MadelynIris
Refugee
BVS,
How would including other types of relationships be appeasing the bigots?
Found this quote from someone on a website that I would definitely not consider a bigot, who supports this line of thinking:
Would you say this person is a bigot?
How would including other types of relationships be appeasing the bigots?
Found this quote from someone on a website that I would definitely not consider a bigot, who supports this line of thinking:
However, instead of pushing for plural civil unions, I favor an approach of pushing for legalization of any kind of family group that considers itself a family - regardless whether the number of adults and children in the unit, marital status, sexual orientation or blood
kinship of the individuals. This skirts the issue of whether the people in the family unit are sexually involved with each other or not. Three borthers raising a kid is a family. Three lesbians raising the adopted child of one of them is a family. Two gay males is a family if they say they are. A bi-man, his female lover and his male lover are a family if they say they are. Five men and three women are a family if they say they are - regardless of whether they all have sex with each other, all are totally platonic with each other or some combination thereof. Give any such unit that sincerely files an application the same official status, legal protections, insurance rights, and tax benefits of a regular marriage - regardless of whose having sex with who.
Would you say this person is a bigot?