PBS Program note Bill Moyers 25 April Iraq War Lies - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-21-2007, 06:17 PM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Jeannieco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A HEART THAT IS BROKEN IS A HEART THAT IS OPEN
Posts: 4,954
Local Time: 09:18 PM
PBS Program note Bill Moyers 25 April Iraq War Lies

PBS program note. Sounds interesting....

Record of Iraq War Lies to Air April 25 on PBS
By David Swanson
t r u t h o u t | Guest Columnist
Thursday 12 April 2007
Bill Moyers has put together an amazing 90-minute video documenting the lies that the Bush administration told to sell the Iraq war to the American public, with a special focus on how the media led the charge. I've watched an advance copy and read a transcript, and the most important thing I can say about it is: Watch PBS from 9:00 to 10:30 PM on Wednesday, April 25. Spending that 90 minutes will actually save you time because you'll never watch television news again - not even on PBS, which comes in for its own share of criticism.
While a great many pundits, not to mention presidents, look remarkably stupid or dishonest in the four-year-old clips included in "Buying the War," it's hard to take any spiteful pleasure in holding them to account, and not just because the killing and dying they facilitated is ongoing, but also because of what this video reveals about the mindset of members of the DC media. Moyers interviews media personalities, including Dan Rather, who clearly both understand what the media did wrong and are unable to really see it as having been wrong or avoidable.
It's great to see an American media outlet tell this story so well, but it leads one to ask: When will Congress tell it? While the Democrats were in the minority, they clamored for hearings and investigations, they pushed Resolutions of Inquiry into the White House Iraq Group and the Downing Street Minutes. Now in the majority, they've gone largely silent. The chief exception is the House Judiciary Committee's effort to question Condoleezza Rice next week about the forged Niger documents.
But what comes out of watching this show is a powerful realization that no investigation is needed by Congress, just as no hidden information was needed for the media to get the story right in the first place. The claims that the White House made were not honest mistakes. But neither were they deceptions. They were transparent and laughably absurd falsehoods. And they were high crimes and misdemeanors.
The program opens with video of President Bush saying "Iraq is part of a war on terror. It's a country that trains terrorists. It's a country that can arm terrorists. Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country."
Was that believable or did the media play along? The next shot is of a press conference at which Bush announces that he has a script telling him which reporters to call on and in what order. Yet the reporters play along, raising their hands after each comment, pretending that they might be called on despite the script.
Video shows Richard Perle claiming that Saddam Hussein worked with al Qaeda and that Iraqis would greet American occupiers as liberators. Here are the Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal, William Safire from The New York Times, Charles Krauthammer and Jim Hoagland from The Washington Post, all demanding an overthrow of Iraq's government. George Will is seen saying that Hussein "has anthrax, he loves biological weapons, he has terrorist training camps, including 747s to practice on."
But was that even plausible? Bob Simon of "60 Minutes" tells Moyers he wasn't buying it. He says he saw the idea of a connection between Hussein and al Qaeda as an absurdity: "Saddam, as most tyrants, was a total control freak. He wanted total control of his regime. Total control of the country. And to introduce a wild card like al Qaeda in any sense was just something he would not do. So I just didn't believe it for an instant."
Knight Ridder Bureau Chief John Walcott didn't buy it either. He assigned Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay to do the reporting and they found the Bush claims to be quite apparently false. For example, when the Iraqi National Congress (INC) fed The New York Times's Judith Miller a story through an Iraqi defector claiming that Hussein had chemical and biological weapons labs under his house, Landay noticed that the source was a Kurd, making it very unlikely he would have learned such secrets. But Landay also noticed that it was absurd to imagine someone putting a biological weapons lab under his house.
But absurd announcements were the order of the day. A video clip shows a Fox anchor saying, "A former top Iraqi nuclear scientist tells Congress Iraq could build three nuclear bombs by 2005." And the most fantastic stories of all were fed to David Rose at Vanity Fair Magazine. We see a clip of him saying, "The last training exercise was to blow up a full-size mock-up of a US destroyer in a lake in central Iraq."
Landay comments: "Or jumping into pits of fouled water and having to kill a dog with your bare teeth. I mean, this was coming from people who are appearing in all of these stories, and sometimes their rank would change."
Forged documents from Niger could not have gotten noticed in this stew of lies. Had there been some real documents honestly showing something, that might have stood out and caught more eyes. Walcott describes the way the INC would feed the same information to the vice president and secretary of defense that it fed to a reporter, and the reporter would then get the claims confirmed by calling the White House or the Pentagon. Landay adds: "And let's not forget how close these people were to this administration, which raises the question, was there coordination? I can't tell you that there was, but it sure looked like it."
Simon from "60 Minutes" tells Moyers that when the White House claimed a 9/11 hijacker had met with a representative of the Iraqi government in Prague, "60 Minutes" was easily able to make a few calls and find out that there was no evidence for the claim. "If we had combed Prague," he says, "and found out that there was absolutely no evidence for a meeting between Mohammad Atta and the Iraqi intelligence figure. If we knew that, you had to figure the administration knew it. And yet they were selling the connection between al Qaeda and Saddam."
Moyers questions a number of people about their awful work, including Dan Rather, Peter Beinart and then Chairman and CEO of CNN Walter Isaacson. And he questions Simon, who soft-pedaled the story and avoided reporting that there was no evidence.
Landay at Knight Ridder did report the facts when it counted, but not enough people paid attention. He tells Moyers that all he had to do was read the UN weapons inspectors' reports online to know that the White House was lying to us. When Cheney said that Hussein was close to acquiring nuclear weapons, Landay knew he was lying: "You need tens of thousands of machines called 'centrifuges' to produce highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon. You've got to house those in a fairly big place, and you've got to provide a huge amount of power to this facility."
Moyers also hits Tim Russert with a couple of tough questions. Russert expressed regret for not having included any skeptical voices by saying he wished his phone had rung. So Moyers begins the next segment by saying, "Bob Simon didn't wait for the phone to ring," and describing Simon's reporting. Simon says he knew the claims about aluminum tubes were false because "60 Minutes" called up some scientists and researchers and asked them. Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post says that skeptical stories did not get placed on the front page because they were not "definitive."
Moyers shows brief segments of an "Oprah" show in which she has on only pro-war guests and silences a caller who questions some of the White House claims. Just in time for the eternal election season, Moyers includes clips of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry backing the war on the basis of Bush and Cheney's lies. But we also see clips of Robert Byrd and Ted Kennedy getting it right.
The Washington Post editorialized in favor of the war 27 times, and published in 2002 about 1,000 articles and columns on the war. But the Post gave a huge anti-war march a total of 36 words. "What got even less ink," Moyers says, "was the release of the National Intelligence Estimate." Even the misleading partial version that the media received failed to fool a careful eye.
Landay recalls: "It said that the majority of analysts believed that those tubes were for the nuclear weapons program. It turns out though, that the majority of intelligence analysts had no background in nuclear weapons." Was Landay the only one capable of noticing this detail?
Colin Powell's UN presentation comes in for similar quick debunking. We watch a video clip of Powell complaining that Iraq has covered a test-stand with a roof. But AP reporter Charles Hanley comments, "What he neglected to mention was that the inspectors were underneath watching what was going on."
Powell cited a UK paper, but it very quickly came out that the paper had been plagiarized from a college student's work found online. The British press pointed that out. The US let it slide. But anyone looking for the facts found it quickly.
Moyers's wonderful movie is marred by a single line - the next to the last sentence - in which he says, "The number of Iraqis killed, over 35,000 last year alone, is hard to pin down." A far more accurate figure could have been found very easily.
---------
This article by David Swanson was first published at http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/21146.
__________________

__________________
Jeannieco is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 06:44 PM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
trevster2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,330
Local Time: 01:48 AM
Already eagerly awaiting it.
__________________

__________________
trevster2k is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 06:53 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Jeannieco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A HEART THAT IS BROKEN IS A HEART THAT IS OPEN
Posts: 4,954
Local Time: 09:18 PM
Should be good!
__________________
Jeannieco is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:10 PM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
trevster2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,330
Local Time: 01:48 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeannieco
Should be good!
Well, good in the sense it reveals all the problems leading to the selling of the war.

I think the bottom line was fear of being labeled a traitor or non-patriot. The network heads probably feared losing money if branded that way by the White House.

As a Canadian, I never had that concern, he's not my president, actually I don't feel that way about the Prime Minister either. I'm a skeptical SOB. I even printed off a copy of the PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses to share with people before the war.
__________________
trevster2k is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:37 PM   #5
Refugee
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,435
Local Time: 05:18 AM
Well, it's a good thing that it's airing on Wednesday...I wonder if 72 hours will be enough time for Bush and Co to have the thing yanked and all copies destroyed. THis program is no doubt Moyer's outraged reply to PBS being hacked into by Richard Perle and HIS doc (ooooh, those big bad anti war protesters!)

Considering how litte time it took to get a 30-yr behmoth like Imus off the air (even if what he said was wrong, you have to marvel at how QUICKLY and effeciently the media and politicians can get something done IF they are stirred to action--if only that level of madia saturation and outrage was given to Africa, as Bono would say. Let alone 32 death versus 6000+ every day...we've heard it all before...)

If this program actually makes it on the air in its origional form, if at all, and Bill Moyers is not put inot pariah status like Imus (for in Bush's mind he's as big a sinner) it will be a triumph for democracy. *Anxiously crosses fingers*
__________________
Teta040 is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:38 PM   #6
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 09:18 PM
Bill Moyers is clearly letting the terrorists win.

We should amend the US Constitution and prohibit him specifically from even speaking.
__________________
martha is online now  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:42 PM   #7
Refugee
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,435
Local Time: 05:18 AM
He'd be only the tip of the iceberg, Martha....and anyway, in the long run, unless we are prepared for WWIII, we are bound to leave.

I am only angry it won't be Bush but a future Presdient who will have to have the burden of coming clean and telling the American people the couple of rason why we are REALLY there. They'll see just how much of a disaterous distraction from the destruction of the Future Caliphate Iraq really was. (Yes, I know what is at stake).
__________________
Teta040 is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 09:28 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Jeannieco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A HEART THAT IS BROKEN IS A HEART THAT IS OPEN
Posts: 4,954
Local Time: 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by trevster2k


Well, good in the sense it reveals all the problems leading to the selling of the war.

I think the bottom line was fear of being labeled a traitor or non-patriot. The network heads probably feared losing money if branded that way by the White House.

As a Canadian, I never had that concern, he's not my president, actually I don't feel that way about the Prime Minister either. I'm a skeptical SOB. I even printed off a copy of the PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses to share with people before the war.
More power to you! Way to go!
I know what you mean about the traitor label. I marched on Washington DC on innauguration day in 2004 and again last spring in NYC. I have protested quietly in my own way from day 1. My brother, through his line of work, knows some of the weapons inspectors and knew long before they started beating the war drums that there weren't any WMD's. As you all know anybody who provided evidence to the contrary was black-balled or fired.
BTW, I don't consider him my President and I am an American! I didn't vote for him twice and I cried when the Supreme Court gave him the most powerful seat in the world. I knew in my gut that he was bad news and I even told my family and friends he was going to ruin our country. Look what happened.
I refuse to give up on my country though. My family has given 2 lives in WWII, so it's not that I am not patriotic, to the contrary! I protest because I care so much!
anyway... sorry for the tangent!
__________________
Jeannieco is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 04:18 AM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 03:18 PM
Blindness before 2000 makes for half a story, Clinton knew that Saddam had WMD.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 10:35 AM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Teta040
Well, it's a good thing that it's airing on Wednesday...I wonder if 72 hours will be enough time for Bush and Co to have the thing yanked and all copies destroyed. THis program is no doubt Moyer's outraged reply to PBS being hacked into by Richard Perle and HIS doc (ooooh, those big bad anti war protesters!)

Considering how litte time it took to get a 30-yr behmoth like Imus off the air (even if what he said was wrong, you have to marvel at how QUICKLY and effeciently the media and politicians can get something done IF they are stirred to action--if only that level of madia saturation and outrage was given to Africa, as Bono would say. Let alone 32 death versus 6000+ every day...we've heard it all before...)

If this program actually makes it on the air in its origional form, if at all, and Bill Moyers is not put inot pariah status like Imus (for in Bush's mind he's as big a sinner) it will be a triumph for democracy. *Anxiously crosses fingers*
I wouldn't worry. Nobody to the right of Hillary takes this guy seriously. He's about one notch less looney than Michael Moore. Another PBS program, "America at a Crossroads" - was educational and objective.
__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 12:47 PM   #11
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 12:18 AM
Come on now, Bill Moyers, member of the Kennedy White House is just above Michael Moore?

__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 12:52 PM   #12
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by AEON


I wouldn't worry. Nobody to the right of Hillary takes this guy seriously. He's about one notch less looney than Michael Moore. Another PBS program, "America at a Crossroads" - was educational and objective.
Where do you get this shit?
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 12:56 PM   #13
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 09:18 PM
"educational and objective"=I agree with it.
__________________
martha is online now  
Old 04-22-2007, 01:00 PM   #14
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
trevster2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,330
Local Time: 01:48 AM
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/0...-on-real-time/

Bill Moyers visits Bill Maher
__________________
trevster2k is offline  
Old 04-22-2007, 04:52 PM   #15
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
sulawesigirl4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,416
Local Time: 12:18 AM
Bill Moyers may be the only sensible voice of reason in the entire US media. I will definitely be setting my DVR to tape this.
__________________

__________________
"I can't change the world, but I can change the world in me." - Bono

sulawesigirl4 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com