The Dark Knight review thread

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
oldman.gif

Oh fuck. :lmao:
 
I don't even remember seeing Dracula. Surely I must have. Better add it to the queue and have another look.
 
I don't even remember seeing Dracula. Surely I must have. Better add it to the queue and have another look.

You should, for his performance alone.....also, lots of old school film tricks used by Coppola. On the negative side, Keanu is in it.

The scene where Keanu first discovers just how....vampiric....Oldman is.....with the three woman and the baby.....yeesh.
 
Saw this with a friend a few nights ago, and we both really enjoyed it.

Admittedly the superhero/action genre isn't my favourite. There's a limit to how much I will probably ever enjoy any movie where there is an unkillable action hero who routinely pulls off the impossible or improbable ie. not just Spiderman or Batman but also franchises such as James Bond and Die Hard. Suspension of disbelief is just too much to ask - not saying that's the way that it should or shouldn't be, that's just my own taste. However The Dark Knight is flush against that upper limit of enjoyability for this sort of movie - I think it was brilliantly done, and IMO the quibbles that most folks have mentioned are easy to overlook. Everything that the Nolan brothers touch seems to turn to gold.. 8/10
 
You should, for his performance alone.....also, lots of old school film tricks used by Coppola. On the negative side, Keanu is in it.

The scene where Keanu first discovers just how....vampiric....Oldman is.....with the three woman and the baby.....yeesh.

yeah...starting to sound familiar...I'm sure I saw it when it first came out. I was living in NYC then and went to the movies like 3x/week.
 
And here we................go.

First off, as I'm sure you're all simply DYING to know, did I like the film? Fuck yes. Absolutely I did. There will not likely be a more entertaining film released all summer, and perhaps for the remainder of the year.

HOWEVER, I was, admittedly, a little underwhelmed. That is, it's not #1 all-time for me, and not even my favorite Batman film. But it's damn close, and that's good too.

Since this is a thoroughly positive review, and I'm still rigid, I'll start with the positives. The acting? Great. Greater than great. Heath, Bale, Eckhard, and Oldman all turned in very strong performances and proved to be a solid backbone for what turned out to be arguably the most intriguing story line in any Batman film so far. Actually, there wasn't one, but that's a key part of the morality tale they wove. More on that later.

This film looks fucking incredible, point blank. I think we can all agree on that, even if the characters and dialogue in particular don't exactly do it for you. The truck flipping over obviously dazzled, but there were many other awesome moments beyond that, particularly the final Batman/Joker scene with Batman losing sight of him. The camera never stops moving throughout the film, and it creates a dizzying and dreadful sensation in the viewer. Basically, Nolan achieved what he set out to do. The scenes set at dusk were my favorite to look at, though those particular scenes were less common than the ones set in the charcoal black of night.

Now, on to the dialogue. Arguably, this was my favorite part of the film, which surprised me. Sure, Joker had some humorous one-liners, but he also brought up some very good points about humanity as well. He was clearly insane, but (if you ignore the massive body count) cheering for the guy isn't hard to do. That's the mark of a very well portrayed villain. Harvey Dent's transformation was not at all implausible, though I still found Two Face occasionally obnoxious.

As you can see, there's plenty to love here. However, I also have a few complaints. First off (and certain to be the most controversial), I didn't find that Ledger's performance was as transcendent and spine-tingling as so many made it out to be. What I loved about his portrayal had less to do with him personally and more to do with the emphasis on brilliant, deadly strategies and, of course, his dialogue, which I praised above. His performance was great, and when he came on screen the crowd came to life, but I feel that he simply took fantastic material and did a good job with it, which isn't so much a complaint as it is a comment. For the record, Nicholson is still my favorite Joker.

Beyond that, it also pissed me off how the movie fell back on car chases/explosions/brawls/more explosions/make out scenes/more explosions as a crutch when this film could have been more than just a really really really good action film, and it occasionally is. Also, the early hype claimed that it was something more than that. Again, it occasionally is, but not quite often enough.

In the end, I can't help but admit to being ever so slightly disappointed, but, on the other hand, that was still really fucking good right there. I plan to buy this on DVD, right along with Casino Royale (I was reminded of its particular level of badass thanks to the Quantum Of Solace trailer, which also impressed me), and I intend to encourage others to see it as well. There are so many Batman movies not worth giving a damn about, but this isn't one of them.

8.5/10
 
Yep, glad you liked it, too, El-Mel.

Since Nolan used a sepia motif for Begins, and a blue one for TDK, what do you think he'd use for the sequel? They're both used to great effect in the overall story, I think. Green? Black?
 
Everyone in here, with one exception has liked or loved the film, and even the one person that disliked it loved Ledger. Rotten Tomatoes has it at over 90%. What in the world would you have gleaned from this site that would make you think it sucked????

Well...I tend to believe anything anybody said...doesn't matter if there are a few bright spots..if a person said the movie suck.....then I might believe them.

I'm a moron...pure and simple.
 
Well...people have said it half sucked....and I tend to be a moron and believe anything anybody will say.

