US 2008 Presidential Campaign/Debate Discussion Thread #6 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-22-2008, 09:52 AM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,979
Local Time: 04:23 AM
US 2008 Presidential Campaign/Debate Discussion Thread #6

[** last two pages of prior thread attached to this one per request ** ~y.]


(AP)WASHINGTON — Republican John McCain says same-sex couples should be allowed to enter into legal agreements for insurance and other purposes, but he opposes gay marriage and believes in "the unique status of marriage between and man and a woman."

"And I know that we have a respectful disagreement on that issue," the likely Republican presidential nominee said in an interview to air Thursday on "The Ellen DeGeneres show."

McCain, who also opposes an amendment to the Constitution to ban same-sex unions, said people should be encouraged to enter into legal agreements, particularly for insurance and other areas where decisions need to be made.

DeGeneres needled McCain on the issue, arguing that she and the senator from Arizona aren't different.

Last week, after the California Supreme Court cleared the way for gay marriage in that state, DeGeneres announced on her program her engagement to longtime girlfriend Portia de Rossi.

"We are all the same people, all of us. You're no different than I am. Our love is the same," she said. "When someone says, 'You can have a contract, and you'll still have insurance, and you'll get all that,' it sounds to me like saying, 'Well, you can sit there, you just can't sit there.'

"It feels like we are not, you know, we aren't owed the same things and the same wording," DeGeneres said.

McCain said he's heard her "articulate that position in a very eloquent fashion. We just have a disagreement. And I, along with many, many others, wish you every happiness."

DeGeneres steered the conversation back toward the humor she's known for.

"So, you'll walk me down the aisle? Is that what you're saying?" she asked.

"Touche," McCain said.
__________________

__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 05-22-2008, 01:06 PM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsSpringsteen View Post
McCain said he's heard her "articulate that position in a very eloquent fashion. We just have a disagreement. And I, along with many, many others, wish you every happiness."
Doesn't he realize that this might be more offending a sentence than just saying "We disagree"?
__________________

__________________
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 05-22-2008, 01:43 PM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Vega View Post
Doesn't he realize that this might be more offending a sentence than just saying "We disagree"?
Sure, but it is much less offensive than anything and everything Bush and Cheney (with his gay daughter) have always done.

The fact that McCain shows up and supports an "inferior" equal will win votes with many independents.

The fact that he is going to address the NAACP and is comfortable doing so, again makes him light years ahead of Bush/Cheney.

It seems that Obama's only strategy,
is to say McCain is the same as Bush.

This should not fly with any reasonable, honest person.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:00 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:23 AM
Quote:
Lawsuit seeks to seat Florida delegates

South Florida Business Journal - by Paul Brinkmann

Three prominent Broward County Democrats filed a federal lawsuit Thursday morning against the Democratic National Committee, seeking to force the committee to seat Florida's delegates at the upcoming presidential nomination convention.

The DNC could not immediately be reached for comment.

The suit was filed by state Sen. Steven Geller, an attorney for Greenspoon Marder in Fort Lauderdale; Barbara Effman, president of the Democratic Club in Broward County; and Percy Johnson, a convention delegate.

The suit alleges that the committee failed to "treat equally all similarly situated states and Democratic voters" when it decided not to seat Florida delegates because the state moved up its primary date against party rules. The suit also claims the committee's actions violated "due process" because the sanctions against Florida "flow from a constitutionally inadequate process that implements DNC rules in an arbitrary manner."


.



This is good news.

Of course, there will be those that say "Rules are Rules"

Thank goodness Rosa Parks would not accept that answer.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-22-2008, 03:24 PM   #5
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,236
Local Time: 03:23 AM
Riiiiight. Because the plight of Florida is sooooo similar to Rosa Park's situation.

Excellent comparison, deep.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 05-22-2008, 05:06 PM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:23 AM
Quote:
McCain Rejects Hagee Endorsement and "Crazy" Comments on Holocaust

May 22, 2008 4:48 PM

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., this afternoon rejected the endorsement of Pastor John Hagee after a sermon was publicized in which Hagen suggested Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust were caused by God so as to bring about the creation of the state of Israel.

A source close to McCain told ABC News the Arizona senator thinks these sentiments are crazy, and that back in February when the campaign accepted Hagee's endorsement, no one on the campaign, and certainly not McCain, had any idea that Hagee believed these types of things.

“Obviously, I find these remarks and others deeply offensive and indefensible, and I repudiate them," McCain said in a statement. "I did not know of them before Reverend Hagee's endorsement, and I feel I must reject his endorsement as well."

Hagee had quoted the book of Jeremiah saying, "Behold I will bring them the Jewish people again unto their land that I gave unto their fathers. Behold I will send for many fishers and after will I send for many hunters. And they the hunters shall hunt them from every mountain and from every hill and from out of the holes of the rocks."

Hagee suggested that Hitler as a hunter, and as a result of the Holocaust, Jews had been brought back to the land God gave unto their fathers.
.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 04:28 PM   #7
Refugee
 
XHendrix24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,496
Local Time: 04:23 AM
Clinton mentions Kennedy assassination

May 23, 2008 04:12 PM

Hillary Clinton appeared to raise the specter of assassination in defending her decision to stay in the Democratic race despite Barack Obama closing in on the delegate number to clinch.

In an interview with the editorial board of the Sioux Falls Argus Leader in South Dakota, she dismissed calls to drop out, adding, "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don't understand it."

Obama last year received Secret Service protection earlier than any other presidential candidate, and his supporters have privately and publicly worried about his safety, citing the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

“Senator Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign,” Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement.

Clinton has had Secret Service protection since her days as first lady.


