The F$$d P$lice are C$ming - Page 42 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-27-2011, 09:25 PM   #616
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,656
Local Time: 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse

So, now a study confirms that sodas are the reason for the increase in
teen violence?

Being raised in a two parent family where values are taught to
children and rules/limits set have nothing to with it.

It's those evil sodas!!!
Reading is fun. Read the study again it never states soda is the reason.
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 10-27-2011, 09:35 PM   #617
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,251
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemen View Post
Bingo?



Well someone is clearly a teacher... Pfan is not one of your students, though. Since you're the interested one here, why don't you do the research and share with the rest of the class?

As to the article, you've totally misrepresenting the study. The study does not claim that soda consumption is THE reason for violent behavior, or even one of the main reasons for violent behavior. And the study doesn't even comment whatsoever on the "increase in teen violence" or broken families, so I'm not really sure from where you're drawing your conclusions about it. It's merely showing a correlation between violent behavior and soda consumption - nothing more, nothing less.



I think that the family is a huge factor in a teenagers life.

I guess we can go back and forth on this with opinions and stats.


Have you ever read The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton?
__________________

__________________
the iron horse is offline  
Old 10-27-2011, 09:51 PM   #618
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,656
Local Time: 08:31 AM
Well this is a tangent, but since this is your thread...

I actually agree, family does play a huge role. But I don't have as a narrow of view as you as to what constitutes family.

I have three friends that made the 40 under 40 list in Texas last month. All grew up poor; one raised by his grandmother, one by his two moms, and one by her single dad. The only thing they had in common besides being poor was that they had loving families.
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 10-27-2011, 10:46 PM   #619
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
Your opinion.


statistics are my opinion? i suppose that's the only recourse you have.

good luck.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 10-27-2011, 10:47 PM   #620
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
I guess we can go back and forth on this with opinions and stats.

but you have only one of the two.

your opinions are as good as someone else's information?

i blame sugary soda for such crappy thinking.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 10-27-2011, 10:52 PM   #621
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
I'd go with:
1) tougher sentencing laws and more efficient policing techniques which led to...
2) record numbers of criminals behind bars (where it's harder to commit crimes)
3) And an aging population


but kids are usually first time offenders, it's not like we're dealing with recidivism.

agree, though, on better policing techniques.

i'd also say that it has a lot to do with technology -- Iron Horse might be upset about kids playing video games, but it keeps them off the streets and from committing crimes out of boredom. also, cell phones makes dealing drugs much easier, and without all the related turf wars. you call your dealer, he makes a delivery, and done. much cleaner.

but i think that our movement away from forcing women to have babies no one wants has absolutely created a better society.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 10-29-2011, 03:56 AM   #622
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
I think that the family is a huge factor in a teenagers life.

I guess we can go back and forth on this with opinions and stats.


Have you ever read The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton?
Are you going to recommend we go watch American Graffiti after that, Ponyboy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
I'd go with:
1) tougher sentencing laws and more efficient policing techniques which led to...
2) record numbers of criminals behind bars (where it's harder to commit crimes)
3) And an aging population
They're behind bars for a couple of months serving out boring misdemeanours related to small amounts of drug possession...who fucking cares
__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 11:58 PM   #623
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,251
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadiens1131 View Post
Are you going to recommend we go watch American Graffiti after that, Ponyboy?


They're behind bars for a couple of months serving out boring misdemeanours related to small amounts of drug possession...who fucking cares



I guess you don't.
__________________
the iron horse is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 05:31 PM   #624
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 09:31 AM
i don't think people should be put behind bars for possession of small amounts of marijuana.

as a smoker, i'm sure you'd agree. marijuana is far less harmful than nicotine.

vote libertarian.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:26 PM   #625
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,251
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
i don't think people should be put behind bars for possession of small amounts of marijuana.

as a smoker, i'm sure you'd agree. marijuana is far less harmful than nicotine.

vote libertarian.

I agree with your first statement. I also vote Libertarian.

"as a smoker, i'm sure you'd agree. marijuana is far less harmful than nicotine."

I'm not sure about that one. I've heard it often, but I haven't read enough for an opinion either way.

Will get back asap.
__________________
the iron horse is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 10:27 PM   #626
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,863
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Plus I can use a vaporizer to inhale marijuana and not deal with most of the harmful smoke.
__________________
PhilsFan is online now  
Old 10-31-2011, 10:35 PM   #627
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
Plus I can use a vaporizer to inhale marijuana and not deal with most of the harmful smoke.
I would love to score some medical marijuana stamps.

They would make going to see really terrible movies with my friends much, much more enjoyable.

Can you imagine a DEATH RACE / REAL STEEL double-feature with medical marijuana stamps? No, you can't, because it would be incredible.
__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 10:37 PM   #628
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
Plus I can use a vaporizer to inhale marijuana and not deal with most of the harmful smoke.


THC is not addictive like nicotine, either.

no physical dependence, unlike nictoine, which is all a cigarette is -- a nicotine delivery system intended to get you addicted so you give cigarette corporations your money.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 10-31-2011, 10:56 PM   #629
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,863
Local Time: 09:31 AM
I don't even like marijuana (it just makes me go to sleep). But it's clearly the best drug health wise and does by far the least damage.
__________________
PhilsFan is online now  
Old 11-16-2011, 11:34 AM   #630
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 10:31 AM
Is this a victory for the freedom of choice for schools to serve shitty food to lazy, fat kids, or is this a victory for corporate money from the purveyors of frozen fish-like sticks?

When it comes to what you serve kids in schools, I have to quote the old computer programmer's mantra:
PHP Code:
Garbage ingarbage out
Quote:
Congress Pushes Back On Healthier School Lunches
by The Associated Press
WASHINGTON November 15, 2011, 02:52 pm ET


WASHINGTON (AP) — Who needs leafy greens and carrots when pizza and french fries will do?

In an effort many 9-year-olds will cheer, Congress wants pizza and french fries to stay on school lunch lines and is fighting the Obama administration's efforts to take unhealthy foods out of schools.

The final version of a spending bill released late Monday would unravel school lunch standards the Agriculture Department proposed earlier this year. These include limiting the use of potatoes on the lunch line, putting new restrictions on sodium and boosting the use of whole grains. The legislation would block or delay all of those efforts.

The bill also would allow tomato paste on pizzas to be counted as a vegetable, as it is now. USDA had wanted to only count a half-cup of tomato paste or more as a vegetable, and a serving of pizza has less than that.

Nutritionists say the whole effort is reminiscent of the Reagan administration's much-ridiculed attempt 30 years ago to classify ketchup as a vegetable to cut costs. This time around, food companies that produce frozen pizzas for schools, the salt industry and potato growers requested the changes and lobbied Congress.

School meals that are subsidized by the federal government must include a certain amount of vegetables, and USDA's proposal could have pushed pizza-makers and potato growers out of the school lunch business.

Piling on to the companies' opposition, some conservatives argue that the federal government shouldn't tell children what to eat. In a summary of the bill, Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee said the changes would "prevent overly burdensome and costly regulations and ...provide greater flexibility for local school districts to improve the nutritional quality of meals."

School districts have said some of the USDA proposals go too far and cost too much when budgets are extremely tight. Schools have long taken broad instructions from the government on what they can serve in the federally subsidized meals that are given free or at reduced price to low-income children. But some schools have balked at government attempts to tell them exactly what foods they can't serve.

Reacting to that criticism, House Republicans had urged USDA to rewrite the standards in a bill passed in June. The Senate last month voted to block the potato limits in its version, with opposition to the restrictions led by potato-growing states. Neither version of the bill included the latest provisions on tomato paste, sodium or whole grains; House and Senate negotiators added those in the last two weeks as they put finishing touches on the legislation.

The school lunch proposal is based on 2009 recommendations by the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said they are necessary to reduce childhood obesity and future health care costs.

USDA spokeswoman Courtney Rowe said Tuesday that the department will continue its efforts to make lunches healthier.

"While it's unfortunate that some members of Congress continue to put special interests ahead of the health of America's children, USDA remains committed to practical, science-based standards for school meals," she said in a statement.

Nutrition advocate Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest said Congress's proposed changes will keep schools from serving a wider array of vegetables. Children already get enough pizza and potatoes, she says. It also would slow efforts to make pizzas — a longtime standby on school lunch lines — healthier, with whole grain crusts and lower sodium levels.

"They are making sure that two of the biggest problems in the school lunch program, pizza and french fries, are untouched," she said.

A group of retired generals advocating for healthier school lunches also criticized the spending bill. The group, called Mission: Readiness, has called poor nutrition in school lunches a national security issue because obesity is the leading medical disqualifier for military service.

"We are outraged that Congress is seriously considering language that would effectively categorize pizza as a vegetable in the school lunch program," Amy Dawson Taggart, the director of the group, said in a letter to lawmakers before the final bill was released. "It doesn't take an advanced degree in nutrition to call this a national disgrace."

Specifically, the bill would:

— Block the Agriculture Department from limiting starchy vegetables, including corn and peas, to two servings a week. The rule was intended to cut down on french fries, which many schools serve daily.

— Allow USDA to count two tablespoons of tomato paste as a vegetable, as it does now. The department had attempted to require that only a half-cup of tomato paste could be considered a vegetable. Federally subsidized lunches must have a certain number of vegetables to be served.

— Require further study on long-term sodium reduction requirements set forth by the USDA guidelines.

— Require USDA to define "whole grains" before they regulate them. The USDA rules require schools to use more whole grains.

Food companies who have fought the USDA standards say they were too strict and neglected the nutrients that potatoes, other starchy vegetables and tomato paste do offer.

"This agreement ensures that nutrient-rich vegetables such as potatoes, corn and peas will remain part of a balanced, healthy diet in federally funded school meals and recognizes the significant amounts of potassium, fiber and vitamins A and C provided by tomato paste, ensuring that students may continue to enjoy healthy meals such as pizza and pasta," said Kraig Naasz, president of the American Frozen Food Institute.

The school lunch provisions are part of a final House-Senate compromise on a $182 billion measure that would fund the day-to-day operations of the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Transportation and Housing and Urban Development. Both the House and the Senate are expected to vote on the bill this week and send it to President Barack Obama.
__________________

__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com