The Gay Thread - Page 27 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-28-2014, 07:59 PM   #391
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,351
Local Time: 11:47 AM
Well, he didn't. My point though is that blaming a politician for your actions and declaring 100% lack of inability to be a free thinker (like you're subject to Obamas view) is stupid.

Well, the democrats don't back gay marriage yet so therefore I think it's okay to back an anti gay campaign! Problem solved!
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 04-29-2014, 06:59 AM   #392
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 05:47 PM
Yeah, it is pretty stupid. But then again, blaming a religion for your actions and declaring a 100% lack of inability to be a free thinker is pretty stupid as well in my books.
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 04-29-2014, 07:25 AM   #393
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,351
Local Time: 11:47 AM
It's moments like that which make me think...

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 04-29-2014, 12:11 PM   #394
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 11:47 AM
i hesitate putting this in the gay thread, since HIV affects everyone, etc.

but it's fascinating, and touches on how diseases/conditions related to sex are somehow "worse" and more shameful than diseases/conditions related to other lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, cigarettes).

(and when i say "lifestyle" i mean it to refer to sex itself, usually unprotected, either hetero or homo, as hetero sex has transmitted much, much, much more HIV globally than homosex)




Quote:
As a doctor, I’d rather have HIV than diabetes

One of the most feared diseases in the world is now, for British doctors, a manageable chronic condition. It’s a triumph we’re oddly scared to talk about
163 CommentsMax Pemberton 19 April 2014


‘There is now a deadly virus, which anyone can catch from sex with an infected person. If we’re not careful, the people who’ve died so far, will be just the tip of the iceberg… If you ignore Aids, it could be the death of you.’ It has been hailed as one of the most memorable health campaigns ever created. The message couldn’t have been clearer and people were petrified. For anyone over the age of 30, the ‘Iceberg’ and ‘Tombstone’ adverts — as they came to be known — with John Hurt’s menacing voice-over, still bring back a sense of crushing dread. The UK actually led the way with its HIV public health campaigns; it was considered so successful in raising awareness that other countries adopted similar adverts relying on shock and fear. The thing I am most struck by now, however, is how over-the-top they seem.

It’s now 30 years since HIV was discovered. During my training as a doctor in central London in the late 1990s, people were still dying of Aids. But since then, incredible pharmacological advances have been made in how the virus is treated and managed. Combination medications — termed ‘highly active antiretroviral therapy’ or Haart — have resulted in being able to maintain the infected person’s immune system and therefore prevent the opportunistic infections that resulted in the development of Aids and led to death. Despite working in the centre of London with high-risk groups such as sex workers and drug addicts, I haven’t seen someone die of HIV for years. It’s now incredibly rare to die as a result of HIV/Aids in this country. The most recent statistics show that in 2012, less than 1 per cent of people with HIV died. This is about the same for the non-infected population. It’s hard, now, to argue that HIV is a death sentence.

Those who are dangerously unwell with the disease are often immigrants who have been infected for years, and present to hospital late with the kind of infections that we no longer see in those on medication. One study suggested that around 75 per cent of HIV-related inpatient admissions are immigrants, with about 60 per cent from Africa. For the vast majority of people with HIV in this country, though, the disease is managed entirely in outpatient clinics. HIV/Aids wards and specialist units have closed simply because there is no longer the volume of patients to fill them. This is a hugely encouraging fact, which would have seemed impossible to those who stood, in the 1980s and 1990s, as friends, family and loved ones faded away while doctors stood by utterly helpless. What is truly startling is the speed with which medicine responded to HIV.



A recent large epidemiological study showed that, for those diagnosed with HIV now, life expectancy is similar to someone who does not have the virus. The medical profession now considers HIV a chronic disease; it’s regarded in public health terms in the same category as, for example, type 2 diabetes. As a doctor I can tell you that, medically speaking, I’d rather have HIV than diabetes. While this might sound shocking or surprising, the facts speak for themselves: the prognosis for those with type 2 diabetes is much worse than for those with HIV. The risk of stroke in newly treated type 2 diabetes is more than double that of the general population. People with diabetes are four times more likely to have cardiovascular disease than someone without diabetes. In 20 to 30 per cent of people with diabetes, there’s damage to the kidney filtering system leading to kidney failure and the need for dialysis. Damage to the delicate vessels in the eye is a leading cause of blindness and damage to nerves is a leading cause of foot wounds and ulcers, which frequently lead to foot and leg amputations. For those with HIV, providing they take their medication, there are very few problems.

Many people are complacent about diabetes in a way that would seem reckless with HIV. People consider type 2 diabetes an irritant — something that can be easily fixed with tablets. But this is wrong. Regardless of how well it is controlled, type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, which results in the need to increase pharmacological therapies over time. A recent study conducted in Australia showed that, after six years, 44 per cent of patients no longer responded to oral medication and required insulin injections. Oral medications eventually fail in most people, meaning that injections are almost inevitable at some point.

Now compare this with HIV. Fixed-dose medications (multiple antiretroviral drugs in a single tablet) have meant that most of those infected simply take a tablet a day. While no one wants to have to take medication for the rest of their lives, it’s a lot easier than injecting insulin. And of course there are side effects, but that’s true for diabetes medication and, with a bit of trial and error, most people find a medication that suits them. To put it starkly, the latest statistics show that because of Haart, HIV now no longer reduces your life expectancy, while having type 2 diabetes typically reduces it by ten years. But this isn’t an easy thing to say publicly.

The news about our incredible progress against HIV is only whispered about because there are concerns that if it is emphasised, then people will no longer take care to avoid infection. The HIV charities, full of older gay men who were mobilised by watching their friends and partners die of the disease in the 1980s and 1990s, are left woefully out of touch with the new realities of the disease. For them, HIV will always be the ogre lurking in the shadows, and so any attempt to put it within a wider context of chronic diseases is met with howls about insensitivity or recklessness. They still rely on mobilising outdated fears about the disease to promote safe sex in a way that, for example, diabetes charities never do about eating a healthy diet. By following this old strategy, they inadvertently help to perpetuate the stigma that those with the infection face.

Throughout its brief history, HIV has been both medicalised as a disease and moralised as a stigma. It is the social impact of the condition that now forms the focus after a diagnosis, often far more than the physical aspects. It is the fear of being ostracised that is the biggest problem for those who are newly diagnosed, not the virus itself. Rates of depression in those with HIV are nearly ten times higher than among the general public, in no small part because of the stigma that remains attached to the condition. And if HIV still has status as a scary disease, that’s down to society’s attitude — rather than the virus itself.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 04-29-2014, 01:23 PM   #395
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 05:47 PM
Yeah but sex is disgusting and immoral and should not happen until after marriage.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 04-29-2014, 03:02 PM   #396
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 08:47 AM
Quote:
“We didn’t bring this lawsuit to make others conform to our beliefs,
but to vindicate the right of all faiths to freely exercise their religious
practices,” said Donald C. Clark Jr., general counsel of the United Church
of Christ."

In America, we have a Constitution that's allows people to practice their religion. People's religious beliefs should not be restricted by laws or judges.


The One Religious Liberty Case Anti-Gay Conservatives Want To Ignore | Blog | Media Matters for America
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 02:08 AM   #397
Blue Crack Supplier
 
IWasBored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 36,504
Local Time: 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
Yeah but sex is disgusting and immoral and should not happen until after marriage.
Plus isn't type II diabetes god's way of tellin them they should have laid off the twinkies when they were younger?
__________________
IWasBored is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 04:16 AM   #398
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
In America, we have a Constitution that's allows people to practice their religion. People's religious beliefs should not be restricted by laws or judges.


The One Religious Liberty Case Anti-Gay Conservatives Want To Ignore | Blog | Media Matters for America
THat's great, so why isn't that law lived by? Why is the one religious belief of Christians so much more important that that of everyone else?

I'd say people should believe whatever they want to believe, as long as it doesn't get in the way of other people's beliefs. Keep it for yourself and don't force it onto others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IWasBored View Post
Plus isn't type II diabetes god's way of tellin them they should have laid off the twinkies when they were younger?
Apparently so! But yeah, same with lung cancer. It's almost like it's 'cool' to have such a stupid disease, and it's the pitfall of our medical science developments. Since we can cure so much now, the idiots don't die as easily and they reproduce much faster, thus more idiots are born. It's an ongoing cycle that will eventually kill off human life as we know it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 05:30 AM   #399
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
jeevey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,095
Local Time: 12:47 PM
I understand what you are saying, GG, but resentment against undesirable people for reproducing is rather a dangerous road to go down, don't you think?
__________________
jeevey is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 06:56 AM   #400
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 05:47 PM
It's no road to go down, it's simply an observation of society as it is. There's a reason most animal species have a completely different system where the weak die and the strong species live on. Yet us humans choose to defy this so we have to live with the consequences.


But maybe this is a topic for a different thread... then again one could argue that gays do the human race and mother earth a favour as they do not reproduce.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 08:28 AM   #401
ONE
love, blood, life
 
digitize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas and around the Texas Triangle
Posts: 13,962
Local Time: 10:47 AM
The Gay Thread

I wonder to what extent a propensity to overeat junk food is genetic.

(I truly have no idea.)
__________________
digitize is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 08:55 AM   #402
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 11:47 AM
Fat and sugar were so scarce throughout most of human history, that we are wired to consume it as much as possible when we find it.

Now it's in abundance, and the challenge is to turn it down. It's hard -- we get addicted to these things, and they are everywhere and marketed to us at all times.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 09:02 AM   #403
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
jeevey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,095
Local Time: 12:47 PM
Well, the craving for sweets is deeply hardwired. Sweet foods are virtually never poisonous in nature and carry a lot of easily available calories, so humans are evolved to seeks them out as much as possible, just like all the other non-carnivorous animals. The only differences are that for bears and pigs, eventually the supply of berries and fallen apples run out as the season for them ends, and we have an artificially enlarged supply of unnaturally sweet, unnaturally fat foods that never go out of season. Edit, whoops, you beat me to it, Irvine!

Some people do have a greater genetic predisposition to addictive behaviors in general, though of course early patterning modeling affect that a lot too. I don't have the data at hand, but I recall a study that indicated people whose mothers had medication for pain during labor when they were born were five times more likely to have an addiction as an adult than their non-medicated birth siblings.
__________________
jeevey is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 11:00 PM   #404
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 09:47 AM
Wow - it seems you guys have just about cleared out any dissenting voices in FYM. Congratulations...
__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 04-30-2014, 11:22 PM   #405
45:33
 
cobl04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Point to Shaolin
Posts: 55,030
Local Time: 03:47 AM
INDY deserved to be banned for his last post, and there aren't any rational opposition arguments to ssm
__________________

__________________
cobl04 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com