World Leader Pretend... - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-25-2005, 11:56 PM   #16
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auto Dafoe
Posts: 9,600
Local Time: 12:02 AM
Ok I'll be cheeky, this has been on my mind all day - A_Wanderer, what precisely is the difference between US hegemony (which you strongly support) and a hypothetical world government (which you clearly fear, were it a reality)?
__________________

__________________
Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 01:33 AM   #17
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 12:02 AM
I do not strongly support a US hegemony or empire ~ I find the idea of a Pax Americana almost as off putting as global communism, because power corrupts and ultimate power corrupts ultimately ~ the only reason that the US in it's current condition is not the same as a global government is because it doesn't have total control over everybodies lives and it is scrutinised and held to account by it's citizens. I do support the idea of free nation states built on principles of liberty and democracy acting in their countries national interest. Now has the US protected these principles all the time ~ of course not, it has put it's interests above the rights and freedoms of those in other countries heaps of times (just like almost every other country, Australia's relationship with Indonesia after they invaded East Timor a good example). But if it is taking actions that do furthur the liberal democratic model that has worked so well around the world spanning vastly different cultures and societies today then I think that supporting those actions is the right thing to do.

I am fearful of authoritarianism, I see how much evil is comitted when the power is consolidated ~ look to communism and the 100 million people that that system managed to get killed ~ it is not a good idea, the dictatorship of the proletariat only means violent aquisition of wealth by the state and minimal redistribution until everybody is a slave to the state, look to Nazism and see the police state, big government interference and control over peoples lives genocide brought about by a madman, look to political Islam and the crimes that are comitted against innocent people for doing things like having pre-marital sex or not submitting to the religious authorities who are infalable and who's decrees come from a higher source and are thus unquestionable. These are all bad systems and they all share a lot in common ~ there is consolidated power, there is a fearful and supressed population, there are leaders who are venerated and build up cults of personality. When your fundamental freedoms are picked away piece by piece the political system usually winds up in an extreme position.

I see where you come from in your question about the US ~ if you keep your eye on the other big bad then you are blind to the more insidious evil that seduces you to surrender the freedom to act and ultimately to think. That is a significant issue. The only way to prevent it from hapening is to have an open political discourse where all issues can be adressed without censure, where the power rests with the citizens and not the few elite who know what is better for the majority. The USA is a liberal democracy, it has different tiers of government and a seperation of the powers, it's citizens are armed (frankly that makes the US more of a free country than Australia in one way), it has a bill of rights. It has all of these different checks and balances that have ensured that it could never go to the extremes that were found in countries that lacked all of those guarantees. I am not saying that it is impossible for the US to become a Nazi Germany ~ I am saying that now it is only as authoritarian as any free liberal democracy with a free press and freedom of speech is. It is built on the backs of many cultures and races so the idea of a leader rallying the people under a unified racial alliance seems very unlikely. I think that when the US is in such a state then we will not hear about the problems at all and criticisms will fall on deaf ears in the state censored media. People will disappear ~ not like Guantanamo where they are captured in hostile environments with reason to believe that they are a threat, listed, get legal representation to take their cases through the courts lobbying their governments with ICRC visits and media attention. I am talking bullet to the head and into a mass grave along with an entire family with everybody too afraid to take action type of disappeared.

I would love to see a world government built on those same principles ~ I think that it is a possibility when those free nations learn to work together through alliances and trade. For any world government to operate effectively people would not be surrendering their rights ~ they would retain them. You would need to have a united humanity ~ this would require less religion in the world - something that I do not think is going to happen naturally until poverty can be alleviated, education becomes a universal human right and living standards are brought up to scratch. Religion is a big problem here because frankly it is a retrograde force in the world and for humanity ~ it divides people into groups, it elevates worthiness and crushes the importance of the individual. I would not want to violently supress religion, that is not how to adress it. People need religion when times are tough and it is difficult to survive; I think that there are plenty of examples where once people are not living in fear their entire lives or dying at 35 from preventable disease and they have higher living standards and education that religion becomes less influential ~ spirituality remains important but institutionalised religion just doesn't hold as much sway over people. It is an obstacle to world government that would be overcome once all the other innumerable problems are.

I would hate to see a world government where the people are enslaved ~ where they have to pay very high taxes to keep most of the world stuck on global welfare dependence, where technophobia obstructs beneficial technologies from adressing global problems (thinking of genetic modification of foodstuffs and nuclear power ~ two breakthrough technologies that could do so much for humanity). Where there is ultimate power in the hands of the few or where corruption is rife ~ that is the problem with the UN, when you mix ice cream (liberal democracies) and shit (autocrats, theocracies etc.) together what comes out isn't halfway, it still tastes like shit.

If you were to show me a world government that worked like The Federation from Star Trek then I may be inclined to be impressed ~ every person being able to live their lives freely, no poverty or hunger, material needs met through a near magical technology the replicator (chief issue; the federation is almost a working communist system in nature; it lacks a monetary system, every persons needs supplied by the government ~ the problem with communism is that we don't have replicators and we need people to work the crappy jobs and get the short end of the stick) and humanity is dedicated to betterment of itself. If on the other hand the world government was made up of a bunch of corrupt beurocrats with their own agenda's punishing certain groups in one way or another for the greater good then it would be less desirable and more akin to what I imagine this single world leader doing whatever they want is.
__________________

__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 02:40 AM   #18
War Child
 
Vorsprung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 976
Local Time: 03:02 PM
^ ^

this thread started so nice with <10 line posts.........
__________________
Vorsprung is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 02:48 AM   #19
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 12:02 AM
Um that post was edited numerous times to a point where one paragraph sort of now means a different thing. Just to clarify I would not love to see a world government built on principles of families being put into mass graves. I intended to state that I would like too see world government that respected individualism, liberty and was democratic.

We lack the technology to make it so, we are not advanced enough to get beyond minor differences and some more significant problems ~ so we must settle for the least worst thing, democratic nations with governments that protect their citizens and their freedoms.

I would still leap at the opportunity if you presented me with a United Earth Government from Trek. I do believe that that is where mankind is heading (not interstellar space travel ~ in all probability that is impossible as in 99% sure that GR will be right about the spped of light). United Government - beginning with powerfull alliances and trade links between free nations eventually through mutual interest extending into a global alliance of free states and the logical extension of that is a global government. Think about the history of Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire and the beginning of the European Union ~ how the political systems were forged and ultimately how kingdoms became nations, nations became economic blocks.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 06:45 AM   #20
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 09:02 AM
i would find a solution to one (or all) of these three problems:

1. an independent, democratic Palestinian state living side-by-side with a secure Israel.

2. improving women's literacy and education (especially health education) on a global scale -- when women are educated, they have fewer children, and are less likely to be infected with HIV

3. secure *all* of the nuclear material in former soviet states.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 02-26-2005, 07:57 AM   #21
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 02:02 PM
I would wish for women all over the world to have the same rights as men.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 09:13 AM   #22
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Rono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 6,163
Local Time: 03:02 PM
More research in clean and cheap ways to make energy. This is the key to fight poverty, polution and the power off the oil producing country`s
__________________
Rono is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 04:46 PM   #23
Refugee
 
wizard2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,580
Local Time: 02:02 PM
Reply

Hi!

I wish I had the "golden" ring.

carol
wizard2c

__________________
wizard2c is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 05:02 PM   #24
War Child
 
Do Miss America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Ryan's Pocket
Posts: 738
Local Time: 08:02 AM
Eliminate all laws based on sex, sexuality, skin color, religion etc through out the world. No second class citizens.
__________________
Do Miss America is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 08:08 PM   #25
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auto Dafoe
Posts: 9,600
Local Time: 12:02 AM
Fair enough A_Wanderer. I too would be very wary of a genuine world government, in the wrong form. Thing is, the UN is not a world government, it is not a government at all. It is as the name suggests, an affiliation of nations. Unless every nation on earth were to become a 'liberal democracy', then I can't see how it would avoid your definition of shit.

I too find the prospect of a Pax Americana offputting. But Wanderer, that is what the neo-cons WANT. That is their goal, so how can they be the good guys?

I'm not saying they'll ever achieve it, but still.
__________________
Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 08:38 PM   #26
Jesus Online
 
Angela Harlem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: a glass castle
Posts: 30,163
Local Time: 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511
...

3. secure *all* of the nuclear material in former soviet states.

Define 'secure'. By whom? America?
Will never work, mate.
__________________

__________________
<a href=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v196/angelaharlem/thPaul_Roos28.jpg target=_blank>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...aul_Roos28.jpg</a>
Angela Harlem is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com