The myth of DDT versus the reality of malaria in Africa - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-20-2005, 02:02 PM   #1
Refugee
 
starsforu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA (and permanently residing in u2bonogirls head!)
Posts: 2,070
Local Time: 06:24 AM
The myth of DDT versus the reality of malaria in Africa

You gotta love when good intentions bring unintended consequences. Is it time to bring DDT back realizing that not all solutions are free from side-effects? Or will environmentalists fight this tooth and nail so that they can keep this sweet victory notched in their belts?


by Phyllis Schlafly

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/p...20050620.shtml

The United States has just assumed the largest burden of forgiving $40 billion in debt owed by 18 mostly African countries. It's no wonder these countries can't repay their debts when they suffer the enormous human and economic costs of malaria.

According to Harvard development expert Jeffrey Sachs, malaria cuts in half the potential growth of African countries. Yet, new evidence has just surfaced that the U.S. Agency for International Development, to which our taxpayers give $90 million a year to fight malaria, spends 95 percent of this money on consultants, advertising, and "social marketing," and less than 5 percent on fighting the disease.

Malaria has killed more people, especially children, than any other infectious disease in history. Annual deaths from malaria, mostly in Africa, Asia and Central America, have long been estimated at between 1 million and 2.7 million.

British scientists at Oxford University recently reported that in 2002 there were 515 million people infected with the most dangerous strain of malaria. Malaria deaths could easily exceed the 3 million people killed annually by AIDS.

In 1998, the World Bank pledged to reduce malaria disease and fatalities by 50 percent by 2010, but instead malaria rates have increased by 15 percent. This is the same World Bank now demanding that its bad loans to African countries be reimbursed by the United States.

Malaria is a disease carried by mosquitoes, and the world knows how to kill the hated mosquitoes - it's to spray them with the insecticide called DDT. Between the end of World War II and 1970, DDT practically eliminated malaria in the United States and Europe, and successfully battled it elsewhere.

According to the National Academy of Sciences, in those years DDT saved more than 500 million lives. In India, for example, there were 1 million deaths from malaria in 1945, and DDT reduced that figure to only a few thousand in 1960.

DDT not only saved lives and prevented debilitating illnesses, it laid a more stable foundation for development and wealth creation in malaria areas of Africa and Asia. DDT's effectiveness against malaria was dramatically demonstrated and is really beyond dispute.

Then, in 1962, Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring" created a worldwide scare about DDT, which she claimed was a danger to wildlife. Much of her so-called scientific basis for a DDT ban was soon proven either wrong or exaggerated, and the 1972 edition of her book admitted as much.

No study has been able to link the use of DDT with any negative human health impact, even though sprayers have worked with the chemical many hours a day.

Nevertheless, contrary to expert testimony that DDT was not harmful to humans, animals or the environment, in a raw exercise of arbitrary power in 1972 the Environmental Protection Agency banned DDT, and it has continued to be banned in most of the world. Since then, more than 50 million people have died from malaria.

The death toll from mosquitoes breeding in the contaminated water left by the tsunami that struck Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka and many more countries on the Indian Ocean could be more deadly than the tsunami itself.

DDT is cheap, easy to use, long lasting, does the job, and could save literally millions of African, Asian and Central American lives every year. Wealthy countries like the United States can afford alternate anti-mosquito repellents that you and I can buy at any supermarket, but the epidemic of malaria in poor countries makes anything other than DDT impractical.

DDT alternatives are less effective and five to 10 times more expensive.
Africans and Asians threatened by hundreds of thousands of cases of the killer disease are far more worried about malaria than about any tiny theoretical threat from DDT.

Despite the obvious value of DDT in saving lives, environmentalist campaigns continue to prevent its use.

Due to the large influx of illegal immigrants who, of course, are not tested for disease, as are legal immigrants, mosquito-caused diseases are re-emerging as a U.S. health problem. Malaria has popped up in Texas, and dengue fever, another mosquito-borne disease, had a virulent outbreak in a Texas county on our southern border.

Another mosquito-borne disease, West Nile virus, which was unheard of in the United States prior to 1998, has come to our country from Africa. It now infects tens of thousands of people in 21 states, and many have died.

Researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch have just discovered that mosquitoes can pass West Nile virus to each other much faster than previously thought. This is what caused the disease to spread rapidly across North America despite earlier predictions that it would spread more slowly or even die out.

The U.S. Agency for International Development and World Bank anti-DDT policy that saves mosquitoes instead of humans has stymied African countries' economic growth and is now forcing U.S. taxpayers to bail out a mountain of bad debt. When will Americans wake up to the high costs of junk environmentalism?
__________________

__________________
starsforu2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 02:29 PM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
Liesje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 19,557
Local Time: 05:24 AM
If it's as safe as this article makes it seem, I'd say go for it.

On my recent trip to Africa, many of our guest lecturers mentioned the huge problems with malaria. They said it's very hard b/c many people don't understand malaria and the importance of a mosquito net or can't afford to buy or maintain a mosquito net. Combine malaria with people weakened by AIDS and other diseases and many rural peoples' chances for survival are bleak
__________________

__________________
Liesje is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 02:35 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Rono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 6,163
Local Time: 11:24 AM
actualy, i would rather see more money going into this http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4074212.stm than poison nature,.....
__________________
Rono is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 03:16 PM   #4
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 05:24 AM
Phyllis Schlafly is as "balanced" as Jerry Falwell. She's actually the head of an uber-homophobic "family" organization, and, from what it sounds like, a Republican tool on other fronts.

I'll pay attention to this article when it's written by someone credible.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 03:34 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,290
Local Time: 05:24 AM
If you want an article on the side effects of DDT, you should go to a journal like Nature, Cell, Science, EMBO, and not an op-ed like this one.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 03:51 PM   #6
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 08:24 PM
Do the benefits of DDT in a situation where many people are dying from malaria outweigh the risks?
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:02 PM   #7
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,290
Local Time: 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
Do the benefits of DDT in a situation where many people are dying from malaria outweigh the risks?
Like I suggested, go read some primary literature to find out what the risk:benefit ratio is, based on science and only science.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:04 PM   #8
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 05:24 AM
And if Schlafly is so interested in science, maybe she can pay attention to 30 years of science that has said that homosexuality is normal, and she can pack her bags and disband her homophobic organization.

Like I said: she's a Republican tool and slamming "Silent Spring" is the newest GOP fad.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:08 PM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 08:24 PM
This thread isn't about homosexuality or for that matter Republicans; must every single thread be brought down like that. Play the issues not the players.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:18 PM   #10
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
This thread isn't about homosexuality or for that matter Republicans; must every single thread be brought down like that. Play the issues not the players.
Agreed. I guess my point is that I don't trust that bitch to be objective or scientific, and that her day job kind of kills any chance that I'll even read this article.

It's really part of a larger agenda to erode environmental laws, since we'd rather make money than admit that global warming exists. And since we refuse to do the latter then hey...let's discredit all environmentalism. Now it's DDT...then what's next?

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:19 PM   #11
War Child
 
Sparkysgrrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: under the table and screaming
Posts: 754
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
This thread isn't about homosexuality or for that matter Republicans; must every single thread be brought down like that. Play the issues not the players.
But when the article is written by Schlafly it's hard to ignore.
__________________
Sparkysgrrrl is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:53 PM   #12
Refugee
 
starsforu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA (and permanently residing in u2bonogirls head!)
Posts: 2,070
Local Time: 06:24 AM
This is not a new idea and Phyllis Schlafly isn't the only one to mention it. Here's a google search on Malaria and DDT. This is just page 1 of hits.


24-Apr-2001 Without DDT, malaria bites back by Roger Bate
http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/000000005591.htm


3- Jun- 2004 In Defense of DDT: A hated pesticide saves lives. by Roger Bate

"Forgive and bear with me for this important confession. As a Brit (technically a nonresident alien) living in D.C., I don't get to vote in the upcoming presidential election. But if I did, given my personal interests, I'd probably vote for Ralph Nader. He's the only candidate who backs the use of DDT for malaria control."
Continued on http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0406030904.asp


This one is probably from the right wing machine targeting Environmental Laws. :sarcasm:
http://www.aaenvironment.com/DDT.htm


This Dr. has spent a lot of time on this site.
http://www.usuhs.mil/pmb/TPH/ddt-malaria-container.html

Another selfish group of folks who care more about dead humans than whether there is a possibility that avian eggs can carry trace amounts of the chemical :sarcasm:
http://www.malaria.org/DDTpage.html

No comment. Just read it.
http://www.fightingmalaria.org/news....nth=May%202005
__________________
starsforu2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 05:23 PM   #13
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,290
Local Time: 05:24 AM
What's wrong with reading primary literature where you can see the data in front of you?
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 05:26 PM   #14
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 08:24 PM
Nothing wrong with that at all, who was questioning it?
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 05:28 PM   #15
Refugee
 
starsforu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA (and permanently residing in u2bonogirls head!)
Posts: 2,070
Local Time: 06:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram
What's wrong with reading primary literature where you can see the data in front of you?
Help us out, put up some links. And what exactly is primary literature?
__________________

__________________
starsforu2 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com