A_Wanderer
ONE love, blood, life
I have spent a reasonable amount of time considering why a binding contract between two lovers of the same chromosomal hand is wrong and I don't see it as an issue. I feel that they are just as entitled as any heterosexual couple in enshrining their relationships and having the guarantees of legality bestowed upon them.
I would like to know why homosexuals should be denied access to the marriage contract. As most FYM'ers live in secular states I would really like to see a legitimate non-religious argument.
Seriously, this is an issue of individual liberty that is quashed by the homophobia of politicians and the electorate (an issue where I feel democracy trumps liberty). I just want to see some justification for opposition to gay marraige that isn't rooted in religious belief (because if the argument is rooted in religious belief it has no role in a secular state).
I would like to know why homosexuals should be denied access to the marriage contract. As most FYM'ers live in secular states I would really like to see a legitimate non-religious argument.
Seriously, this is an issue of individual liberty that is quashed by the homophobia of politicians and the electorate (an issue where I feel democracy trumps liberty). I just want to see some justification for opposition to gay marraige that isn't rooted in religious belief (because if the argument is rooted in religious belief it has no role in a secular state).
Last edited: