars 2.

Seeing as how the potential market for them is just as wide if not moreso than most homeland Disney products, and how universal in artistry and content most of them are.

While I do understand that the overall message of Ghibli films tend to be extremely relatable and easy to decipher, a major selling point when it comes to marketing, what do you mean by "universal in artistry?"
 
I liked the first Cars, but I heard years ago that Disney was cashing in on a sequel, so I didn't have my hopes up and Mater being tied up in some ridiculous spy caper just doesn't make any sense. It's like they took of one those Tall Tales shorts and tried to expand that into a movie instead of making a true continuation of the Cars story.
 
Sorry, those were the worldwide numbers, which aren't terribly relevant, though the claim that it made half as much as Wall-E stateside is still just about right even after the adjustments.

Not quite. The $125,000,000 that Crouching Tiger made would be over $150 million in 2008 dollars. That's significantly more than half of Wall-E's $220 million, but whatever.

While I do understand that the overall message of Ghibli films tend to be extremely relatable and easy to decipher, a major selling point when it comes to marketing, what do you mean by "universal in artistry?"

I think Lance was basically saying what my last post did. The artwork isn't overtly Japanese, or some kind of niche Anime product like Akira or Ghost in the Shell. It's a children's fantasy that arguably could have reached much of the audience for Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland. Now I know that was a monster hit and Spirited Away wouldn't likely have made $400 million, but I do think that it had a wider audience than you're giving it credit for.
 
Even with Ghibli-loving John Lassiter at the helm of Disney Animation, Ponyo's widest release was only 927 theaters.

Total Lifetime Grosses:
Domestic: $15,090,399 (7.5%)
Foreign: $186,660,538 (92.5%)
Worldwide: $201,750,937

Fucking bullshit.
 
I don't get why Ponyo wasn't given a bigger release than that, they actually did ads for it and I felt like they were pushing that one far more.
 
Thank you LemonMelon, I definitely wasn't being dismissive, I'm asking fans to wake up to the fact that anime is very niche in this country, no matter the marketing campaign or release size you get, the interest and acceptance for the genre has to be there and it just isn't in this country. We're talking box office and demographics here. Of course I opened this ridiculous wormhole with a throwaway sentence at the end of my real message, to which no one really reacted. Why must we nitpick random things and blow them into arguments?

Also let's see how Brave is and what Pete Docter has up his sleeve for his next project before claiming that they've lost their mojo.
 
I think Lance was basically saying what my last post did. The artwork isn't overtly Japanese, or some kind of niche Anime product like Akira or Ghost in the Shell. It's a children's fantasy that arguably could have reached much of the audience for Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland. Now I know that was a monster hit and Spirited Away wouldn't likely have made $400 million, but I do think that it had a wider audience than you're giving it credit for.

Yeah, basically. Anime is kind of a niche market over here, because a lot of it is stylized, both in terms of visual artwork and general form or tone. I feel a lot of Ghibli's non-domenstic (meaning, outside of Japan) appeal has to do with their film's somewhat fundamental cinematic language and means of communication. They aren't the only studio making anime that's decidedly not ANIME, so to speak, but certainly the most visible.
 
But Ghibli films AREN'T the kind of anime you're referring to that is niche, Powerhour, that's what bugs me about what you're saying.It comes off dismissive to me of the entire animation capabilities of Japan by dismissing all of it as "anime" in the sense you're talking. You make it sound as if Japan is completely incapable of making a film that people in other countries would want to see and that's CLEARLY not the case.
 
No I'm telling you how the mainstream audience in the country perceives such films, nowhere have I said there aren't people who like them or that such filmmakers are incapable of making great films. I'm done with this, you can think what you like about what I'm saying or about what the realities are about animation-going demographics in this country, I've said my piece and again this is never what I was discussing.
 
Yeah, basically. Anime is kind of a niche market over here, because a lot of it is stylized, both in terms of visual artwork and general form or tone. I feel a lot of Ghibli's non-domenstic (meaning, outside of Japan) appeal has to do with their film's somewhat fundamental cinematic language and means of communication. They aren't the only studio making anime that's decidedly not ANIME, so to speak, but certainly the most visible.

I agree with you, it isn't as hard to relate to or get into the way more out there or nerdy serial Japanese animation is, but there are conventions of design and motion that they still retain that turn Americans off in a way that Pixar or Disney's conventions don't. And I'm saying this from listening to what non-film buffs/non-Kotaku nerds have told me about such fare. I'm not debasing their achievements, simply saying that they do not have the potential acceptance here that they do in Japan, the same way no matter how revered or successful Pixar's movies are they won't top Ghibli's in Japan.
 
Also, all I can say out of the Cars 2 ashes is, this gives Rango a real hance at winning the Oscar, and that's awesome.
 
Powerhour, seriously, this is really bugging me. Just give me a straight answer to this question: Are you suggesting that all Japanese animation is a similar style and ALL Japanese animation is inaccessible in the United States?
 
No. But I am saying that some of the characteristics of stereotypical Japanese animation exists in Miyazaki's work, that while the art design, and stories are far from typical, the look and feel is not 100% distinctive from that stereotype enough to attract the mainstream in the United States to giving it a try. That's all I'm saying, I'm not saying I dislike it, or that all these mainstream viewers would if they gave it a chance.
 
Plus, while people like to say that subtitled movies just don't sell in the US, dubbed movies go over even worse.
 
Syncing in anime is typically somewhat wonky even in its original language, and I find that unless a dub is especially poor, syncing issues are rarely too distracting. Which doesn't speak directly to the quality of the dub itself of course, but yeah. Disney especially at least handles Ghibli's dubs with great care.
 
No. But I am saying that some of the characteristics of stereotypical Japanese animation exists in Miyazaki's work, that while the art design, and stories are far from typical, the look and feel is not 100% distinctive from that stereotype enough to attract the mainstream in the United States to giving it a try. That's all I'm saying, I'm not saying I dislike it, or that all these mainstream viewers would if they gave it a chance.

Ok, I get what you're saying. I disagree, but at least now I understand what you're trying to say and that'll do :).

Dubbed animation is usually a completely different story, for what it's worth.

I think it's just because of my semi-familiarity with Japanese culture/language that watching the dub of Ponyo killed me. I would've loved it other wise, Neeson and Betty White were some great casting decisions.
 
Oh no, the Ponyo dub is nearly unlistenable. I know it has its fans, but compared to most of Disney's others I found it quite shoddy.
 
No. But I am saying that some of the characteristics of stereotypical Japanese animation exists in Miyazaki's work, that while the art design, and stories are far from typical, the look and feel is not 100% distinctive from that stereotype enough to attract the mainstream in the United States to giving it a try. That's all I'm saying, I'm not saying I dislike it, or that all these mainstream viewers would if they gave it a chance.

And yet you are still failing to acknowledge that Disney does not give these films the same push and promotional attention (or theatre count) as their own product, so WE'LL NEVER KNOW how wide their appeal could be.
 
Back
Top Bottom