Survey Finds Growing Divide Between Muslims, Westerners

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

yolland

Forum Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
7,471
If you want to read the whole report, it's available at the Pew Global Attitudes Project site.
This is just bits and pieces from various news articles about it:
June 22 — Non-Muslim Westerners and Muslims around the world have widely different views of world events, and each group tends to view the other as violent, intolerant and lacking in respect for women, a new international survey of more than 14,000 people in 13 nations indicates. In what the survey, part of the Pew Global Attitudes Project for 2006, called one of its most striking findings, majorities in Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan and Turkey—Muslim countries with fairly strong ties to the US—said, for example, that they did not believe that Arabs had carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the US.

"Many in the West see Muslims as fanatical, violent and...lacking tolerance," according to an analysis of the survey by the Washington-based Pew Global Attitudes Project. "Muslims in the Middle East and Asia generally see Westerners as selfish, immoral and greedy, as well as violent and fanatical." But the survey also found that was less true among European Muslims. "In many ways, the views of Europe's Muslims represent a middle ground between the way Western publics and Muslims in the Middle East and Asia view each other," it said.

Overall, Muslims in the survey--including the large Islamic populations in Britain, France, Germany and Spain--broadly blamed the West for the bad relations, while Westerners tended to blame Muslims. The survey found that negative views of Muslims had become especially pronounced in Germany and Spain, where only 36% and 29% of respondents, respectively, expressed favorable opinions of Muslims. Both marked major declines from the last Pew poll one year ago. By contrast, nearly two-thirds of French and British citizens said they had favorable views of Muslims. 56% of Russians agreed with that opinion, as did 54% of US respondents. Interestingly, British and French respondents were the most upbeat as well about the prospects for democracy in Muslim countries: 6 in 10 respondents in France and Britain said democracy could work well there, while only 49% of US citizens and an average of 4 in 10 Spanish and Germans agreed.

More than 60% of Indonesians and Jordanians said they had favorable views of Christians, followed by 48% of Egyptians. But only about one-quarter of Pakistanis described their views as favorable, while only about 1 in 7 Turks agreed, a possible reflection of growing anti-European and anti-US opinion resulting from negotiations over Turkey's admission to the European Union and popular anger there against the US invasion of Iraq. The religious divide was found to be surprisingly sharp in Nigeria, where, for example, nearly 3 out of 4 Muslims and Christians each ascribed negative traits to the other groups. Nigerian Muslims also constituted a "conspicuous exception" to the trend toward declining confidence in bin Laden in the Muslim world. In addition, nearly half of Nigeria's Muslims said suicide bombings could be justified often or sometimes in the defense of Islam.

By contrast, Muslims living in Europe were much more positive about Christians, one of a number of indications in the survey that European Muslims are not only considerably less alienated from the societies in which they reside than many recent analyses have suggested, but also that they could act as a moderating force in the Muslim-Western divide. 9 out of 10 French Muslims said they had positive views of Christians, followed by 8 out of 10 Spanish Muslims (in spite of the strongly anti-Muslim views of most Spanish). Roughly 7 out of 10 English and German Muslims also said their views of Christians were favorable.

Of all Muslim populations surveyed, French Muslims were by far the most positive toward Jews--71% said they had favorable opinions, roughly twice the percentage of Muslims in Britain, Germany and Spain. Elsewhere in the Muslim world, views of Jews were far more negative: in Indonesia, only 17% of respondents said they had favorable opinions; in Turkey, 15%; in Pakistan 6%; and in the two Arab countries surveyed, Egypt and Jordan, only 2% and 1%, respectively.

In follow-up interviews in countries surveyed about the results, Muslims attributed poor relations with the West to a variety of causes. But many pointed to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians as the main cause and accused the West of double standards on terrorism. Majorities in the Muslim world, Pew said, also expressed the opinion that the victory of the militant group Hamas in Palestinian elections in January would "be helpful to a fair settlement between Israel and the Palestinians"—a view that was roundly rejected by non-Muslim publics.

As to relations between Muslims and Westerners, majorities in 10 out of 12 countries described them as "generally bad". In Europe, the most negative views were found in Germany (70% said "generally bad") and France (66%). 55% of US respondents described it the same way. Turkey was the most negative of the predominantly Muslim nations, with nearly two-thirds opting for "generally bad"--though 77% of Nigerian Muslims made the same assessment--followed by Egypt (58%), Jordan (54%) and Indonesia (53%). Pakistan, where a slight plurality said that relations were "generally good", was the only exception.

The Pew analysis concluded that Muslims held "an aggrieved view of the West--they were much more likely than Americans or Western Europeans to blame Western policies for their own lack of prosperity. For their part, Western publics instead pointed to government corruption, lack of education, and Islamic fundamentalism as the biggest obstacles to Muslim prosperity." Similarly, Muslims, particularly in Asia and the Middle East, tended to blame the controversy this year over Danish cartoon depictions of Mohammed on Western disrespect for Islam. Majorities in the US and Europe, on the other hand, blamed the crisis on Muslim intolerance.

When asked to choose among a list of negative traits seen in the other group, Muslims in the Middle East and Asia--often by large majorities--generally viewed Westerners as selfish, arrogant and violent. European Muslims, however--particularly those in France and Spain--tended to be far less damning about the traits of non-Muslims than those in predominantly Muslim countries. At the same time, majorities of non-Muslims in most of Europe found Muslims to be fanatical and violent--although only minorities in Britain, the US and France subscribed to that view.

Pew found sharp divergences regarding respect for women: non-Muslims in the West view Muslims as lacking respect, the survey indicated, while Muslims outside Europe say the same of Westerners. In the West, where many see Islamic customs like mandatory veils for women and regulations barring them from working outside the home or driving as discriminatory, big majorities saw Muslims as not respectful of women. By contrast, fewer than half the Muslims asked in Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey said they associated Westerners with respect for women. European Muslims surveyed were more likely to view Westerners as respectful of women, in some places by wide margins.

The survey's findings suggested that French and Spanish Muslims were the least alienated from their surrounding societies, even if the general public in Spain was found to be the most hostile toward Muslims of any of the European societies covered by the poll. 4 in 10 non-Muslim Spaniards said they believed that most or many Muslims in their country supported Islamic extremism, but only 12% of Spanish Muslims agreed. Of the four minority publics surveyed, British Muslims were the most critical of their country, and "come closer to views of Muslims around the world in their opinions of Westerners".


The results were not uniform, and delivered some surprises. Support for terrorism declined in some of the Muslim countries surveyed, dropping sharply in Jordan, where terrorist bombings killed more than 50 people in Amman in November. Support for suicide bombing has also plummeted in Pakistan and Indonesia. In Pakistan now, 69% said the terrorist tactic was never justified, compared with 38% four years ago. Still, there was no obvious correlation between diminishing support for terrorism and more positive perceptions of the West.
 
I loved that the British had majority favourable opinions to Muslims (more than most of the continent) but but British Muslims had the lowest regard for Westerners.
 
I did just fine in Turkey with a U.S. passport. I think in some cases the Islamic people of a particular nation may dislike the United States government but have nothing against the American people.
 
Because it will Halifax, that's why. Look, surveys are interesting and all, but what about Muslims who ARE westerners (so to speak)? Like, oh say the population of Malaysia.
 
A_Wanderer said:
I loved that the British had majority favourable opinions to Muslims (more than most of the continent) but but British Muslims had the lowest regard for Westerners.

Kinda like the Spanish Muslims had the strong favorable opinions about Westerners while the Spanish Europeans had the worst opinions of Muslims.
 
Kieran McConville said:
Because it will Halifax, that's why. Look, surveys are interesting and all, but what about Muslims who ARE westerners (so to speak)? Like, oh say the population of Malaysia.

Well, there's this side: Full article link below


AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) - Europe's Muslims have remained largely silent in the face of terrorist attacks that have killed 254 people in Madrid, London and Amsterdam. Europeans want to know why.

Why have so few of them publicly condemned the train and bus bombings in Madrid and London? Why have so few spoken out against the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, killed because his work was considered an insult to Islam?

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20060624/D8IEM1MO0.html


Then there's this side, again full article link below. If you're not worried about calls for a renewed worldwide caliphate you can just erroneously and politically correctly dismiss this as just Islam bashing.

"Kill those who insult the Prophet Muhammad "

http://www.alghurabaa.co.uk/articles/cartoon.htm
 
Oh god, all this 'why won't they publicly condemn' stuff... honestly, who publicly condemns anything? When do Christians take to the streets in their thousands condemning something? I won't say never, but the nature of a modern and pretty atomised society is that collective action rarely if ever occurs.

Silence suggests consent in theory, so therefore, what? All muslim people everywhere are guilty for 911? Cause that's the subtext to these endless and not-so-subtle talking points, isn't it?

In our own lives, if our silence always indicated legally binding consent, we'd be fucked. I can't count the number of times I haven't protested stuff because I figured the vast majority was against me, and why bother, etc etc. Better to keep one's head down, before the whole shithouse blows, right guys?

As for 'politically correct', shove it.
 
ntalwar said:
What I found interesting is that some of those numbers are higher than some global attitudes towards the US.
The same Pew site mentioned above published this a couple of weeks ago:
http://pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=252


Check out these countries where favorable opinion of the United States has improved over the past 6 years!


Russia: from 37% in 2000 to 43% in 2006.

Pakistan: from 23% in 2000 to 27% in 2006.

Nigeria: from 46% in 2000 to 62% in 2006.

India: from 54% in 2002 to 56% in 2006.


Over the past year in China, favorable opinion of the United States has improved from 42% to 47%.


Most people in Great Britain, Nigeria, Japan, India and China have a favorable opinion of the United States. Just remember, these countries have a combined population equalivant to half the population of the entire planet. :wink:
 
Maoilbheannacht said:


Check out these countries where favorable opinion of the United States has improved over the past 6 years!


Russia: from 37% in 2000 to 43% in 2006.

Pakistan: from 23% in 2000 to 27% in 2006.

Nigeria: from 46% in 2000 to 62% in 2006.

India: from 54% in 2002 to 56% in 2006.


Over the past year in China, favorable opinion of the United States has improved from 42% to 47%.


Most people in Great Britain, Nigeria, Japan, India and China have a favorable opinion of the United States. Just remember, these countries have a combined population equalivant to half the population of the entire planet. :wink:




bright side of a train wreck ...





;)
 
Kieran McConville said:
Oh god, all this 'why won't they publicly condemn' stuff... honestly, who publicly condemns anything? When do Christians take to the streets in their thousands condemning something? I won't say never, but the nature of a modern and pretty atomised society is that collective action rarely if ever occurs.

Silence suggests consent in theory, so therefore, what? All muslim people everywhere are guilty for 911? Cause that's the subtext to these endless and not-so-subtle talking points, isn't it?

In our own lives, if our silence always indicated legally binding consent, we'd be fucked. I can't count the number of times I haven't protested stuff because I figured the vast majority was against me, and why bother, etc etc. Better to keep one's head down, before the whole shithouse blows, right guys?

As for 'politically correct', shove it.

While I do, for the most part, agree with your post here; I do believe (at least I hope) that if some Christians were slaughtering thousands of people in the "Name of Christ" - you would indeed see a public outrage within the Christian community.

Almost every Christian leader within all major denominations spoke out against those that bombed abortion clinics or murdered doctor's that performed abortions.
 
AEON said:
Almost every Christian leader within all major denominations spoke out against those that bombed abortion clinics or murdered doctor's that performed abortions.


do you think that one of the reasons you know about this public outcry against the killing of doctors is because you were a Christian?

and, likewise, if you were every bit as devout a Muslim as you are a Christian, do you think you would be able to rattle off however many names of various leaders in the Muslim community who have denounced, repeatedly, any sort of Islamist extremist terrorism?
 
Irvine511 said:



do you think that one of the reasons you know about this public outcry against the killing of doctors is because you were a Christian?

and, likewise, if you were every bit as devout a Muslim as you are a Christian, do you think you would be able to rattle off however many names of various leaders in the Muslim community who have denounced, repeatedly, any sort of Islamist extremist terrorism?

Good questions!

I will try and answer. A the time of the abortion clinic bombings, I was not actively involved in the christian community - I heard the outcry through the news media.

As far as the other question - perhaps I would, but I'm not certain. If the leaders of the Muslim community truly are speaking out repeatedly about the violence, and the media is not covering this - then it is obvious that CNN, Fox, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, AP, Reuters...etc are all guilty of doing a poor job.
 
toscano said:


Well, there's this side: Full article link below


AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) - Europe's Muslims have remained largely silent in the face of terrorist attacks that have killed 254 people in Madrid, London and Amsterdam. Europeans want to know why.

Why have so few of them publicly condemned the train and bus bombings in Madrid and London? Why have so few spoken out against the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, killed because his work was considered an insult to Islam?

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20060624/D8IEM1MO0.html"
----------------------------------------------

Well, many would argue that there's been plenty of condemnation by Muslim leaders from thoughout the world...but is anyone listening?

Part of the "problem" may be that Islam really doesn't have that one religious head, like the Pope, that people can run to and get him to speak/condemn on behalf of 1.1 billion people. So you do get varying voices, from hundreds of Imams to nutty fundamentalist religious leaders, to Muslim-country political leaders, etc. How genuine are their words? Who knows. Try to sift through all these groups' and individuals' political motivations, as the western media or commentators have to do, and you'll get a pretty fragmented view.

