Trayvon Martin's murderer George Zimmerman is still a free man

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gingrich, Romney, Santorum discuss Trayvon Martin - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

can't make up my mind what to think of that ^


this case from the first day I heard about it has been mind-boggling to me.

the first day, I thought ok, perhaps this kid was trespassing, when I was a kid I cut through peoples yards all the time, I would climb fences, hop walls, even disable gates to make a 'short cut'.

it had been called a 'gate guarded' community, did he sneak in?

the police did a alcohol and drug test on the kid, he was as clean as new nun.

no medical marijuana, no chronic he got from his boys in the hood, he didn't steal a beer out of the fridge, all of those things are not uncommon for kids his age. if any of that had happened, I am sure many would be calling him a 'law-breaker' and saying that the watch captain, spotted a trouble maker

the police did not check Zimmerman for drugs or alcohol. did not take his gun, check it for finger prints, the 'blood' Zimmerman has on himself, was it his or the kids? did they check Zimmerman's vehicle?


as for the hoodie, the million hoodie march, jesus christ. please just stop!
that is one of the stupidest things brought up in this case.

i am an older white man in The O C, I wear a black hoodie, when its cold or raining, sometimes I wear a beanie, knit cap.

the kid just as easily could have been wearing a beanie in the rain, he would have still got shot.
will somebody please shoot The Edge.
and then give him a drug and alcohol test.


Quick, somebody shoot this gang banger, looks like a weapon in the hand, a detonator in right hand and fuel bomb in left hand for sure, and if not? her fault for faking it.

definitely a weapon in the waistband or pockets, better to shoot first and ask questions later. better to be judged by a jury of my peers, than be carried by six ! ! !
 
i am an older white man in The O C, I wear a black hoodie, when its cold or raining, sometimes I wear a beanie, knit cap.

the kid just as easily could have been wearing a beanie in the rain, he would have still got shot.
will somebody please shoot The Edge.
and then give him a drug and alcohol test.

I know you're mostly kidding, but this has got to be one of the most retarded leaps in logic I've ever read (then brought around to a pointless U2 reference for good measure)
 
Atlanta Journal-Constitution, March 23
We’d had “the talk” before. Now I had another reason to have the father-son chat: The fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old black boy in Florida.

Miles had heard snippets about the tragedy, which occurred in a Florida town 30 miles from where he was born. He knew that Trayvon, wearing a hoodie and packing a cellphone, a bag of Skittles and an Arizona tea, had been unarmed. He learned that the shooter, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, had claimed self-defense and remains free.

This tragic incident is a parent’s nightmare. It cuts deeper, though, and its sting lingers for parents who aim to protect, insulate and prepare their sons for a reality they must shoulder: Being a young black man in America.

So “the talk” focuses on survival. Dads, especially, pass on a healthy paranoia steeped in practicality, designed as a lifesaver. These are the kinds of things we impress upon sons: Be aware of your surroundings. Keep your hands in full view when approached by police. “Yes sir” and “No sir” answers are givens. Know situations will arise in which you’re treated suspiciously, with skepticism, simply because you’re young, black and male. Accept the fact that, for some, your color will trigger the worst stereotypical imagery, some of which your peers sadly personify and perfect. Thief. Carjacker. Home invader. A menace to society warranting extermination. Understand these things fathers preach. Carry yourself with confidence, above reproach. Be smart. Watch your back. Don’t press to have the last word. Avoid dust-ups.

Sometimes before the talk ends, dads might share personal stories of their younger days, before the hair grayed. How, when we were teen drivers, cops would occasionally follow us and sometimes stop us. How occupants in a passing car might yell the n-word. How high school players on an opposing team might utter that same word under their breath to mess with our psyches. And while these experiences aren’t societal norms, they occur. They happen enough to give the impression that ignorance and hate thrive in the 21st century. And yes, it’s a double-edged sword.

The Trayvon Martin tragedy has ignited a national debate on racism, self-defense and relationships between blacks and police. Then there are the self-defense laws in Florida and Georgia that say a person being attacked has no duty to retreat before opening fire. Laws such as these render “the talk” vital. White boys who wear hoodies and eat Skittles don’t routinely get shot to death. Black boys do. We have to let our young men know they are Trayvon Martin. And he has been silenced.
 
