Why does the U.S. call itself "America"?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

U2@NYC

Rock n' Roll Doggie Band-aid
Joined
Nov 6, 2000
Messages
4,281
Location
Back in Buenos Aires
Doesn't it seem too pretentious to you to have a country that actually uses name of the whole continent to call just their own country?

Yes, some people may argue that it is more practical to call U.S. citizens like that (the word "unitedstatian" does not exist) and that the full name of the country is "United States of America" and so on... but I can't get over the fact that it may sound like an act of disrespect towards the rest of the people living in the same continent (which are also "Americans").

With the same argument, if Italy was called "Italian Republic of Europe", then Italians would be "Europeans", following the same line of thought.

I might be overreacting and perhaps missing some historical fact that gives the U.S. the right to use the name of the continent, but I am curious about how you feel about this...

:huh:
 
Well, we're the biggest superpower in the West, so we can really call ourselves anything we please. :wink:

Seriously though, I have no idea how it got to be like that, except for the fact that "unitedstatians" doesn't roll off the tongue well.

U2@NYC said:
With the same argument, if Italy was called "Italian Republic of Europe", then Italians would be "Europeans", following the same line of thought.

Actually, they would probably still be Italians. "Italian" is a nationality in itself, while "United" isn't. A more accurate comparison would be something like the "United States of America" as opposed to the "Democratic Republic of Europe." In that case, the citizens of the latter would probably be called Europeans.
 
Re: Re: Why does the U.S. call itself "America"?

XHendrix24 said:
Well, we're the biggest superpower in the West, so we can really call ourselves anything we please. :wink:

Seriously though, I have no idea how it got to be like that, except for the fact that "unitedstatians" doesn't roll off the tongue well.



Actually, they would probably still be Italians. "Italian" is a nationality in itself, while "United" isn't. A more accurate comparison would be something like the "United States of America" as opposed to the "Democratic Republic of Europe." In that case, the latter would probably be called Europeans.

I agree with your second argument.

Actually, other languages have the word equivalent to "unitedstatian" in order to to call U.S. citizens, Americans. For instance, in Spanish, the word is 'estadounidense', which seems to be better than 'americano'.
 
Re: Re: Why does the U.S. call itself "America"?

BonoVoxSupastar said:


You pretty much answered it right there. The country as a whole suffers from a lack of humility.

You forgot the part about our being self-righteous American pigdogs.


Yes, American pigdogs. :wink:
 
Please stop looking at History through the year 2005. It's been called America for a lot longer than we've been a Nation. We haven't always been called arrogant, and we haven't always been a Super Power.

Besides maybe the original intent was to incorporate the entire continent into America :shrug:

Perhaps you'd like the name "The United States of North America except Canada and Mexico"

But if we ever adopt them as member states than we can just be the The United States of North America until our World domination tour continues down through Central America.
 
Last edited:
starsforu2 said:
Please stop looking at History through the year 2005. It's been called America for a lot longer than we've been a Nation. We haven't always been called arrogant, and we haven't always been a Super Power.


Not always a super power, I'll give you that. But I think history will prove you wrong about most everything else.
 
I make it a habit to say "U.S" or "United States" or "North America" because I've heard it is offensive to other countries that make up the Americas to refer to the U.S. as "America". However, whenever I have traveled abroad people refer to me as "American" and I watch BBC news every night and the reporters constantly refer to the U.S. as "America."


So I don't think it's a matter of arrogance. Most of the world and most of the people living here think of "America" and the U.S. as the same thing.
 
Well, it wouldn't make sense to call us unitedstates-ians or anything. "United States" simply describes the way "America" is laid out (United States of America). So I guess you could find fault with whoever named our country the United States of America way back whenever, but I don't think it has anything to do with people today being arrogant. American has just become a commonly used term to described people from the USA, I guess. :shrug: (and I've noticed that foreigners tend to call the country America more than people who actually live here, who usually say US/United States.)
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


Not always a super power, I'll give you that. But I think history will prove you wrong about most everything else.

Fair enough. It's possible that we've only been known as America since the founding. But we are officially known as "The United States of America". That we are now called America, or Americans may not be our fault. That would take more research than I would be willing to do.
 
starsforu2 said:


But if we ever adopt them as member states than we can just be the The United States of North America until our World domination tour continues down through Central America.

:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
COZ WE'RE AMERICA.......FUCK YEAH!!!



Lol I'm just kidding. Perhaps we just do it because we were the first established country in the Americas :shrug: I really don't know
 
I use "United States" when it's possible at all. Yes, it's arrogant for us to call ourselves Americans when "America" applies to a whole hemisphere, for goodness' sakes. When I use "American" to describe my nationality it's pure force of habit.
 
starsforu2 said:


But if we ever adopt them as member states than we can just be the The United States of North America until our World domination tour continues down through Central America.

yes, and one day, God willing, we shall be known as the United States of the World!!! mwuahaha :evil:

:wink:
 
So there is no historic rationale... it seems. My sense is that foreigners call the U.S., "America" just to follow the U.S. example... I doubt that the term "America" could have been created overseas...

Maybe my issue is with the fact that the world "unitedstate-ian" does not exist in English but it does in other languages...

:confused:

Or maybe I should print out this thread, give it to Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, so he can ask the U.N. to ban the use of the term "American" in the U.S. context...

:D

What about using "U.S. national"?
 
i always said "i'm from the States."

not for any historical reasons, but because i felt a bit jingoist saying, "i'm an American."

yet, anyone can be an American, but try as i might, i'll never be, say, Japanese.

i think it's all to do with custom, there's no sinister plan.
 
starsforu2 said:
Besides maybe the original intent was to incorporate the entire continent into America :shrug:

:huh:

I do not follow you... you mean that the original intent was to incorporate the whole continent into the U.S. but the U.S. kept the name?

:confused:
 
Some interesting stuff on the same topic...

"English-language usage in the United States and some other countries, notably Britain, defines the words "America" and "American" as referring exclusively to citizens of the United States of America. As most school-children know, the name "America" was actually coined by the German geographer Martin Waldseemuller (Hylacomilus), in honor of the Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci, to refer to the entire "Mundus novus" (New world). Strictly speaking, then, all inhabitants of North and South America and the Caribbean are Americans.

There have been various attempts to coin new terms in English to refer to inhabitants of the USA. For example "USAnian", "USonian" and "United Statesian" have all been proposed as potential equivalents of the geographically-correct Castillian term "estadounidiense" (unitedstatesian). Likewise, there are proponents of "North American", which is the English translation of the commonly used Mexican term "norteamericano". In many parts of Latin America (another odd usage, but that is for another webpage... :) the term "yanqui" is used to distinguish English-speaking northerners from Spanish, Creole and Portuguese speaking southerners. All of these are problematic. The first look and sound kind of ugly in English. The second confuses Canadians with United Statesians. The third might seem to be a pretty good choice. Everybody knows that "yankee" refers to the United States and not to Canada. The problem with "yankee" is an internal one...

Although outside of the USA "yankee" refers to all citizens of the US, within the USA it is a term that has been marked forever by its divisive usage during the US Civil War (1861-1865), when "yankee" came to mean people from states that supported the Union Army (mainly northerners) and emphatically not those who supported the Confederate Army (southern secessionists). To this day, no inhabitant of one of the southern states in the US would ever consider himself or herself to be a "yankee".

Furthermore, within general cultural usage, "yankee" refers specifically to people from the six New England states (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island) and within New England "yankee" is most closely associated with people from the 3 northern New England states. It is said that within those 3 states (Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire), it is common knowledge that a real Yankee is someone who eats pie for breakfast! (And then there are those who say that, if you eat pie for breakfast, then a yankee is someone who plays baseball in New York City ;-) In other words, there are very few Americans who are happy being called a "yankee".

Some purists even quibble with the term "United States". The argument here is that there are other member-countries of the United Nations -- notably Mexico -- whose official name also includes the term "United States". Therefore, this argument goes, leaving off the "of America" part is insensitive and arrogant."
 
Arrogant; no. Realistic; yes. What the heck else are we supposed to call ourselves? People who complain about this are seriously nitpicking and a bit too worried about sounding P.C.

Yes, I understand that the western hemisphere consists of the "Americas," but it's not like there's any other nation in the Western Hemisphere that has "America" in the official name of the country. I could see now how it would be annoying if other countries official titles were like "American Brazil" or whatever; but this isn't the case. As someone already mentioned, we are the United States of AMERICA. I guess it's hard to break a 300 year habit of people and the rest of the world refer to the present day USA as America.

Also, as others have mentioned, I hear foriegners refer to the U.S. as often as I hear the U.S. do so.
 
The people who come from the country we commonly refer to as Mexico are called Mexicans, yet the full name of their country is the United States of Mexico or Mexican United States. We don't called them Unitedstatians, the same way that people from the US are not. America is the name of the place where the 50 united states belong to, hence the people are referred to as Americans. We also don't usually refer to the people from the Rebublic of Ireland as an Republicans also.

Since there are 2 continents called America, you could say anyone from the countries of these 2 continents are Americans, but you would be more precise to call the people who live from Canada to Panama as North Americans and those from Venezuela to the southern tip of Argentina as South Americans. There is no such thing as a continent of Central America, though the people from the southern part of North America can be referred as as such.
 
Last edited:
ImOuttaControl said:
Arrogant; no. Realistic; yes. What the heck else are we supposed to call ourselves? People who complain about this are seriously nitpicking and a bit too worried about sounding P.C.

Yes, I understand that the western hemisphere consists of the "Americas," but it's not like there's any other nation in the Western Hemisphere that has "America" in the official name of the country. I could see now how it would be annoying if other countries official titles were like "American Brazil" or whatever; but this isn't the case. As someone already mentioned, we are the United States of AMERICA. I guess it's hard to break a 300 year habit of people and the rest of the world refer to the present day USA as America.

Also, as others have mentioned, I hear foriegners refer to the U.S. as often as I hear the U.S. do so.

I agree with you -- United States of America is the name of the country! Plus, I also think the worry about it sounding arrogant is just nit-picking and uber-political correctness.
 
Halup said:
The people who come from the country we commonly refer to as Mexico are called Mexicans, yet the full name of their country is the United States of Mexico or Mexican United States. We don't called them Unitedstatians, the same way that people from the US are not. America is the name of the place where the 50 united states belong to, hence the people are referred to as Americans. We also don't usually refer to the people from the Rebublic of Ireland as an Republicans also.

Since there are 2 continents called America, you could say anyone from the countries of these 2 continents are Americans, but you would be more precise to call the people who live from Canada to Panama as North Americans and those from Venezuela to the southern tip of Argentina as South Americans. There is no such thing as a continent of Central America, though the people from the southern part of North America can be referred as as such.

I agree! :yes:
 
I just think we should have picked a cooler name right in the beginning. :grumpy:
 
This is a slight diversion form this topic but one thing I perceive to be a bit of arrogance is what many Asian Americans do. In trying to be politically correct, we no longer really use the term Orientals to decribe the people from Asia.

It's commonly accepted and correct to refer to people from Asia as Asians, but in my experience, I have found that people whose heritage is eastern Asian (Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, etc) refer to themselves as Asian, yet when they use this term, they exclude many Asian nations. They generally do not include Indians, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, Iraqis, Afghanis, Banga Deshians, the Russians from Asia, sometimes even South East Asians when they are referring to Asians, as if they do not want to be grouped together with these other people from the continent.

I have many Asian friends and colleagues whose heritage is from the eastern part of Asia and they all seem to do this. Any thoughts on this?
 
I say "America," because I frankly don't give a fuck about being politically correct, and I think everyone knows what I mean without thinking it's offensive. I can understand not using racist or sexist terms, but the only people this offends are people looking for a fight.

Melon
 
melon said:
I say "America," because I frankly don't give a fuck about being politically correct, and I think everyone knows what I mean without thinking it's offensive. I can understand not using racist or sexist terms, but the only people this offends are people looking for a fight.

:rockon: FUCK YEAH.



:wink:
 
In Canada, we never say "America", always "United States", for obvious reasons.

Here in Québec, many journalists will use the word états-unien ("unitedstatsian") instead of "américain" because, technically, we're also "américains". I doubt this will ever catch on for one simple reason. We don't want to be called Americans. Not because we don't like the USA, but because it's just not part of our history. So since the word "Americans" clearly means "citizens of the United States of America", it will always be so. There's no ambiguity in there. It's a habit.

But if we want to refer to ourselves from a continental point of view, we'll say nord-américain (north american). No problem here.
 
Similar issue with "Holland" and "The Netherlands". North and South Holland are regions of The Netherlands. Yet we often say Holland, when we mean the whole country. Habit.

The word Dutch is also funny. Comes from "Deutsch", which means "German", in German. But it was twisted with time into Dutch and refers to the people and language of The Netherlands...
 
Back
Top Bottom