US 2008 Presidential Campaign Thread - Part 2

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The video below has been submitted for the Republican CNN YouTube debates by a couple whose son was killed because he was gay.

We're Lynn and Pat Mulder of Auburndale, Florida. Our son Ryan was murdered in March because he was gay. We would like to ask the presidential candidates how will they work to promote the value of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender families.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC0kPPlU4DI
 
NY Post

November 18, 2007 -- You know what we need in the White House? A bitch.

We need a bitch facing down terrorists, Iran and Congress. A bitch to order around the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Come to think of it, there's a bitch right now trying to save Pakistan. Golda Meir, Queen Elizabeth, Margaret Thatcher - all great leaders. All bitches.

It's unlikely, of course, that the voter who asked John McCain “how we going to beat the bitch?" this week in South Carolina considered this. She meant it as an insult, and McCain, stupidly or ignorantly, called it a good question. When asked about it, Sen. Trent Lott, classy guy that he is, said, “the witch?"

My advice for Hillary Clinton? Take it as a compliment. I'm a bitch and proud - a Babe In Total Control of Herself.

The reality is that every woman who has ambition, business acumen and an independent way of thinking - the very qualities we admire in men - has been called a bitch.

It's sad the word needs to be used at all, considering how insulting it is. A female dog. When you actually think about what the term means, what it implies, it's amazing how much it's slipped into regular conversation. Rappers toss it off in lyrics; Britney introduces herself on her new album with the term; they don't even bother bleeping it out on television. Despite what Isiah Thomas said in his sex harassment deposition, no one - black or white - should be able to say it.

That a woman would be the one to ask the question of McCain shows how robbed of import “bitch" has become, otherwise she would have realized how the term could boomerang. If the voter can call Clinton a bitch, it's license for others to do the same to her.

If we can't stamp it out, then we must embrace it. Ten years ago, Meredith Brooks had a hit singing “I'm a bitch," and since then, smart women have known that a man who calls them a bitch is only demonstrating his own inadequacies.

Case in point: Hillary herself, who wisely said nothing during the McCain debacle. In proper form, she subscribed to the Hollywood axiom, “No audience, no show." She's nobody's poodle.

But if I may, let me offer some more advice to Clinton - a little etiquette for bitches, if you will:

Remember that each time you are called a bitch on the campaign trail, you are helping women across America. As long as they are calling you a bitch, it means that some other poor woman is getting a break from being called one.

Lead with compassion for your male counterparts. Many still suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and night sweats, even though it's been decades since the feminist movement.

Never let them get under your skin. And if they do, never give them the satisfaction of knowing it.

Wear skirts often. It'll flummox them even more.

And one final word from the trenches. Being a woman who is running for office is sometimes threatening to those who aren't used to seeing women be productive outside the kitchen and the laundry room. The good news is, they'll adjust. Ain't that a bitch?

Sherry Argov is the author of “Why Men Marry Bitches."
 
Wow, so Huckabee has a Chuck Norris Facts campaign ad. I, I really don't know what to say.
 
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) - Presidential hopeful Barack Obama on Tuesday told high school students that when he was their age he was hardly a model student, experimenting with illegal drugs and drinking alcohol.

Obama stopped by a study hall at Manchester Central High School and answered students' questions about the war in Iraq and his education plan. But when an adult asked about his time as a student, Obama spoke bluntly.

"I will confess to you, I was kind of a goof-off in high school. My Mom reminds me of that," said Obama, an Illinois Democrat who grew up in Hawaii

"You know, I made some bad decisions that I've actually written about. You know, got into drinking. I experimented with drugs," he said. "There was a whole stretch of time that I didn't really apply myself a lot. It wasn't until I got out of high school and went to college that I started realizing, 'Man, I wasted a lot of time.'"

Obama has written about his drug use in his memoir, "Dreams from My Father."

"Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final fatal role of the young would be black man," Obama wrote. Mostly he smoked marijuana and drank alcohol, Obama wrote, but occasionally he would snort cocaine when he could afford it.

