The FYM Democratic Primary - Page 9 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
View Poll Results: Which Democratic Presidential candidate are you voting for?
U.S. Sen. Joseph R. "Joe" Biden, Jr. (D-DE) 6 5.77%
U.S. Sen. Hillary R. Clinton (D-NY) 27 25.96%
U.S. Sen. Christopher J. "Chris" Dodd (D-CT) 0 0%
'VP 04 nominee / ex-U.S. Sen. John R. Edwards (D-NC) 9 8.65%
ex-U.S. Sen. Maurice "Mike" Gravel (D-AK) 0 0%
'04 candidate / U.S. Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH) 22 21.15%
U.S. Sen. Barack H. Obama (D-IL) 33 31.73%
Gov. William B. "Bill" Richardson (D-NM) 2 1.92%
Other - Write In 5 4.81%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-04-2007, 03:33 PM   #121
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 12:01 AM
Yes, of course there are waiting lists for elective surgeries or treatment. When my friend had a brain tumor, she got an MRI the following morning, not 4 months later. It is a triage system.

So everyone waits for ELECTIVE procedures, but guess what? Everyone gets everything for free. You have what, 40 million people who get nothing and who knows how many more with shitty insurance who can't afford your speedy treatment anyway. What is it worth to me that I can get an MRI tomorrow afternoon if I can't afford it anyway? It's nothing more than a theoretical benefit.

I've said this before but I'm really, honestly wondering whether it is a uniquely American view to believe that you shouldn't have to wait in line for anything, because certainly everywhere else in the developed world, people wait for elective procedures without screaming that the heavens are falling. So is there some kind of cultural difference that precludes one nation from being able to cope with potential waits? One honestly has to wonder.
__________________

__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:03 PM   #122
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Well, the "waiting" is de facto rationing isn't it? The truth is no country can guarantee access, quality and keep healthcare costs down. There is always going to be a trade-off. Our system provides unequaled quality, rewards innovation/excellence and provides (but does not guarantee) access through high supply...but it is costly. That is our trade-off.
__________________

__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:11 PM   #123
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500
Our system provides unequaled quality, rewards innovation/excellence and provides (but does not guarantee) access through high supply...but it is costly. That is our trade-off.
And of course this is the rose colored glasses version.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:14 PM   #124
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 05:01 AM
I wouldn't mind having to wait for an elective procedure. If I can't afford it, what's the point? That's why I want universal health coverage. Unfortunately, I think Kucinich is the only Democrat proposing it.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:18 PM   #125
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,256
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram
I've said this before but I'm really, honestly wondering whether it is a uniquely American view to believe that you shouldn't have to wait in line for anything, because certainly everywhere else in the developed world, people wait for elective procedures without screaming that the heavens are falling.
I'm not sure how big a problem that is elsewhere in the world-I'd be interested to the answer to that, too. But you are absolutely right that many here in the U.S. have trouble with the concept of patience, and it's kinda troubling. Sure I would like everything I want right now, everyone would, but I know that's not always going to happen. There are times you're just going to have to wait, plain and simple. If it's a dire emergency that needs attention RIGHT NOW or the person will die right then and there, I fully understand the rush, but otherwise, waiting for things is a part of the medical routine sometimes.

I know my family's had to struggle over the years due in part to medical bills for my dad's health issues. Things are better now, but it shouldn't have to cost an arm and a leg just to get treated for things that many people will have to deal with eventually.

Angela
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:30 PM   #126
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


And of course this is the rose colored glasses version.
Got mine in an hour or less at the optometrist in the mall.

But, I'm not Canadian.
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 06:52 PM   #127
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500


at the optometrist in the mall.

That's the unequaled quality you're talking about?
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 07:01 PM   #128
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 06:01 AM
47 million uninsured and medical bills as the most common cause of personal bankruptcy isn't a "trade-off," it's a crisis. I don't understand how anyone can in conscience rationalize it otherwise.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 12:33 AM   #129
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 11:01 PM
"The truth is that some people will choose not to buy insurance even though it’s affordable, knowing that the rest of us will pay for their emergency room visits."

--John Edwards
(Hey John, the rest of us also pay for frivolous lawsuits against doctors and drug manufacturers)

Now, under John Edwards, Hillary, Barack, choosing not to buy health insurance will no longer be an option. That's how they keep costs down, by enlarging the pool of those paying into the system while rarely using it. Chiefly the young. (Something to keep in mind "Rock The Vote" voters.) But is that the best way to go, keep building on our current employer based bureaucratic mishmash of fragmented payers -- high in overhead, built around the tax code and already overburdened by government mandates?

And crisis? I don't think there are any faults in our health care system that a little more "free-market" wouldn't correct. Will there always be a role for government, yes. But I'd support any candidate that would scrap our current system and return to consumer-directed health care. Lower costs through competition -- return to "health insurance" being just that, high deductible insurance against remote and financially catastrophic illness or accident, not low deductible "prepaying" for all health expenses.
Just listen to any debate, health insurance and health care have become interchangeable. That's one of the problems.
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 12:46 AM   #130
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500


And crisis? I don't think there are any faults in our health care system that a little more "free-market" wouldn't correct. Will there always be a role for government, yes. But I'd support any candidate that would scrap our current system and return to consumer-directed health care. Lower costs through competition -- return to "health insurance" being just that, high deductible insurance against remote and financially catastrophic illness or accident, not low deductible "prepaying" for all health expenses.
Just listen to any debate, health insurance and health care have become interchangeable. That's one of the problems.
Wow, just wow...

What a misunderstanding of our current situation you have. Free market won't change anything. How freer would you like to make this market? And how would it change anything?

And even the profiteers of the medical industry(who will lose the most with social medicine) would tell you consumer-directed medicine is a HORRIBLE idea.

Look around you, we aren't a healthy society. Your idea would be great if we were... And it's not just the poor that are sick, the middle class and wealthy still make up for part of that percentage.

I'm assuming you don't work in the medical industry, am I correct?
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 01:59 AM   #131
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Wow, just wow...
Shall I pull out my cellphone as you play One?

Quote:
consumer-directed medicine is a HORRIBLE idea.
So by inference, government-directed medicine is a GREAT idea? Are you against Capitalism in general, or just in the realm of health care? Really, where in our current health care system have free markets really been tried? The best example is Radial Keratometry and it supports my thesis. No insurance pays for it, so it's all out of pocket. And guess what, not only has it gotten much better over the years (lasers replacing scalpels for instance) but the costs continue to drop. Want another one? Watch how the price of the antihistamine Zyrtec plummets when it goes off prescription next year and becomes available OTC. No longer paid for by insurance. We've seen great advances across the board in medicine, but at a cheaper price? Of coarse not or we wouldn't be discussing our "crisis."

Quote:
Look around you, we aren't a healthy society.
Last time I checked our life expectancy was lengthening, not shortening, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
Quote:
I'm assuming you don't work in the medical industry, am I correct? [/B]
No
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 06:26 AM   #132
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500
And crisis? I don't think there are any faults in our health care system that a little more "free-market" wouldn't correct.
Quote:
Originally posted by yolland
47 million uninsured and medical bills as the most common cause of personal bankruptcy isn't a "trade-off," it's a crisis. I don't understand how anyone can in conscience rationalize it otherwise.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 10:38 AM   #133
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,655
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500


Shall I pull out my cellphone as you play One?
I'm sure somewhere that's funny.

Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500

Are you against Capitalism in general,
Wow, what a leap of logic. When capitalism gets in the way of people's health, that's where I draw the line. When pharma companies are driving up insurance costs because they spend millions of dollars on stuffed animals and trinkets to market their erection pill, that's where I have a problem.


Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500

Really, where in our current health care system have free markets really been tried? The best example is Radial Keratometry and it supports my thesis. No insurance pays for it, so it's all out of pocket. And guess what, not only has it gotten much better over the years (lasers replacing scalpels for instance) but the costs continue to drop. Want another one? Watch how the price of the antihistamine Zyrtec plummets when it goes off prescription next year and becomes available OTC. No longer paid for by insurance. We've seen great advances across the board in medicine, but at a cheaper price? Of coarse not or we wouldn't be discussing our "crisis."
I love how you still think 47 million not insured is still not a "crisis".

So you're giving me an example of an elective surgery? Of course insurance doesn't pay for it and prices drop.

Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500

Last time I checked our life expectancy was lengthening, not shortening, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
Well if that's your only indicator then by all means have at it. You can turn your eye on everything else as long as we're still living the same length of time. Ignore the sky rocketing of Diabetes, obesity, etc... who cares, it's ususally the poor folks anyways.


Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500

No
So you do work in the medical field? What do you do?
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 10:45 AM   #134
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,272
Local Time: 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500


Got mine in an hour or less at the optometrist in the mall.

But, I'm not Canadian.
Hilarious.

Because you know, we here don't have optometrists at the mall.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 12-05-2007, 10:46 PM   #135
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by INDY500
Now, under John Edwards, Hillary, Barack, choosing not to buy health insurance will no longer be an option. That's how they keep costs down, by enlarging the pool of those paying into the system while rarely using it. Chiefly the young. (Something to keep in mind "Rock The Vote" voters.) But is that the best way to go, keep building on our current employer based bureaucratic mishmash of fragmented payers -- high in overhead, built around the tax code and already overburdened by government mandates?
If COBRA costs are any indication, I don't know too many people who have an extra $300+ a month lying around. And that's just for individual health insurance costs.

Of course, our fabled Senators would not understand this, considering that they all make six or more figures a year--and, on top of it, have legislated to themselves the free high quality health care that they want everyone else to pay for.

Quote:
And crisis? I don't think there are any faults in our health care system that a little more "free-market" wouldn't correct. Will there always be a role for government, yes. But I'd support any candidate that would scrap our current system and return to consumer-directed health care. Lower costs through competition -- return to "health insurance" being just that, high deductible insurance against remote and financially catastrophic illness or accident, not low deductible "prepaying" for all health expenses.
Just listen to any debate, health insurance and health care have become interchangeable. That's one of the problems.
The only true "free market" solution would be to ban health insurance altogether, as health insurance, naturally, artificially inflate the demand curve. That, in turn, should effectively decimate our health care industry as we know it, since nobody can afford anything at all related to health care without insurance (unless you're U.S. Senators raking in five to six figure sums for speaking engagement fees, of course, then it's just pocket change).

Of course, if you're going to substantially reduce the medical industry's income one way or another, you might as well go the path of least resistance and start regulating health care costs like the rest of the industrialized world.
__________________

__________________
melon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com