Should this Judge be fired? impeached, elevated to the Supremes - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2005, 02:49 PM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
deep's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,507
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Normal Should this Judge be fired? impeached, elevated to the Supremes

or just overruled on appeal?

Judge OKs discarded embryo lawsuit

Couple suing over wrongful death

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- A couple whose frozen embryo was accidentally destroyed at a fertility clinic has the right in Illinois to file a wrongful-death lawsuit, a judge has ruled in a case that some legal experts say could have implications in the debate over embryonic stem cell research.

In an opinion issued Friday, Cook County Judge Jeffrey Lawrence said "a pre-embryo is a 'human being' ... whether or not it is implanted in its mother's womb."

He said the couple is as entitled to seek compensation as any parents whose child has been killed.

The suit was filed by Alison Miller and Todd Parrish, who stored nine embryos in January 2000 at the Center for Human Reproduction in Chicago. Their doctor said one embryo looked particularly promising, but the Chicago couple were told six months later the embryos had been accidentally discarded.

In his ruling, Lawrence relied on the state's Wrongful Death Act, which allows lawsuits to be filed if unborn fetuses are killed in an accident or assault. "The state of gestation or development of a human being" does not preclude taking legal action, the act says.

Lawrence also cited an Illinois state law that says an "unborn child is a human being from the time of conception and is, therefore, a legal person."

"There is no doubt in the mind of the Illinois Legislature when life begins," Lawrence wrote.

Another judge had thrown out the couple's wrongful-death claims, but Lawrence reversed that decision, partly because that judge did not explain his decision at the time.

An attorney for the fertility clinic said an appeal would likely be filed.

The decision could curb reproductive research, said Colleen Connell, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Chicago.

Connell expects the ruling will be overturned on appeal.

"It may be groundbreaking, but it's the wrong decision," Connell said. "No appellate court has ever declared a fertilized egg a human being in a wrongful-death suit."

Stem cells can potentially grow into any type of human tissue. Many scientists believe they could someday be used to repair spinal cord injuries and treat some diseases. Anti-abortion groups oppose such research because it involves destroying embryos, and the Bush administration has severely restricted federal stem cell funding.

Abortion opponents praised Lawrence's ruling. "Life begins at fertilization, not implantation," Pro-Life Action League director Joe Scheidler said.

While the ruling likely is too narrow to affect abortion law, it increases legal risks for fertility clinics, said John Mayoue, a family attorney in Atlanta and specialist on in-vitro law.

Mayoue said court rulings on the treatment of embryos have been contradictory.

"We are considering embryos to be property for certain purposes and life for others, and that's the incongruity," he said.

deep is offline  
Old 02-05-2005, 04:03 PM   #2
love, blood, life
indra's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,689
Local Time: 04:39 AM
Maybe whoever is willing to keep an embryo on ice for years should be charged with child abuse. I think people are becoming increasingly nutty. I hope his ruling is's not wrongful death.

indra is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 04:25 AM   #3
The Fly
Sheltie's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: somewhere in time
Posts: 237
Local Time: 08:39 AM
Lawyers and some people will do anything for a buck.
Sheltie is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 07:45 AM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
nbcrusader's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 12:39 AM

What is your analysis between the article and your thread title?

Perhaps some insight from people going through fertility issues may give some balance to the presentation thus far.
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 08:52 AM   #5
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Great Beyond//
Posts: 8,637
Local Time: 08:39 AM
Originally posted by Sheltie
Lawyers and some people will do anything for a buck.
Mullen4Prez is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 01:12 PM   #6
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 442
Local Time: 08:39 AM
This isn't the only court case I can think of where members of the judiciary get to decide what is or isn't a human being.

I'd let science decide. You really only need a 4th or 5th grade knowledge of science.

drhark is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©