namkcuR
ONE love, blood, life
I have several friends in their late 20s-early 30s who are knowledgeable film guys and will debate people who make negative passing remarks about the films. They feel as strongly as I do, even if we all know we're in the minority.
If you want more of a professional opinion, Matt Zoller Seitz is one of the best film writers online, he started the House Next Door Blog (and became known for his long musings on Terrence Malick's The New World) and now writes for Roger Ebert's official site.
Here's something he wrote way back when about Revenge of the Sith that's pretty in-line with what I feel:
Fellowship of the Sith | The House Next Door | Slant Magazine
That's a fair and well-written review of Sith. And I tend to agree with the majority that it's the best of the prequels. The second half of it particularly, is extremely well done. The only real problems with it are the unnecessary Obi-Wan/Grievous stuff, the way Padme was handled(poor dialogue, not enough emphasis on the political side of her, and the childbirth death), and of course, Hayden's portryal of Anakin(which is like 50% dialogue and direction issues and 50% acting issues). Oh, and Vader's NOOO.
But for the most part it's a solid film with great performances from McDiarmad, McGregor, and, you may disagree, Samuel L. Jackson, and a really affecting portrayal of the fall of the Jedi.
I think you could get away with making ROTS the only prequel you watch when watching the films in series and not miss all that much.
I think we pretty much see eye to eye on TPM, its strengths and weaknesses, except that you go out of your way to defend the gungan drudgery.
AOTC is where we differ the most. It's easily at the bottom of my rankings. EASILY. It's slow-paced, one plot contrivance after another - I get that the detective Obi-Wan thing is different, and maybe even interesting, but it doesn't belong in a Star Wars film imo, at least not a main Saga one - Jango and kid Boba annoy me, the explanation for the clones doesn't do it for me, the climax is the least satisfying - both from an action and emotional resonance standpoint - of any Star Wars film, just a bunch of all-over-the-place action with no real point...etc.
You, on the other hand, list it as one of your favorites, if I recall. Different strokes.
But I think the most bizarre prequel-related thing I've ever seen you say is that you hoped the unaltered OT never gets released in HD. It's one thing to like the SE, even to prefer it to the OT, but to feel so strongly about it that you wish for the unaltered versions never to get their fair treatment? I don't get it.
Anyway, you know I'm not trying to start anything here, I just like having these debates.