diamond
ONE love, blood, life
Foxxern said:
So are you saying the US should have put some sort of pressure on Iraq in 1993 or 1998 when they first began to violate their sanctions? I hardly think it would have made sense back then given the circumstances. Then again, I'm not sure what has really changed between then and now regarding our relationship with Iraq.
Yes.
We shoulda.
The current President then was dealing w other issuses, perhaps.
Chasing skirts
Jogging to McDonalds
Invading Haiti
Sending our soilders to be ambushed in Somolia.
Clinton was lousy at foriegn policy.
Did ok w Ireland
Did ok w Bosnia..
Saddam never feared Clinton like the Bushes..
thats about it..
Arun-
I have 3 words for you-
1-Gulf
2-War
3-Treaty
In the last 10 yrs..Iraq signed this document and violated many times over.
We dont need new UN resolutions to blast Iraq.
We just forgot about what Iraq agreed to do when they surrendered in 1991.
GWBush is demonistrating that he IS NOT a mad-mad by getting 75 per-cent of the elected officials on his side both Democrat and Republican..
At this time-GW now has the majority of the Democrats on his side in the Senate.
GW has a 66 per cent Job Approval Rating
Either GW is doing the right thing..
or
ALOT of Democrats are selling out.
Which is it?
And thats the accurate truth.
Sometimes the truth is uncomfortable..
Peace-
diamond