Numerous cities will have demonstrations calling for justice for Trayvon Martin this weekend--I know of a couple in Chicago, and one in Cleveland, all early this evening; Monday afternoon we plan on taking our kids to the one in Indianapolis, there's one in Detroit that evening too. That's just the Great Lakes Midwest, I assume there'll be demonstrations in many other places as well.
 
Last edited:
some people just don't get it

we live in post-racial America, white America elected a black president, Obama would not be president with out white folks voting for him.

slavery and jim crow is illegal and has been over for decades, why are people still trying to exploit it?
 
I know you're mostly kidding, but this has got to be one of the most retarded leaps in logic I've ever read (then brought around to a pointless U2 reference for good measure)

what?

do you think if Trayvon did not have his hood up and was wearing a beanie in the rain,
he would not look like he was on drugs, and a f*cking coon?


hoodie, beanie, ball cap :shrug:

l_5a6fd0b65bf1915419cbe80974c16bbd.jpg
 
and baggy pants,
I always thought he was affiliated
I bet he is with one of the cartels, explains why he is still on the air.

tumblr_m1cphn9psw1rssd6zo1_500.jpg
 

It was more the "he wore a hoodie in the rain, I wear a beanie in the rain, edge wears a beanie, let's shoot edge" retardation I was referring to.

By the way, who intentionally wears wool in the rain??? Weirdo
 
I almost wrote American skin, two or three times today.
Trayvon could take his hoodie off, but he would still be wearing his American skin. And if you listen closely or not to the Zimmerman 4 minute 911 call, it really was the American skin that caught his eye.

The only real safe way yo wear American Skin, is naked in chains.
 
Wow. The GOP candidates actually said something reasonable for once. Obama's words were good, too.

That piece yolland shared from that Atlanta paper makes me so sad.

I tried to avoid listening to the tapes the transcripts alone were difficult to read but then I heard the tape on the nightly news and I instantly had tears in my eyes. I find everything about this murder horrific and disturbing. I think the "Stand your Ground" law is a stupid, senseless law that should have never passed. I also just found out that Georgia has a similar law. :huh: :down:

I heard them on the news, too. And agreed on the "Stand your Ground" law-I don't know if my state has one or not. I should look into that.

Also, Geraldo Rivera's an idiot (but I'm sure that's not news to anyone here). Yes, because what you wear is just crying out for people to suspect you and attack you.

trojanchick, thank you for that picture :lol:. Oh, Geraldo.
 
And New Gingrich just called President Obama's remarks on Trayvon Martin "disgraceful".

Gingrich is denying that Trayvon's murder was related to his race.

“Is the president suggesting that if it had been a white who had been shot, that would be OK because it didn’t look like him. That’s just nonsense dividing this country up. It is a tragedy this young man was shot. It would have been a tragedy if he had been Puerto Rican or Cuban or if he had been white or if he had been Asian American of if he’d been a Native American. At some point, we ought to talk about being Americans. When things go wrong to an American, it is sad for all Americans. Trying to turn it into a racial issue is fundamentally wrong. I really find it appalling.”

Gingrich Calls Obama Comments on Martin Slaying ‘Disgraceful’ - Matthew Shelley - NationalJournal.com
 
*Puts head in hands*

Oh, for the love of all that's good, Gingrich, really?

I heard those very same remarks and found absolutely nothing offensive in them, nor did I hear anything even remotely close to what you apparently heard.

As usual, he's a fucking hypocritical idiot.
 
deep said:
dog whistle, blown hard

Louisiana primary tomorrow, one last chance to get the angry white southern voters.

There are plenty of those left to exploit in my great state, if the primary lasts through whenever Texas's vote has been delayed to now in order to allow the GOP how to rig as many Texas Republicans into the House as possible without getting shut down by the Justice Department or Supreme Court.
 
