Rehnquist Retirement? - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-08-2005, 09:26 AM   #1
War Child
 
MaxFisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 776
Local Time: 10:23 AM
Rehnquist Retirement?

just posted on Drudge....

Media on standby after growing reports Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist is handing in his resignation... DEVELOPING...
__________________

__________________
MaxFisher is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:53 PM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 05:23 AM
that was a rumor yesterday

Is he waiting until 5 or something?
__________________

__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:00 PM   #3
War Child
 
MaxFisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 776
Local Time: 10:23 AM
Reporter Bob Novak declares on CNN that Rehnquist will announce retirement today after Bush's plane touches down at Andrews AFB approx. 4:50 PM EDT...
__________________
MaxFisher is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 06:51 AM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 05:23 AM
Saturday, July 09, 2005 Fox News

WASHINGTON — Though the White House insisted Friday that it had not been in communication with the Supreme Court over the timing of a resignation letter from Chief Justice William Rehnquist, rumors abound that his departure is imminent.

"Chatter," as it is known in intelligence circles, started picking up on Thursday after columnist Robert Novak, most recently noted for his role in the leak of a CIA officer's identity, wrote in daily papers that adding to the pressure on President Bush to choose a Supreme Court nominee to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is "word from court sources that ailing Chief Justice William Rehnquist also will announce his retirement before the week is over."

Senior advisers to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, as well as top aides to Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. — the top senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee — told FOX News on Friday that they knew nothing of a planned retirement announcement scheduled for Friday.

The 80-year-old Rehnquist, who is battling thyroid cancer, left his home early on Friday, but gave no indication what his plan is.

When asked by one reporter Friday if any speculation about his resignation is true, Rehnquist said: "That's for me to know and you to find out."

Some analysts suggested that the chief justice may have been intending to quit on Friday but because of the London terror attacks on Thursday, he would decide to delay his announcement.

It's likely that if Rehnquist had planned to retire on Friday "events have played a part in terms of when he will submit a resignation," former President Clinton's chief of staff, Leon Panetta, told FOX News.

Others suggested that Rehnquist was not going to make his decision known until after Bush returned Friday from his visit to the G-8 summit in Scotland.

O'Connor announced her retirement last Friday, giving Bush at least one appointment to the high court. Nominated by President Reagan and seated in 1981, she is the first woman to serve on the high court. O'Connor had been expected to be a conservative justice, but her record has bore her out as a moderate who has voted to preserve abortion rights and other social issues while also siding with conservatives on states' rights decisions. With her varying points of view, she has earned the title of "swing voter" on the court.

Rehnquist, born in Wisconsin, was active in the Republican Party during his years as an attorney in Arizona and was highly regarded as a former assistant attorney general for President Nixon. His reputation as a fair-minded jurist as well as someone able to form coalitions earned him widespread, bipartisan admiration throughout his tenure.

"Rehnquist plays the good solid citizen. He has his positions, they're ideological, but he doesn't try to attack, he doesn't try to go full-bore on the history," said Martin Belsky, professor at the University of Tulsa College of Law and author of "The Rehnquist Court: A Retrospective."

"He basically is the straight shooter. He has very good relationships with the justices, and more importantly, has been able to use [those relationships] in an effective way to develop pluralities of four, and more often than not, majorities of five ... he is often the conciliator."

If Rehnquist retires, Bush will be left with two openings to fill simultaneously. Some court watchers say it could change his plans on who he wants to nominate.

"It certainly makes it that much more interesting. From a political point of view ... the president has some great options," Panetta said, adding that Bush could choose a hard-leaning conservative to replace Rehnquist while also choosing a more moderate conservative to take O'Connor's place.

"What is very likely is that two vacancies would work to the advantage of the White House. The White House would conveniently be able, surely, to get a very conservative nominee through and maybe have a second nominee, like [Attorney General] Alberto Gonzales, who is somewhat distrusted by conservatives as not reliable enough. It gives the White House, frankly, a little more room to bargain and trade a bit in terms of who those nominees would be," said George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley.

But not all court-watchers agree that the president will have to fill vacancies on the court with mirror images of the justices who sat in the seat before. Turley said binding a president to that mold could cost him his role on court decisions for years to come.

"What is at stake is nothing short of a lasting legacy for this president," he continued. "If he changes the balance of the court, shifts it to the right, to produce a consistent conservative majority, he can literally change the face of the law. There are dozens of cases that are hanging by a single vote, that vote has often been Sandra Day O'Connor's. He really can have that great effect on American law, than perhaps any prior president. It is that significant."

Ultimately, the debate on whether nominees are too conservative or not conservative enough will be fought out in the Senate. Panetta suggested that Bush's only criteria for a nominee is someone who knows how to judge.

"I think the key for the president is to appoint somebody who has a great judicial reputation, someone who has a keen mind and someone who is faithful to the Constitution," he said.

Oddsmakers are also looking for clues about the future plans of Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens, both of whom have been named as possible departures.

Ginsburg, 72, was seated on the court in 1993. In September 1999, she underwent surgery to treat colon cancer after which she received chemotherapy and radiation treatment from October 1999 to June 2000.

Stevens, 85, has sat on the court since 1975. Sources told FOX News that Stevens hired two law clerks from Yale University in the last two weeks, suggesting that he has no intention of stepping down.

Stevens, who was appointed by President Ford, turned out to be among the most liberal members of the court. Ginsburg, too, is a liberal-voting member of the court.

The current court has been in its formation for the last 11 years. Before that, Justice Harry A. Blackmun stepped down and Clinton tapped the second justice of his presidency, Stephen G. Breyer .
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 01:19 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:23 AM
This may happen once O'Conner's replacement is approved.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 01:33 PM   #6
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,492
Local Time: 05:23 AM
it's going to be a long hot summer ... and i really wonder if this might not be a healthy thing, airing out the nation's dirty laundry in regards to the many pressing social issues the Supreme Court has to deal with. maybe we'll find points of commonality between the all-too-easy Red/Blue dichotomy and we'll come to realize that we all want the same things, for people to live better, and that while we might disagree on the way to achieve that, we are at the end of the day all citizens of a flawed but still great nation.

but probably not.

prepare for bloodshed.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:30 AM   #7
pax
ONE
love, blood, life
 
pax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ewen's new American home
Posts: 11,412
Local Time: 06:23 AM
Well, Rehnquist released a statement today saying that he has no plans to retire and will remain on the Court as long as his health allows.

Even though Rehnquist is a conservative, I must say I'm relieved that we're not (immediately) faced with 2 vacancies for Bush to fill.
__________________

__________________
and you hunger for the time
time to heal, desire, time


Join Amnesty.
pax is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com