One Big Hot Steamy SEX BOMB

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Dreadsox

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Messages
10,885
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.

The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.

Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.
 
Dreadsox said:


Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

This is an interesting one given the climate today.
 
they did not need to create one...here I am....they could save the money!!!:D
 
Isn't there a Tom Jones song called Sex Bomb? I think I saw that on VH1 :D They should have just played that and the enemy would just head for the hills

It's scary that govt money is spent on this foolishness
 
Dreadsox said:

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.



hasn't the MTV and the diet sodas been doing this to our kids for 20 years now? not to mention Bravo.
 
At least we had a president back then
that took personal responsibility

and had the courage to volunteer for the project.
 
so what's next? a killing joke?

seriously, if this is true, it's disgracefull that they would even contemplate developing Chemical or Biological weapons. It is also extremely dumb, if they seriously think a gay army cannot fight...Alexander the Great proved that...or if enemy soldier have no access to sunblock? one the other hand we are talking about the pentagon...
 
Also making soldiers horny can also make them more agressive so in that case it may not be such a great idea. This stuff is just like the stuff they were thinking about during operation mongoose. This is all part of nonleathal weapons research, I think that nonlethal and yet effective weapons will be a very good thing (set phasers to stun!). Being able to render an enemy innefective without harming them is the best way, nobody gets hurt.

But if anybody disagrees with this weapon then you are homophobic :wink:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom