United States of Entropy - Page 50 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-16-2013, 09:24 AM   #736
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,863
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Which means that Tourist's right-wing friend didn't realize it was satire either.
__________________

__________________
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 09:31 AM   #737
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,473
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the tourist View Post
Wow. Just read the most retarded article ever thanks to someone on my Facebook who is a good ole boy super right wing guns freak. I mean really, Cruz has now said Obama is worse than Hitler. Yeah, because Obama started a world war and created Holocaust. I mean seriously, what cornucopia of drugs are these retarded reps of our nation taking to not only believe this garbage, but to say it in interview? House Republicans Schedule Obama Impeachment Hearings - The Daily Currant


This is a satirical article from a satirical website.

I noticed that it has fooled a lot of people, left and right.

Also, I don't like that use of the word "retarded."
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 09:41 AM   #738
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 04:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
Which means that Tourist's right-wing friend didn't realize it was satire either.
I'm not sure if they ever grasp satire...
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:01 PM   #739
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 26,955
Local Time: 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Also, I don't like that use of the word "retarded."
re·tard: to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.

Which is exactly what is happening. But okay. I won't use it.
__________________
the tourist is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:03 PM   #740
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 26,955
Local Time: 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
I loved this part!

But you should know the Currant is satire.
Thank goodness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
Which means that Tourist's right-wing friend didn't realize it was satire either.
I'm sure he didn't. He's a guy I went to school with, never had any classes with, and rarely if ever talked to. I didn't have the heart to not accept his friend request.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
I'm not sure if they ever grasp satire...
Not likely.
__________________
the tourist is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:13 PM   #741
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Looks like it's all over.

Total and embarrassing failure by the GOP. They shut down the government for what? A clean bill?

Good luck with the Tea Party caucus guys. God willing, you'll elect even more of them next time. Country loves 'em!
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:34 PM   #742
ONE
love, blood, life
 
namkcuR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 10,288
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Looks like it's all over.

Total and embarrassing failure by the GOP. They shut down the government for what? A clean bill?

Good luck with the Tea Party caucus guys. God willing, you'll elect even more of them next time. Country loves 'em!
All over? The Senate agreed to a deal, but would you really be shocked if the Tea Partiers refuse once again to vote for it, and if Boehner refuses to bring it to a vote without them?
__________________
namkcuR is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:41 PM   #743
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Boehner has already publicly stated that he'll bring it to a vote regardless.

ETA: Take a look at the markets as well - Wall Street knows it's over.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:58 PM   #744
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,473
Local Time: 05:51 AM
And in the end, it's clear that "terrorists" was exactly the right word.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 01:00 PM   #745
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 56,363
Local Time: 05:51 AM
If this failed coup leads to a spilt in the Republican party between the tea party and the moderates, then it will be the greatest government shutdown ever.
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is online now  
Old 10-16-2013, 04:21 PM   #746
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:51 AM
Quote:
(CNN) -- Damn those extreme Republicans. President Obama and White House press secretary Jay Carney have found Republicans guilty of extortion and blackmail. Joe Biden, per a report in Politico, once christened Republicans as terrorists.

Liberals have led a media assault, calling the GOP anarchists, jihadists, "gun to head" hostage takers, and the political equivalent of the Taliban. White House advisor Dan Pfeiffer has likened Republicans to suicide bombers "with a bomb strapped to their chest."

What could be more extreme?

The Democratic Party.

True, the Ted Cruz wing in the House of Representatives is relentless, uncompromising and unmoved by practicality. As we all know, there are perhaps 40 or so "bullet-proof Republicans" in the House, in safe GOP districts, invulnerable except to Kryptonite. They fear a fellow Republican getting to their right in a primary more than a long-shot Democratic opponent who would paint their district blue in a general election.

No doubt, the GOP is a party divided, but there are a lot of Democrats in safe districts, too. Why don't they fear a fellow Democrat getting to their left in a primary? Why aren't the Democrats a party divided between a centrist mainstream and a more extreme, radicalized left?

Let us count the reasons: Barack Obama has taken the Democratic Party left of Clinton. He left blue-dog, centrist Democrats to be punished for his sins and they were wiped out in the GOP's 2010 Congressional landslide. All the while, the Internet has empowered and organized the party's remaining and most extreme elements. The Democratic Party can't go left. It is left, in entirety. They already occupy America's left fringe.
Nixon: De Blasio 'a real game changer'

Bill Clinton's New Democrats are dead. This is not Hillary Clinton's Democratic Party. Today's Democratic Party belongs to Elizabeth Warren. It is the party that just nominated a Sandinista trainee who returned from Nicaragua with "a vision of unfettered leftist government" for mayor of New York City, according to the New York Times.

And today's Democrats think this is a good thing.

They dream audaciously, as Ruy Teixeira wrote in the Atlantic, of a new "Emerging Democratic Majority." As Peter Beinart noted in a Daily Beast piece, "The Rise of the New New Left," "Bill de Blasio's win in New York's Democratic primary isn't a local story. It's part of a vast shift that could upend three decades of American political thinking."

The Democratic Party is now animated by the "mobilized left," Beinart writes, emboldened by Internet activism. Their cause was galvanized by President Obama's seemingly impossible re-election.

Once, Obama may have campaigned as a centrist, but that was long ago. He has since governed as an old school economic liberal from the '60s. As Fred Thompson has noted, Barack Obama has been "George McGovern without the experience." Obama's answer to every economic challenge has been top-down. Our governing class knows best, he believes, especially since Washington's elite now includes him.

If the world has changed in eight decades, our President hasn't noticed. His view of government is cast from the bronze of Franklin Roosevelt and the '30s. He puts our big, dumb, inflexible public sector at the top of American life, to mandate redistribution and prosperity.

At every opportunity, he has grown the public sector's archaic program-and-policy factory. This empty presidency tries only to cure too much old government with even more of it. Though little of what he has tried has worked, it has not seemed to deter his party. It hasn't deterred him.

His government doesn't govern education: The U.S. educational system barely edges out nations such as Slovakia, in international rankings. His government doesn't govern retirement: Our public-sector retirement system is akin to an unsustainable Ponzi scheme. His government doesn't govern health care: The Affordable Care Act is making health care more unaffordable for many seniors. His old government doesn't govern our economy: A record high 89 million Americans don't participate in the workforce and 300,000 more dropped out this August. Barack Obama is building the largest public sector since World War II and, yet, our government governs nothing.

Still, an intellectually exhausted Democratic Party proposes nothing new. If at first you don't succeed, keep trying until you are $20 trillion in debt and failure litters your streets.

The rollout of the Obamacare website is but another symptom of an old, hierarchical bureaucracy incapable of keeping pace with the complexities of a modern, adaptive America. Healthcare.gov is the best old Washington can do, not the worst.

While our world transforms itself through revolutions in energy, technology and communication, the ideologists of the left stagnate. Barack Obama's Democratic Party is intellectually exhausted. Their old Democratic Party has nothing up its sleeves but more of the same.

How our young President could only offer such dated ideas will be studied for decades. For now, we can mark candidate Obama's transformation from agent of hope and change to defender of liberal calcification as one of the great sleight-of-hand tricks in political history.

With any luck, he will be the last President who tried to teach our dinosauric public sector to dance to the music of a new and adaptive era. Others, beyond Obama, will not expand but instead transform what we now pretend "governs" us. As for his legacy, today's tweeters and texters will remember Barack Obama as the last President of the Industrial Age and once he is gone, there will be no cover for his party's intellectual barrenness.

Obama will leave a Democratic Party epitomized by ancient ideas, radically positioned left of our political center. The political trouble Barack Obama inherited from George W. Bush is nothing compared to what Obama has teed up for a future contender such as Hillary Clinton.

Our former secretary of state has had no choice but to campaign for president earlier than she would have chosen. Clinton can see that this radicalized Democratic Party could easily leave her behind and find another champion. It did so before, to her distress, in 2008.

No other member of the old Democratic elite can possibly hold its left-sliding legions together, yet Hillary Clinton has only one credential that appeals to her party: She could be our first female president. Elizabeth Warren's growing followers, more in tune with today's radicalized, populist Democrats, are likely to find that distinction unimpressive. If Clinton's rationale begins to fray, all hands on deck: The Democratic Party's 2016 nomination process is going to look like the casting call for "One-Flew-Over-The Cuckoo's Nest."

Howard Dean may have screamed his way past the Democratic nomination in 2004, but the revolution he started has borne fruit. The 2016 nomination battle may be a fight between Elizabeth Warren, Governors Martin O'Malley and Deval Patrick, an unpolished pack of ideological duds and even a reinvigorated Dean, all vying to out-crazy each other and take the Democratic Party over a precipice. They'll make the troupe that sought the 2012 GOP nomination look like the committee awarding the Nobel Prize for Physics.

Which party is more extreme?

A Republican Party divided between 180 mainstream House members and 40 Ted Cruz mini-me's? Or a Democratic Party united to preserve our fossilized, ineffective public sector?

A Republican Party advocating a path to fresh, natural, economic growth? Or a Democratic Party offering young voters the outdated economics of conformity, artificially imposed by Washington's elites?

A Republican Party being driven to offer change? Or a Democratic Party united against it?

Entrepreneurs, start printing tie-died shirts now. They will be hot sellers at the next Democratic Convention. Both sides are in for an interesting ride, but for Democrats, it's going to be an extreme 2016.
Are Democrats more extreme than GOP?

I couldn't help but think of where this thread has gone after reading this op-ed piece.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 04:42 PM   #747
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,473
Local Time: 05:51 AM
The idea that the Democrats -- pushing a health care plan that came from right wing think tanks in the 1990s and recently implemented by a Republican governor who was the party's 2012 presidential nominee -- occupy some sort of left wing fringe is nonsense. There is no left wing fringe in the US. Further, Warren Buffet has talked about these "political weapons of mass destruction." Calling these people "terrorists" is an accurate description after what they've put the nation through these past 2 weeks.

The author of the piece is a GOP strategist. I assume this op-ed is a strategy piece designed to map out a possible political narrative for the GOP "moderates" to begin to explain their way out of yet another debacle and crushing defeat by Obama. And good luck to them -- washing off the stink of the Tea Party will be no easy task.

It'd a smart editorial in that sense. What the GOP has done is inexcusable. They are unfit to govern by any measure. He's wisely trying to shift the focus back on Obama.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 04:48 PM   #748
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
The 2016 nomination battle may be a fight between Elizabeth Warren, Governors Martin O'Malley and Deval Patrick, an unpolished pack of ideological duds and even a reinvigorated Dean, all vying to out-crazy each other and take the Democratic Party over a precipice. They'll make the troupe that sought the 2012 GOP nomination look like the committee awarding the Nobel Prize for Physics.
I'm sorry, but how can you take this seriously after reading this paragraph?

A Republican strategist is insulting the intelligence of somebody like Elizabeth Warren? This coming from the party of Michele Bachmann (MARANATHA LORD!!), Herman Cain, Rick Perry and Sarah Palin? To say nothing of other wackjobs who think that raped women can't get pregnant, that there is something called legitimate rape, and so on.

nbc, I expected better of you.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 04:49 PM   #749
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,863
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
Are Democrats more extreme than GOP?

I couldn't help but think of where this thread has gone after reading this op-ed piece.
Alex Castellanos - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 06:37 PM   #750
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 56,363
Local Time: 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
The idea that the Democrats -- pushing a health care plan that came from right wing think tanks in the 1990s and recently implemented by a Republican governor who was the party's 2012 presidential nominee -- occupy some sort of left wing fringe is nonsense. There is no left wing fringe in the US. Further, Warren Buffet has talked about these "political weapons of mass destruction." Calling these people "terrorists" is an accurate description after what they've put the nation through these past 2 weeks.

The author of the piece is a GOP strategist. I assume this op-ed is a strategy piece designed to map out a possible political narrative for the GOP "moderates" to begin to explain their way out of yet another debacle and crushing defeat by Obama. And good luck to them -- washing off the stink of the Tea Party will be no easy task.

It'd a smart editorial in that sense. What the GOP has done is inexcusable. They are unfit to govern by any measure. He's wisely trying to shift the focus back on Obama.
There are left wing fringe elements in the United States. They just aren't in Congress. Not enough gerrymandering.
__________________

__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is online now  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com