drivemytrabant said:
Are we talking about the same thing here? I'm talking about Strong Leader the war in iraq and terrorism as my post clearly states. Not the overall poll of registered voters.
Calm down, Righty, I missed your other posts. The significance of recent polls is not that they show John Kerry leading, but that they show him once again as a contender in the presidential race, and that they suggest he may even have the momentum necessary to win the presidential race. Of course, this assumption rests entirely on his performance in the upcoming presidential debates.
As far as I know, Mr. Gallup Jr. is still firmly in charge of his daddy’s organization. Though, I could be wrong.
http://www.moveon.org/content/pdfs/Final-Gallup-Ad.pdf
http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=97
Historically, no incumbent has lost an election while the country was at war. However, no wartime president has had the marginal support President Bush receives as commander in chief.
Also, the discussion of the candidates’ performance in polls other than the national vote is irreverent. While Kerry may not be the favoured commander in chief, he is still in a virtual tie with the president for the national vote. Only the Electoral College matters outside the national vote, and here is Kerry’s only true obstacle from winning the White House. Fortunately for Kerry, enough time remains in the election and a significant amount of states are still “undecided” to make a substantial difference in his favour.
From you conviction that ABC is run by the GOP because of its spread in the presidential race, is FOXNews run by liberals for its spread?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134494,00.html
Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal, no one is suggesting that Bush still leads the presidential race!
Last edited: