New Study On Bisexuality

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

MrsSpringsteen

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
29,276
Location
Edge's beanie closet
from the NY Times

July 5, 2005
Straight, Gay or Lying? Bisexuality Revisited
By BENEDICT CAREY

Some people are attracted to women; some are attracted to men. And some, if Sigmund Freud, Dr. Alfred Kinsey and millions of self-described bisexuals are to be believed, are drawn to both sexes.

But a new study casts doubt on whether true bisexuality exists, at least in men.

The study, by a team of psychologists in Chicago and Toronto, lends support to those who have long been skeptical that bisexuality is a distinct and stable sexual orientation.

People who claim bisexuality, according to these critics, are usually homosexual, but are ambivalent about their homosexuality or simply closeted. "You're either gay, straight or lying," as some gay men have put it.

In the new study, a team of psychologists directly measured genital arousal patterns in response to images of men and women. The psychologists found that men who identified themselves as bisexual were in fact exclusively aroused by either one sex or the other, usually by other men.

The study is the largest of several small reports suggesting that the estimated 1.7 percent of men who identify themselves as bisexual show physical attraction patterns that differ substantially from their professed desires.

"Research on sexual orientation has been based almost entirely on self-reports, and this is one of the few good studies using physiological measures," said Dr. Lisa Diamond, an associate professor of psychology and gender identity at the University of Utah, who was not involved in the study.

The discrepancy between what is happening in people's minds and what is going on in their bodies, she said, presents a puzzle "that the field now has to crack, and it raises this question about what we mean when we talk about desire."

"We have assumed that everyone means the same thing," she added, "but here we have evidence that that is not the case."

Several other researchers who have seen the study, scheduled to be published in the journal Psychological Science, said it would need to be repeated with larger numbers of bisexual men before clear conclusions could be drawn.

Bisexual desires are sometimes transient and they are still poorly understood. Men and women also appear to differ in the frequency of bisexual attractions. "The last thing you want," said Dr. Randall Sell, an assistant professor of clinical socio-medical sciences at Columbia University, "is for some therapists to see this study and start telling bisexual people that they're wrong, that they're really on their way to homosexuality."

He added, "We don't know nearly enough about sexual orientation and identity" to jump to these conclusions.

In the experiment, psychologists at Northwestern University and the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto used advertisements in gay and alternative newspapers to recruit 101 young adult men. Thirty-three of the men identified themselves as bisexual, 30 as straight and 38 as homosexual.

The researchers asked the men about their sexual desires and rated them on a scale from 0 to 6 on sexual orientation, with 0 to 1 indicating heterosexuality, and 5 to 6 indicating homosexuality. Bisexuality was measured by scores in the middle range.

Seated alone in a laboratory room, the men then watched a series of erotic movies, some involving only women, others involving only men.

Using a sensor to monitor sexual arousal, the researchers found what they expected: gay men showed arousal to images of men and little arousal to images of women, and heterosexual men showed arousal to women but not to men.

But the men in the study who described themselves as bisexual did not have patterns of arousal that were consistent with their stated attraction to men and to women. Instead, about three-quarters of the group had arousal patterns identical to those of gay men; the rest were indistinguishable from heterosexuals.

"Regardless of whether the men were gay, straight or bisexual, they showed about four times more arousal" to one sex or the other, said Gerulf Rieger, a graduate psychology student at Northwestern and the study's lead author.

Although about a third of the men in each group showed no significant arousal watching the movies, their lack of response did not change the overall findings, Mr. Rieger said.

Since at least the middle of the 19th century, behavioral scientists have noted bisexual attraction in men and women and debated its place in the development of sexual identity. Some experts, like Freud, concluded that humans are naturally bisexual. In his landmark sex surveys of the 1940's, Dr. Alfred Kinsey found many married, publicly heterosexual men who reported having had sex with other men.

"Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual," Dr. Kinsey wrote. "The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats."

By the 1990's, Newsweek had featured bisexuality on its cover, bisexuals had formed advocacy groups and television series like "Sex and the City" had begun exploring bisexual themes.

Yet researchers were unable to produce direct evidence of bisexual arousal patterns in men, said Dr. J. Michael Bailey, a professor of psychology at Northwestern and the new study's senior author.

A 1979 study of 30 men found that those who identified themselves as bisexuals were indistinguishable from homosexuals on measures of arousal. Studies of gay and bisexual men in the 1990's showed that the two groups reported similar numbers of male sexual partners and risky sexual encounters. And a 1994 survey by The Advocate, the gay-oriented newsmagazine, found that, before identifying themselves as gay, 40 percent of gay men had described themselves as bisexual.

"I'm not denying that bisexual behavior exists," said Dr. Bailey, "but I am saying that in men there's no hint that true bisexual arousal exists, and that for men arousal is orientation."

But other researchers - and some self-identified bisexuals - say that the technique used in the study to measure genital arousal is too crude to capture the richness - erotic sensations, affection, admiration - that constitutes sexual attraction.

Social and emotional attraction are very important elements in bisexual attraction, said Dr. Fritz Klein, a sex researcher and the author of "The Bisexual Option."

"To claim on the basis of this study that there's no such thing as male bisexuality is overstepping, it seems to me," said Dr. Gilbert Herdt, director of the National Sexuality Resource Center in San Francisco. "It may be that there is a lot less true male bisexuality than we think, but if that's true then why in the world are there so many movies, novels and TV shows that have this as a theme - is it collective fantasy, merely a projection? I don't think so."

John Campbell, 36, a Web designer in Orange County, Calif., who describes himself as bisexual, also said he was skeptical of the findings.

Mr. Campbell said he had been strongly attracted to both sexes since he was sexually aware, although all his long-term relationships had been with women. "In my case I have been accused of being heterosexual, but I also feel a need for sex with men," he said.

Mr. Campbell rated his erotic attraction to men and women as about 50-50, but his emotional attraction, he said, was 90 to 10 in favor of women. "With men I can get aroused, I just don't feel the fireworks like I do with women," he said.

About 1.5 percent of American women identify themselves bisexual. And bisexuality appears easier to demonstrate in the female sex. A study published last November by the same team of Canadian and American researchers, for example, found that most women who said they were bisexual showed arousal to men and to women.

Although only a small number of women identify themselves as bisexual, Dr. Bailey said, bisexual arousal may for them in fact be the norm.

Researchers have little sense yet of how these differences may affect behavior, or sexual identity. In the mid-1990's, Dr. Diamond recruited a group of 90 women at gay pride parades, academic conferences on gender issues and other venues. About half of the women called themselves lesbians, a third identified as bisexual and the rest claimed no sexual orientation. In follow-up interviews over the last 10 years, Dr. Diamond has found that most of these women have had relationships both with men and women.

"Most of them seem to lean one way or the other, but that doesn't preclude them from having a relationship with the nonpreferred sex," she said. "You may be mostly interested in women but, hey, the guy who delivers the pizza is really hot, and what are you going to do?"

"There's a whole lot of movement and flexibility," Dr. Diamond added. "The fact is, we have very little research in this area, and a lot to learn."
 
MrsSpringsteen said:

He added, "We don't know nearly enough about sexual orientation and identity" to jump to these conclusions.




the quote above makes the most sense to me. the nature of desire is slippery, and attempts to quantify it through such studies are going to do little but make some people angry and defensive. if a man states that he is bisexual, and you respond, "but, no, as a man you cannot be truly bisexual," then you're essentially accusing someone of lying. which they might be, but i've learned to essentially take people at their word when discussing their sexual preference -- because i know that i'd throw a fit if someone were to tell me that, really, there's no such thing as homosexuality, that i'm just disordered, and that there is only one natural way to be sexual.

however, this study does confirm all the jokes and urban legends that you hear about bisexuality, especially in men. i think many gay men, myself included, make a stop at the bisexual station. for me, it was a form of rationlization and a way to convince myself that, if i met the right woman, then i could achieve some semblance of a "normal" life and not have to tell my family. but it was a big rationalization, and my first boyfriend, to whom i still claimed bisexuality, said, "yeah, i was bisexual once too." i think many gay men go through that, and that's where you get the source of the impatience for bisexual men. to claim bisexuality, especially if you pretty much date only men, is a bit of a metaphoric slap in the face of gay men. it's like saying, "i want the fun but not the responsibility."

however, i'm sure that there are some truly bisexual men. there must be. and if someone tells me that they're bisexual, so be it.
 
How can anyone just say bisexuality doesn't exist? How would they know? I can't believe the people who say they are bisexual are just making it up.
 
I agree with Irvine, when somebody tells me they are one way or another, regardless of what might seem obvious I still take them at their word
At the time they may truly be something theyre not admitting to, but theyre probably not admitting it to themselves either.
My friend Donte seemed completely gay since the time I met him in 6th grade. People made fun of him and teased him and the said that he wasnt gay. I took him on it and stook up for him all the way up until halfway through freshman year. Then he admitted it to himself and everyone else.
He was gay.
From that point on I chose to still stick up for him, and try to help people see that he wasnt a "freak" as they were all calling him.
I did feel betrayed that he lied to me and his other real friends, but he was doing the same thing to himself.
 
I fail to see how genital arousal can be used as a basis for whether bisexuality in men is genuine or not.
Surely it's obvious that individuals will respond to different sexes in different ways :shrug:
And where does it talk about the emotional implications in all this?
 
beau2ifulday said:
I fail to see how genital arousal can be used as a basis for whether bisexuality in men is genuine or not.

I agree, this quote from the doctor seems rather overstated to me

"and that for men arousal is orientation."
 
MrsSpringsteen said:


what do you mean by "normal" ?
I do not think that people struggle with choices of sexuality when they consider their feelings right.

If a man had homosexual urges but felt uneasy with them then surely part of that could be because they wanted to be what they consider normal.

I am not stating that homosexuality is not normal, for some it is normal, just like for most heterosexuality is normal.
 
so straight = normal?

I'm not trying to start that whole thing again, honestly I hesitated posting the thread for that reason (among others). But I think perhaps we should avoid labelling people as normal/abnormal

I think all humans are abnormal in their own ways :shrug:
 
Last edited:
In the mind of somebody who is clinging to bisexuality so that they are not exclusively gay then yes, I think that they probably would consider straight to be normal.

It is not an issue of labels or anything of the sort, I consider my own sexuality which is attraction towards the opposite gender to be normal because it is. By the same token if I was attracted to the same gender then that would be normal for me.
 
A_Wanderer said:
In the mind of somebody who is clinging to bisexuality so that they are not exclusively gay then yes, I think that they probably would consider straight to be normal.

Ok I see what you are saying, but perhaps also they also consider straight to be a far less painful way to live, considering what gay people are still subjected to
 
I don't have too much experience when it comes to having to deal with sexuality; but there may be more of a societal thing and a basic want to belong at play than outright bigotry.

The greatest struggle for any person is to be at ease with themselves, surely sexuality is more of an element of this internal struggle and not a reaction to society. Then we ask how the individual is shaped by their society and it's manifestations,
 
If the first thing somebody asks when a baby is born is "is it a boy or a girl" then theres a lot of importance in gender identity. Obviously, right? We have separate bathrooms and locker rooms....etc
if this boy or girl is taught that youre supposed to like the opposite sex, and one day they start feeling like they have feelings for the same sex, it probably throws off the whole gender identity.
That would cause some confusion on their part Im sure. In that confusion maybe they think that well, if Im supposed to like girls (if this is a boy) then they think that theyve liked them all along and just started liking boys too.
But I dont know anything really. Ive never had the feelings so I cant describe what happens
 
Considering that many will engage in sexual behavior for the simple pleasure of the acts, could it be that individuals will engage in sexual acts where a desire for a pleasurable feeling overrides whatever orientation they may have?
 
u2bonogirl said:
If the first thing somebody asks when a baby is born is "is it a boy or a girl" then theres a lot of importance in gender identity. Obviously, right? We have separate bathrooms and locker rooms....etc
if this boy or girl is taught that youre supposed to like the opposite sex, and one day they start feeling like they have feelings for the same sex, it probably throws off the whole gender identity.
That would cause some confusion on their part Im sure. In that confusion maybe they think that well, if Im supposed to like girls (if this is a boy) then they think that theyve liked them all along and just started liking boys too.
But I dont know anything really. Ive never had the feelings so I cant describe what happens



it's not about gender misidentity -- you just feel a bit different.

while i was taunted with the same words that most somewhat sensitive, bookish, non-aggressive, non-sports obsessed boys get all the time in elementary school -- "sissy" "girl" "fag" "pansy" etc. -- those are more to do with simply being an atypical boy than actually acting or feeling like a girl or being gay, which was certainly not on my mind when i was in elementary school in the mid-to-late 1980s. i've never wanted to be a girl, i never thought i was a girl (though i always enjoyed the friendship of girls, sometimes more than boys), and i had no real desire to play "girl" games. i wanted to be friend with boys, but to relate to them in a slightly difficult way. i wanted to talk about books, music, movies, play video games, play in the woods, go on adventures while on bikes, and develop deep friendships based upon communication -- this is slightly atypical, as most pre-pubescent boys tend to make friends through shared interests and activities, and the friendship grows through participation in such an activity. i remember doing that -- i wasn't totally averse to sports, and enjoyed baseball quite a bit, and i became an obsessive swimmer into junior high and high school. but i do remember feeling very different from other boys and being unable to relate to pretty much any of them until junior high school.

i suppose the point is not feeling like a girl -- which is interesting, because i think homophobia is really misogyny in disguise -- but feeling like a different kind of boy, and not feeling excluded or tormented (i pretty much got along with everyone, even if i made few real friends at a young age) but just feeling like more of an observer than participant.
 
I am actually curious whether this bisexuality theory also applies to women... and why did they use only men for this study?
 
nbcrusader said:
Considering that many will engage in sexual behavior for the simple pleasure of the acts, could it be that individuals will engage in sexual acts where a desire for a pleasurable feeling overrides whatever orientation they may have?


i think this might be the litmus test: if you enjoy receiving oral sex, from a man or a woman, you might be gay or bisexual, but since most people enjoy receiving, it's not a terribly good indicator; if you enjoy performing oral sex upon someone of the same-gender, then you're probably gay or bisexual.

i think that's a crucial distinction. i've had sex with women, and to be blunt, it's a nice place to place a penis. however, that reduces sex to something very, very base. having sex with a man, for me, isn't about trying to find one particular sensation, but it's a much more wholistic act -- it's about the whole body, not a particular body part.

does that make sense?

somewhat hard to talk about without being totally graphic.

and this is a family forum, of course ... ;)
 
Last edited:
I can relate to being an atypical child and I know other people can too so I wouldnt necessarily attach your unique personality to your sexual orientation (regarding other people. I have no idea if you would be different if you had naturally preferred women)
I craved the same type of friendships that you did and related much better to boys than girls. I loved sports and wanted nothing to do with barbies or any other girl stuff. I wore clothes that hid my female shape a lot of the time because I thought if I seemed more boyish that certain people in my life would like me better.
I never wanted shallow relationships but wanted to talk about books and films and things like that.
But through all of that I had an attraction to the same sex that I related the best to. It was an odd feeling most of the time.
I had male friends but would inevitably end up messing around with them. :rolleyes:
One day when one of my female friends trapped me in a small space with her and tried to stick her tongue in my mouth I got really confused.
I thought, whoa. If shes attracted to me, what if that means Im bisexual?
Eventually I sorted my thoughts and realized that it was nothing I had told myself but something outside me that had confused me.
I have no doubt that if certain confusing things happen to somebody when theyre young enough, they could be more likely to consider themselves bisexual.
I have a friend that got pimped out by his dad to drug dealers to get his fix and his son eventually thought he was gay.
 
U2@NYC said:
I am actually curious whether this bisexuality theory also applies to women... and why did they use only men for this study?

Because it's easy to test men's arousal...not so easy to do the same with women.
 
Bisexuality exists. The flaw in this study is to presume that bisexuals are simultaneously attracted to both sexes at any given moment, when, in fact, it is one or the other over longer periods of time, most often.

Melon
 
Bisexuality exists. The flaw in this study is to presume that bisexuals are simultaneously attracted to both sexes at any given moment, when, in fact, it is one or the other over longer periods of time, most often.

Based on personal experience, I would agree with such a conclusion.

Ant.
 
MrsSpringsteen said:
I think all humans are abnormal in their own ways :shrug:

I agree with that.

Personally, if someone tells me they're gay/straight/bi, like Irvine, I'll take them at their word. They'd know better than me, after all. And I'm not willing to discount anything regarding the legitimacy of any one sexual orientation, either.

Bottom line, people should just do whatever feels the most comfortable to them regarding romantic relationships.

Angela
 
Back
Top Bottom