Drugs, Obama wrote, were a way he "could push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory."

Obama told students he developed his sense of social justice at college—he attended Occidental College in Los Angeles for two years before transferring to Columbia University in New York. Before he got to Columbia, he said, he lived a naive life.

"I went to high school in Hawaii, so there was a lot of opportunity to goof off because the weather is really good all the time," he said. "I did well in school, but I didn't really apply myself. I did what I needed to do to get into college and it came fairly easily to me."

His biggest interest was in sports and girls.

"I was big on basketball. We were state champs. I thought I was better than I was," said Obama, who finds time on the campaign trail to still play a pickup game.

He then added: "I thought about girls a lot, I won't lie."
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats and Republicans alike have strong opinions about who has the best chance of capturing the presidency in 2008 - Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani, that is - but that's not necessarily the candidate they'd rather go bowling with, take along on a family vacation or even vote for.

An in-depth survey of more than 2,000 people offers a window into the thinking of Americans as they look far beyond electability in making their choices for president - grappling with matters of personality, policy and religion in sorting through the candidates.

Overall, the poll finds, Democrats are weighing personal traits more heavily than policy positions this election season; Republicans are putting greater emphasis on policy. The survey by The Associated Press and Yahoo News is a departure from traditional polling in that it will track the opinions of the same people across the country as their beliefs develop and change through the campaign.

The interplay of the personal and the political doesn't always make for neat and tidy decision-making.

Take self-described die-hard Republican Donald Stokes. The 48-year-old steelworker from Waterbury, Conn., would pick Democrat John Edwards if he could take a candidate along on his family vacation. He likes Edwards' personality and his family values. But he supports Giuliani for president, largely because of the former New York mayor's leadership after the 9-11 terror attacks in 2001.

"I'd rather have a president that's going to get in somebody's face if he's got a problem with them or another country," says Stokes.

Charolette Thompson, a 48-year-old retired landscaper from Federal Way, Wash., is a Democrat backing Barack Obama for president. But she would probably pick "the Mormon guy" - that would be Republican Mitt Romney - for a bowling partner.

Jasmine Zoschak, a 30-year-old physician's assistant from Milford, Pa., would love to see a woman in the White House - "just not the female that's running this year." She's backing Republican Mike Huckabee for president because of his positive outlook and opposition to abortion, but she'd rather invite Obama to dinner.

In this first gut-check of the polling series, the voters signaled there's still hope for candidates playing catchup: Half of likely Democratic voters said they could change their minds about who should win their party's nomination, as did two-thirds of Republicans.

Ask Democrats to size up their party's candidates on personal qualities, and it's easy to see why Clinton is leading national polls of Democrats. She is the candidate most often seen as strong, experienced, decisive, compassionate. Looking for strength, for example, 78 percent of Democrats see the quality in Clinton, 61 percent find it in Obama, 56 percent in Edwards.

The picture is less clear-cut when it comes to ethics and honesty, where Clinton and Obama run about even.

Which Democrat is judged the most likable? None has a clear advantage among Democratic voters, with Clinton, Obama and Edwards running about even. Among all voters, however, Obama has the edge.

It is a measure of how polarizing Clinton can be that she is the both the voters' favored bowling or vacation companion and the one most often ruled out.

Irene Soria, a 60-year-old Democrat from Tulare, Calif., says she's backing Clinton because "she knows how to play Washington. ... The other two, Edwards and Obama, seem kind of weak to me."

Likability, Soria says, is over-rated. A lot of people thought they could have a beer with George W. Bush, she said, but "look at all the things he's done to the United States. He hasn't done much good."

When Republican voters size up the GOP candidates, Giuliani claims the advantage on a host of personal qualities. He is the GOP candidate most often seen as decisive, strong and compassionate. But, just as for Clinton, ethics and honesty are a potential soft spot. Some 59 percent of GOP voters see Sen. John McCain as ethical, compared with 54 percent for Giuliani, 45 percent for Fred Thompson and 42 percent for Romney. On honesty, McCain and Giuliani run about even.

Which Republican is the most likable? Giuliani gets the nod, both from GOP voters and among voters overall.

Hold a sheer popularity contest, pitting the most likable Democrat vs. the best-liked Republican, and it would be Obama over Giuliani, 54 percent to 46 percent.

Ask voters which qualities are most important, though, and they put likability well down the list. They attach far more importance to being honest, ethical, decisive and strong.

The AP-Yahoo News survey, conducted by Knowledge Networks, also asked voters to shine the spotlight in the other direction, to evaluate some of their own qualities.

It turns out that supporters of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee are the most likely to be happy. Huckabee has a relatively high proportion of support among Evangelicals, who tend to be happier than most people.

Among Democrats, supporters of Obama and Edwards are more likely to say they are very happy than are Clinton's backers. Her supporters include more lower-income and less-educated voters, who tend to be less happy.

The voters do own up to some reservations about the age, gender and religion of certain candidates, but some also manage to swallow their concerns. Nearly 60 percent of 71-year-old John McCain's supporters say they have at least some reservations about supporting a candidate who is over 70. About 30 percent of Romney's supporters have qualms about voting for a Mormon. Fifteen percent of those who support thrice-married Giuliani have reservations about someone who is divorced.

On the Democratic side, 7 percent of Clinton's supporters report some reservations about voting for a woman.

The numbers show a significant share of respondents resisting the pack mentality. Fully half of Obama's supporters and a third of Edwards' backers think Clinton is the Democrat with the best chance of winning next November. On the Republican side, a third or more of the voters supporting McCain, Thompson and Romney think Giuliani has a better chance of winning.

Who would win right now? When an unidentified Democratic nominee is pitted against an unidentified Republican, the Democrat gets 42 percent of voters, the Republican 27 percent and another 27 percent don't know who they'd vote for.

The survey of 2,230 adults was conducted Nov. 2-12 by Knowledge Networks and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. The survey included 1,049 Democrats, for whom the margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3 points, and 827 Republicans, for whom the margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3.4 points. Unlike most Internet polls, this one is nationally representative because people are first contacted using traditional telephone polling methods, and are then followed using online interviews. People selected for the study who do not already have Internet access are provided with Internet access for free.
 
Yeah, I never got the whole thing of voting for somebody based on whether or not you could hang out with them, either. Much as I love my family and friends, and enjoy hanging out with them, I wouldn't look to most of them when thinking about who our next president should be.

I'm glad that people seem to be focusing more on the issues and the candidates' leadership abilities this time around...hopefully that will come through in the election next year.

Angela
 
examiner.com

DeLay Knocks GOP: ‘The leadership just isn’t getting it’
November 20

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay may not be in a leadership position on Capitol Hill anymore, but that doesn't mean he can't weigh in on the current GOP leadership.

DeLay told Yeas & Nays that Republicans in Congress are "looking for something to believe in" and "they're not getting it out of this Republican leadership. … The leadership just isn't getting it."

"They're looking for some backbone," said DeLay, who also chimed in on the 2008 election. He said the Republican party is "going to get our clocks cleaned in 2008" and unequivocally said that "Hillary [Clinton] will be the next president." Which ought to give DeLay’s newest projects, the Coalition for a Conservative Majority and a consulting firm called First Principles, LLC, plenty to do.

DeLay gave us is his dour assessment at a book party for former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, which was held at the Georgetown home of former Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman
 
Chicago, IL — Rudy Giuliani declared that Americans should not expect a “pretense of perfection” from candidates running for office and says he respects Barack Obama’s “honesty” for discussing his previous drug use with a group of high schoolers today.

The Illinois Senator is receiving criticism from Mitt Romney, among others, for opening up and discussing past mistakes during a town hall at a Manchester, NH High School Tuesday.

“I made some bad decisions that I’ve written about, there were times when I got into drinking and experimented with drugs.. there was a whole stretch of time when i didn’t really apply myself a lot,” Obama told the group.

Giuliani said he believes Obama’s topic of conversation was completely appropriate.

“I respect his honesty in doing that. I think that one of the things we need from our people who are running for office is not this pretense of perfection,” Giuliani said. “The reality is all of us that run for public office, whether its governor, legislator, mayor, president–we are all human beings. If we haven’t made mistakes don’t vote for us cause we got some big ones that are gonna happen in the future and we wont know how to handle them.”

The former NYC mayor has been forthright about admitting his own mistakes during the campaign–most recently dogged by his connection to indicted former NYC Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik–even noting in two recent television ads that he is not perfect.

But fellow Republican contender Mitt Romney feels differently, saying Obama committed a “huge error.”

“It’s just not a good idea for people running for President of the United States who potentially could be the role model for a lot of people to talk about their personal failings while they were kids because it opens the doorway to other kids thinking, ‘well I can do that too and become President of the United States,’” Romney told an Iowa audience today. “I think that was a huge error by Barack Obama…it is just the wrong way for people who want to be the leader of the free world.”
 
MrsSpringsteen said:
The Illinois Senator is receiving criticism from Mitt Romney, among others, for opening up and discussing past mistakes during a town hall at a Manchester, NH High School Tuesday.

But fellow Republican contender Mitt Romney feels differently, saying Obama committed a “huge error.”

“It’s just not a good idea for people running for President of the United States who potentially could be the role model for a lot of people to talk about their personal failings while they were kids because it opens the doorway to other kids thinking, ‘well I can do that too and become President of the United States,’” Romney told an Iowa audience today. “I think that was a huge error by Barack Obama…it is just the wrong way for people who want to be the leader of the free world.”

This is how many of the Mormon's I've met think though - they have to appear to be perfect. That has to get old. None of us are. I think the way Obama phrased it as a "waste of time," was wise. That goes above the whole "drugs are bad, kids" phrase and gives them more of a long-term perspective.
 
MrsSpringsteen said:
C
Giuliani said he believes Obama’s topic of conversation was completely appropriate.

“I respect his honesty in doing that. I think that one of the things we need from our people who are running for office is not this pretense of perfection,” Giuliani said. “The reality is all of us that run for public office, whether its governor, legislator, mayor, president–we are all human beings. If we haven’t made mistakes don’t vote for us cause we got some big ones that are gonna happen in the future and we wont know how to handle them.”

Wow. It's not often I find myself agreeing with what Rudy Giuliani has to say.
 
Diemen said:


Wow. It's not often I find myself agreeing with what Rudy Giuliani has to say.
I agree with Giuliani as well, but my skeptical side also recognizes that he's just repositioning himself for when the rest of his NYC-days skeletons come tumbling out of the very large closet they are currently inhabiting.
 
coemgen said:


This is how many of the Mormon's I've met think though - they have to appear to be perfect. .

Pious "Christians" are far worse, especially those that knock another Christian's faith.

dbs
 
Canadiens1160 said:
I agree with Giuliani as well, but my skeptical side also recognizes that he's just repositioning himself for when the rest of his NYC-days skeletons come tumbling out of the very large closet they are currently inhabiting.

Oh definitely. But at least he was rational enough to at least publicly give Obama credit for it.
 
“It’s just not a good idea for people running for President of the United States who potentially could be the role model for a lot of people to talk about their personal failings while they were kids because it opens the doorway to other kids thinking, ‘well I can do that too and become President of the United States,’” Romney told an Iowa audience today. “I think that was a huge error by Barack Obama…it is just the wrong way for people who want to be the leader of the free world.”

:rolleyes:. Yeah, I'm gonna do something just 'cause Obama said he did it once. Okay, Romney...

I agree with you guys, that whole "holier-than-thou" attitude irritates me, too. Obama was simply being honest, which is kinda nice to see for a change. And hey, it's best that he shared that stuff now-avoid a big mess ahead of time by beating the rush of people who would've brought that stuff out down the line. Though really, I don't care one way or another about Obama's childhood-so long as what he did/does in his personal life doesn't affect his job performance or lead to people getting hurt or killed, then it's really none of my business. And that goes for all other politicians, too, regardless of what party they belong to.

Angela
 
Diemen said:


Oh definitely. But at least he was rational enough to at least publicly give Obama credit for it.

It's a slippery slope though w/Obama divulging this, for a few reasons.

Obama had to come out and say something because this week Hilary was threatening to divulge "something negative" about Obama, it was all in the press that Hilary was sitting on a "bombshell" about Obama's past, but Obama diffused this by preempting Hilary's "bombshell" by addressing the issue.

He will be the net winner in this fiasco.

The reason this hurts Obama is because:


1-Casual drug users will have a claim that drugs should be legalized ,or may feel they shouldn't be arrested because Obama used drugs in the past.

2-That you had bad behavior in the past that was unsavory needn't be made mentioned publicly as it is cleary in your past; the only time it should be discussed is if somebody broaches the subject.
A lot kids do drugs because they reason that if so and so did it and turned out ok, why shouldn't I give it a whirl ? I know I have.

Where Obama calulating diffused this potentail problem was by divulging it in his book first, thereby minimizing a larger distraction later.

So Obama is the net winner in all this, and did the wisest thing based on all the circumstances, although I don't know if sprouting off about past youthful indiscrections in a book is the wisest of all choices.

I'm wrought with ambivalence over this matter.

dbs
 
diamond said:
1-Casual drug users will have a claim that drugs should be legalized ,or may feel they shouldn't be arrested because Obama used drugs in the past.

How will they make that claim exactly? Because someone famous admitted to using them, even though he clearly spoke negatively of that fact? If there are any who try to make that claim, they are the fringe and needn't be worried about.

2-That you had bad behavior in the past that was unsavory needn't be made mentioned publicly as it is cleary in your past; the only time it should be discussed is if somebody broaches the subject.
A lot kids do drugs because they reason that if so and so did it and turned out ok, why shouldn't I give it a whirl ? I know I have.

I understand what you're saying, and you're right, some kids may see this and say "if he turned out ok, a little try won't hurt me." But really, those who use his comments as an excuse to try drugs would've found another excuse without Obama's comments out there. But Obama clearly said that it was a waste of time and basically an unfortunate mistake of his youth.

What I don't agree with is never speaking of your mistakes unless asked. Besides, I don't understand how speaking about one's past in a book is somehow dangerous. It's not as if many kids read books these days anyway. :wink:
 
There's not a single person who wasn't going to use drugs who said, "Ah, but Barack Obama said he mistakenly used them as a teen, so now I'll give it a shot." And anyone who says so is a liar looking for an excuse.
 
Yeah, I don't think there are too many alcoholic coke abusers out there shrugging their shoulders and saying "Well, if it was good enough for George W, it's good enough for me."
 
I think this gives credence to the argument that Obama really isn't black.


when black men in America use cocaine
they go to prison for many years
 
Last edited:
diamond said:


It's a slippery slope though w/Obama divulging this, for a few reasons.


Your hero is a recovering alcoholic, was that a slippery slope for you?:huh:

Do the two sides of your mouth ever speak to each other?
 
Earnie Shavers said:
Yeah, I don't think there are too many alcoholic coke abusers out there shrugging their shoulders and saying "Well, if it was good enough for George W, it's good enough for me."

you never know what you say, do or even type on how those actions can have some affect on a person, even indirectly.

Listen to the song "One".

dbs
 
diamond said:
you never know what you say, do or even type on how those actions can have some affect on a person, even indirectly.

Listen to the song "One".

dbs

But each time you claim homosexuality is a sin, it's not affecting homosexuals?

Give. Me. A. Break.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom