Where Is The Outrage?? - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-05-2003, 10:21 AM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Where Is The Outrage??

In support of her fellow Democrat, California Senator Diane Feinstein is appearing in a frequently run television commercial urging a No vote on the upcomming recall.

Prominately displayed behind Feinstein in the ad is a Vishnu statue (the second member of the Hindu trinity).

So, California's most prominent political figure is appearing along side a Hindu statue. Considering the uproar over a Ten Commandments monument, the silence in California is deafening.



What they say "We support separation of Church and State."


What they mean "We support separation of Christ and State."
__________________

__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 11:10 AM   #2
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 04:57 AM
This was in a government building?
__________________

__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 11:19 AM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:57 AM
In the case of the Ten Commandments controversy it was Moore's behavior rather than the monument per se that bothered me. My criticism of Moore was that he didn't have any dignity and was way too confrontationist when he presented his argument. If he had I think things would have gone differently. Aesthetically, the monument left something to be desired but that's just a matter of taste.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 11:38 AM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
This was in a government building?
The commercial does not make that clear.

Does that make a difference? It suggests that a government official can endorse a religion as long as the endorsing is not done in a government building.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 11:49 AM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader


The commercial does not make that clear.

Does that make a difference? It suggests that a government official can endorse a religion as long as the endorsing is not done in a government building.
The dispute over the Ten Commandments monument was based on it being in a government building, and not really over a government official endorsing a religion. Heck, people could have gone after our governor for having Christian Coalition people in the governor's mansion for prayer breakfasts. No one did and few people even cared. The difference? PR. Moore made alot of enemies. The governor hasn't made enemies because of his religion. They were really after Moore, not the monument.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 11:57 AM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by verte76


The dispute over the Ten Commandments monument was based on it being in a government building, and not really over a government official endorsing a religion.
No way. Moore may have made his enemies, but the basis for the lawsuit requiring removal of the monument is that it represents an endorsement of a religion. After all, that is what the Constitution says.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:01 PM   #7
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 04:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader


The commercial does not make that clear.

Does that make a difference? It suggests that a government official can endorse a religion as long as the endorsing is not done in a government building.
Absolutely it does. Individuals in the government can be any religion they want to. In fact I believe all US Presidents have been claimed Christians with the majority of them protestant.

But they aren't allowed to hang a cross over their podium! The difference is that a government can not endorse a religion and when you place a religious monument in a government building then in effect you're stating that this state court or whatever endorses this religion.

Moore could have placed the monument in his front yard. He could have ran commercials with him next to the monument. I don't care. But you can't bring it into the courthouse. It's as simple as that.

This is not a case of "separation of Christ and state." And remember once again 10 commandments are not solely Christian law, so this was never about just Christianity.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:05 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
womanfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: moons of Zooropa
Posts: 4,181
Local Time: 10:57 AM
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that 98% of the population has no clue what that even is.
__________________
womanfish is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:07 PM   #9
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
But they aren't allowed to hang a cross over their podium!
Feinstein had her "cross" on her podium.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:25 PM   #10
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 05:57 AM
Is this woman even Hindu?

It's possible that it was in her house, she bought the statue on a trip to India for its artistic/cultural merit rather than a pronouncement of her faith.

My mother, a devout Catholic, has purchased Hindu religious icons and one is hanging in my own bedroom. We also have a couple of Buddhist sculptures from Korea and African religious tribal masks on our walls.

If it's not in a government building, she can have whatever she wants standing behind her. I don't care if a politicial wears a crucifix around their neck, but when you put it in a courthouse, then I object.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:25 PM   #11
Refugee
 
ThatGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vertigo
Posts: 1,277
Local Time: 02:57 AM
I have not seen the commercial. Did it look like she in her home or office? Or was she standing in front of a Hindu shrine? Was it a life-size statue, or was it just on a bookshelf behind her?
__________________
ThatGuy is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:36 PM   #12
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
It appears in an office setting. The statue was on a bookcase, directly over her right shoulder. It can be seen clearly - and we have a small 13" television.

I find the false distinctions amusing. I really don't care what Feinstein has in her office. But, as my premise was in the Alabama case, the "separation of church and state" crowd is only heard regarding Judeo-Christian matters.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:40 PM   #13
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 04:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader
It appears in an office setting. The statue was on a bookcase, directly over her right shoulder. It can be seen clearly - and we have a small 13" television.

I find the false distinctions amusing. I really don't care what Feinstein has in her office. But, as my premise was in the Alabama case, the "separation of church and state" crowd is only heard regarding Judeo-Christian matters.
When she tries to place this statue in a government building there will be an uproar. I'm not sure why you're not getting the distinction. This is not someone trying oppress your beliefs.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:44 PM   #14
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


When she tries to place this statue in a government building there will be an uproar. I'm not sure why you're not getting the distinction. This is not someone trying oppress your beliefs.
But you had no trouble equating the Ten Commandments monument with oppression??

She very well may have this statute in her publically funded office and I doubt anyone would make a peep. I bet there are plenty of Vishnu statues that are treated as works of art and therefor ignored.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-05-2003, 12:45 PM   #15
BAW
The Flower
 
BAW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The OC....!!!!
Posts: 11,094
Local Time: 02:57 AM
I'm a bit confused. This could have been a gift or simply a part of her office decor. She's not acting in a governmental capacity in this commercial and is not in a govermental facility. How is this in any way endorsing a religion?
__________________

__________________
BAW is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com