U.S.A. -- good or evil?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Irvine511

Blue Crack Supplier
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
34,521
Location
the West Coast
question:

on balance, since the end of WW2 and the ascention of the United States to the position of most powerful nation on earth (perhaps ever in history), is the world a better place? is the USA, on balance, good for the world or bad for the world?

(no one word answers)
 
Last edited:
Good
> Rebuilt Western Europe
> Protected South Korea from communist agression.
> Fought and won the cold war, liberating millions ~ flipside is the power vacuum and the instability that that created.
> Is one half of the reason that the world did not go up in an atomic fireball (the other half is obviously those in the USSR who let level heads prevail on numerous occasions.

Bad
> Getting involved in a colonial war, Vietnam.
> MK Ultra
> Supporting hardline governments for the greater good, a bad practice that yields some good in the long run unfortunately.
> Paying off Arab governments not to act up, like the billions of dollars given to Egypt as protection money.

Unintended Concequences
> Supporting the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan during the 1970's and 1980's.
> Unconditional support and deals with the Saudies.

I think that the USA has been a force for good, if it is to be considered an empire then it is an empire of influence and not one of domination. On the whole the USA is a force for good in the world.
 
Last edited:
Scientifically some of the greatest discoveries have come from the USA. The US has the best space program in the world.
 
Irvine511 said:
i'm also asking culturally, not just geo-politically.

Culturally? Ok

Good: (1) Bob Dylan
(2) John Lee Hooker
(3) Brett Easton Ellis
(4) David Lynch
& many more

Bad: (1) Britney Spears
(2) Most Hollywood Blockbusters


The account is in credit, as we say in the accountancy trade.
 
Good when encouraging human rights, did right with the Marshall Plan, helped liberate Eastern Europe (with credit due Walesa, Gorby, Pope John Paul II).
Bad when emphasizing corporate profits over human rights, which it sometimes does, and strong-arm governments just because they were anti-Communist (i.e, Somoza in Nicaragua)
 
cocacolonisation
*cough*

Sorry, you wanted more than a one word answer. Do you think any nation, not specifically the US can maintain such power? I think to call it perhaps the most powerful in history, is a stetch, but arguable for sure. But to simply be in this position is not entirely good (and conversely bad) but is more difficult to maintain as history shows.
 
This is a difficult question. In the past we've done much good. I won't list them all, although someone else probably will--but short form: Bill of rights, industry, technology, science, aeronautics, movies. But try as I do, I cannot think of much good we are contributing right now.

1. I think the world will take much less notice of us when
we make claims for war in the future. I think our
credibility is shot to hell.
2. We are not being well-educated. I certainly would not
put out a PR billboard touting our educational prowess
(any everybody is to blame here--student, parent, teacher,
local and national government). There is really no
push to improve the quality of education.
3. The cost of medical care and pharmaceuticals and insurance is
skyrocketing. The quality of medical care is diminishing.
Apparently so is the quality of drugs being pushed on us.
4. All the politicians are stressing how Americans are the best
workers---blah, blah, blah and then we outsource.
5. I think we are proving the old adage that the business of
America is business--and only business.
6. When I see politicians calling French fries Freedom fries,
covering up the naked breast of a work of art, or doing
constitutional cartwheels to impeach a President for a blowjob
and the subsequent lie thereof, I cringe.
7. We are providing very little cultural impact. (Although I think
there are some interesting Indie films and independent books),
Hollywood is a rehash of old TV shows, old movies, and old
ideas. There is nothing fresh. There are a handful of
interesting TV shows. Everything else is Reality TV, the only
reality being that the shows are really cheap to produce
and get a good audience. (And now, the integrity of American
Idol is being impeached :huh:) We do not support new
writers, new visions etc. Origininality has priced itself right out
of the market.
8. We do not want to hear any bad news, anything that goes
against our agendas, our reputations, ourbottom lines. We
don't want to do the investigations ahead of time that might
save the lives of our soldiers, our astronauts, our consumers.
We are in a very dangerous mindset. We are resting on our
laurels and don't think we have to do another thing.

Most of us are to blame in not demanding more and showing our determination to get it. We talk, we talk, we talk. But we watch the shows, we pay for the drugs, we support the school sports teams, but not the debating teams or the science clubs. We want our kids to get good grades, not necessarily a good education.
We think we will always be what we once were. I'm guilty of generally opting out of the system. And I have all the respect in the world for the people on this forum and everywhere else who are trying to make a difference. But right now, I think we are getting just about the right worldwide respect we are earning.

I think right now at this time, the world sees us as opportunistic morons with a lot of weaponry and no sense of history or the future.

Sigh, as I talk, talk, talk.
 
7. We are providing very little cultural impact. (Although I think
there are some interesting Indie films and independent books),
Hollywood is a rehash of old TV shows, old movies, and old
ideas. There is nothing fresh. There are a handful of
interesting TV shows. Everything else is Reality TV, the only
reality being that the shows are really cheap to produce
and get a good audience. (And now, the integrity of American
Idol is being impeached ) We do not support new
writers, new visions etc. Origininality has priced itself right out
of the market.
Just because something is crass and big budget does not mean that it cannot be hugely influential. The US entertainment industry has a big effect on how the world views you, be it the stereotypical dirt poor rednecks that you see on Jerry Springer or the usual reality palp.

There are some very good shows that get produced today in the US ~ your cable network HBO has given a few (The Sopranos, 6 feet under, Band of Brothers). Your regular commercial stations can still give out some good shows, The Simpsons, Buffy/Angel/Firefly (all Joss Whedon created though), Futurama, Star Trek (a franchise that has over its 40 years represented in quite a few ways American idealism).

The cultural impact of the US on the rest of us cannot be understated, it is no coincidence that US culture is at least reciogised and at most emulated around much of the world.

8. We do not want to hear any bad news, anything that goes
against our agendas, our reputations, ourbottom lines. We
don't want to do the investigations ahead of time that might
save the lives of our soldiers, our astronauts, our consumers.
We are in a very dangerous mindset. We are resting on our
laurels and don't think we have to do another thing.
Quite the contrary, I would say that you cannot get enough bad news, bad news about your economy, bad news about your personal safety, bad news about the world. And I think that the idea of dragging astronaut safety into it; you have a space shuttle design from the 1970's ~ it is effective but not 100% safe; the shuttle disasters have been unforseen and could not have reasonably been avoided. Also for your soldiers there have been plenty of weapons systems pioneered during the 1980's and 1990's that have proven themselves extremely useful for your soldiers, these were built because the risk assesments and practical events showed where there were gaps ~ particuarly in the area of urban combat where modern targeting and communications technology has given the US battlefield superiority. All this tech was designed, built and rigorously field tested before it was needed in a combat environment.
 
Wanderer's points are taken. However, we are not raising the bar for movies, TV, literature, etc. We are lowering it. We do have a few good shows. We should have the talent to have many more.

Americans are addicted to bad news. However, the manufacturers, politicians when it suits their agenda, businesses
are inclined to bury it before they are absolutely forced to fix the results.

There were shuttle warnings that NASA administration chose to ignore. Point is we wait until something horrible happens before we do anything about it. Government, manufacturers, etc. choose not to listen to their workers who actually have an inkling of what's going on. God knows, it happens every day in our own jobs. When a worker -- a physician, an engineer, a military person, a government staff member--is discouraged from going outside of the party line, you endanger everyone.

Re: Iraq. We have wonderful weapons. We were also told the Iraqis would be greeting us with flowers. Because we don't want anything like real facts getting in the way. I won't argue Iraq. But we certainly weren't prepared for it upfront. But those who lead us count on our short memories and even shorter attention spans.
 
Good in the sense that:

- Americans can be great people to socialise with and are very fun loving
- Gave us REM, Live and the Foo Fighters
- Produce some great television
- There exists a strong and real desire amongst many Americans to want a peaceful world

Evil:

- Can be very arrogant.

- A lot of Americans are brainwashed into thinking that any religion besides those that take a Christian influence are inferior and "wrong."

- People who believe that "God" is the be all and end all, and believe that this "idea" actually influences the way of the world. This is outdated and too fanciful.

- Keep talking about Jesus. He is a DEAD MAN, get over it and relaise it's up to you to make a difference.

- Under the false impression that Capitalism is a perfect ideological system, when the reality is that it is extremely flawed and in urgent need of reform.

- Killed Socialism

- A Maniac for a president.

- KKK

- Mormons
 
Last edited:
Yes, intedomine, please be more respectful towards members who also post in this forum.

Let us please take into consideration what pax said recently about 'lumping' people together and calling them names, especially in a thread as potentially 'explosive' as this.


Ant.
 
Anthony said:
especially in a thread as potentially 'explosive' as this.



*crosses fingers*

that was my plan from the start.

;)

another question. let's say that another country had risen to the same level of dominance that the US currently enjoys. or, say, the UK never relinquished its empire and remained at the top.

how different would the world be today? are the actions of the US rooted more in the essential nature of that country, or the essential nature of the specific position of being the most powerful nation, whichever nation that might be?
 
If we still had a British Empire and the U.S. were no longer a superpower things would be different. The mindset of the typical British subject isn't as "ruggedly individualist" as that of the typical U.S. citizen, and that would make some differences.
 
A_Wanderer said:
Good
> Rebuilt Western Europe
> Protected South Korea from communist agression.
> Fought and won the cold war, liberating millions ~ flipside is the power vacuum and the instability that that created.
> Is one half of the reason that the world did not go up in an atomic fireball (the other half is obviously those in the USSR who let level heads prevail on numerous occasions.

Bad
> Getting involved in a colonial war, Vietnam.
> MK Ultra
> Supporting hardline governments for the greater good, a bad practice that yields some good in the long run unfortunately.
> Paying off Arab governments not to act up, like the billions of dollars given to Egypt as protection money.

Unintended Concequences
> Supporting the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan during the 1970's and 1980's.
> Unconditional support and deals with the Saudies.

I think that the USA has been a force for good, if it is to be considered an empire then it is an empire of influence and not one of domination. On the whole the USA is a force for good in the world.

:up:

I think if you look back at all the "empires" throughout history, we are by and large one of the *most* benevolent ones. We've done some things that I wish didn't have to happen (Hiroshima & Nagaski) but may have been necessary, and we've done some things that were out and out wrong...Nicaragua, Chile, etc. But if you compare that to the wholesale colonization and rape of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East by the French and British empires, we don't look as bad.

In fact, we have a history of actually helping countries to rebuild after we defeat them, see Japan.

I don't like a lot of what our government has done and a lot of what they're doing, and I think the overboard arrogant-American attitude can be annoying (same could be said for Europeans), but I still take pride in my country. I really do, and I don't think there's a problem with it.

Since you're talking mainly post-WW2, consider this. Would the world be better or worse off had the Soviets "won" the Cold War instead of us?
 
Last edited:
Everything that wanderer said :up:

(shocking i know! :ohmy: )

i may be a liberal who can't stand the current administration but damnit i love this country despite some of its obvious and less obvious mistakes. we're #1, so naturally we're subject to immense criticism. some of which is true, some is not.
 
Last edited:
verte76 said:
and strong-arm governments just because they were anti-Communist (i.e, Somoza in Nicaragua)

Wow, I didn´t expect someone else here to know about Somoza.
(with a few exceptions)
Big :up: - good college.

T´was a dictatorship, not a democratic government, btw.
 
whenhiphopdrovethebigcars said:


Wow, I didn´t expect someone else here to know about Somoza.
(with a few exceptions)
Big :up: - good college.

T´was a dictatorship, not a democratic government, btw.

Yes, actually there were two Somozas, a couple of generations. The first one was installed in Nicaragua in the '30's--he'd been a used car salesman in Philadelphia, and they installed him as dictator in Nicaragua. President Roosevelt said "Somoza may be a son of a b:censored:h, but he's our S.O.B." The second one pissed off the business community in Nicaragua with his greed, so they didn't save him from the revolutionaries. Eventually the place got straightened up with democratic elections.
 
Anthony said:
Yes, intedomine, please be more respectful towards members who also post in this forum.

Let us please take into consideration what pax said recently about 'lumping' people together and calling them names, especially in a thread as potentially 'explosive' as this.
Ant.

Seriously dude, get over yourself. The reality is, posts remotely critical of the USA are routinely censored here.

Any poster critical of anything non-USA can just about get away with anything.

Don't even bring Pax into it, in my view she is the most pro-American biased mod ever.

F**k it, American lump Muslims as terrorists all the time, and also they lump Europeans as Socialists are whatever.

I have seen this on here, and the mods never object to it, so spare me the sanctimonious whinging about cry-baby Americans.
 
Last edited:
financeguy said:


Seriously dude, get over yourself. The reality is, posts remotely critical of the USA are routinely censored here.

Any poster critical of anything non-USA can just about get away with anything.

Don't even bring Pax into it, in my view she is the most pro-American biased mod ever.

F**k it, American lump Muslims as terrorists all the time, and also they lump Europeans as Socialists are whatever.

I have seen this on here, and the mods never object to it, so spare me the sanctimonious whinging about cry-baby Americans.

Oh please. Anti-American posts are not censored.

But you will face severe questioning of stupid anti-American posts because of the large number of Americans on this board.

And Pax does a great, even-handed job in her role as Mod.
 
nbcrusader said:

Oh please. Anti-American posts are not censored.

Really? In that case what happened to the George Bush thread that someone started yesterday. It appears to have miraculously disappeared!
 
nbcrusader said:

because of the large number of Americans on this board.

And Pax does a great, even-handed job in her role as Mod.

In relation to point 1, I would see that as a "chicken-and-egg" type argument, i.e. non Americans are perhaps reluctant to post if they see the majority of posters are Americans.

In relation to point 2, I'll keep my thoughts to myself on that one.
 
financeguy said:


Really? In that case what happened to the George Bush thread that someone started yesterday. It appears to have miraculously disappeared!
That would be the totally unproductive flamebait that was sent to locksville and has since shifted to page 2.
 
Back
Top Bottom