Same-Sex Marriage General Discussion Thread - Page 25 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-19-2012, 03:52 PM   #361
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,649
Local Time: 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
how is this selling clothes?
Really? Come on now, marketers have been using sex, shock value, and the flat out weird to sell clothes for decades now. This isn't new.
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 04-19-2012, 03:58 PM   #362
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,472
Local Time: 04:32 PM
do you think Urban Outfitters sells a lot of clothes to people outraged enough by two women kissing to boycott?

NOM's Starbucks "boycott" is a hilarious failure, and those "Million" Moms sure trounced Ellen didn't they?
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 04-19-2012, 04:49 PM   #363
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:32 PM
what is the highest priority, (political goal) for gay people in the United States ?
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:26 PM   #364
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,472
Local Time: 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
what is the highest priority, (political goal) for gay people in the United States ?


full legal equality (state and federal marriage rights, ENDA).

i might be missing something but that's about it. i'm fine with people saying horrible things about me. they just can't actually *do* anything to me.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 04-19-2012, 08:21 PM   #365
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:32 PM
that is about it, the whole ball of wax

and we know public acceptance is moving in the right direction,

for the under 30, it is a no brainer, for the over 60, well, they say they want to protect traditional marriage.

and every one in-between? that is where we win or lose converts

I can reason with some people in my age group, when I talk about fair-play, equal protection, common decency, full taxation deserves full representation and participation

if the people are religious, anything that lends any credence to the arguments that gays want to recruit young people is not helpful

I know families that choose not to watch FOX channel or any shows that have any sexuality or use any bad words, they do not watch R rated films, these are there choices,
if they don't want their young children looking for school clothes being exposed to this, lambasting them is not a way to try and move them over to acceptance of full civil rights.


civil rights passed in 1968, not 1948 0r 1928. it was a process.
Jackie Robinson endured more than he should have. But that was part of the process to get to the most obvious, basic, human decency place. A modest Civil Rights bill. If Jackie Robinson had held his fist up during the National Anthem, as the Olympians did in Mexico City in 1968, he would have set back Civil Rights by giving the wrong side amuniotion for thier argumnets.

And yes, this catalog picture is not that big of a deal. But parents not wanting it for their children to see, also is not that big of a deal.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 12:44 AM   #366
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,256
Local Time: 03:32 PM
As stated, it's entirely your right to decide what's acceptable in your household. I can't tell any parent they should look at something they don't like any more than that parent can tell me I shouldn't look at something they don't like.

But honestly, of all the issues in the world for mothers to concern themselves with, THIS is it? Two girls kissing in an ad? I agree that it doesn't really do anything for the product itself and is mainly there for shock value and is rather pointless as a result...but the reason shock value marketing continues to occur is because people continue to respond and be shocked by it and make it a news story. If you make it seem like it's not that big a deal, they'll have to switch marketing strategies eventually when people just look at their oh-so-shocking ads with a yawn and a shrug.

And at some point and time these mothers are going to have to explain lesbianism to their children. At some point and time their children will be exposed to it. Maybe even turn out to be lesbian themselves! How will they deal with that when the time comes? Shunning things only gets you so far for so long, and it often makes things worse instead of better for the kids.

They have the right to not support such things or let them in their homes, but I also have the right to tell them to be realistic, grow up, and realize there are bigger, more serious battles to be fought in this world.
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 03:17 PM   #367
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,862
Local Time: 04:32 PM
USB-eqipped record players? What a fantastic non-sequitur.
__________________
PhilsFan is online now  
Old 04-25-2012, 02:41 PM   #368
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 01:32 PM
California Bill to Limit ‘Ex-Gay’ Therapy Advances in Legislature

that has a long ways to go before it becomes a law

but, sometimes the bully a child needs protection from is their own parent
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 04:58 AM   #369
Acrobat
 
ladyfreckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 402
Local Time: 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlit_Angel View Post
As stated, it's entirely your right to decide what's acceptable in your household. I can't tell any parent they should look at something they don't like any more than that parent can tell me I shouldn't look at something they don't like.

But honestly, of all the issues in the world for mothers to concern themselves with, THIS is it? Two girls kissing in an ad? I agree that it doesn't really do anything for the product itself and is mainly there for shock value and is rather pointless as a result...but the reason shock value marketing continues to occur is because people continue to respond and be shocked by it and make it a news story. If you make it seem like it's not that big a deal, they'll have to switch marketing strategies eventually when people just look at their oh-so-shocking ads with a yawn and a shrug.

And at some point and time these mothers are going to have to explain lesbianism to their children. At some point and time their children will be exposed to it. Maybe even turn out to be lesbian themselves! How will they deal with that when the time comes? Shunning things only gets you so far for so long, and it often makes things worse instead of better for the kids.

They have the right to not support such things or let them in their homes, but I also have the right to tell them to be realistic, grow up, and realize there are bigger, more serious battles to be fought in this world.
Well said.
__________________
ladyfreckles is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 06:28 PM   #370
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 10:32 PM
BuzzFeed, Apr. 30
Quote:
A week from Tuesday, North Carolinians vote on whether to make gay marriage constitutionally illegal. This print ad campaign was launched to shock voters into defeating the Amendment:



This is how the Amendment One question will appear on the ballot:
[__] For [__] Against
Constitutional amendment to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized by this State.
The state already doesn't "recognize" same-sex unions. That apparently isn't a strong enough statement for North Carolina lawmakers.

These segregation-riffing ads—tagged "On May 8th, make history. Don't repeat it."— are via Every1Against1. They argue that Amendment One "aims to turn all unmarried couples—whether same-sex or opposite-sex—into second-class citizens unworthy of basic dignity and fair treatment."

...[A]fter a similar constitutional amendment was passed in Ohio, several courts ruled that domestic violence protections did not apply to unmarried couples and cases were dismissed.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 07:47 PM   #371
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 03:32 PM
Ewww. You can catch gay from the gay water fountain right?
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:02 AM   #372
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,472
Local Time: 04:32 PM
Of course! Why, according to some, acknowledging the very existence of gay people is enough to turn whole classrooms of 2nd graders into glee club aspirants.

Apparently heterosexuality is so tenuous and fragile, and must be nurtured along like a baby bird with a broken wing.
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 05-01-2012, 04:51 AM   #373
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 10:32 PM
Man, I'm still pretty damn baffled how this is still such a big issue in so called first world countries in this day and age..
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 05:03 AM   #374
Cin
Blue Crack Addict
 
Cin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in the gutter, looking at the stars. . .and smiling
Posts: 21,900
Local Time: 07:32 AM
It's a huge issue here, I'm ashamed that so many people are hardcore against it.
__________________
Cin is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 10:49 AM   #375
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,974
Local Time: 04:32 PM
msn.com

A Republican Missouri House member announced Wednesday that he is gay, urging GOP leaders to end the state’s so-called “don’t say gay” legislation that would limit discussion of sexual orientation in public schools.

“Today I ask you to stand with me as a proud Republican, a proud veteran, and a proud gay man who wants to protect all kids, addressing bullying in our schools,” said Rep. Zachary Wyatt, the Kirksville Daily Express in Kirksville, Mo., reported.

The 27-year-old cattle farmer from the rural northern Missouri town of Novinger said current legislation, HB 2051, prompted him to disclose his sexual orientation for the first time. Wyatt has publicly denounced the bill, which would ban teaching, extracurricular activities or materials that discuss sexual orientation unless they relate to the scientific facts about human reproduction.

“I will not lie to myself anymore about my own sexuality. It has probably been the hardest thing to come to terms with. I have always ignored it. I didn’t even think about it or want to talk about it. I’ve not been immune to it. I hear the comments, usually snide ones, about me,” Wyatt said, the Daily Express reported.

“I am not the first or last Republican to come out. I have just gotten tired of the bigotry being shown on both sides of the aisle on gay issues. Being gay has never been a Republican or Democrat issue, and it should never be,” Wyatt said, the Daily Express reported.

HB 2051 appears unlikely to pass before the session ends on May 18, according to The Associated Press.

“If I can save one kid from hurting themselves or taking their life, then I have done my job as a representative,” said Wyatt, according to the Daily Express.

Republican Rep. Steve Cookson, who sponsored the bill, says he has no plans to withdraw it, according to local media reports.

According to the AP, a spokesman for the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, a national group that supports gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual candidate, said Wyatt is the only openly gay Republican now serving in a state legislature. There have been other gay GOP politicians who have served in state legislatures in the past, the AP reported.
__________________

__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com