US Presidential Election 2016...because it's never too early

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.

trojanchick99

Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
8,352
Location
Los Feliz, CA (between Hollywood and Downtown LA)
So, we have our first official candidate.

Ted Cruz.

In 24 hours he's made more gaffes than Romney in a month. My favorite is the irony of him signing up for Obamacare after losing his wife's insurance. :lol:

Ted Cruz says he's going on Obamacare - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO

But the weirdest may be the story he told about how he stopped listening to Rock music after 9/11. The hell?

Ted Cruz: I stopped listening to rock music after 9/11 - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO

The Daily Show's coverage of his announcement makes me sad that Jon Stewart won't be around next year to cover this clusterfuck of an election.

Democalypse 2016 - Ted Cruz Is In - The Daily Show - Video Clip | Comedy Central
 
I work for the Fed. Don't get me started on this guy, and the horse he rode in on. He is the worst possible candidate the GOP could nominate. He would be a fucking disaster for this country. Of course, the other board i frequent (car forum) is chock full of middle aged, middle class white dudes, and they all love him. Texas Quit giving us these idiotic moronic dumbfucks for candidates. Just stop it. If he wants to be President, then let texas secede and he can be their goddamned president. (sorry for anyone here who is from texas)

Even some of his own party cannot stand him:

GOP Peter King dismisses Ted Cruz as 'carnival barker' - CNN.com

GOP Rep. Peter King dismisses Ted Cruz as 'carnival barker'
By Deirdre Walsh and Eric Bradner, CNN
Updated 9:16 AM ET, Tue March 24, 2015

Washington (CNN)Rep. Peter King called Sen. Ted Cruz a "big mouth" who "basically led the Republican Party over the cliff" and dismissed Sen. Rand Paul as an "isolationist" on Monday as he said their party should ignore those two candidates for its 2016 presidential nomination.

King's sharpest comments were directed at Cruz.

"To me, he's a guy with a big mouth and no results," the New York Republican told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in an interview on "The Situation Room."

"We have very, very complex issues facing the country today, and he goes out of his way to oversimplify," King said of Cruz. "Ted Cruz may be an intelligent person, but he doesn't carry out an intelligent debate. He oversimplifies, he exaggerates ... he doesn't provide leadership and he has no real experience."

King, who is considering his own campaign for the White House, also took aim at another freshman senator who's likely to enter the 2016 race -- Kentucky's Rand Paul.

He said Paul is a "nice guy" but far too much of an "isolationist" for his liking.

"His views would basically remove the U.S. from having a real role to play in the world, and his mindset -- when you look at things he's said over the years, in effect blaming the United States for problems around the world, somehow that it's our fault," King said. "To me that's a bad mindset for the commander-in-chief of the United States to be going into office with."

He said there are several Republican presidential candidates he could support. Among them, King said, are former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

"We have a lot of talent out there," he said. "I just don't see Ted Cruz and Rand Paul being part of that talent pool."

King's doing little to hide his frustrations with freshman senators who are courting the GOP's most conservative and libertarian factions.

Earlier Monday, King had issued a written statement criticizing Cruz's announcement that he was running in 2016 and said the Texas Republican isn't qualified to serve as president.

"Shutting down the federal government and reading Dr. Seuss on the Senate floor are the marks of a carnival barker not the leader of the free world," King said in a written statement on Monday.

King's statement references a Cruz speech on the Senate floor that last more than 20 hours, railing against Obamacare in 2013.

King has been a vocal Cruz critic since the government shutdown that fall, blaming him for the standoff and calling him a "fraud."

Cruz and other conservatives pressed House Republican leaders to push a strategy to defund Obamacare as part of the annual legislation to fund federal agencies. The fight over the issue triggered a closure of the government for more than two weeks. House GOP leaders ultimately relented and passed a spending bill without the health care provision, and later acknowledged the strategy damaged their standing in public opinion polls.

King, a senior member of both the Homeland Security and Intelligence committees, has traveled to some early primary states and said he's mulling a potential 2016 bid because he believes the Republican party needs to nominate someone who will press a strong national security agenda.

Another potential GOP presidential contender took aim at Cruz on Monday. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations, scoffed when asked how a President Cruz would handle a nuclear crisis.

"Ted with nukes, Ted with nukes, let's see ..." he joked, drawing laughter from the crowd. "I dunno what Ted would do, but he should come up here and answer these questions, don't you think?"

Graham is openly contemplating a presidential bid and has also been trying to establish himself as the national security candidate in the soon-to-be crowded field.


Im ready for Hillary, or Warren, hell, anyone who can defeat the tea party. If you know me you would know what a thing this is for me to say. (sorry for the rant) :angry:
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I wonder what the birthers are gonna say about him being born in Canada?

1384069_1402227100013714_253315895_n.jpg
 
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx_mobile.html

Here's a great article from Forbes about who Cruz is really running for. If he's elected he'll only represent white, evangelical Christians, he doesn't give a shit about anyone else. Choosing to have his announcement at Liberty University (which has a center for "Creation Studies") and the explicitly religious language that made up most of his announcement show that. Luckily, (and I say this with 100% confidence) he will not be president.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Welcome to Forbes

Here's a great article from Forbes about who Cruz is really running for. If he's elected he'll only represent white, evangelical Christians, he doesn't give a shit about anyone else. Choosing to have his announcement at Liberty University (which has a center for "Creation Studies") and the explicitly religious language that made up most of his announcement show that. Luckily, (and I say this with 100% confidence) he will not be president.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Cruz probably doesn't get the nomination because he is just too divisive. He might be somebody's (Jeb) VP pick though. Assuming of course, he doesn't pull too many stunts in the primaries and debates and completely piss off the rest of the GOP field.

He might be 2016's version of ass juice Santorum, which is a great thing for Democrats, because he will look down upon anyone who isn't white, christian, and heterosexual. And of course this would be well documented by everyone (except Faux news).

As we learned last time around, nothing gets people to the polls like voting against an endless display of bigotry, real or manufactured.
 
Keep on bringing on the most divisive candidates, GOP! The more wackadoo, the better.

Ted Cruz is a good start.

A lot of my fellow Wisconsinite Facebook friends are freaking out about Scott Walker. I'd like to think he is also too divisive or "far right" to be a serious contender, but I feel like I don't know enough about it to know for sure.
 
Ted Cruz is well aware he's not going to win the nomination. This isn't about actually becoming president. This is about Ted Cruz getting attention and building his brand.
 
Cruz probably doesn't get the nomination because he is just too divisive. He might be somebody's (Jeb) VP pick though. Assuming of course, he doesn't pull too many stunts in the primaries and debates and completely piss off the rest of the GOP field.



He might be 2016's version of ass juice Santorum, which is a great thing for Democrats, because he will look down upon anyone who isn't white, christian, and heterosexual. And of course this would be well documented by everyone (except Faux news).



As we learned last time around, nothing gets people to the polls like voting against an endless display of bigotry, real or manufactured.


My guess is that Scott Walker is gonna get the nomination; Bush's name will prevent him from getting the nomination, but I could be wrong. You're right that Cruz is too divisive, today Peter King called him a "carnival barker" and my best guess is that a quarter to a third of Republicans share that sentiment.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
My guess is that Scott Walker is gonna get the nomination; Bush's name will prevent him from getting the nomination, but I could be wrong. You're right that Cruz is too divisive, today Peter King called him a "carnival barker" and my best guess is that a quarter to a third of Republicans share that sentiment.

Whenever a Bush's name is involved, you can never count them out. I never thought W would get elected in 2000, but thanks to Jeb, he was able to.
 
I'd much rather take McCain or Romney over any of the numbskulls the GOP is floating out there this go-around. Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are legitimate disasters.
 
Cruz makes W look like an intellectual.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference



Actually, Cruz is supposed to be quite brilliant. In a totally wrong sort of way, but he's eons beyond W when it comes to raw brainpower.

He's a vanity candidate, and a grifter. He ran for office to make money, and to sell shit like dumb books to Tea Party dupes.

He's Palin with self-awareness.
 
Keep on bringing on the most divisive candidates, GOP! The more wackadoo, the better.

Ted Cruz is a good start.

A lot of my fellow Wisconsinite Facebook friends are freaking out about Scott Walker. I'd like to think he is also too divisive or "far right" to be a serious contender, but I feel like I don't know enough about it to know for sure.

Scott Walker legit frightens me, especially because I really feel like he's going to get the nomination.
 
Scott Walker legit frightens me, especially because I really feel like he's going to get the nomination.


Yeah, I believe that he's the only Republican candidate who might have a chance against Hillary and that's why he scares me.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Have any of you read anything about Ted Cruz' father?

Batshit crazy doesn't even begin to cover it.

I also agree about Scott Walker being scary. The problem is that there is actually a real issue re: private vs. public sector pay, allocation of benefits (and the fact many states actually cannot afford to stand behind them), etc which resonates with a LOT of people. Plus it's an issue that is more of a pure economic/conservative one, albeit with social undertones, so it is easier to cling to it and push it in the media without looking insane. It just does not have the revulsion of the "let's make sure all women have transvaginal ultrasounds forced on them before they can have an abortion" or "gays are icky."
 
Have any of you read anything about Ted Cruz' father?

Batshit crazy doesn't even begin to cover it.

I also agree about Scott Walker being scary. The problem is that there is actually a real issue re: private vs. public sector pay, allocation of benefits (and the fact many states actually cannot afford to stand behind them), etc which resonates with a LOT of people. Plus it's an issue that is more of a pure economic/conservative one, albeit with social undertones, so it is easier to cling to it and push it in the media without looking insane. It just does not have the revulsion of the "let's make sure all women have transvaginal ultrasounds forced on them before they can have an abortion" or "gays are icky."


Rafael Cruz is insane. Go to Right Wing Watch if you're interested in reading more about him. It's funny because the right is always talking about how Obama's (absent) father supposedly influenced him into becoming a socialist, communist, freedom-hating Muslim, but they don't give a shit about Cruz's dad because they agree with him.

I hope that Democrats will attack Walker's economic record because it isn't good. Wisconsin (which is Republican) is doing pretty bad compared to Minnesota (which is Democratic).


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
The problem with Walker is that he's "accomplished" things and will point to that over and over again. What he's accomplished is dreadful, but like Anitram said, it's not considered insane in the mainstream.
 
A lot of my fellow Wisconsinite Facebook friends are freaking out about Scott Walker. I'd like to think he is also too divisive or "far right" to be a serious contender, but I feel like I don't know enough about it to know for sure.

Yeah I've heard the Walker predictions as well; he's too polarizing even in his own right-leaning state to be a serious contender on the national stage. Plus he has even less charisma than Romney, as if that were even possible.
 
it's a two stage process

1. who can get the GOP nomination
2. can that GOP nominee win a few toss up states to get 271 electoral votes


answer to both of those questions is that Walker is capable of doing both
Cruz is not.
 
I think Scott Walker shouldn't run, because we all know that none of us are really ready for Scott Walker.




#oldinterferencejokesdiehard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom