U2democrat
Blue Crack Addict
Thanks for posting that
joyfulgirl said:Yeah, I think this could finally bring the bastard down.
japes4 said:
If not this, I'm sure his opponents will come up with something else.
japes4 said:
If not this, I'm sure his opponents will come up with something else.
Bush’s support jumps after long decline
Poll shows growing optimism on Iraq, economy
By Dan Balz and Richard Morin
Updated: 8:53 a.m. ET Dec. 20, 2005
President Bush's approval rating has surged in recent weeks, reversing what had been an extended period of decline, with Americans now expressing renewed optimism about the future of democracy in Iraq, the campaign against terrorism and the U.S. economy, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News Poll.
What won't last long?stammer476 said:
deep said:What won't last long?
the outrage at his illegalities?
or
the bump in the polls?
Could've said the same thing on 9-10-01.diamond said:That we haven't had any terrorists attacks on our soil post 9-11 -01 makes this policy worthwhile.
U2democrat said:
Whose district are you in? Moran?
Sen. Warner is hopefully pretty pissed about this but I bet Allen is sucking up to Bush.
in the thread about his last addressstammer476 said:The bump, yes.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
But if he got a blow job you'd be screaming impeachment...
Wow the priorities...
I'm so old, I remember when it was the conservatives who were suspicious of government. My how times have changed.deep said:his base will not abandon over this issue
he will keep blurring it as 9-11 related,
and their attitude will be
we have not had any more attacks
and who cares if you got nothing to hide
You don't see the difference in lying about something that should have remained a private matter and spying?japes4 said:
I don't see any difference between Monicagate and whatever you want to call this.
japes4 said:
If it turns out that Bush did not break any laws, will anyone here let it go?
japes4 said:I doubt anyone on this board (except maybe Dreadsox) had any love for Bush when he entered office.
cydewaze said:
I'm so old, I remember when it was the conservatives who were suspicious of government. My how times have changed.
BonoVoxSupastar said:But if he got a blow job you'd be screaming impeachment...
BonoVoxSupastar said:
If you don't live well within the status quo, if you think outside the box, if you question anything you are the enemy.
deep said:
but will never approach 60% approval rating again
Scarletwine said:I love how some people don't care whether he follows the law. They just blindly take it.
No one is above the law.
nbcrusader said:
A common re-writing of history, but the impeachment process dealt with lying under oath.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
You don't see the difference in lying about something that should have remained a private matter and spying?
You really don't see the difference?
Wow
Let what go?
nbcrusader said:
An investigation of a PETA event may indeed be warranted given some of the violent acts done by animal rights organizations.
nbcrusader said:
A common re-writing of history, but the impeachment process dealt with lying under oath.
But I digress from our W bashing.... carry on.
nbcrusader said:
Yes, the President must follow the law.
But there has been precious little discussion on the laws that were broken and the facts that substantiate the criminal violations.
We can continue to speak in generalities, but we do not bring any granularity to the issue.
japes4 said:
Has anything been proven? Have any laws been broken? Are there any indictments? Is there even an investigation yet?
It just seems that Bush's opponents are a little too eager condemn him, not unlike Clinton's opponents.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
You can't prove much without an investigation, hopefully that will happen and the truth will follow.
But you can't be so blind as to not see the difference between illegal spying(if true), and trapping someone into perjury.
If this does prove to be true. There was no trap set, there was no need for a trap, Bush set it himself.