Torture/Waterboarding: Discussion/Debate Thread - Page 6 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-04-2008, 06:50 AM   #76
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
Khalid Sheik Mohammed? He is hardly some random "man of middle eastern appearance" off the street.
Our law system has trials, and even in those trials, it's only "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt," not "guilty with absolute certainty." These people aren't even getting to the trial process.
__________________

__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 06:51 AM   #77
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond


Clever. Well done.
__________________

__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 10:50 AM   #78
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by phillyfan26


Our law system has trials, and even in those trials, it's only "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt," not "guilty with absolute certainty." These people aren't even getting to the trial process.
For citizens of our country, not terrorists or enemy combatants.
They shouldn't expect to have the same rights as USA citizens, nor do they, only the liberal left is trying to foist it upon them.

This is why you can argue that modern liberalism is a mental disorder.

db
__________________
diamond is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 10:57 AM   #79
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
BonosSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,566
Local Time: 07:09 PM
So they say:

__________________
BonosSaint is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 11:04 AM   #80
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond


For citizens of our country, not terrorists or enemy combatants.


honey, i know you don't want to know this, but our President Bush has given himself the power to detain American citizens indefinitely, and to waterboard them. it all happens at his discretion.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 11:54 AM   #81
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 05:09 PM
On Sept 11, 2001, 4 American jetliners were hijacked and purposely crashed resulting in the death of all on board.

At the least that is murder plain and simple.

However, one of those jets, United Flight 93, was hijacked for a second time and taken down in a field solely to prevent the further loss of life that would have occurred had the jet been allowed to crash into a building in a major U.S. city. Did those "passengers" allow themselves to 'become the monster"?

Doesn't it matter that even though the result, intentionally crashing the plane and killing innocent airline passengers, was the very same -- the motive was completely different? Doesn't that matter? Isn't OK to sometimes do a bad thing to prevent a much worse thing?

Waterboarding a handful of key suspects is never acceptable, even if the motive is to possibly identify additional terrorists or gain actionable intelligence to prevent another mass murder? It simply can't be justified, right?

Then good luck with this.
Only one country has actually used atomic weapons to instantly kill several hundred thousand people, the majority being women and children.
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:01 PM   #82
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
ntalwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,900
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond


For citizens of our country
How about Padilla?

Quote:
Originally posted by diamond


This is why you can argue that modern liberalism is a mental disorder.

db
And neoconservatism is dictatorship.
__________________
ntalwar is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:10 PM   #83
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by maycocksean



I don't recall him making any exceptions in the turn the other cheek rule; I don't recall him expressing his toleration for violence against the bad guys.


Apologies to those who are not Christians on the thread--this is not addressed to you.

Our greatest soldier in World War I, Sergeant Alvin York, found justification. Read of his doubts and deeds.
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:15 PM   #84
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500
On Sept 11, 2001, 4 American jetliners were hijacked and purposely crashed resulting in the death of all on board.

At the least that is murder plain and simple.

However, one of those jets, United Flight 93, was hijacked for a second time and taken down in a field solely to prevent the further loss of life that would have occurred had the jet been allowed to crash into a building in a major U.S. city. Did those "passengers" allow themselves to 'become the monster"?



you should go back and do some research to find out what actually happened. the passengers didn't fly the plane into the ground. the attempted an insurrection, and the hijackers themselves flew the plane into the ground. were the passengers able to wrest control of the plane from the hijackers, you can rest assured that they would ahve attempted some sort of landing or averted the crash that killed them all.

unless, of course, you want to propose that the plane was shot out of the sky by the US military.






[q]Waterboarding a handful of key suspects is never acceptable, even if the motive is to possibly identify additional terrorists or gain actionable intelligence to prevent another mass murder? It simply can't be justified, right?[/q]


nope.



Quote:
Only one country has actually used atomic weapons to instantly kill several hundred thousand people, the majority being women and children.
the argument being that a full-scale invasion of the nation of Japan would have resulted in 800,000 American deaths and well over a million Japanese deaths. could you imagine a street-to-street, house-to-house battle in the streets of Tokyo?

i'm not saying i don't think that these were the only two options -- there was certainly a political motivation behind dropping the bomb, and many will say that Japan would have surrendered if given more time -- but of these two options, surely it actually was kinder to drop the bomb than invade Japan?
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:25 PM   #85
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,238
Local Time: 05:09 PM
I can't believe the contortions some people will go through to justify both their religion and torture.

If you think Jesus would be ok with torturing, with giving the enemy a taste of its own medicine, then you've completely missed the point. Either that or your belief in God is a temporary thing that you can turn off when you get upset or when someone does something wrong.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:39 PM   #86
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511
[B]

unless, of course, you want to propose that the plane was shot out of the sky by the US military.

Would the order to do that, shoot down a commercial airliner (murder those civilians) to stop an attack on the Capitol or White House, been justified?

I think so and that's my point. What's a handful of waterboard cases against blowing an American jet out of the sky on the moral outrage scale? Or launching a missile at a suspected terror house in Iraq knowing innocent people could be killed or injured. Or killing 200,000 Japanese to save many times more lives?
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:49 PM   #87
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500



Would the order to do that, shoot down a commercial airliner (murder those civilians) to stop an attack on the Capitol or White House, been justified?

I think so and that's my point. What's a handful of waterboard cases against blowing an American jet out of the sky on the moral outrage scale? Or launching a missile at a suspected terror house in Iraq knowing innocent people could be killed or injured. Or killing 200,000 Japanese to save many times more lives?


you're doing the STING thing -- thinking all things are the same.

blowing a hijacked airliner out of the sky when it is known that it is heading for a civilian target is quite different from the President deliberately increasing his own power to expand the rules of what is and what isn't an acceptable method of interrogation. this is a policy, it is an actual program of interrogation, and it is applicable in more than just worst-case scenarios.

as John McCain has said, "Life is not "24"." it's not. there isn't going to be an airplane of civilians heading towards a tower and if we only had the power to waterboard someone, then we could somehow avert the airplane. there isn't going to be a ticking bomb in a building and we'll only find out where it is before it goes off if we waterboard someone.

life doesn't work this way. these are not the situations we ever face. and you're still ignoring the fact that torture does not work. people will say anything to get you to stop torturing them. so what happens? you spend countless resources checking out tips that you *wanted* to be true, rather than the ones that were true.

haven't we learned the lesson from Iraq? you get bad intelligence precisely when you try to make your information-gathering fit a prescribed course of action. intelligence is not supposed to support a policy, policy is supposed to be designed around intelligence. when you torture, you get the information you've already decided you want to get because the man will tell you what you want to hear in order to get you to stop.

so what happens? you get the Soviet Union. the good people leave, and the sadists take over, and false confessions are deliberately extracted.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:50 PM   #88
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Diemen
I can't believe the contortions some people will go through to justify both their religion and torture.

If you think Jesus would be ok with torturing, with giving the enemy a taste of its own medicine, then you've completely missed the point. Either that or your belief in God is a temporary thing that you can turn off when you get upset or when someone does something wrong.


and for all their wailing about moral relativism, they're suprisingly relativist about torture.

premarital sex is never okay, but torture is sometimes?

i'd rather my 16 year old be having sex than waterboarding anybody.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:04 PM   #89
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Diemen
I can't believe the contortions some people will go through to justify both their religion and torture.

If you think Jesus would be ok with torturing, with giving the enemy a taste of its own medicine, then you've completely missed the point. Either that or your belief in God is a temporary thing that you can turn off when you get upset or when someone does something wrong.
What happened to the separation of church and state? Why is GWB said to be "imposing his religion on Americans over abortion and Gay marriage" and then taken to task for not "imposing his religion" when it comes to national defense. Regardles of what some of our more fanatic posters may think, Bush does not rule over a theocracy. He may spend hours at night on his knees seeking guidance and asking forgiveness for some of his actions, but his highest duty remains to protect the citizens of the United States.

To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven...A time of war, And a time of peace (Ecclesiastes 3:1,8)
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:07 PM   #90
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500


To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven...A time of war, And a time of peace (Ecclesiastes 3:1,8)
Gymnastics to justify.
Who would Jesus waterboard?
__________________

__________________
martha is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com