Marriage Equality Defended in Massachusetts - Page 10 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-21-2007, 01:28 AM   #136
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,255
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by blueeyedgirl

You've never met a gay person have you?
Yes I have.
__________________

__________________
2861U2 is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 01:30 AM   #137
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
Sorry. I'll trust science with many things, but hearing that people are born gay just doesnt make sense.
Hold on. Let me get this straight. Hearing that people are born gay doesn't make sense? That's the thing that doesn't make sense. You're saying that in a proven scientific fact against a Biblical MISinterpretation, the proven scientific fact is the one that doesn't make sense?

And do I really have to show you? Honestly, it's a fact. It's not something hidden in the Internet. It's known. Often ignored, but known. I don't believe I have to give you thousands of links in order to prove to you that science proves it. In fact, I find the request laughable.
__________________

__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 01:36 AM   #138
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
blueeyedgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bottom of the earth
Posts: 6,774
Local Time: 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2


Yes I have.
And why do my suspicions make me think you met this person in some "re-education" setting, rather than being some schoolmate/work colleague setting? Maybe that's just me.
__________________
blueeyedgirl is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:41 AM   #139
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha


I'm gonna ask, although I know you won't answer, but here goes:

I have had a variety of reproductive organs removed. Therefore, I cannot have children. If I continue to have sex with my male husband of 18 years, are we sinning?
I go off to see the Police, and still no answer. I won't be able to enjoy certain things until I know if I'm sinning.
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:42 AM   #140
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511
two lithe young men in the prime of their lives overcome by sweaty passion for the other's rippling, glistening bodies who ... nevermind.
You always stop too soon.
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:58 AM   #141
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2

Men lusting after other men 2000 years ago is not that different from men lusting after men today. It's the reason Sodom was destroyed. Check it out.
And what exactly does it say about lesbians? Since you are so up on your scripture please show me something...
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 06:14 AM   #142
Blue Crack Addict
 
unico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rage Ave.
Posts: 18,747
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
No, I dont buy into the idea that people are born gay. I believe they choose to be.
The American Psychological Association has come right out with saying people are born gay. I've studied sexuality development theories that show the same thing. It isn't just "science" as you say, I didn't pick up a flask nor did I calculate equations. These theories came along after years of studying and observing how people grow. The Cass Model (you can probably google it) is a very good one and used by many in my field. Actually, there are some parallels between sexual identity development and ethnic identity development in that the person is trying to discover a part of themselves that may not be "mainstream" or whatever.

How can you believe that people aren't born gay but are born heterosexual?? That part I don't understand. It is like saying that someone isn't born black, they choose to be.
__________________
unico is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:01 AM   #143
LJT
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
LJT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,039
Local Time: 02:26 AM
^Another point I find extremely annoying is the selection of science that extreme Christians won't accept....

...They will accept most medicine because it will save their life. They can accept science has given us the ability to fly, to go to the moon and back, they accept science can allow us to predict the weather, or that science can carbon date the Haraldskær woman to 500 BC, or that science created the computer we type on, and many, many other things....

...but science is incredibly wrong when it says homosexuals are born how they are, that it is wrong again when it says the Earth is older than 6000 years, when it is a clear that the earth and humans had been about thousands of years before that...science just has to be wrong, it is ridiculous beyond belief, and should be beyond any reasonable person's faith.
__________________
LJT is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:10 AM   #144
Blue Crack Addict
 
unico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rage Ave.
Posts: 18,747
Local Time: 08:26 PM
^ you're right it is due to science that we're able to post on these boards.

i'm curious though...i know many christians get a bad rep over this, but aren't there other religious groups that share a similar narrowed perspective against science?
__________________
unico is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:42 AM   #145
LJT
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
LJT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,039
Local Time: 02:26 AM
I don't think Islam is quite so anti-science, it was under Arab scholars that science continued to flourish before the renaissance, when a lot of science teaching was lost in Europe. The extremists I suppose would, but there isn't anything fundamentally anti-science in Islam.

The Catholic Church basically accepts everything science, except when it comes to homosexuality, it becomes distinctly anti-science.

Buddhism I don't think has any issues with science....

There are probably some small cults or something that denounces all science, but evangelical Christians are the only ones I can think of that denounce quite a bit of science in the mainstream.
__________________
LJT is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:48 AM   #146
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
No, I dont buy into the idea that people are born gay. I believe they choose to be.


maybe you chose to be straight, but i didn't choose to be gay.

in order to have any credibility whatsoever on this topic, you're going to have to disabuse yourself of this notion.

did this one gay person you know tell you about the day he/she chose to be gay?

(and can you PLEASE tell me more about the gay lifestyle)
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:49 AM   #147
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
Sorry. I'll trust science with many things, but hearing that people are born gay just doesnt make sense.


has it occured to you that your religious beliefs pretty much have to be bogus if you have to lie to yourself in order to live with them?
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:50 AM   #148
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,297
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2



Sorry. I'll trust science with many things, but hearing that people are born gay just doesnt make sense.
Yeah, it makes a lot more sense that they decide to be gay and live in a world full of people like you.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 08:35 AM   #149
War Child
 
Ormus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Frontios
Posts: 758
Local Time: 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
It's the reason Sodom was destroyed. Check it out.
This is a later revisionist view originated by the apocryphal "Book of Jubilees" (~2nd century B.C.) which was intended to be a defense of traditional Judaism from the dominant Greek culture of the day.

The traditional view is that it is related to ancient hospitality customs.

Quote:
Rabbinic writings affirm that the primary crimes of the Sodomites were terrible and repeated economic crimes, both against each other and outsiders.

A rabbinic tradition, described in the Mishnah, postulates that the sin of Sodom was related to property: Sodomites believed that "what is mine is mine, and what is yours is yours" (Abot), which is interpreted as a lack of compassion. Another rabbinic tradition is that these two wealthy cities treated visitors in a sadistic fashion. One example is the story of the "bed" that guests to Sodom were forced to sleep in: if they were too short they were stretched to fit it, and if they were too tall, they were cut up
The linguistic evidence is supportive, as the word traditionally misapplied to "sex acts" literally means "know" (yad'ah).

"Bring them out to us that we may know them."

And, indeed, there are verses in the Bible referring to how one can "yad'ah" YHWH ("know God"). The Book of Jubilees likely made its extrapolation on the fact that "yad'ah" could also have a sexual definition. However, in all other instances of the word in the Old Testament that could refer to sex, it is always in reference to heterosexual sex.

Where I end up further deferring to old rabbinic tradition is on the issue of Judges 19, which tells of the destruction of Gibeah--and the text is pretty much a retelling of the Sodom and Gomorrah texts, but involving a female.

Quote:
"There they turned off to enter Gibeah for the night. The man waited in the public square of the city he had entered, but no one offered them the shelter of his home for the night. In the evening, however, an old man came from his work in the field; he was from the mountain region of Ephraim, though he lived among the Benjaminite townspeople of Gibeah. When he noticed the traveler in the public square of the city, the old man asked where he was going, and whence he had come. He said to him, "We are traveling from Bethlehem of Judah far up into the mountain region of Ephraim, where I belong. I have been to Bethlehem of Judah and am now going back home; but no one has offered us the shelter of his house. We have straw and fodder for our asses, and bread and wine for the woman and myself and for our servant; there is nothing else we need." "You are welcome," the old man said to him, "but let me provide for all your needs, and do not spend the night in the public square." So he led them to his house and provided fodder for the asses. Then they washed their feet, and ate and drank. While they were enjoying themselves, the men of the city, who were corrupt, surrounded the house and beat on the door. They said to the old man whose house it was, "Bring out your guest, that we may abuse him." The owner of the house went out to them and said, "No, my brothers; do not be so wicked. Since this man is my guest, do not commit this crime. Rather let me bring out my maiden daughter or his concubine. Ravish them, or do whatever you want with them; but against the man you must not commit this wanton crime." When the men would not listen to his host, the husband seized his concubine and thrust her outside to them. They had relations with her and abused her all night until the following dawn, when they let her go. Then at daybreak the woman came and collapsed at the entrance of the house in which her husband was a guest, where she lay until the morning. When her husband rose that day and opened the door of the house to start out again on his journey, there lay the woman, his concubine, at the entrance of the house with her hands on the threshold. He said to her, "Come, let us go"; but there was no answer. So the man placed her on an ass and started out again for home. On reaching home, he took a knife to the body of his concubine, cut her into twelve pieces, and sent them throughout the territory of Israel. Everyone who saw this said, "Nothing like this has been done or seen from the day the Israelites came up from the land of Egypt to this day. Take note of it, and state what you propose to do." - Judges 19:15-30
Notice the distinction that they made between "abusing" her and "having relations" with her. Nonetheless, this roving mob of depraved heterosexuals prompted God to raise an army and destroy the entirety of Gibeah. Should we, thus, extrapolate that God destroyed Gibeah because of "heterosexuality"? And if we are to make that extrapolation, should we thus make another extrapolation that says that God prohibits "all heterosexuality"?

This is my main problem with how people view the Bible. Even if we are, for a moment, to assume that the Book of Jubilees was correct, why Sodom and Gomorrah wouldn't be a narrow prohibition against violent rape is because of bias. As far as I'm concerned, those who wish to condemn the entirety of "homosexuality" based on Sodom and Gomorrah must also condemn the entirety of "heterosexuality" based on Gibeah.
__________________
Ormus is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 08:36 AM   #150
Blue Crack Addict
 
unico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rage Ave.
Posts: 18,747
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by LJT

The Catholic Church basically accepts everything science, except when it comes to homosexuality, it becomes distinctly anti-science.
Really? I thought they had changed this stance. My understanding is that the catholic church believes that people are born gay, that it is okay to "be" gay, but not okay to participate in "gay sex." Which...is absurd to me, but whatever.
__________________

__________________
unico is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com