MERGED: Bush vs. the Irish Reporter - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-02-2004, 07:31 PM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,294
Local Time: 06:33 PM
Pampered Bush meets a real reporter

Snippet is from here:

Quote:
On the eve of his recent sojourn in Europe, President Bush had an unpleasant run-in with a species of creature he had not previously encountered often: a journalist.

He did not react well to the experience.

Bush's minders usually leave him in the gentle care of the White House press corps, which can be counted on to ask him tough questions about when his summer vacation starts.

Apparently under the mistaken assumption that reporters in the rest of the world are as ill-informed and pliable as the stenographers who "cover" the White House, Bush's aides scheduled a sit-down interview with Carole Coleman, Washington correspondent for RTE, the Irish public television network.

Coleman is a mainstream European journalist who has conducted interviews with top officials from a number of countries - her January interview with Secretary of State Colin Powell was apparently solid enough to merit posting on the State Department's Web site.

Unfortunately, it appears that Coleman failed to receive the memo informing reporters that they are supposed to treat this president with kid gloves. Instead, she confronted him as any serious journalist would a world leader.

She asked tough questions about the mounting death toll in Iraq, the failure of U.S. planning, and European opposition to the invasion and occupation. And when the president offered the sort of empty and listless "answers" that satisfy the White House press corps - at one point, he mumbled, "My job is to do my job" - she tried to get him focused by asking precise follow-up questions.

The president complained five times during the course of the interview about the pointed nature of Coleman's questions and follow-ups - "Please, please, please, for a minute, OK?" the hapless Bush pleaded at one point, as he demanded his questioner go easy on him.

After the interview was done, a Bush aide told the Irish Independent newspaper that the White House was concerned that Coleman had "overstepped the bounds of politeness."

As punishment, the White House canceled an exclusive interview that had been arranged for RTE with first lady Laura Bush.
If you want to watch the interview, you can find it here in Real Player format.

He really does seem unhinged at moments there, like he couldn't believe she wasn't buying his story. It's such a difference, as the article points out between how Canadian and European reporters interview their leaders as compared to the American ones.
__________________

__________________
anitram is online now  
Old 07-02-2004, 08:31 PM   #2
War Child
 
najeena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: an island paradise
Posts: 995
Local Time: 11:33 PM
Welcome to the real world, Mr. Bush. Why don't you sit down and stay a while?
__________________

__________________
najeena is offline  
Old 07-02-2004, 09:07 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
RockNRollDawgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 3,304
Local Time: 06:33 PM
About time the mental midget faced some real questions. Of course, Dubya can only answer in half-sentences and go " uh."
__________________
RockNRollDawgie is offline  
Old 07-02-2004, 09:07 PM   #4
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 06:33 PM
Gotta love the so-called "liberal media" in America. Frankly, America has forgotten what "liberal" means; they should be forced to stop using the term in favor of "less conservative." Sort of reminds me of Orwellian newspeak...

So why are American journalists so "nice" to Bush? They joked about it in the CBS TV show, "Murphy Brown," back during the Bush I Administration, as Murphy, who was unabashedly liberal, would get kicked out of the White House and never get an interview again. And that's what it really boils down to: you don't want to be the network that doesn't have first-person access to the White House. It is actually detrimental to be hard-nosed in today's business, and that's too bad. Perhaps in the interest of the public, the White House shouldn't be allowed to kick out members of the press for asking questions they don't like, without due process.

Nice to see that Europe has no need to be nice.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 07-02-2004, 09:33 PM   #5
ONE
love, blood, life
 
zoney!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: six metro locations
Posts: 11,292
Local Time: 05:33 PM
is there an online transcript for Internet users of the dial-up variety?
__________________
zoney! is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:13 AM   #6
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,685
Local Time: 05:33 PM
He didn't stumble as much as I expected. He was frustrated by an agressive journalist.

Oh his "famine and disease" portion was ridiculous he never talked about how he couldn't get his own party to vote for the funding.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 03:54 AM   #7
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,237
Local Time: 05:33 PM
I read the transcript (I can't find the link though, zoney, sorry). It's clear Bush can't think on his feet very well. Every single question he launched into one of his canned speeches. He'd start trailing off, and of course the interviewer would interrupt trying to bring it back on course, and then Bush would get snippy.

To be fair though, many of the interviewer's questions were loaded and not very fairly worded, but still, if Bush were comfortable speaking off the cuff, rather than reciting prepared blurbs, that should not have been a problem for him.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 08:54 AM   #8
you are what you is
 
Salome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,016
Local Time: 12:33 AM
the really scary part is that in her own mind she probably was relatively easy on him, because she + her bosses would have been well aware that the white house won't exactly be co-operative if she would really be extremely critical
__________________
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 12:40 PM   #9
Refugee
 
LoveTown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,359
Local Time: 07:33 PM
my personal favorite moment was how he told her that because he believes in God it doesn't make him better than her. Was he implying that she doesn't?
__________________
LoveTown is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:51 PM   #10
The Fly
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 262
Local Time: 06:33 PM
It's interesting how liberals think that the media is too conservative and soft on Bush, while conservatives think that the media is too liberal and slanted against Bush.

At the same time, many liberals seem to think of Bush as an incompetent dolt, while many conservatives view Bush as a brilliant leader.

In regards to all of these theories, I'm guessing that the truth actually lies somewhere in between.

IMO, painting anyone as a simplistic cartoon (some liberals are doing it to Bush, some conservatives did it to Clinton) is just a little bit too easy.
__________________
TheFirstBigW is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 04:23 PM   #11
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,237
Local Time: 05:33 PM
All I'm going to say is that the leader of our nation should be able to speak well without preparation, and should be able to field criticism, whether valid or biased, and especially when in the form of an interview, in an eloquent and intelligent fashion, without resorting to the canned soundbytes we've heard numerous times.

Reagan was brilliant in this regard, Clinton was fairly good, Bush is just plain lousy. Notice how I'm not bringing their politics into play, just their ability to speak well on their feet.

Most European politicians, especially in Britain, have to deal with these kinds of interviews on a daily basis - indeed their interviewers are often a lot more critical and probing, and the politicians typically handle it quite well. The US media has really slacked off in this regard. Hell, most of it is questions turned in prior to the interview that the White House approves and prepares an answer for. There's nothing wrong with being critical and probing. Frankly I'm getting sick of the attitude that to be critical of the president is to somehow be unpatriotic. Skepticism is necessary for compelling journalism.

I leave you with a quote:

Quote:
"The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

--Theodore Roosevelt
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 09:24 PM   #12
War Child
 
najeena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: an island paradise
Posts: 995
Local Time: 11:33 PM
Can't wait for the debates...
__________________
najeena is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 05:01 PM   #13
Blue Crack Addict
 
meegannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 15,798
Local Time: 11:33 PM
The transcript is on the WH website.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040625-2.html
__________________
meegannie is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 10:55 PM   #14
pax
ONE
love, blood, life
 
pax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ewen's new American home
Posts: 11,412
Local Time: 07:33 PM
I love that quote you posted, Diemen. My boss has it taped to her office door at work (supercool boss!).

Hang out in FYM more often!
__________________
and you hunger for the time
time to heal, desire, time


Join Amnesty.
pax is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 11:19 PM   #15
Blue Crack Supplier
 
dazzledbylight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the sound dancing - w Bono & Edge :D
Posts: 33,002
Local Time: 06:33 PM
Big Grin

Go Reporter Coleman!

I heard some of it earlier in the week.
Air America Played a snippet of on part their exchange. AirAm is on the case, again!

Air America Bush
__________________

__________________
dazzledbylight is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com