Just say "NO" please!!!!

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

deep

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Messages
28,598
Location
A far distance down.
Pentagon pressing for new rapid-strike weapon:
Sun May 28, 2006 7:44 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon is seeking congressional approval for development of a new weapon able to strike distant targets an hour after they are detected, a newspaper reported on Monday.

The International Herald Tribune said the weapon would be a non-nuclear version of the submarine-launched Trident-2 missile and be part of a president's arsenal when considering a pre-emptive attack.

The report quoted military officials as saying it could be used to hit terrorist camps, enemy missile sites, suspected caches of weapons of mass destruction and other urgent threats.

General James Cartwright, head of the U.S. Strategic Command, said the system would allow U.S. forces to attack targets conventionally and precisely and "limit the collateral damage".

The Pentagon would like the system available in two years, the report said.



Can these people be trusted? (the rest of article here)
 
We have gone from the horror of Dresden to targeted strikes, improvements such as this reduce civilian deaths furthur.
 
yeah.

i think i heard the same thing about some cities in iraq, how they were "intelligent bombs" or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom