US Presidential Election XII - Page 35 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-19-2016, 08:31 PM   #511
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,196
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
You don't have to necessarily close down bases to not be involved with other countries' wars and affairs.

We live in a globalized world. Including the military reach of other countries, good or bad. I believe in non-interventionist government, whenever possible. But, and here I'll go sounding like I'm copying the talking head that is Gary Johnson, there's a difference between interventionism and being involved on the global stage. If you're not involved globally, you're falling behind in all spheres. Militarily. Influentially. Economically. We must participate, but that's different from going and fucking shit up.
__________________

__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 08-19-2016, 08:52 PM   #512
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,353
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
You don't have to necessarily close down bases to not be involved with other countries' wars and affairs.

We live in a globalized world. Including the military reach of other countries, good or bad. I believe in non-interventionist government, whenever possible. But, and here I'll go sounding like I'm copying the talking head that is Gary Johnson, there's a difference between interventionism and being involved on the global stage. If you're not involved globally, you're falling behind in all spheres. Militarily. Influentially. Economically. We must participate, but that's different from going and fucking shit up.

This


I mean to think we can just pack up and leave is idiotic.

To think we need to send them a bill is yuuuuuuugely idiotic.

Are there bases that need to be reaccessed? Sure.

But isolationism is no longer an option in this world.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 08-19-2016, 10:13 PM   #513
Vocal parasite
 
Axver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1853
Posts: 150,257
Local Time: 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by womanfish View Post
Totally agree. I called this back when Carson was up in the polls during the primaries. I said neither Carson or Trump, WANT to be president. Carson, to his credit, had a small enough ego to find a way out. Trump can't stop himself. He wants to win, no question. There just is no way he wants to be president. Or actually do the duties of the president.
He would simply seek to be a figurehead and outsource all the actual work. His ideal seems to be more in line with figurehead presidents of parliamentary republics in Europe, where the head of government has much greater authority and responsibility. Not that he would be suited to any sort of elected office, and it's increasingly obvious he's not even really suited to business. The man is a fucking clown who has got where he is by being one of the single most detestable people to carve out a public profile without murdering anybody (yet).

Quote:
Originally Posted by iron yuppie View Post
Yeah? Go ahead and give some examples. I'd love to hear them. Because when people like PFan and Vlad have brought up concerns about her foreign policy record, for example, it's immediately crickets. Then there's something about Bernie's tax records, and right on cue, pages of mockery.
It surprises me to read this, because my feeling is that it's almost impossible to post favourably about Clinton without some sort of qualifier - that you are uncomfortable with some of her foreign policy (I've said this often), that you are closer ideologically to Sanders but don't believe he could win (again, I've said this), etc. I hated when this thread became a Sanders vs Clinton shitfest because obviously the priority is making sure an absolute madman does not become president of one of the most powerful countries in the world. A Trump victory is the sort of thing from a nightmare. I'd have expected people to be able to put aside their differences to stop the common threat, like how in France people on the left and centre-right banded together to stop Marine Le Pen.

I also note that Bernie fans got very quiet on the topic of his poor stance on gun control, or passed it off as political expediency for a Vermont rep - the sort of political expediency argument they never ever accepted as valid justification for anything Clinton did.
__________________
"Mediocrity is never so dangerous as when it is dressed up as sincerity." - Søren Kierkegaard

Ian McCulloch the U2 fan:
"Who buys U2 records anyway? It's just music for plumbers and bricklayers. Bono, what a slob. You'd think with all that climbing about he does, he'd look real fit and that. But he's real fat, y'know. Reminds me of a soddin' mountain goat."
"And as for Bono, he needs a colostomy bag for his mouth."

U2gigs: The most comprehensive U2 setlist database!
Gig pictures | Blog
Axver is offline  
Old 08-19-2016, 11:06 PM   #514
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
iron yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pushing my wheel of love.
Posts: 9,336
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axver View Post
I also note that Bernie fans got very quiet on the topic of his poor stance on gun control, or passed it off as political expediency for a Vermont rep - the sort of political expediency argument they never ever accepted as valid justification for anything Clinton did.
The tendency that emerged while Bernie was in his dwindling days seems to me to have been dismissing all criticisms of one's preferred candidate and accepting all criticisms of the opposition. In terms of Hillary, I absolutely see how her supporters would tire of the endless shit flung her way, and indeed a good deal of that shit is completely fabricated.

But my fear is the pendulum has swung the other way in that there is an almost reflexive response to brush aside concerns about her when we on "the left" should be having a serious discussion about what she represents for the future of the country. Because right now it's easy to see her as a necessity against Trump, but when she inevitably wins this election, we will have to live with her policies and decisions. "She's better than Trump" will no longer have any relevance.
__________________
iron yuppie is offline  
Old 08-20-2016, 12:06 AM   #515
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auto Dafoe
Posts: 9,364
Local Time: 03:36 AM
Indeed, if it turns out that she's (not to overly personalise; frankly insert any 2016 Democratic president-elect here) better than Trump, and no better than that, there will be another Trump in four years. Maybe the next one won't be an incompetent.
__________________
Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 08-20-2016, 08:16 AM   #516
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,357
Local Time: 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron yuppie View Post
The tendency that emerged while Bernie was in his dwindling days seems to me to have been dismissing all criticisms of one's preferred candidate and accepting all criticisms of the opposition. In terms of Hillary, I absolutely see how her supporters would tire of the endless shit flung her way, and indeed a good deal of that shit is completely fabricated.

But my fear is the pendulum has swung the other way in that there is an almost reflexive response to brush aside concerns about her when we on "the left" should be having a serious discussion about what she represents for the future of the country. Because right now it's easy to see her as a necessity against Trump, but when she inevitably wins this election, we will have to live with her policies and decisions. "She's better than Trump" will no longer have any relevance.



What policies do you think she will advance that would concern you? Or is it more that she won't pursue the kinds of deeper Leftist policies that a President Sanders might have pursued?

Let's even imagine the Democrats win back the Senate and she has an easier time with legislation.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 08-20-2016, 08:21 AM   #517
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
BEAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,392
Local Time: 05:36 PM
I think Wall Street is the biggest concern with her. Even with a majority in the house and senate would legislation pass to reel them in a bit?

Most think it would go the other way.

Of course I'm not sure what Bernie would do.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
BEAL is online now  
Old 08-20-2016, 10:32 AM   #518
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 55,164
Local Time: 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEAL View Post
I think Wall Street is the biggest concern with her. Even with a majority in the house and senate would legislation pass to reel them in a bit?

Most think it would go the other way.

Of course I'm not sure what Bernie would do.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
To counter, how then does anyone believe that Sanders would be successful in passing his far left policies that he ran on?

Any policy Sanders put forth would instantly get zero votes from the right. With a moderate, or at least somebody who seems willing to compromise on their ideals, you're able to continue the progress of pushing the middle further to the left, which should be the ultimate goal.

Shoving far left policies down the country's throat will alienate the middle and galvanize the right.

Obama got this. And as much as many on the far left see his presidency as a blown opportunity to advance the progressive agenda... look at all the progress we've made in 8 years?

I don't see the anger from Trump shpporters, which is real, as a sign that we're more divided as a country than ever... I see it as a sign that the pushing of the can further down the left side of the road is working, and the last hold outs are getting desperate because they see what they believe to be "their country" slipping away.

And they're right. It is slipping away from the old guard. And that's a good thing. But it's still fragile, and can swing back the other direction if the left is stupid. If they're smart, then George W Bush's proclamation that he might be the last Republican president ever just might come true.
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is online now  
Old 08-20-2016, 10:40 AM   #519
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
iron yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pushing my wheel of love.
Posts: 9,336
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Or is it more that she won't pursue the kinds of deeper Leftist policies that a President Sanders might have pursued?
This is it, basically. If we have two terms of Clinton and a term of Kaine, or someone similar to Kaine, then we end up with a Centrist party in the Democrats and a far Right opposition in the Republicans, with essentially no viable Left.

More specifically, I think something more dramatic needs to be done about financial inequality, which is the fount of most social tensions as well IMO. The old Democratic "tax the rich and close loopholes" mentality doesn't really work, because the people such policies target simply disguise their money, move it elsewhere, find still other loopholes, etc. Under Clinton the mammoth budgetary allotment to the military will likely continue as well.

And I get that Bernie was more rhetoric than hard policy on wealth disparity, but I do think he would have made it a high priority as president.
__________________
iron yuppie is offline  
Old 08-20-2016, 05:20 PM   #520
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,353
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron yuppie View Post
This is it, basically. If we have two terms of Clinton and a term of Kaine, or someone similar to Kaine, then we end up with a Centrist party in the Democrats and a far Right opposition in the Republicans, with essentially no viable Left.

More specifically, I think something more dramatic needs to be done about financial inequality, which is the fount of most social tensions as well IMO. The old Democratic "tax the rich and close loopholes" mentality doesn't really work, because the people such policies target simply disguise their money, move it elsewhere, find still other loopholes, etc. Under Clinton the mammoth budgetary allotment to the military will likely continue as well.

And I get that Bernie was more rhetoric than hard policy on wealth disparity, but I do think he would have made it a high priority as president.

I really don't understand this fear, and unless Kaine does something outstanding, I don't see him taking it. I predict that both parties will make a fairly drastic facelift in the next 8 years.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 08-20-2016, 07:08 PM   #521
Blue Crack Addict
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: illegitimi non carborundum
Posts: 17,183
Local Time: 01:36 PM
if they don't, the moment for a third party to strike may be right. i doubt either of the current parties will be able to come up with the will to change enough though.
__________________
DaveC is offline  
Old 08-21-2016, 09:52 AM   #522
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,780
Local Time: 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
What policies do you think she will advance that would concern you? Or is it more that she won't pursue the kinds of deeper Leftist policies that a President Sanders might have pursued?

Let's even imagine the Democrats win back the Senate and she has an easier time with legislation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/ma...hawk.html?_r=0
__________________
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 08-21-2016, 02:31 PM   #523
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
BigMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,178
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
Well, that was an eye opener. She's more bonkers than I ever could have imagined. Obama looks like the biggest peacenik a President could possibly be by comparison.
__________________
BigMacPhisto is offline  
Old 08-21-2016, 02:59 PM   #524
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,156
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMacPhisto View Post
Well, that was an eye opener. She's more bonkers than I ever could have imagined.
Quit trolling.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 08-21-2016, 03:54 PM   #525
Refugee
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,869
Local Time: 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemen View Post
Quit trolling.
You're well aware of Mrs. Clinton's foreign policy record, even without reading the NYT article posted here.....
__________________

__________________
Bluer White is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com