Will Los Angeles Change Its Name? - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-02-2004, 11:08 AM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 11:20 PM
Will Los Angeles Change Its Name?

It could be the next move by the ever vigilent anti-Christian elements of the ACLU.

Los Angeles is being force to change its seal. Among the many symbols on the seal, including a cow, a tuna fish, a Spanish galleon, the Hollywood Bowl and the Goddess Pomona was a vile and offensive symbol - a cross.

Ignoring history and the role of Catholic missionaries in the area, the ACLU filed suit to have the cross removed (the Goddess Pomona is on the acceptable religious symbol list apparently).



Facing Suit, County to Remove Seal's Cross
__________________

__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 11:15 AM   #2
Creator of the Blue Crack
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,008
Local Time: 11:20 PM
There are MANY cities which the ACLU is taking to battle over similar symbols... specifically the cross.

There are other acceptable symbols that can represent the missionaries besides a cross.
__________________

__________________
I created this place. I hyped a band.
Now I own an ad agency. We hype brands.
All roads for me lead back to U2. Ain't it grand.
FB me. IG me. Tweet me.
Elvis is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 12:28 PM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Seems to me there are many more important things in the world that people should be concerned about than that.

I know someone who has a friend who is on TV news, and this woman tucks her cross inside her blouse when she's on air..she's not told to do that, she just does. I just think that's sad.

Oh well
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 12:35 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 07:20 AM
Elvis, in heraldry, yes, a cross is a religious symbol. It's also a historical symbol that represents a particular people who lived in the area, perhaps centuries ago. If they decide to move the "offending" cross (and mind you, I don't think it's any of my damn business because I'm not from L.A. or even California) wouldn't that be denying an aspect of the region's *culture* as it has a Hispanic heritage? My state's flag has the cross of St. Andrew on it. I don't mind this because St. Andrew is the patron saint of Scotland, and Alabama's population is heavily Scotch-Irish. I am of Scotch-Irish and German ancestry, for the most part. Incidentally I opposed Roy Moore's Ten Commandments grandstanding, I thought it was a cynical power ploy on the part of certain elements of the right wing of the state Republican party. I am glad the Congressional candidate Moore endorsed for my district lost in the primary yesterday. They were trying to oust a principled supporter of debt relief for Africa.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 01:03 PM   #5
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
Seems to me there are many more important things in the world that people should be concerned about than that.

I know someone who has a friend who is on TV news, and this woman tucks her cross inside her blouse when she's on air..she's not told to do that, she just does. I just think that's sad.

Oh well
In TV news, impartiality is imperative. A serious news organization will have their news anchors display no symbol that hints towards any of their own personal beliefs, whether that be secular or religious. That's why, following 9/11, NBC had to reiterate this policy, since some anchors wanted to wear ribbons in patriotic support. I firmly agree with NBC on this one; it is just unfortunate that an organization like FOX News often makes a mockery of this profession, with their clear and overt biases.

As for Los Angeles' seal, I do tend to believe that it is also a bit too far, especially if they have a "goddess" on the seal. :P

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 01:31 PM   #6
Refugee
 
ThatGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vertigo
Posts: 1,277
Local Time: 11:20 PM
The ACLU seems to be pulling a PETA on this issue. That is, they're pursuing something worthwhile (in this case, the separation of church and state) in a bizarre manner that turns people off from their cause.

Regarding religious symbols on government seals, what is the ACLU going to do about the seal of the state of California?


That's the goddess Minerva in the Roman garb.
__________________
ThatGuy is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 02:20 PM   #7
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Then again, maybe they do tell her to hide her cross. I wouldn't be surprised.

She only does the traffic report, so I don't see any harm in her cross showing

I don't see what would be wrong w/ wearing a flag or ribbon pin after 9/11-.I wouldn't be offended by it or read anything into it either. I think this just goes too far sometimes..and the ACLU does too
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 02:39 PM   #8
Creator of the Blue Crack
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,008
Local Time: 11:20 PM
Unfortunately.. the right and the left are both beating the shit out of this... one trying to remove everything of 'church' in 'state'... and the other side constantly trying to sneak prayer into public schools.. not to mention many other religious things...

The foundation of this govt is the separation of church and state, and although I don't agree with the radical approaches by either 'side'... I'm going to have to side with the ACLU on this one... since technically they are just attempting to maintainwhat is already part of our constitution while others really are tyring to make a mockery of it.
__________________
I created this place. I hyped a band.
Now I own an ad agency. We hype brands.
All roads for me lead back to U2. Ain't it grand.
FB me. IG me. Tweet me.
Elvis is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 02:42 PM   #9
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Elvis
The foundation of this govt is the separation of church and state,
Actually, the foundation is the non-establishment of a state religion. I haven't seen one established in LA.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 02:47 PM   #10
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Interesting..I just read this on CNN.com. It's regarding a baptism in a public park in VA. There is a quote from someone in the ACLU

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/South/06/....ap/index.html
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:16 PM   #11
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,271
Local Time: 01:20 AM
That's pretty stupid.

Angela
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:48 PM   #12
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 02:20 AM
I am curious since it was said there is a better symbol to be used to symbolize the missionary and the historical importance of this in the history of the state, what that symbol might be, and I would like to know why if it is a symbol of that very same heritage, how it could possibly be any less offensive to the people who wanted it removed?
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:48 PM   #13
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Somehow a double post.
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:50 PM   #14
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Elvis, If I am understanding one of your statements you are implying that the people who want the cross on their seal are making a more of a mockery of the constitution. How so? If I am misunderstanding you please explain.
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:57 PM   #15
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Well, I think it is time we took away the red and white stripes as well as the field of blue from the American Flag. My reasoning would be that they are their to recognize our heritage as being from England. The English FLag is composed of the Cross of St. George, the Cross of St. James, and the Cross of St. Patrick.



St. George



St. Andrew



St. Patrick

Clearly we do not want to hurt any citizens who have come to this country to be offended by our countrys Christian heritage, and clearly the stripes, although they are turned, and the field of blue, represent symbolism that might be construed as religious symbolism.
__________________

__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com