Munich

[Sherry Darling]

Ergh--that's a good thought, but now it's past the time when I can edit. Could a mod give a bit of Spoiler Space to my post?

 

[Irvine511]

As I remember--and this was a really potent final sucker-punch for me--the final shot of the film, as Bana and his wife move to NYC towards the end of the movie, is of the NYC skyline. Of course, this is mid-70s and the WTC towers were standing. This being Speilberg, I can't believe that was a mistake.
Is that what you meant, Irvine?

the towers opened in 1973 -- so i think it was historically accurate.

 

[MrsSpringsteen]

AP

After months of fending off pro-Israel pundits who accused his movie "Munich" of overly sympathizing with the Palestinians, director Steven Spielberg has found a new foe in the Jewish state: bored critics.

The film opened in Israel over the weekend to hostile reviews focusing more on cinematic technique than any assumed political message in the depiction of the Israeli hunt for the masterminds of a Palestinian raid on the 1972 Munich Olympics.

The conservative Jerusalem Post newspaper called the thriller "muddled, inept, offensive -- and boring to boot."

"There is something slovenly about the way in which Spielberg constructs the film, a slovenliness that leaks into the directing style itself," the liberal Haaretz said.

Shirit Gal, the Israeli publicist for "Munich," said on Monday that around 25,000 tickets had been sold for the film -- a turnout she called "good" although Hollywood blockbusters have drawn 35,000 in their opening weekends in Israel.

"I am sure the reviews will have had some effect," Gal said.

U.S. critics have been kinder to "Munich." It is on several Top Ten lists, with some predicting it will win Academy Awards.

Arrayed against the praise are pundits who accuse Spielberg of using the film to criticize Israel's two-fisted security tactics and, by extension, the U.S.-led "war on terror."

The dispute was triggered last year by disclosures that Spielberg had based "Munich" on a widely discredited book about Israel's reprisals for the killing of 11 of its Olympians, and had not consulted with those involved in the actual operations.

Haaretz came to the film-maker's defense. "Cinema has no obligation to chronicle history, even if by its very existence the film becomes part of history, often representing it or even replacing it in our memories," it said.

The debate was largely lost on mainstream Israelis who best remember Spielberg for his Holocaust epic "Schindler's List."

"The only people likely to see this film as anti-Israel are those on the right-wing fringes, and even then, only those with serious ideological blindness," said the YNetnews Web site.

Another reviewer disliked Spielberg's portrayal of an Israeli hit-team -- not because of the nature of the mission, but because its members are occasionally shown as self-doubting bunglers.

"It is not the script's political stance that harms Israel's reputation, but the shoddy way in which the vanguard of the 'Zionist superspies' is depicted," said the Maariv daily. "What is surprising is Munich's failure as an action film."

 

[Irvine511]

AP
The conservative Jerusalem Post newspaper called the thriller "muddled, inept, offensive -- and boring to boot."

"There is something slovenly about the way in which Spielberg constructs the film, a slovenliness that leaks into the directing style itself," the liberal Haaretz said.

erm, what film were they watching?

i thought the film was a bit too long, yes, but the directing itself -- especially the action sequences -- are so fluid and tense and so filled with different layers of movement yet thoroughly coherent, that, really, only Spielberg could have done it. as a director of large-scale movements of people and machines, he has no equal.