Yes Weldo, but who has said this? Some minority will always pop up, but when the response is overwhelmingly positive, isn't that something you'd respond to greater?
 
Exactly. Batman explaining anything differently has the chance of exposing who he is.

Exactly. It would be stupid for the Dark Knight to tell the White Knight he'd rather save the White Knight's girlfriend. Because that would get the White Knight really wondering: WHY?
 
Yes Weldo, but who has said this? Some minority will always pop up, but when the response is overwhelmingly positive, isn't that something you'd respond to greater?


Not really...I usually have "Wait and see" type attitude with most of the movies that I'm interested in...but sometimes if overall the movie reviews are positive and I see one bad or semi-bad...I tend to get a bit scared.
 
Not really...I usually have "Wait and see" type attitude with most of the movies that I'm interested in...but sometimes if overall the movie reviews are positive and I see one bad or semi-bad...I tend to get a bit scared.

Why?
 
I think Oldman's 2 best perfs were Dracula and Beethoven, both posted above. It's a crime he wasn't nominated for the former.

You should, for his performance alone.....also, lots of old school film tricks used by Coppola. On the negative side, Keanu is in it.

The scene where Keanu first discovers just how....vampiric....Oldman is.....with the three woman and the baby.....yeesh.

Oldman as Bram Stoker's Dracula was great. You should see this. The only negative about it, as NSW said, is that Keanu was in it. I thought his performance was weak at best.

12754__dracula_l.jpg
 
Not really...I usually have "Wait and see" type attitude with most of the movies that I'm interested in...but sometimes if overall the movie reviews are positive and I see one bad or semi-bad...I tend to get a bit scared.

When there is a movie you are interested in, should not your attitude just be "see" instead of "wait and see"? Odd.
 
When there is a movie you are interested in, should not your attitude just be "see" instead of "wait and see"? Odd.


It depends on how bad I want to actually see the movie. Most of the time I'm not interested and the movies I am interested in I either wait until I get enough money or it gets to one of the cheaper theaters or on DVD.

Thus the "wait and see" attitude. (It has nothing to do with reviews most of the time because I usually don't read the reviews)

:sigh:
 
And here we................go.

First off, as I'm sure you're all simply DYING to know, did I like the film? Fuck yes. Absolutely I did. There will not likely be a more entertaining film released all summer, and perhaps for the remainder of the year.

:up:

The acting? Great. Greater than great. Heath, Bale, Eckhard, and Oldman all turned in very strong performances and proved to be a solid backbone for what turned out to be arguably the most intriguing story line in any Batman film so far.

Agreed. Heath stole the show. Just makes me even sadder that we lost someone so talented and dedicated. Bale was awesome and Oldman was solid. Gyllenhaul pissed me off. But I spose she was better than Katie Holmes.


This film looks fucking incredible, point blank. I think we can all agree on that, even if the characters and dialogue in particular don't exactly do it for you. The truck flipping ...
was fucking awesome!


I didn't find that Ledger's performance was as transcendent and spine-tingling as so many made it out to be. What I loved about his portrayal had less to do with him personally and more to do with the emphasis on brilliant, deadly strategies and, of course, his dialogue, which I praised above. His performance was great, and when he came on screen the crowd came to life, but I feel that he simply took fantastic material and did a good job with it, which isn't so much a complaint as it is a comment. For the record, Nicholson is still my favorite Joker.

I got chills. He freaked me out. I couldn't get him out of my head. IMO, he blew Nicholson out of the water. And seeing him in Brokeback, then this role just astonishes me. He was so immersed in the roles that it's almost impossible to link the two.

I've seen it twice and I'd see it again... and agian ... I'm usually hard to please, but this movie just rocked my fucking socks off. I'm giving it a 9.
 
I don't even know what to say about the suggestion that Nicholson was better. Not in terms of faithfulness to the character, not in terms of acting, not in terms of anything.

So wrong.
 
The whole Hong Kong scene could have been cut in my opinion, and they could have spent more time on developing other storylines that left me going huh? How did they get there? What just happened with...who did what?

I have to agree with you here. When we left the theatre, one of my friends said that at the end of the movie she had to sit there and think about whether the Hong Kong scenes were actually IN this movie or if she was remembering them from somewhere else, because they didn't really fit in seamlessly.
 
I have to agree with you here. When we left the theatre, one of my friends said that at the end of the movie she had to sit there and think about whether the Hong Kong scenes were actually IN this movie or if she was remembering them from somewhere else, because they didn't really fit in seamlessly.

I bought it because it goes into the whole "going after the mob's money sources" storyline, but it wasn't the most important thing. It was a fun action set piece though.

Oh fuck no:

Poll: Who Wants Angelina Jolie to Play Catwoman? - Cinematical
 
I think the series has done just fine without Catwoman. She was absent in all three of the best Batman films.
 
Oh, man, disagree. For me, the best of the Burton Batmans features Catwoman. Not saying that I do or do not want Catwoman back, but, I really really enjoy Batman Returns.

Michelle Pfeiffer certainly made the part more appealing. :drool:

I'm neither here nor there on Batman Returns. The Penguin is one of the weaker Batman villains, and the film just doesn't feel right to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom