Dreadsox said:
Nope, I think that there are many conservatives who sought and engaged in rational debate. I think you get tired of being accused of being something you are not based on an internet conversation. I think back in the day, there were some decent discussions between conservatives and liberals on this board.
I also think the political climate changed, and the tenor of the dialogue did to.
For the most part I agree with you, including the effects of political climate (those are very obvious, I think, if you skim through the archives chronologically--it's maybe more a question of an everpresent tension lurking there that didn't before, rather than increased 'bias' per se). What bothers me most is the increase in letting slip snide or condescending digs, mocking, belittling etc.--whether towards individuals or "anonymous" collectives--that don't contribute anything to "debate" at all and over time, add up to creating the impression that certain people apparently have a 'Kick Me' sign stuck on them. It's not that "liberals" have a monopoly on that--I've certainly seen "conservative" posters get condescending and mocking, too--but in the big picture, the statistical discrepancies do add up to a cumulative effect, and I wish people would try to stay sensitive to that, even when others are trying your patience at the moment. I think Lies had the right idea--sure no one can
make you like everyone, and really the thought's no skin off my nose if you resolve I'm full of myself and probably a jerk in real life too, but given the low broader-impact stakes this place realistically has, it makes sense to approach it
as if people in here were your friends, relatives, coworkers or whatever, and extend them the kind of willingness in principle to assume they're fundamentally a good sort as you would in real life. Otherwise, our political debates are going to get just plain old boring after awhile; you need some tension to draw out the really interesting stuff, but you also need some sensitivity to the psychological risks engaging that tension can pose, especially for 'minority' viewpoints, and mind how you "package" your replies accordingly. If someone can't handle an intellectual challenge well that's their problem, if they're gonna hold it against someone forever for blowing up on them once or twice then that's their problem too...but it's not a sign of being 'thin-skinned' to not want to be regularly taunted and feel like apparently no one else reading cared.
My accent is more CT than Bawston.
Hmm, I've always 'pictured' you with a Bawston accent too, and unlike Irvine, saying 'CT accent' calls nothing to mind for me.
I know Brooklyn, Joisey, Bawston and Maine, but that's about it. Then again, I've had encounters with other Southerners where we both did a double take upon hearing each other's accents and were like, "Whoa, where are
you from?" Funny how that works...