Muslim Cab Drivers - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-03-2007, 09:04 PM   #1
War Child
 
MaxFisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 776
Local Time: 12:11 PM
Muslim Cab Drivers

Curious to hear people's thoughts on this subject...

http://www.startribune.com/535/story/913549.html

Airport wants to crack down on taxi drivers
By John Reinan, Star Tribune

The Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport wants to crack down on Muslim taxi drivers who refuse to carry alcohol or service dogs in their cabs.
At a meeting Wednesday of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, airport staff asked the commission to give the go-ahead for public hearings on a tougher policy that would suspend the licenses of drivers who refuse service for any reason other than safety concerns.

Drivers who refuse to accept passengers transporting alcohol or service dogs would have their airport licenses suspended 30 days for the first offense and two years for the second offense, according to a revised taxi ordinance proposed by the commission's staff.

"Our expectation is that if you're going to be driving a taxi at the airport, you need to provide service to anybody who wants it," commission spokesman Patrick Hogan said. The full commission is expected to vote on the proposal for public hearings at its next meeting, scheduled for Jan. 16.

About 100 people are refused cab service each month at the airport. Roughly three-quarters of the 900 taxi drivers at the airport are Somalis, many of them Muslim. In recent months, the problem of service refusals for religious reasons has grown, airport officials have said, calling it "a significant customer-service issue."

Last year, the airport proposed a system of color-coded lights on taxis, indicating which drivers would accept passengers carrying alcohol. That proposal was dropped.

Hogan said the goal is to have a new policy in place by May 11, when all airport taxi licenses come up for annual renewal.

"We want the drivers to know about the policy in advance, so that if they don't think they can work under these conditions, they have the option of not renewing their license," Hogan said.
__________________

__________________
MaxFisher is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:11 PM   #2
ONE
love, blood, life
 
snowbunny00774's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: londonontario
Posts: 12,298
Local Time: 08:11 AM
I think they should be allowed to stand by their convictions if they only refuse to carry passengers with alcohol that no Muslims made money from. That would be anywhere through the refining, bottling, transportation, cashier ringing it through, store manager, owner etc. etc.

Seriously though, that's ridiculous. They are contracted to provide a service. Provide it. Other than real safety concerns obviously.
__________________

__________________
snowbunny00774 is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:15 PM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 12:11 PM
They are supposed to provide service to everyone. No one should be refused service at an airport. If they don't want to carry someone because they are carrying alcohol or have a service dog, they're in the wrong line of work. There are other occupations that do not force them to compromise their values.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:38 PM   #4
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 01:11 PM
The airport has the right to attach some basic service expectations as to who they will and won't grant airport licenses to.

We had dinner with some Muslim friends of ours last month and this topic actually came up, not sure where they'd heard about it, but it was certainly news to us. They were both perplexed as to why whichever Muslim organization it was these taxi drivers belonged to (can't recall the name) would see transporting passengers who happened to be carrying alcohol, or a dog, as a problem to begin with. There are of course proscriptions against Muslims drinking or selling alcohol, and (I *think* this was how it worked) on not washing one's hands after coming in contact with a dog's mouth, but in their opinion, nothing that could be said to justify imposing these kinds of restrictions on taxicab passengers, especially non-Muslim ones. They were speculating that it might have something to do with Somalian Muslim traditions specifically (our friends are Indian) but weren't really sure.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:20 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 04:11 AM
this is very similar to the person that works in a pharmacy and (for moral or religious reasons) does not want to fill certain prescriptions


they have a right not to fill prescriptions that violate their personal convictions and cab drivers have a right to refuse service to fares that violate their personal convictions

and they should have their sorry, worthless asses fired!!!
these people are ridiculous!!!
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:46 PM   #6
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 06:11 AM
It's real simple:

In our pluralistic republic, civil law takes precedence over the customs of any religion. Including Islam.

E Pluribus Unum
__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:19 AM   #7
ONE
love, blood, life
 
indra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,689
Local Time: 08:11 AM
This clearly answers the question in regards to service dogs.

Here's the section specifically about taxis:

Quote:
Q: I operate a private taxicab and I don't want animals in my taxi; they smell, shed hair and sometimes have "accidents." Am I violating the ADA if I refuse to pick up someone with a service animal?

A: Yes. Taxicab companies may not refuse to provide services to individuals with disabilities. Private taxicab companies are also prohibited from charging higher fares or fees for transporting individuals with disabilities and their service animals than they charge to other persons for the same or equivalent service.
There is no mention of refusal on religious grounds, however, if you know (or feel) your religion prevents you from accepting passengers with service dogs, and the law requires that you do accept passengers with service dogs, either you accept that you are going to have to go against your religion or you don't become a cabbie in the first place.

And it's not as if the requirements are anything new -- this document is dated 1996.

I suspect religion rarely prohibits as much as some adherents like to pretend it does.
__________________
indra is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 03:09 AM   #8
Refugee
 
jimmmm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lincolnshire
Posts: 1,221
Local Time: 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by indra
This .

I suspect religion rarely prohibits as much as some adherents like to pretend it does.
Couldn't agree more.
__________________
jimmmm is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:00 AM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 10:11 PM
They should be allowed to enforce their religious practices on passengers, they should have a right to discriminate; and cab companies have the right to fire their arses.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 09:40 AM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
CTU2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,366
Local Time: 08:11 AM
Cabbies have been discriminating for years, I think Lenny Kravitz wrote a song about it back in the day.
__________________
CTU2fan is online now  
Old 01-04-2007, 09:45 AM   #11
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 12:11 PM
Maybe I feel the way I do at least partially because I'm handicapped myself, in a different way. I'm an autistic and I wouldn't want someone to deny me a taxi ride because of this. Maybe the custom is Somali and not Musliim as Yolland suggests.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 11:17 AM   #12
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
sulawesigirl4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,416
Local Time: 07:11 AM
I asked my Muslim boyfriend about this over breakfast. He laughed and said he thought it was ridiculous. He doesn't drink alcohol, but there's nothing in the Koran about driving someone who is carrying it. His words, "some people just like to be difficult." I don't think this is a religion question so much as a cultural one.
__________________
"I can't change the world, but I can change the world in me." - Bono

sulawesigirl4 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:12 PM   #13
Refugee
 
oceane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,302
Local Time: 11:11 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by sulawesigirl4
I asked my Muslim boyfriend about this over breakfast. He laughed and said he thought it was ridiculous. He doesn't drink alcohol, but there's nothing in the Koran about driving someone who is carrying it. His words, "some people just like to be difficult." I don't think this is a religion question so much as a cultural one.
Yeah seriously i think a lot of Muslims would find this ridiculous. I live in a country that is 90% Muslim and this would never be an issue here! People choose not to drink alcool on religious grounds but they don`t care if others do... that being said I think West Africa is especially tolerant but still.
__________________
oceane is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:31 PM   #14
War Child
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 760
Local Time: 12:11 PM
Seems like this is more intra-Muslim-group politics than anything else. Check out last paragraph, i.e. "MAS is an Arab group; we Somalis are African, not Arabs," he said. "MAS wants to polarize the world, create two camps. I think they are trying to hijack the Somali community for their Middle East agenda."


Friday, October 27, 2006
Airport taxi flap about alcohol has deeper significance

Star Tribune

The airport taxi controversy may go deeper than the quandary over whether to accommodate Somali Muslim cabdrivers who refuse to carry passengers carrying alcohol.

Behind the scenes, a struggle for power and religious authority is apparently playing out.... When I asked Patrick Hogan, Metropolitan Airports Commission spokesman, for his explanation, he forwarded a fatwa, or religious edict, that the MAC had received. The fatwa proclaims that "Islamic jurisprudence" prohibits taxi drivers from carrying passengers with alcohol, "because it involves cooperating in sin according to the Islam." The fatwa, dated June 6, 2006, was issued by the "fatwa department" of the Muslim American Society, Minnesota chapter, and signed by society officials. The society is mediating the conflict between the cab drivers and the MAC. That seems odd, since the society itself clearly has a stake in the controversy's outcome.

So the Muslim American Society issued the fatwa, and is not seeking to mediate with the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, to get them to agree to apply Arab rules on African cab drivers.

How did the MAC connect with the society? "The Minnesota Department of Human Rights recommended them to us to help us figure out how to handle this problem," Hogan said.

Omar Jamal, director of the Somali Justice Advocacy Center, thinks he knows why the society is promoting a "no-alcohol-carry" agenda with no basis in Somali culture. "MAS is an Arab group; we Somalis are African, not Arabs," he said. "MAS wants to polarize the world, create two camps. I think they are trying to hijack the Somali community for their Middle East agenda. They look for issues they can capitalize on, like religion, to rally the community around. The majority of Somalis oppose this, but they are vulnerable because of their social and economic situation."... Mohamud adds that Americans need to learn about Islamic law because the Muslim population here is growing. That's why the proposed two-tier system for airport cabdrivers is important, he says. It could become a national model for accommodating Islam in areas ranging from housing to contractual arrangements to the workplace.
__________________
Judah is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 02:28 PM   #15
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 04:11 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
They should be allowed to enforce their religious practices on passengers, they should have a right to discriminate; and cab companies have the right to fire their arses.
We said the same thing



Quote:
Originally posted by deep
this is very similar to the person that works in a pharmacy and (for moral or religious reasons) does not want to fill certain prescriptions


they have a right not to fill prescriptions that violate their personal convictions and cab drivers have a right to refuse service to fares that violate their personal convictions

and they should have their sorry, worthless asses fired!!!
these people are ridiculous!!!
__________________

__________________
deep is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com