I got into it with someone (not on this forum) who was basically defending Zimmerman and say if Martin didn't dress in a "punk ass hoodie" then this wouldn't have happened. He said he wasn't going to "play the race card but..." Generally when I hear someone say that, they're going to place the race card. He went on to to say that had he been Zimmerman, if he saw black males in hoodies he would ask why they were there... I asked if he would confront them if they were white males in hoodies.. no response.

My heart goes out to Trayvon's parents and friends. How horrible... and that law needs to go the way of the dinosaur.
 
I read in the paper that Zimmerman's dad claimed his son isn't racist. Because he has a lot of black friends.


Now where have I heard that argument before..... :rolleyes:
 
What the President said, I thought it was beautiful. Newt was taking a huge leap in twisting his words there, and I'm just so tired of his bs. He's such an ass.
 
He said he wasn't going to "play the race card but..."
whenever anyone says anything negative, but...it means exactly the opposite. "i'm not racist, but..." "i'm not homophobic, but..." and yet these comments are always followed by, shockingly, racist and homophobic comments. they seem to think by prefacing it with that, that it somehow excuses comments like that.
 
Miami Herald (column), Mar. 24
The killing of Trayvon Martin was only the most infamous Florida homicide complicated by the legal insanity known as “Stand Your Ground.”
Like Trayvon Martin, Pedro Roteta was pursued down a city street by his killer. On Jan. 25, Roteta had apparently been trying to steal the radio from a truck owned by Greyston Garcia, parked outside his apartment in southwest Miami. Truck burglary’s a crime of course, but not a capital case. Not before 2005.

Garcia grabbed a large knife and chased the 26-year-old Roteta down the block. He caught up with Roteta, who was unarmed except for an unopened pocketknife in his pocket, and stabbed him to death. The confrontation was captured on a surveillance video. Miami police were not nearly as cautious as the cops in Sanford. Garcia was arrested and charged with second-degree murder. But under the peculiarities of the stand-your-ground statute, the case never went to trial. [Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Beth] Bloom decided Wednesday that Garcia was immune from prosecution. This aspect of the law drives prosecutors to distraction. The Florida Supreme Court, trying to sort out the ineptly written law (a piece of boilerplate legislation contrived by the NRA) ruled that the immunity conferred by stand-your-ground was for a judge, not a jury, to decide. Judge Bloom decided, under the squishy language of the statute, that Garcia “reasonably believed it is necessary” to use deadly force “to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”
Stand Your Ground preempted any thought of prosecuting a former Broward County deputy sheriff who pumped four rounds into an aggressive panhandler outside a Miami Lakes ice cream parlor in January.

The month before, Broward Circuit Judge Ilona Holmes bypassed a jury and acquitted Nour Badi Jarkas, 54, of Plantation, who had shot his estranged wife’s boyfriend four times inside her house in 2009. Judge Holmes cited Stand Your Ground, saying, “nothing was presented...to rebut the reasonableness of the fear that [Jarkas] testified that he had.”

In 2009, after two FPL [Florida Power & Light Company] workers, in their blue shirts and pith helmets, approached Ernesto Che Vino’s mobile home in Northwest Miami-Dade to shut off the juice, Vino came storming out of the house with his rifle, cuffing one of the workers on the head then firing shots as the two ran for their truck. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John W. Thornton, “following the dictates of Stand Your Ground,” decided that Vino’s claim that he feared for his life was not unreasonable. He tossed two counts of armed assault and one count of improper exhibition of a firearm.

Essentially, the law requires a judge to read the mind of any assailant who claims self-defense, no matter how outrageous the circumstances. Jurors, of course, would do a fine job of sorting out truly reasonable fears from all this hokum. No mind reading required.
It’s not as if prior to 2005 prosecutors were ringing up convictions on innocent self-defense claimants. In 1986, in South Florida’s most famous case of self-defence, a Miami-Dade grand jury refused to indict Prentice Rasheed, a crime-weary Overtown merchant who had booby-trapped his shop windows and managed to electrocute a burglar. Rather than a criminal defendant, Rasheed became a local folk hero. Nor was there a public outcry to loosen the definition of self defense back in 2005. The law was just another of a series of overreaching and dangerous statutes passed in homage to the National Rifle Association. Some 23 other states have passed variations of Stand Your Ground. The NRA is pushing the law in other states, but perhaps the Trayvon Martin tragedy will slow the gun lobby’s momentum.


Miami Herald (op-ed), Mar. 25
Chances state lawmakers will strike the deadly force law from the books: Nil. Chances it will be amended: Slight. Chances the NRA will get to boast of a win: High.
In the past decade, the NRA successfully took on: the Florida Chamber of Commerce over the right to allow employees to store locked guns in the cars at workplace parking lots; police departments that compiled data on firearms purchases at pawn shops; adoption agencies that would ask prospective parents about guns; environmentalists who wanted to sue over gun-range lead clean-up; local governments that want to regulate guns; doctors who ask patients about firearms, and colleges that ban firearms on campus. The college gun law is its only [Florida] legislative loss—for now.

Trayvon’s hometown senator, Miami Gardens Democrat Oscar Braynon, is bringing the fight to the NRA—a rarity in the state Capitol—by simply asking for legislative hearings into Stand Your Ground. The senator also wants the law changed to make sure that a suspect can’t be immune from arrest if he pursues another, provokes a confrontation and then uses force. That could have happened in Trayvon’s Feb. 26 shooting death by neighbor George Zimmerman.
The law’s authors say the police are misconstruing Stand Your Ground. But Rep. Dennis Baxley said he doesn’t want the law touched. “There’s nothing in the law that says you can pursue and confront people,” said Baxley, R-Ocala. “There’s nothing to clarify.”

The NRA’s lead lobbyist, Marion Hammer, has praised the law for giving citizens the right to defend themselves. “It has become very emotional and political,” she told the Tallahassee Democrat. “Politicians who say we need to rewrite the law are politically grandstanding.” She also has decried the “rush to judgment” and the use of “one incident” to change the law.

Hammer is an expert in just that type of emotional politics where one anecdote leads to a wholesale change in law. In 2005, for instance, she got the Stand Your Ground law passed based on just one case, that of 77 year-old James Workman. He shot and killed an intruder in his hurricane-ravaged home near Pensacola. Workman was never charged. The state attorney specifically said Workman had a right to defend himself on his property—a concept known as the “Castle Doctrine,” a reference to the old saying that “a man’s home is his castle.” But Hammer persuaded legislators that citizens needed to have the doctrine enshrined in statute. And they decided to expand the right to use deadly force almost anywhere a person feels reasonably threatened.


Hammer’s successes are a result of her tenacity and the fact that gun owners are passionate. They email. And they vote.

In nearly every debate, gun-control advocates have predicted “blood in the streets” and a “wild West” atmosphere. But violent crime has fallen 19% in Florida and firearm crimes have declined 9% between 2005 and 2010 (the most recent year for which crime data is fully available). Still, murders increased overall by 12%--to 987--and the reports of justifiable homicides have tripled, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

Braynon is up against more than just the NRA. There’s a cultural divide between the constituents of rural white representatives like Baxley and the constituents of urban black senators like Braynon, who are outnumbered in the Legislature. “For many of the people in my district, only criminals and police carry guns,” he said. “In North Florida, it’s a whole different story.”
 
Last edited:
In the past decade, the NRA successfully took on: the Florida Chamber of Commerce over the right to allow employees to store locked guns in the cars at workplace parking lots; police departments that compiled data on firearms purchases at pawn shops; adoption agencies that would ask prospective parents about guns; environmentalists who wanted to sue over gun-range lead clean-up; local governments that want to regulate guns; doctors who ask patients about firearms, and colleges that ban firearms on campus. The college gun law is its only [Florida] legislative loss—for now.

I'm staying the hell away from Florida. Good god.

Those things you shared perfectly illustrate the illogical nature of this law. "Self-defense" can be used in the absolute loosest of terms with this. There are indeed times when it's perfectly acceptable to fight back. If someone is grabbing me and trying to kidnap me, for instance, hell, yes, I'm using every method possible to get them to stop.

But if I were to just go around attacking every man who I think might pose even the slightest of threats, that would be...well, insane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom