Job growth up, unemployment drops even more! - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-07-2004, 07:37 PM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 01:47 PM
Job growth up, unemployment drops even more!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._nm/economy_dc


Robust April Jobs Data Spur Rate Fears

By Glenn Somerville

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. employment swelled for a second straight month in April with American employers adding 288,000 more jobs to payrolls for the strongest two-month gain in four years, the Labor Department (news - web sites) said on Friday."

"The national unemployment rate fell to 5.6 percent in April from 5.7 percent in March."


"Analysts said the employment report showed the pace of U.S. economic activity has kicked into a higher gear that promises continued gains in hiring."


"If so, it may take some sting from charges by prospective Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry (news - web sites) that President Bush (news - web sites) has presided over such huge job losses that he should be replaced in presidential voting in November."


"In the first four months of this year, 867,000 jobs were created -- a striking contrast to the comparable four months in 2003 when 195,000 jobs were scrubbed from payrolls."
__________________

__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 07:17 AM   #2
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:47 AM
Again, I'd love to see what kind of jobs were created. Construction jobs? Because, by the end of summer into winter, they'll all be unemployed again, and, come spring, they'll be "re-hired." That is, after all, the nature of this profession, particularly in the north.

That's what I hate about these figures. They never tell you the quality, but always the quantity.

Melon
__________________

__________________
melon is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 08:00 AM   #3
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 08:47 AM
Do you think that jobs created are any different at any other time Melon?

My thoughts are that some are seasonal and some ride a longer wave, but are jobs EVER completely created foreveer?
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 10:14 AM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 05:47 AM
Hi Sting,


Here is one more quote from the article you posted.


"Bush remains on track to be the first president since the Great Depression to have a net loss of jobs at the end of his term but April's gains cut that tally to about 1.5 million and it may shrink further in coming months. "
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 01:10 PM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
theSoulfulMofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,490
Local Time: 06:47 AM
This week NBC News made two points:

1. High school students seeking jobs this summer may have the toughest time since WWII due to competition with recent college grads and other more qualified applicants. (Local news)

2. Though unemployment rate is decreasing, the job search is stilll tighter because it is tough to find the right fit between company hire and job applicant. There are cases where a number of people must go back to technical or continuing ed school for manufacturing jobs, and other cases where even middle-aged chemical engineers have tough time finding employment. (NBC Nightly News Friday 5/7/04)
__________________
theSoulfulMofo is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 01:57 PM   #6
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
Do you think that jobs created are any different at any other time Melon?
The difference is that this is an annual event. Thus, no new jobs are really being created; they're just rehiring people who are annually fired.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 03:11 PM   #7
War Child
 
najeena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: an island paradise
Posts: 995
Local Time: 01:47 PM
...and remember, flipping hamburgers is actually a manufacturing job.
__________________
najeena is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 05:48 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 01:47 PM
For a little perspective lets compare the current 5.6% unemployment rate to the annual unemployment rates of the past 30 years, broken into four year segments by presidential administrations.



Nixon/Ford

1973 4.9%
1974 5.6%
1975 8.5%
1976 7.7%

Carter

1977 7.1%
1978 6.1%
1979 5.8%
1980 7.1%

Reagan

1981 7.6%
1982 9.7%
1983 9.6%
1984 7.5%

Reagan

1985 7.2%
1986 7.0%
1987 6.2%
1988 5.5%

Bush

1989 5.3%
1990 5.5%
1991 6.7%
1992 7.4%

Clinton

1993 6.9%
1994 6.1%
1995 5.6%
1996 5.4%

Clinton

1997 5.0%
1998 4.5%
1999 4.3%
2000 4.0%

Bush II

2001 4.8%
2002 5.9%
2003 6.2%
April 2004 5.6%



The average unemployment rate over the past 30 years in the United States has been 6.4%. Over the last 30 years, unemployment rate has only been below 5.4% in 6 different years.

Bill Clinton won re-election with 5.4% unemployment in 1996.

The Current unemployment rate is 5.6% and economist project this unemployment rate to drop to 5.2% towards the end of this year.
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 06:02 PM   #9
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon


The difference is that this is an annual event. Thus, no new jobs are really being created; they're just rehiring people who are annually fired.

Melon
Well thats not the case here. For example, Unemployment was increasing at this time last year and peaked in August of 2003 at 6.4%. Unemployment is now down to 5.6%. So the idea that this is simply the result of temporary hiring for construction jobs for the summer is simply not true.


I don't have a break down of the Quality of the jobs but I do know where the USA currently stands among other nations in regards to Standard Of Living.

According to the United Nations Human Development Index which measures Standard of Living in all countries around the world, the USA currently ranks 7th in the world as of last Summers 2003 report. Here are the countries that ranked in the top 20 on standard of living.

1. Norway
2. Iceland
3. Sweden
4. Australia
5. Netherlands
6. Belgium
7. United States
8. Canada
9. Japan
10. Switzerland
11. Denmark
12. Ireland
13. United Kingdom
14. Finland
15. Luxembourg
16. Austria
17. France
18. Germany
19. Spain
20. New Zealand
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 06:06 PM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by deep
Hi Sting,


Here is one more quote from the article you posted.


"Bush remains on track to be the first president since the Great Depression to have a net loss of jobs at the end of his term but April's gains cut that tally to about 1.5 million and it may shrink further in coming months. "
Here is some math for you. 6 months till election time. Last month about 300,000 jobs were created. If this rate of job creation remains the same for the next 6 months, that tally will turn into a plus rather than a negative.

Can you name an incumbent President that lost an election when the unemployment rate was 5.5% or less?
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 06:37 PM   #11
you are what you is
 
Salome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,016
Local Time: 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by STING2
If
I am a big fan of maths that include "if"
__________________
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 07:23 PM   #12
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Popmartijn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 32,543
Local Time: 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by STING2
Nixon/Ford

1973 4.9%
1974 5.6%
1975 8.5%
1976 7.7%

Carter

1977 7.1%
1978 6.1%
1979 5.8%
1980 7.1%

Reagan

1981 7.6%
1982 9.7%
1983 9.6%
1984 7.5%

Reagan

1985 7.2%
1986 7.0%
1987 6.2%
1988 5.5%

Bush

1989 5.3%
1990 5.5%
1991 6.7%
1992 7.4%

Clinton

1993 6.9%
1994 6.1%
1995 5.6%
1996 5.4%

Clinton

1997 5.0%
1998 4.5%
1999 4.3%
2000 4.0%

Bush II

2001 4.8%
2002 5.9%
2003 6.2%
April 2004 5.6%
The great thing about these numbers is that you can interpret them any way you want them. For instance, while Sting says that the average unemployment rate was 6.4% over the past 30 years, the current 5.6% is an increase of 1.6 percentage points compared with the 4.0% of the last year of the Clinton administration. And while it is true that Clinton won the re-election while he had an unemployment rate of 5.4%, that was a improvement of 1.5 percentage points of his first year as president (and even 2 percentage points compared to the last year of Bush I).
Oh, and the numbers also show that when there isn't a decrease in the unemployment rate, the president is out.
Looking over the numbers, we see that there's only one term for Bush I and now we have Bush II. And in the last 30 years, there was not a two-term administration following a two-term administration.

These are just some of the things you can get out of numbers.



Marty
__________________
Popmartijn is offline  
Old 05-08-2004, 07:49 PM   #13
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Popmartijn


The great thing about these numbers is that you can interpret them any way you want them. For instance, while Sting says that the average unemployment rate was 6.4% over the past 30 years, the current 5.6% is an increase of 1.6 percentage points compared with the 4.0% of the last year of the Clinton administration. And while it is true that Clinton won the re-election while he had an unemployment rate of 5.4%, that was a improvement of 1.5 percentage points of his first year as president (and even 2 percentage points compared to the last year of Bush I).
Oh, and the numbers also show that when there isn't a decrease in the unemployment rate, the president is out.
Looking over the numbers, we see that there's only one term for Bush I and now we have Bush II. And in the last 30 years, there was not a two-term administration following a two-term administration.

These are just some of the things you can get out of numbers.



Marty
#1 The one year that Clinton had a 4% unemployment rate is a record and unlikely to be repeated any time soon. That year, US firms were paying students from Europe to come over and work because they couldn't find any workers. The current 5.6% unemployment is much closer to a good maintainable unemployment level than the 4% level .

#2 Unemployment under the Bush II administration peaked at 6.4% last summer and already the Bush administration has brought this unemployment down by almost a full percentage point. So, the unemployment rate is decreasing.


#3 The fact that there was only one Bush I term and currently on one Bush II term as well as the fact that there has not been a complete two term president followed by another two term president are interesting but irrelevant to predicting the 2004 election.


The strongest point to be made about these statistics is how rare it is to have an unemployment rate of 5.6% much less 5.2% which economist predict it will be around election time.

Who ever is President for the next 4 years is not going to have an unemployment rate similar to what Clinton had in his second administration. A 4.7% or 4.8% unemployment rate average for the next 4 years is most likely and the current rate is already within a single percentage of that and dropping. Who ever takes over the office on January 20, 2005 will be far more interested in maintaining the unemployment level than reducing it because it is unlikely such and unemployment rate could be reduced anymore and then sustained over a good period of time.

If the current economic performance keeps up, John Kerry will have no arguement to make when it comes to jobs this fall.
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 05-10-2004, 04:18 AM   #14
Refugee
 
Klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: on a one of these small green spots at that blue planet at the end of the milky way
Posts: 2,432
Local Time: 02:47 PM
5.6% unemployment is a good rate. The only thing that's questionalble is the trend.
If it continues to go down (5.something) it seems like the unemployment rate is ok.
It's not as excelent like in the clinton times but it's no desaster.
__________________
Klaus is offline  
Old 05-10-2004, 04:48 AM   #15
you are what you is
 
Salome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,016
Local Time: 02:47 PM
why compare figures from different periods without any info on what the main reasons of the influxes are?

we do not know what kind of jobs were created/got axed
we do not know the role of the government in this
if the governemnt did play any role in it we don't know the long term consequences

the info this does give has about 0% to do with politics
so if Kerry was planning on attacking Bush on these numbers instead of attacking him on his policies it would make no sense
as much sense as it would make for Bush to claim that he must be a pretty good president because some economic figures do not look piss poor
__________________

__________________
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com