__________________
XHendrix24 is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 05:07 PM   #8
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:23 AM


Just frisk Hillary (you can hide a lot in a puffy pant suit) before she is allowed to be near Obama.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:03 PM   #9
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 10:23 AM
So, by her timetable, which primary will turn the table? Puerto Rico on June 1, or Montana on June 3, or South Dakota on the same day?
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:14 PM   #10
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2democrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: England by way of 'Murica.
Posts: 22,140
Local Time: 09:23 AM
I'm going to take some deep breaths before I respond to what she said about the RFK Assassination...
__________________
U2democrat is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:21 PM   #11
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:23 AM
wink

deep breaths

your replies can be as insightful as mine
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:49 PM   #12
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,284
Local Time: 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
This is good news.

Of course, there will be those that say "Rules are Rules"
Among those people was Hillary Clinton...up until she started losing.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 09:43 PM   #13
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by melon View Post
Are we all that surprised that a foreign nation would have a considerably lopsided opinion of another nation's leader? I'm pretty sure that we could see similar lopsided views if you asked the American public whether they had a favorable view of Iran's president, for instance. The media has long determined what the acceptable answer to that question is (just as it seems to be in every country), whether one likes it or not, and very few are going to study a subject like this in-depth and come to their own conclusions.

Canada, as expected, is obviously more nuanced when it comes to its own internal politics. Why else would they have elected a Conservative government into power, albeit even in a minority government position? One could argue that it was more of a vote against the Liberal scandals of the last several years--e.g., a vote against one party, rather than a vote in favor of another. I'd say that that pretty much sums up the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections here. It was less of a vote of confidence for Bush, and more of a vote against the Democratic Party. The American public sure did pick an odd time to vote that way, though.
The one difference between Canadians analyzing an American president and Americans analyzing other world leaders is that here, we're pretty much inundated with American media. Your media sources make up a large part (but not the whole, certainly) of what we receive here. It's extremely easy for Canadians interested in American politics to keep informed, and even those not interested probably know more about US politics than the average American knows about other nations.

And yes, I would argue that our current Conservative government is more the result of apathy toward the Liberal party. However, as I'm sure you're aware given your knowledge of Canada, being conservative here is a relative matter. Our Conservative government is much closer to your Democratic party than to your Republicans.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 10:05 PM   #14
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by XHendrix24 View Post
Clinton mentions Kennedy assassination

May 23, 2008 04:12 PM

Hillary Clinton appeared to raise the specter of assassination in defending her decision to stay in the Democratic race despite Barack Obama closing in on the delegate number to clinch.

In an interview with the editorial board of the Sioux Falls Argus Leader in South Dakota, she dismissed calls to drop out, adding, "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don't understand it."

Obama last year received Secret Service protection earlier than any other presidential candidate, and his supporters have privately and publicly worried about his safety, citing the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

“Senator Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign,” Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement.

Clinton has had Secret Service protection since her days as first lady.


I'm almost afraid to post this, lest I gain even more of a reputation as a Hillary apologist, but let me preface this with an explanation: when I first heard of this story, my first thought was "Hillary, wtf are you talking about? You're insane."

However, reading it over just now, I think it's just an EXTREMELY poorly worded way of saying that both her husband's and RFK's Democratic nomination campaigns lasted until June, and that the assassination comment "We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California" was probably meant as a way of her saying "remember, he was assassinated while seeking the nomination, and he was assassinated in June, therefore his campaign went into June, too."

As I said, very, very poorly worded, but I doubt it was meant in any malicious or disrespectful way toward RFK. It sounded to me more like she was thinking aloud, which is really stupid for someone in her position who should be choosing words more carefully.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 05-23-2008, 10:14 PM   #15
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VintagePunk View Post
The one difference between Canadians analyzing an American president and Americans analyzing other world leaders is that here, we're pretty much inundated with American media. Your media sources make up a large part (but not the whole, certainly) of what we receive here. It's extremely easy for Canadians interested in American politics to keep informed, and even those not interested probably know more about US politics than the average American knows about other nations.
It's an interesting phenomenon, because I've argued before that, by keeping the "focus" on U.S. politics, it has allowed a lot of things that's wrong with Canada (every country has something wrong with it, mind you) to go unnoticed. I think that it is not coincidental that an issue becomes "hot button" based on the media's reaction to that issue. But, more importantly, an issue can get brushed aside if it's neglected completely. And that makes the dominant hegemony of Canada--the two major political parties and Canadian big business--quite happy.

Quote:
And yes, I would argue that our current Conservative government is more the result of apathy toward the Liberal party. However, as I'm sure you're aware given your knowledge of Canada, being conservative here is a relative matter. Our Conservative government is much closer to your Democratic party than to your Republicans.
Is it, really? The core Conservative constituency is not terribly different from the "conservatism" of U.S. Great Plains states in the Midwest and South. The old Reform Party/Canadian Alliance that took over the PCs to form today's Conservative Party certainly held views that would have rivaled many of the beliefs that socially conservative Republicans hold. I do give Harper quite a lot of credit for finding a face-saving way of accepting gay marriage in Canada; it seems that the U.S. GOP would rather sink with its ship on this issue than accept it.

In many ways, U.S. and Canadian politics are quite different (the inherent differences between parliamentary versus U.S.-style representative democracy) and quite similar (two major political parties that both nations seem to be incredibly apathetic and distrustful about). I would argue that Canadians, as a whole, really are quite more educated about American politics than Americans about Canadian politics. However, what I do not think that Canadians are immune to is the fact that media coverage of foreign nations are rarely given the level of nuance that's required to understand it completely. There's always some level of nationalism that gets in the way of the whole story. And I think that's the subtext behind that very interesting poll about our presidential candidates.
__________________

__________________
melon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com