MERGED--> So...Ron Paul + Vote Ron Paul

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Melon meant that as an absolute.

:rolleyes:

Whether it or not it was meant as an absolute is besides the point. It's stereotypical assumption and it needs to be nailed.
 
financeguy said:
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12102

The writer is (a) openly gay
(b) hispanic

Justin Raimondo is also a paleolibertarian. He supported Pat Buchanan in the 1992, 1996 and 2000 campaigns.

Raimondo is also anti-war to the point of lunacy, as he has claimed that the U.S. provoked Japan into war in WWII and claims that "Israeli intelligence" had prior knowledge of 9/11 (ah, yes, when in doubt, blame "the Jews").

For your own sake, I wouldn't be parading Raimondo around as an example of a "good" Ron Paul supporter.
 
melon said:
For your own sake, I wouldn't be parading Raimondo around as an example of a "good" Ron Paul supporter.




Is that supposed to be some sort of threat?:huh:
 
financeguy said:
Is that supposed to be some sort of threat?:huh:

Not at all. I'm saying that Raimondo furthers my contention that Paul is a reactionary ideologue, rather than his carefully cultivated image as a "maverick."

No threats intended.
 
melon said:


Not at all. I'm saying that Raimondo furthers my contention that Paul is a reactionary ideologue, rather than his carefully cultivated image as a "maverick."

No threats intended.

Right. I now understand, but do not necessarily agree with your point.
 
financeguy said:
Right. I now understand, but do not necessarily agree with your point.

That's okay. I respect that we disagree on Ron Paul here.
 
financeguy said:


Yet again, you're utterly and completely wrong, Martha.


You're right. I'm so wrong. All the time. It must be tough being me. :sad:

:sigh:

Fine, so the dude has supporters among black Republicans. So?

What are other stats? Dig some up that show how wide a spectrum Ronster really has among his supporters. I'm not the one who made the assertion anyway. But it's easier to go after me isn't it? :wink:
 
Although, I'm a bit skeptical as to what exactly they show. That post was cut-and-pasted from The Jones Report, which is owned by Ron Paul supporter Alex Jones (also of Prison Planet and Infowars), whose media company Jones Productions commissioned the Zogby poll (meaning, they own the rights to it and were able to specify its design). If you follow the provided link to Zogby's site, which the post claims has the data it's quoting from, you'll see that in fact it doesn't--all it contains is a link to Jones Productions'/Zogby's poll of 389 Republican primary voters, which had completely different findings, and one brief mention of (but no link to) the much larger nationwide poll: "The blind bio question was also posed to a larger pool of 1009 likely voters nationwide, including Democrats and independents, and Paul was the big winner among that universe of voters, winning 33%, compared to 19% for Giuliani, 15% for Romney, and 13% for Thompson." Note that this Zogby poll was a blind bio (meaning respondents didn't know the actual identities of who they were supporting, but rather made their evaluations based on selective brief bios, presumably composed by Jones Productions) and also that no Democratic nominees' bios (which might have affected independents' and Democrats' responses) were included.

I also find it strange that, so far as I can tell at least, none of Jones' websites provides the actual full poll results despite that being his privilege as its commissioner, though that's neither here nor there I guess.
 
Last edited:
melon said:


Perhaps its no wonder that the only people who seem to support him are straight white men.

I'm not white and I have a lot of friends who are not white who support Paul.
 
Canadiens1160 said:
Who cares when the new "who has friended me?" feature lets me know that Sicy actually secretly loves me.

I love when I do random searches of my username :drool:
 
To all Ron Paul supporters, your guy is a WHACKO:


damning New Republic expose on Ron Paul shows the “libertarian” Republican candidate to be a racist, a homophobe and an anti-Semite. Will his diehard supporters continue to defend a man who called Martin Luther King a gay pedophile? Daniel Koffler, a former Paul sympathizer, has a compendium of the Texas congressman’s creepiest hits, pulled straight from his decades-old newsletter.

Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
by Daniel Koffler

James Kirchick of the New Republic has a devastating piece on Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) online today on the TNR website. Kirchick provides a meticulously detailed history of the “Ron Paul Political Report,” a newsletter Paul had circulated to a network of some 7,000 subscribers from the late 80s and early 90s.

As Kirchick reports—whether describing post-apartheid South Africa as a “destruction of civilization,” alleging that Martin Luther King “seduced underage girls and boys,” warning of “tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise,” or urging white readers to arm themselves after “the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s,”—virtually every historic trope of racism, anti-Semitism, anti-gay bigotry, or conspiracy theorizing has been featured in the “Ron Paul Political Report” in one way or another. For his part, Paul has alternately acknowledged writing some of the material that went out under his name, only to deny authorship when confronted with the most disturbing details. In any case, Paul has taken “moral responsibility” for the contents of the “Ron Paul Political Report.” What follows is a quick digest of some of his greatest, which is to say most disgraceful, hits.

I might add, on a personal note, that as a libertarian with significant sympathy for Paul’s platform, I initially viewed claims of his past history of racism skeptically. But the evidence is so overwhelming that the defense of Paul is now, itself, indefensible.

Racist Pull Quotes:

“[O]ur country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists—and they can be identified by the color of their skin.”

“I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city [Washington, D.C.] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

“We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational.”

“The riots, burning, looting, and murders are only a continuation of 30 years of racial politics.”

“The criminals who terrorize our cities—in riots and on every non-riot day—are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to “fight the power,” and to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible. Anything is justified against ‘The Man.’ And ‘The Woman.’’”

“My friend waved to the tiny [African-American] child, who scowled, stuck out her tongue, and said (somewhat tautologically): “I hate you, white honkey.” And the parents were indulgent. Is any white child taught to hate in this way?” [As a matter of fact, Paul has appeared on a radio program called “The Political Cesspool,” which has featured the neo-Nazi twin pop stars Prussian Blue. –ed.]

“But this is normal, and in fact benign, compared to much of the anti-white ideology in the thoroughly racist black community. The black leadership indoctrinates its followers with phony history and phony theory to bolster its claims of victimology.”

“Korean-Americans, hated by blacks, never riot, and in fact are some of the most productive people in America (the reason for black hatred).”

“The cause of the riots is plain: barbarism. If the barbarians cannot loot sufficiently through legal channels (i.e., the riots being the welfare-state minus the middleman), they resort to illegal ones, to terrorism.”

“We must not kowtow to the street hoodlums and their sanctimonious leaders.”

“Regardless of what the media tell us, most white Americans are not going to believe that they are at fault for what blacks have done to cities across America. The professional blacks may have cowed the elites, but good sense survives at the grass roots.”

“Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among blacks in this country.”

“Blacks have ‘civil rights,’ preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black beauty contests, black TV shows, black TV anchors, black scholarships and colleges, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”

Source: The Ron Paul Report, “Los Angeles Racial Terrorism”

“Black males age 13 that have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary, and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such.”

Source: The Ron Paul Political/Survival report, 1990-1994, excerpted by the Austin Chronicle

Conspiracist Pull Quotes:

“We now know that we are under assault from thugs and revolutionaries who hate Euro-American civilization and everything it stands for: private property, material success for those who earn it, and Christian morality.”

“In San Francisco and perhaps other cities, says expert Burt Blumert, the rioting was led by red-flag carrying members of the Revolutionary Communist Party and the Workers World Party, both Trotskyite-Maoist.”

“Many people tried to buy guns to protect themselves. But, whoops, California has a 14-day waiting period. And then, just to make sure honest Californians could not get ammunition for the firearms they already owned (poor ragefilled youth might be shot), Mayor Tom Bradley ordered all gun and ammo shops closed, a great help to criminals who had stocked up earlier, or who could simply break in and loot.”

“Several days after the violence ended, we learned that there would have been blacks on the King jury—if the NAACP hadn’t engaged in jury tampering by telling potential black jurors that it was their racial duty to convict the cops. The blacks admitted this to defense lawyers, and were rightly excluded from jury. This is a serious crime, but the NAACP will not be prosecuted.”

“Two years ago, in a series of predictions for the 1990s, I said that race riots would erupt in our large cities. I’m now predicting this will be the major problem of the 1990s.” [Helter Skelter, anybody?—ed.]

Source: The Ron Paul Report, “Los Angeles Racial Terrorism”

“Last month I reported on massive, illegal spying by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith against its perceived opponents, as revealed in California. The ADL keeps track of people and groups from left to right, and purchases illegally obtained information on Americans from its agents in police departments in order to prepare and maintain hundreds of thousands of dossiers.”

“The [Los Angeles] Times also brought to light the ADL’s work against ‘cults,’ especially interesting given the BATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms]-ADL connection.”

“It was such a seminar [i.e. a cult awareness training seminar], arranged by the ADL, that targeted the Branch Davidians in the first place.”

Source: The Ron Paul Survival Report, June 15, 1993

“The intensity with which Israel lobbies in the U.S. Congress is surpassed only by its media campaigns to drown all criticism of Israel. Prominent U.S. Editors and media owners don’t even pretend to objectivity on the issue. They all follow the advice of Norman Podhoretz, editor of the influential neo-conservative magazine Commentary….” [Our emphasis –ed.]

“This bias [Martin Peretz’s] informs every opinion expressed in The New Republic. For example, it opposed Contra aid until the Sandinista government showed sympathy for the PLO.”

Source: The Ron Paul Political Report, date uncertain

“If this walking bomb had gone off, it would have demolished the House Chamber and most of the congressmen in it. Yet this attempted terrorist attack was buried by the media. Why? Because the perpetrator was an undoubtedly mad Israeli, furious over alleged slights to his country… [T]he Israeli lobby deep-sixed the story, and no one outside of Congress ever head about it.”

Source: The Ron Paul Political Report, date uncertain

“The Earth Summit is the creepiest meeting of politicos since the first gathering of Bolsheviks. Officially known as the UN Conference for Environment and Development, it will be held in Brazil in June; bad guys from all over the globe will attend.”

“[Hillary Clinton] is one of the most dangerous women in public life. Not only is she a fanatical abortion advocate, she wants parents to register with the government as a condition for having children to be able to sue and `divorce’ themselves from their parents. Maybe her daughter ought to sue her parents for attempting to raise her as a leftist. That sure qualifies as abuse to me.”

“Disgruntled taxpayer Dean Hicks fired bombs through mortars at night at buildings of the Internal Revenue Service in California. Hicks did damage federal property, but no individuals were injured… Hicks was sentenced to 20 years in prison, given a $45,000 fine, and ordered to pay $335,000 in restitution to the IRS. If he had been a serial murderer, he would not have gotten this sort of sentence.”

“There is good news after the L.A. riots. Statewide, gun sales are up 45% over the same period last year. People have been purchasing a record number. If the cops are not going to take care of the problem, the people will.”

Source: The Ron Paul Political/Survival report, 1990-1994, excerpted by the Austin Chronicle

Daniel Koffler graduated from Yale in 2006 with a BA in philosophy. He has written for Reason, Dissent, Jewcy, and the Guardian’s “Comment is Free,” among other outlets.

———
Return to Pajamas Media homepage
 
diamond said:
To all Ron Paul supporters, your guy is a WHACKO:



He didn't say any of those quotes. Here is a response to the article from him that was posted on his website today.



January 8, 2008 5:28 am EST

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:

“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’

“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”
 
I can just imagine orders being given to military leaders and the president saying, "I didn't do it, sorry. I should pay closer attention to what goes out under my name."
 
He made a mistake, by accidentaly letting those quotes go out under his name. Name one candidate or President who hasn't made a mistake. And no, I really don't think there would be military orders going around accidentantly.
 
I can't think of a candidate making a mistake like that. :huh:

Most candidates mistakes happen when they make a contradictory statement about immigration or something. Not in an extremely racist report.
 
Infinitum98 said:
He made a mistake, by accidentaly letting those quotes go out under his name. Name one candidate or President who hasn't made a mistake. And no, I really don't think there would be military orders going around accidentantly.

Even if he didn't make those comments, who authors a book without reading it? Who allows those comments out?

That's not an accident, that's a monumental mistake.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


Even if he didn't make those comments, who authors a book without reading it? Who allows those comments out?

That's not an accident, that's a monumental mistake.

I haven't looked at his book so I don't know. But if some of those comments were in his book, then you are right, that is a huge mistake. But I really do think it would be a mistake. I don't see how a person who wants to run for President, whether he is or isn't racist, can intentionally put something like that in his book.

But I agree, huge mistake.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


Even if he didn't make those comments, who authors a book without reading it? Who allows those comments out?

That's not an accident, that's a monumental mistake.

I guess we have two choices.

Ron Paul is either:

a) a racist or
b) way too stupid and careless to be elected president
 
I find myself asking...

Is Ron Paul the "Lyndon LaRouche" for the 21st century?

Heh...
 
Bono's shades said:


I guess we have two choices.

Ron Paul is either:

a) a racist or
b) way too stupid and careless to be elected president

Okay. Since I am a Republican, I have two choices:

a) Vote for a guy who made a huge mistake editing a book but who will pull out of Iraq and not police the world.

b) Vote for a guy who will continue to police the world.


Why can't we all just look at the policies of these people. He made a mistake, okay. It is not like making the mistake of attacking Iraq, which our current President did. Hillary made a mistake of voting for going into Iraq.

Oh, here is one that really compares:

John Kerry made a mistake by not calling off the Swiftboat ad fast enough.

Everyone makes mistakes, they do.
 
Back
Top Bottom