But I don't think anyone can blanketly say that the Muslim world does not denounce terrorism, or violent Muslim fundamentalist ideology.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150098,00.html

"The attack, which wounded more than 1,500 people, shocked Spain into rethinking the way it deals with Islamic extremism and prompted Muslims in Spain to issue a fatwa, or Islamic edict, declaring usama bin Laden an apostate unworthy of his faith."

http://www.pluralism.org/news/intl/index.php?xref=Madrid+Train+Bombings&sort=DESC#headline6345

Muslims Worldwide Condemn Madrid Attacks (Spain, International)
• On March 13, 2004 IslamOnline.net reported, "World Muslims condemned the Madrid blasts, sending it clear that killing civilians is forbidden in their religion regardless of where or who carry out the attacks. After the blasts, which left 200 people dead and 1,400 others injured, a crowded group of Muslims gathered outside the Islamic Cultural Center in the Spanish capital to raise their voice strongly against terrorism. 'These blasts were not only against the Islamic religion but also the entire humanity,' Director of the Islamic Cultural Centre in Madrid Saleh bin Mohammed Al Sinaidi told reporters Friday, March 12. 'We deeply regret that such incidents rocked our city where Muslims live as well,' Al Sinaidi said, through an interpreter."

MPAC Condemns Terrorist Attacks in Madrid (Spain, United States)

• On March 11, 2004 the Muslim Public Affairs Council issued a press release condemning the bombings in Madrid. The relesase read, "The carnage in Spain represents one of the most heinous crimes committed against the people of Spain and the civilized world as a whole. As we express the strongest condemnations of such an act, and of the criminals who committed it, we pray to God to comfort the families and to guide the authorities in Spain to bring the criminals to justice. We call on all decent human beings not to lose heart and to stay determined to work together across barriers of race, faith and nationality, to rid the world of the scourge of terrorism. We offer condolences to the families of the victims, and to the people and government of Spain."
(March 11, 2004, Muslim Public Affairs Council)

Spanish Islamic Body Issues Fatwa Against bin Laden (Spain)
Cross-references: Islam in European Society

• On March 11, 2005 Reuters reported, "Spain's leading Islamic body has issued a religious order declaring Osama bin Laden to have forsaken Islam by backing attacks such as the Madrid train bombings a year ago. The Islamic Commission of Spain timed its 'fatwa' for Friday to coincide with the first anniversary of the attacks, which killed 191 people and were claimed in the name of al Qaeda in Europe. The commission's secretary-general, Mansur Escudero, said the fatwa had moral, rather than legal weight, and hoped it would spur similar pronouncements from Muslim groups worldwide. 'We declare ... that Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda organisation, responsible for the horrendous crimes against innocent people who were despicably murdered in the March 11 terrorist attack in Madrid, are outside the parameters of Islam,' the commission said."
(March 11, 2005, Reuters)

http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20375

http://cair-net.org/default.asp?Page=articleView&id=37170&theType=NB

Muslim Leaders Condemning Terror to Deaf?

Why don't we hear Muslim leaders condemning terrorism? In the wake of the London bombings, I called Parvez Ahmed, a Jacksonville resident who three months ago became chairman of perhaps the best-known Muslim organization in America, and asked him that.

In the past week, Muslim groups have been condemning the attacks via e-mail blasts to the media, through news conferences, during a personal meeting with the British ambassador, in prayer services all over the country and, coming soon to television stations, with a public service announcement. This hardly is new. After Sept. 11, Muslim leaders issued statements, prayed for the victims, encouraged relief efforts and, in some cities, took out a full-page newspaper ad signed by 40 groups that said: "We condemn in the strongest terms possible the use of terror to further any political or religious cause." Nearly 700,000 Muslims have signed a "Not in the Name of Islam" petition on CAIR's Web site that begins: "We, the undersigned Muslims, wish to state clearly that those who commit acts of terror, murder and cruelty in the name of Islam are not only destroying innocent lives, but are also betraying the values of the faith they claim to represent."

Yet when Ahmed speaks in public, the most common question is: Why don't Muslims denounce terrorism?


http://www.archives2004.ghazali.net/html/muslim_leaders_denounce.html

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDI4MDYxYmRjODNkOTE4NDE1NjZlMGNkZGUwMzMwMTg=

http://www.islamfortoday.com/60minutes.htm
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom