Michael Moore - brilliant and uplifting - Page 18 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-05-2007, 11:40 PM   #256
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx


Why would I want too? You would just make me and my arguments feel like shit anyway. Congratulations.
Woah, I'm not attacking you. I'm pointing out the flaws in your comparisons. That's all, it has nothing to do with you...
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 07-05-2007, 11:41 PM   #257
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx


Why would I want too? You would just make me and my arguments feel like shit anyway. Congratulations.
I just read this whole thread, and he was not ganging up on you. As soon as he posted a rebuttal, you got incredibly defensive. He asked for a response, and twice instead of responding to his point, you gave a different point. He's not trying to make you feel bad, he's trying to get you to respond to his points as opposed to changing the subject or getting defensive.
__________________

__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 11:42 PM   #258
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by shart1780
I seems like most of you would find the movie less believeable if Fox likes it.
I'd say more like most people here stopped caring about Fox's opinion a long time ago.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:12 AM   #259
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by phillyfan26

He's not trying to make you feel bad, he's trying to get you to respond to his points as opposed to changing the subject or getting defensive.
I was accused of not responding to points too, and I think I did. stuckpx's two main points were that 1) universal health care sucks; and then once he changed tactics, that 2) the US government isn't capable of carrying out such a plan.

I think people that frequent here know, you need to bring your A game to this place.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:29 AM   #260
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by VintagePunk


you need to bring your A game to this place.
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:43 AM   #261
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
In Sicko, Moore tries to skirt the issue of rationing by going to a Canadian emergency room and finding that people have only had to wait there for 20 minutes. But that's not the relevant comparison, of course. The emergency room is less crowded in places where everyone has health care. The question is what happens for the vast majority of expensive procedures that you don't go to the emergency room for. And for those, patients in single-payer countries tend to wait much longer than in the U.S. and can easily be told that they can't have a particular treatment at all.
Interesting article Yolland, thanks for posting. There are a few points I'd like to address.

As someone earlier in the thread pointed out, Anitram, I think, our medical system works pretty much on the triage system - those in greater need go first. As far as Michael Moore going into emergency rooms and finding happy people who have waited for only 20 minutes, that's certainly not the norm here, in most areas. This is going to get into anecdotal evidence, and I apologize for that, but I think I well represent the experience of many Canadians. If you come into our local ER with the sniffles or the flu, yes, you're probably in for a wait of several hours. But, that's not what ER is for. The acronym stands for "Emergency Room." A cold is not an emergency. However, if you've been involved in a motor vehicle accident, or have experienced symptoms of a heart condition or stroke, yes, you will be seen immediately.

My mother has heart disease, and has been to our local ER several times over the past five years. I've seen her taken in and treatment administered within a couple of minutes, while the waiting room was full of people who had undoubtedly been waiting for hours, with much less severe ailments.

Very recently, she went in with symptoms that probably weren't related, but could have been. I think we waited maybe 20 minutes for treatment to begin. Meanwhile, a man and his wife were sitting there, griping very loudly, about the fact that they'd been waiting for 5 hours. I gathered from their conversation that she's been hurt at work and needed a tetanus shot. She had a bandage on her leg, and at one point she removed it, revealing barely a scratch. Later, she was taken into the same treatment area as my mom. I heard her and her husband loudly complain to a nurse about the wait times, saying that the ER must be understaffed. The nurse calmly explained that it's not understaffed, that those who need to be treated immediately are, and that that night, there were several serious cases that came in. The man and his wife eventually left in disgust.

I'm sorry, but I feel little sympathy for them. Emergency room, remember? A tetanus shot for a scratch isn't an emergency. Our community has several after hours clinics they could have gone to, or she could have seen her own doctor the next day. those are the kinds of waits and inconveniences that Canadians put up with.

As far as experimental care not being an option or available to Canadians? My sister is being treated for rheumatoid arthritis. She went to one specialist for several months, and was very unsatisfied as he seemed to not take her maladies seriously. She asked her family GP to change specialists, and now she's with one who put her in a study that's being done with a drug that would cost over $1,000 per month. It's obviously experimental, but she's in the study and gets it for free for the next 3 yrs. My point here is that it's not like treatments are severely limited with Canadian doctors, and if there's an experimental one for you that they feel will help, they'll get you in somehow.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:53 AM   #262
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,297
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Yes, we work on a triage system. I think it's standardized in Ontario, something like T1-T5, but I am not 100% sure of the levels.

In the movie, I think the people said they waited from 20-45 minutes, but again, that depends what you're there for.

When an ambulance brings you in (even if it is non life-threatening), you are taken in immediately, bypassing the triage system. If you walk in yourself, you are triaged. I walked in twice. Once when I had appendicitis and I think I waited about 90 minutes, as they thought I had the stomach flu. Needless to say I wouldn't go to the ER for a stomach flu - it was so painful I remember thinking I would die. Another time I went was when I broke my finger and I think I probably waited about 25 minutes or so (they gave me an ice pack to hold).

My brother broke his wrist snowboarding and was immediately admitted. My grandmother had a heart attack, went in an ambulance, was seen right away.

If you go to an ER on any given night, most of the people who are sitting and waiting for hours are those who are rather intoxicated, young kids who have ear infections and their parents bring them in instead of going to their family physician in the AM, or old people with bad flu or something. There are also a few idiots who use the ER instead of a family doctor, and they probably wait 2-3 hours in an urban hospital, although, really, that's the way it should be.

Quote:
As far as experimental care not being an option or available to Canadians?
That's completely ridiculous.

My grandmother was in one of the first pilot studies for Exelon, a new(ish) and very successful Alzheimer's drug. She was part of the study that included both Canadian and American patients. I worked in a lab that patented a number of leukemia drugs, a couple of which are in research trials now. How dumb can somebody be to think we don't have experimental care here? Hello, that's how any drug made here will be eventually approved for widespread use.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:54 AM   #263
Acrobat
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 485
Local Time: 03:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by VintagePunk


I was accused of not responding to points too, and I think I did. stuckpx's two main points were that 1) universal health care sucks; and then once he changed tactics, that 2) the US government isn't capable of carrying out such a plan.

I think people that frequent here know, you need to bring your A game to this place.
i stated many more points than that, its just people degraded me b/c of my age. i put forth viable solutions which were shot down and also ideas which were ignored. i did bring solid points, review my 50+ posts, just everyone here already has there mind set on what they want towards the health care system and won't partake in any other way.

it isn't just me that was degraded in this thread. it was everyone that did not fully agree w/ michael moore.
__________________
struckpx is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:59 AM   #264
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx


i stated many more points than that, its just people degraded me b/c of my age.
Bullshit. I'm 16, and I don't feel like I've been degraded due to my age in this forum.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:00 AM   #265
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx


i stated many more points than that, its just people degraded me b/c of my age. i put forth viable solutions which were shot down and also ideas which were ignored. i did bring solid points, review my 50+ posts, just everyone here already has there mind set on what they want towards the health care system and won't partake in any other way.

it isn't just me that was degraded in this thread. it was everyone that did not fully agree w/ michael moore.
Don't abuse your age, please. You called the USPS a monopoly, you said anyone who worked could get healthcare, and you blamed the population... ALL OF WHICH ARE UNTRUE!!!

There were no solid points, I'm sorry...
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:03 AM   #266
Acrobat
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 485
Local Time: 03:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


Don't abuse your age, please. You called the USPS a monopoly, you said anyone who worked could get healthcare, and you blamed the population... ALL OF WHICH ARE UNTRUE!!!

There were no solid points, I'm sorry...
you are completely ignoring my other points and other solutions earlier in the thread, which were extremely reasonable. but it isn't worth debating. i have better things to do, and its a freaking michael moore movie for crying out loud.
__________________
struckpx is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:05 AM   #267
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx
but it isn't worth debating. i have better things to do, and its a freaking michael moore movie for crying out loud.
That's what this thread is about though...
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:19 AM   #268
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram
Yes, we work on a triage system. I think it's standardized in Ontario, something like T1-T5, but I am not 100% sure of the levels.

In the movie, I think the people said they waited from 20-45 minutes, but again, that depends what you're there for.

When an ambulance brings you in (even if it is non life-threatening), you are taken in immediately, bypassing the triage system. If you walk in yourself, you are triaged. I walked in twice. Once when I had appendicitis and I think I waited about 90 minutes, as they thought I had the stomach flu. Needless to say I wouldn't go to the ER for a stomach flu - it was so painful I remember thinking I would die. Another time I went was when I broke my finger and I think I probably waited about 25 minutes or so (they gave me an ice pack to hold).

My brother broke his wrist snowboarding and was immediately admitted. My grandmother had a heart attack, went in an ambulance, was seen right away.

If you go to an ER on any given night, most of the people who are sitting and waiting for hours are those who are rather intoxicated, young kids who have ear infections and their parents bring them in instead of going to their family physician in the AM, or old people with bad flu or something. There are also a few idiots who use the ER instead of a family doctor, and they probably wait 2-3 hours in an urban hospital, although, really, that's the way it should be.



That's completely ridiculous.

My grandmother was in one of the first pilot studies for Exelon, a new(ish) and very successful Alzheimer's drug. She was part of the study that included both Canadian and American patients. I worked in a lab that patented a number of leukemia drugs, a couple of which are in research trials now. How dumb can somebody be to think we don't have experimental care here? Hello, that's how any drug made here will be eventually approved for widespread use.
It's nice to have another Canadian to dispel myths. When politicians of the US media talk about "socialized healthcare," they say it in a tone as though it's substandard and that we're all marching in red, up here.

Regarding general wait times for surgery and specialists (and Anitram, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), here's the way it seems to me - it varies greatly from area to area, and even from doctor to doctor within areas. For example - my mom had surgery early this year for a gynecological cancer. It did wait for several months, but the main hold up was that the internalist she had to see to approve her for the surgery was very busy. Once we finally got into him after a few months, her specialist approved the surgery for 9 days later.

During her recovery in the hospital from this, she experienced a complication (that we were informed could happen) that required her to be treated by another internalist. She got through that fine, but once she was released, there was a question regarding a medication she was put on during her hospital stay. I called her original internalist, ans was told he'd call me back. After several days, I called the one who treated her in the hospital and put her on the medication. She was able to see that DR in her office within a few days, and the problem was cleared up. This was back in Feb. The other internalist I called? Their office just got back to me a couple of weeks ago. He's a great DR and a very busy man, but his wait times are just too long. Now, my mom is seeing the other one, the one who got back to her in days. She's not a substandard doctor, just relatively new in town, and seems very thorough.

I guess my point is, a lot of wait times depend on what kind of specialist you need, how many are in your area, and how big and busy their practices are. But patients certainly aren't devoid of options.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:21 AM   #269
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx


you are completely ignoring my other points and other solutions earlier in the thread, which were extremely reasonable. but it isn't worth debating. i have better things to do, and its a freaking michael moore movie for crying out loud.
I'm sorry, but this is your problem, you are all over the place, you don't care that 99% of your points are wrong, you keep trying to justify your beliefs with something... The truth is, you never did.

You haven't. Not even close. Show one that hasn't been buried.

It's just not an issue you are very well versed in, don't take offense...
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:21 AM   #270
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by struckpx

and its a freaking michael moore movie for crying out loud.
No, you're wrong, there. It's much more than a Michael Moore movie, it's the fate of many citizens of your nation. Moore was only the one who made it topical.
__________________

__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com