MrsSpringsteen
Blue Crack Addict
MILF is Mom I'd Like To F (fill in the blank Anne )
MrsSpringsteen said:Sure Bono meets w/ world leaders and is trying to eradicate AIDS and poverty, but he could never invent fake dog testicles..
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/10/06/dog.invention.ap/index.html
BostonAnne said:
I'll need to keep a better eye on that boy I hope he didn't offend you guys.
He claims to be a Democrat, but you never know.
um, what does MILF stand for?
"for their efforts to prevent nuclear energy from being used for military purposes and to ensure that nuclear energy for peaceful purposes is used in the safest possible way"
The U.N. nuclear watchdog and its head, Mohamed ElBaradei, won the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for their efforts to limit the spread of atomic weapons.
U2democrat said:
Interesting...
Well there's always next year.
Dreadsox said:
Are you kidding me....
Meeting you and your son made the night all that more spectacular! You have a GREAT kid on your hands.
BostonAnne said:
I believe he will win it eventually.
nbcrusader said:
Of course, they accomplished next to nothing in 2005. Perhaps they should have gotten the award in a different year.
BostonAnne said:
I believe he will win it eventually.
Headache in a Suitcase said:more worthy than these jokers, who really haven't accomplished anything this year. iraq is a mess, iran is doing what they want, and so is north korea.
Irvine511 said:
i agree.
you know why? i stayed up late to watch Conan last night and feel like dog poo today, but i noticed that Bono was at his most engaged and excited not when talking about U2 or the tour but when talking about Africa.
it does sound like he's at the beginning of losing interest in U2 and becoming a full time activist.
this might take 5 years, but, it seems to me, that Africa is where his heart is.
(ducks)
whenhiphopdrovethebigcars said:
I think nobel prizes are not awarded for a certain year, but more for the course of hard work in a period of several years to decades.
Headache in a Suitcase said:meh... i certainly didn't think bono would win, but i do think he's more worthy than these jokers, who really haven't accomplished anything this year. iraq is a mess,
ouizy said:I am not sure if Bono deserved the award or not, he may still be a bit 'green,' but any organization linked to the U.N. in my opinon should not even be in the running for this award (at least the modern UN of today and the past 5 years.)
They have done many shameful things, and I am not so sure this organization has done more to halt proliferation of nukes, than the fear that the modern governments of today have.
(not that that is OK.)
It just leaves a sour taste in my mouth that the nuclear subject even was the reason for the awarding of the prize. I think it is a bit early to tell what some countries are going to do with this technology, and the fact that Africa is starving and 'burning' is absolutely inexplicable.
Maybe someone did not get the prize because enough has not been done in, or for Africa, but I do hope this turns around.
nbcrusader said:
Of course, they accomplished next to nothing in 2005. Perhaps they should have gotten the award in a different year.
beli said:
All the Nobel prizes are awarded for the individual and/or groups body of work, not work done in the current year.
I'm surprised at how nasty this thread is. Many good people were nominated. Some won the prize, some eg Bono and Bob Geldof did not.
This world needs more leaders. People who actually grab an idea and run with it. Congratulations to everyone who won, or whos work was deemed worthy of nomination.
The Nobel Peace Prize for 2005
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2005 is to be shared, in two equal parts, between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its Director General, Mohamed ElBaradei, for their efforts to prevent nuclear energy from being used for military purposes and to ensure that nuclear energy for peaceful purposes is used in the safest possible way.
At a time when the threat of nuclear arms is again increasing, the Norwegian Nobel Committee wishes to underline that this threat must be met through the broadest possible international cooperation. This principle finds its clearest expression today in the work of the IAEA and its Director General. In the nuclear non-proliferation regime, it is the IAEA which controls that nuclear energy is not misused for military purposes, and the Director General has stood out as an unafraid advocate of new measures to strengthen that regime. At a time when disarmament efforts appear deadlocked, when there is a danger that nuclear arms will spread both to states and to terrorist groups, and when nuclear power again appears to be playing an increasingly significant role, IAEA's work is of incalculable importance.
In his will, Alfred Nobel wrote that the Peace Prize should, among other criteria, be awarded to whoever had done most for the "abolition or reduction of standing armies". In its application of this criterion in recent decades, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has concentrated on the struggle to diminish the significance of nuclear arms in international politics, with a view to their abolition. That the world has achieved little in this respect makes active opposition to nuclear arms all the more important today.
Oslo, 7 October 2005