Should homosexual couples be able to adopt kids?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
just opinions and nice talking here please.

Remember how FYM doesn't need personal attacks in it? Let's stay with the issue, not call people names on behalf of ourselves or anyone else.
 
My best friend was gay, and he would have made a great father if he wanted to have kids in the future, and if he was still alive. God, I miss him...

I would rather see a child happy, physically and emotionally healthy with 2 men or 2 women who are great parents, than for some poor kid who ends up with a so-called "mom and pop family" who end up screwing up the child's life.
 
Guess I'll just repeat the majority opinion here. But I honestly dont know if ALL homosexual couples should be able to adopt. If they meet the requirements all couples must meet, good, and yes, let them adopt. Lets stop discriminating on gender and sexual preference. Lets also stop generalising that a heterosexual relationship is the best foundation for a happy healthy home environment. We all know it isn't always the case. Someone did raise a good point, apologies for forgetting who that was, that ideally children do require a role model of each gender. I dont think that should be grounds for denying a homosexual couple the right to raise a child of their own. Any potential parent who is aware and intelligent will realise this is rather necessary and hopefully will endevour to introduce such role models in their child's life. Like single parents who may seek to find a good substitute for the missing parent figure, be it in a brother, cousin, aunt, neighbour whatever.

The unfortunate truth for many homosexual couples is they face first of all the hurdle of mother nature and unless they can find a willing 'helper' they really dont have a lot of choice with opportunities to parent a child. I dont like that our society feels we can decide for another whether they can become parents. Parenting is a wonderful blessing and who are we really to deny that to someone as it may go against "our" ideals? What do we know about another couple, regardless of their gender and sexual preference, in regards to raising a family? Its a huge call to name someone as unfit....after all, in who's eyes?
 
First of all, I have many gay friends... I am not unwilling to associate with homosexuals and do not dismiss homosexual adoption because I think it is "disgusting".

Having said that, I do not think that homosexual couples should be able to adopt. This issue is above all dealing with a child's welfare, yet I think it is primarily looked at as a gay right's issue. Children need both a mom and a dad in order to directly experience a number of important relationships which support social devlopment such as husband/wife and mother/father. Not to mention children of homosexual couples are likely to be confused about their own sexual identity. The child's parental figures would be in direct conflict with the predominantly heterosexual world around them, and everyone should agree that a person is greatly influenced by the structure within a person's home. This would create great confusion and instability at the very least.

The natural family is a beautiful thing, but for the sake of being "politically correct" homosexual coupling is seemingly being encouraged in some schools. It happened recently where students were asked to wear ribbons to support homosexual adoption. You probably wouldn't find homosexuals eager to support the heterosexual arrangement, yet this support is being shown vice/versa and you have to wonder why ... the final thing I will say on the matter is that this fear of being "politically incorrect" has, in my opinion, caused too much tolerance in regard to the family institution. I have my own religious reasons aside from these as well, but I realize that they are not received by everyone therefore I see no reason to share them as it is late and I am tired.
 
Okay don't flame me, this is only my opinion, I'm not simple or closed minded.

I don't hate homosexuals, but I strongly disagree with their choice of lifestyle. I believe they make life very difficult for themselves, because society and the world can be very unforgiving and evil.

And to me, the idea of a homosexual couple raising a child will most probably influence the child and effect him/her in a way that he/she will grow to be a homosexual him/herself. I don't like this idea beause of the consequences and risks that homosexuals face throughout life (predjudice from society, aids, std's etc). And I don't stereotype homosexuals by believing that they all have promiscuous sex, there are just as many heterosexual people that are just as guilty of this too.

But in terms of having parents, I believe only a mother can offer true nurturing, care and love when a child is at a young age, and where a father can teach discipline and how to survive in the world. Like I'm not being sexist and talking specifically about private and public spheres where one gender cannot take on the role of another, I just believe that mothers are naturally better at their role and fathers are naturally better at theirs.

When you have two people of the same sex raising a young child, the child is missing out on one vital aspect of growing up from an infant into a teenager. Like I don't see a problem with a fully matured teenager living with a homosexual couple having come from a heterosexual background, but when the child is young and an infant I consider it WRONG and very IMMORAL for them to be raised in a homosexual environment because it most probably will have an effect on them where they will develop believing that homosexuality is normal and acceptable by everyone in society.

Yeah anyway I sound like a critical sociologist or something now, so yeah that was only my opinion, many of you will disagree with me. I don't prejudice or display hatred against homosexuals, I just disagree and don't approve their lifestyle. I think it's very sad.
Although I know Bono would greatly disagree with me. :yes:

*no offense to any homosexual people reading this*
 
Last edited:
Okay, I don't agree with the last two posts, here's why:

If people who find out they're gay come from homes with heterosexual parents, obviously their parents' sexual preference had no influence on them, so what makes people think that that will happen with the opposite-what makes people think that just because a child grows up with homosexual parents that they are more likely to become gay (especially when there has been evidence that you are born with your sexual preference and that it isn't something you just become one day)?

I think a child can grow up in a homosexual household and still have a firm grasp on their sexual preferences, just as a child can grow up in a heterosexual household and have a firm grasp on their sexual preferences. It can happen.

And as for the last post, what's so wrong or immoral about a child learning from the time they are a baby that homosexuality is perfectly normal and acceptable?

I don't see why people disagree with homosexuals' lifestyle. I've always considered homosexuality to be completely normal and moral in my book.

Angela
 
pr0digy said:

I don't hate homosexuals, but I strongly disagree with their choice of lifestyle. I believe they make life very difficult for themselves, because society and the world can be very unforgiving and evil.

And to me, the idea of a homosexual couple raising a child will most probably influence the child and effect him/her in a way that he/she will grow to be a homosexual him/herself.

the child is young and an infant I consider it WRONG and very IMMORAL for them to be raised in a homosexual environment because it most probably will have an effect on them where they will develop believing that homosexuality is normal and acceptable by everyone in society.


First paragraph: Society and the world making it difficult is people like YOU. So there goes that argument.

Second paragraph: Is there any credible research supporting your position? Or do you just wish that were true?

Third paragraph: Why is this a problem for you? Why is raising a child to be understanding and tolerant such a threat to you?
 
Moonlit_Angel said:

If people who find out they're gay come from homes with heterosexual parents, obviously their parents' sexual preference had no influence on them, so what makes people think that that will happen with the opposite-what makes people think that just because a child grows up with homosexual parents that they are more likely to become gay......
I agree with this point and think it is a good one.
I think a child can grow up in a homosexual household and still have a firm grasp on their sexual preferences
Isn't that is what cable is for anyway. kidding kidding


I am sure you can tell by now judging by my responses that my opinion is yes.
 
martha said:


First paragraph: Society and the world making it difficult is people like YOU. So there goes that argument.

Second paragraph: Is there any credible research supporting your position? Or do you just wish that were true?

Third paragraph: Why is this a problem for you? Why is raising a child to be understanding and tolerant such a threat to you?

it's called an opinion, look it up
 
I don't have any studies to back up my statement here so I can only go on my own personal experience...being raised by a gay couple does not mean their kids will be gay.

I know 3 people who were raised by gay couples and all 3 are heterosexual, married and raising their own children. On the other hand, the majority of the 20 - 25 gay and lesbians friends and family members I know were raised by the traditional male/female parents.

I agree that a child needs a role model from both sexes and most of the gay couples I know who are raising kids make sure their kids have someone of the opposite sex to bond with.

I do agree that male/female is the ideal parenting situation but this is not an ideal world and there are too many kids sitting in foster care or being raised by people who shouldn't own a pet, let alone care for a child. If there are qualified people who just happen to be gay and want a child, why not give them a chance?
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:

But one thing that gay couples don't automatically provide that needs to be considered, and this also goes for these celebrities that are adopting as single mothers like Rosie, Ally McBeal, etc. is a close role model of each sex for the child.

Every child regardless if they're a boy or girl needs a CONSISTENT male and female role in their life.

If not men can grow up to not respect females in their life, or women could grow up to not trust or hate the males in their life etc.


(Not to personally attack you BonoVoxSupastar, but I think there are inconsistencies in what you said above.)


As far as a close rold model of each sex... Straight parents may have majorly flawed expressions of their sex. For instance, there are marriages where the father is overly aggressive and the mother insecure- isn't that an imbalance being taught?

Consistent male & female role in their life... but what if it's consistently wrong? (An absuive - but straight!- father or an alcoholic -but straight!- mother. :confused: ) Since we can't monitor this for straight parents what makes us think we can monitor it for gay parents? (although I do wish we COULD monitor it for some parents! Ugh!)

I know many men who do not respect females, and they were raised by straight parents. Likewise I know many females who don't trust men, and they too were raised by straight parents. Obviously having the "proper gender influences" on them didn't raise them ideally.

Parenting is an incredibly serious job, I wish more people treated it as such. If a gay couple is willing to take a child into their home and love him or her then I wish them peace and total enjoyment from their child.

Perhaps they'd even be better parents than say, some who accidentally get pregnant, because they have time to talk and think about what it seriously means to have a child and raise a child.

And I agree with what Gina said. :yes:
 
I don't care to go beyond what bonosloveslave has said on this topic.

Anyone wishing to condemn homosexuality on a moral basis (as a sin in God's eyes) must deal with all other forms of sinful behavior. We would never think to ban adoption by heterosexual couples where one or both adults engage in adulterous activity. God doesn't rank sin (possible exception for apostacy).
 
A very close friend of mine was raised by his Lesbian mother and her girlfriend. He grew up in all all female house with four sisters.
One might argue that this constant exposure to estrogen may have 'confused' him about his own sexual identity. It may have made him unable to forge male bonds, or heck, it may have actually made him gay.

...
Well, unfortunatly for those that would argue the above, he is completely, 100% normal and happy. He has good guy friends, good girlfriends. He is not confused about his sexual identity (as I believe sexual orientation isn't learned - it's born into you). He is able to forge friendships with both sexes.

Just because a child doesn't have a father doesn't mean that he will be unable to act like a 'man.' Similarly, just because a child doesn't have a mother does not mean that she will grow up 'butch.'

I do believe that children raised by same sex couples grow up with a better understanding of the world, and if anything, are more likely to be accepting of people and their differences.

This does not mean that ALL homosexuals will make good families. In the same way, it does not mean that ALL heterosexuals will make good families. It is a case by case basis, dependent solely upon the people involved. IT is poor logic to say that just because these people are 'gay', they will make better/worse parents than these 'straight' people. Everyone is different.


If ANY couple can provide a loving, stable environment for the children, I see no reason why not.
 
So many eloquently stated ideas here, there isn't much for me to add...except to say that yes, I do think that gay couples should be able to adopt, and should be put through the same screening process as straight couples adopting. I also agree it's important to have strong role models from the opposite sex around too.

I would think with young children, it doesn't even occur to them to get confused about their sexuality. They don't even know what sexuality is (for the most part) anyway. I mean just for an example, there was this whole thing about how children would think Ernie and Bert were gay because they lived together (or that thing about the teletubby with the purse)....but when I was young, I simply thought here are Ernie and Bert and they live together. End of story. By the time kids are mature enough to think about that, they will have been exposed to enough hetero couples to see the other perspective anyway.

If anything, I would think children of gay couples would be more accepting and tolerant people in general, and that can only be a good thing.

I also can't believe people still think that being gay is a "choice of lifestyle". I don't think there is any choice in the matter, just as straight people can't choose their sexuality. Who on earth would CHOOSE to go through life facing all that intolerance??
 
I see absolutely no difference between allowing a man and a woman to adopt a child and allowing two men or two women to adopt. Surely the only thing that matters is that the child will grow up in an environment where they'll be loved and cared for. And last time I checked, sexuality didn't determine whether someone had the capacity to love another person or not.

For the few people who've talked about being lesbian, gay or bisexual as a "choice", I just want to ask you - when did you make the choice to be heterosexual? Did you sit down one day and decide on your sexuality? Did you read a book and decide that it sounded like the best way to be? Or was it just that you instinctively liked people of the opposite sex? So it wasn't really a choice at all.

And if it's suggested that growing up without a male or female role model is detrimental to a child, then what about children growing up in single parent families? Is that "wrong" too?
 
martha, please remain respectful of pr0digy's opinions in here, they are respecting opposing points of view, please extend the same curtesy back.






And I really want to congratulate everyone on this thread, I'm getting a lot of good points in here we didn't think of in class, and we are, for the most part, being respectful. :up:
 
Mrs. Edge said:
I also can't believe people still think that being gay is a "choice of lifestyle".

While off the main topic, it was widely held by the gay community through the 60's and 70's that homosexuality was a lifestyle choice.
 
Angela Harlem said:
But I honestly dont know if ALL homosexual couples should be able to adopt.

Well, my response here should be a given. Just as not ALL heterosexual couples are allowed to adopt for whatever reason, the same exact criteria should be given to prospective homosexual couples. Sexual orientation should be blind. And to assume that gays are all anti-God is ignoring the entire gay Christian movement, which is fairly prevalent. To ban gays from adopting simply because some people view it as going against their beliefs...well, then why can't I ban Protestants from marrying and adopting? In a conservative Catholic sense, Protestants could be seen as heretics themselves.

Melon
 
pr0digy said:
it's called an opinion, look it up
but opinions don't make an argument. you have to have facts to back it up.

the one thing about homosexuality, is that no one's really sure how someone "gets it." are gays born that way or do they become gay? i myself am not sure which one it is. i suppose if someone were to put a gun to head and make me choose, i'd say it's something you're born with. those who may switch sexual orientations throughout their lives (david bowie, anyone?) were either confused or experimenting. even gays themselves have differing views as to how they became gay.

in my opinion, i think gay couples should be allowed to adopt. however, they need to make sure they understand that every child needs positive role models for each gender, so if it's two men raising a child, they'll need at least one positive female in the child's life, and vice versa. single parents have been doing it longer (raising children in a single-sex environment, and hopefully having a positive role model of the opposite sex) and they're still allowed to keep their children, or even in some cases adopt, so i don't see why two people of the same sex can't have this opportunity as well.
 
pr0digy said:
Well I'll probably get flamed for this, but

Hell no! :mad:
That's evil and wrong!

Children need a mother and a father, because both offer different things to a child!

They can be loved, raised well etc etc but it's still wrong, it wasn't Gods intention.

I find that extremely disgusting, and I feel sorry for the child! :no:

Lilly,

To label people evil and extremely disgusting is not respectful.

Prodigy's second post was tolerable.
 
nbcrusader said:


While off the main topic, it was widely held by the gay community through the 60's and 70's that homosexuality was a lifestyle choice.

That may be true. But it's the 21st century. Anyone who thinks that sexuality is a 'choice' need only imagine trying to 'choose' being other than what they are. If you are straight, imagine 'choosing' to be gay. Imagine 'choosing' to be sexually attracted to the same sex.
 
Kudos to all on both sides....

This is a good thread.......

I can only speak of my experiences as a teacher.
I would love for all of my students to go home to a safe and loving environment. The reality is that many of the kids I see on a daily basis are not going home to this situation. It is sad. It saddens me to see so many children, who, with a little love and guidence could have a future so bright.


The reality of the job of teaching is, that within two years of leaving my classroom, any positive influence I have made on the child, is gone in most cases. I wish I could find the study I read that in, or I would link it to you all here.

The home is where it has to come from. Being Gay/Straight/Lesbian has nothing to do with your ability to raise and parent a child. I would love to see some of these children in homes where LOVE and guidance are given on a daily basis. they would soar.

Pax wants to start a by having a nation where we have ethics we can be proud of. What is wrong with being proud that we want people who will love and nurture a child to be a parent?

I try not to bring work home with me.....but today was a particularly bad day for me at school. As concervative as some of you think I am......This topic is near and dear to my heart..........

In most cases.....it is easy to create a life.......That does not make you a parent, a father or a mother. There are plenty of people who would make excellent parents...that could provide a home for a child.


Peace
 
[ignorant white trash]

Them homo-sexuals is filthy disgusting perverts, all tryin to take over the world! Any homo-sexual couple tryin to adopt a kid is tryin to corrupt his young mind! They's all goin ta hell!

[/ignorant white trash]

In reality homosexuality is not a learned behavior. There has never been any study establishing that as fact. Most studies, however, show that homosexuality is like left-handedness. It's not the norm, but it happens. It's not a bad thing.

Studies also have shown that children raised by homosexual parents tend to be more loved and more well-rounded than adopted by married couples.

Furthermore, heterosexual white males make up the vast majority of child molestors, not homosexuals, as some may have us believe.

It is my belief that it is better for a child to be raised by a gay couple than to be bounced around in a foster home or aborted. If you ask me, I think the world would be a much better place if homosexuality was the norm.
 
martha said:


There are some things I would miss. :sexywink:


Me too.....

This one time at band camp.... there was this girl named Ma.....


:::: DUCKING FOR COVER::::::
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom