Strategic points - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-23-2003, 08:57 PM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 7,574
Local Time: 02:19 AM
Strategic points

I've been reading a bit about the specific military strategies the coalition is using. I'll try to dig up references as I have time.

It seems like the coalition's basic strategy was to go for the jugular immediately. Bomb all the major military targets in Baghdad, then send in the ground troops on what is essentially an all-out sprint to the city. The troops have not spent a whole lot of time or effort on securing and occupying the cities on the road to Baghdad (Umm Qasr, Basra).

There are reports that the Iraqi 51th infantry division, rumored to have surrendered, is actually putting up strong resistance in Basra.

It is very possible that this strategy could backfire. As the troops are marching toward Baghdad, Iraqi troops or guerrilla bands could cut off the coalition supply chain or hit them from behind.

It seems like it would be prudent for the coalition to slow down a bit and take care of business before proceeding further. This means occupying Umm Qasr, Basra and other cities, rounding up Iraqi POWs (for real), and most importantly, making sure humanitarian aid reaches the occupied regions.
__________________

__________________
speedracer is offline  
Old 03-23-2003, 09:04 PM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 11:19 PM
yes,

better to go slow

and keep our casualties as low as possible and Iraqis deaths, too.


Much better to take five or six weeks instead of 5-6 days.

In America we are impatient.
__________________

__________________
deep is offline  
Old 03-23-2003, 11:49 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 7,574
Local Time: 02:19 AM
Here's a good article from the Washington Post (which imho is kicking everyone else's butt as far as coverage of the war goes) that explains in more detail some of the points above.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Mar23.html
__________________
speedracer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com