Gore on the Rocks - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-22-2007, 10:30 AM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 07:39 PM
Gore on the Rocks

I have always disagreed with Adam about mixing music and politics, sports and politics...etc. This is a good article about the danger of mixing science and politics.

Quote:
Gore on the Rocks
Consensus is reached: Gore’s global-warming alarmism is overblown.

By Steven F. Hayward

As international celebrity and film star Al Gore prepared to testify about global warming on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, it was already apparent that the hot air may be leaking out of the global-warming balloon.

After a year of concentrated effort that includes a multimillion-dollar p.r. campaign on top of An Inconvenient Truth and slavish media coverage parroting the climate-alarmist line, recent polls show that public opinion has barely budged. Only about a third of Americans, according to a recent Gallup survey, are agitated about climate change, and even people who say the environment is their most important issue rank climate change behind air and water quality in importance.

Meanwhile a backlash in the scientific community has begun. Last week, New York Times veteran science reporter William Broad filed a devastating article about scientists who are “alarmed” at Gore’s alarmism; Gore’s account of global warming goes far beyond the evidence. The dissents from Gore’s extremism, Broad explained, “come not only from conservative groups and prominent skeptics of catastrophic warming, but also from rank-and-file scientists” who have “no political ax to grind.” It appears Gore refused to be interviewed directly for the article; he responded to e-mail questions only.

This backlash has been quietly building for a while. In November, Mike Hulme, director of Britain’s Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, expressed his unease about climate alarmism to the BBC:

I have found myself increasingly chastised by climate change campaigners when my public statements and lectures on climate change have not satisfied their thirst for environmental drama and exaggerated rhetoric. It seems that it is we, the professional climate scientists, who are now the [catastrophe] skeptics. How the wheel turns. Why is it not just campaigners, but politicians and scientists too, who are openly confusing the language of fear, terror and disaster with the observable physical reality of climate change, actively ignoring the careful hedging which surrounds science’s predictions? To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science.

Then in December, Kevin Vranes of the University of Colorado, by no means a climate skeptic, commented on a widely read science blog about his sense of the mood of the most recent meeting of the American Geophysical Union, where Gore had made his standard climate presentation. “To sum the state of the climate science world in one word, as I see it right now, it is this: tension,” Vranes wrote. “What I am starting to hear is internal backlash. . . None of this is to say that the risk of climate change is being questioned or downplayed by our community; it’s not. It is to say that I think some people feel that we’ve created a monster by limiting the ability of people in our community to question results that say ‘climate change is right here!’”

Gore and other climate extremists have been hammering away at “consensus” science for years now — especially the assessments produced by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). So it is a highly inconvenient truth that the latest IPCC scientific assessment undermines many of Gore’s most spectacular claims. The IPCC says the worst-case sea-level rise this century would be 23 inches; Gore portrays 20 feet or more in his horror film. Ditto for Gore’s claims about hurricanes and melting ice caps; the new IPCC fails to bolster Gore’s alarmism. Already climate alarmists are starting to mutter under their breath that the IPCC is now “too conservative,” but having built up the IPCC as the gold standard of “consensus” science, the alarmists are in the awkward position of being hoist by their own petard. It could be an inconvenient moment for Gore on Wednesday if someone asks him why he is so far outside the scientific consensus on so many aspects of the issue.

A new anti-alarmist documentary from Britain’s iconoclastic Channel Four, The Great Global Warming Swindle, is attracting Internet viewers by the millions. And the most significant blow to climate alarmism came last week in New York, where in a formal debate MIT’s Richard Lindzen and author Michael Crichton decisively defeated the alarmists in an audience vote. You know there is something fundamentally weak about the case for climate catastrophe when you see an alarmist attributing the skeptics’ victory to Crichton’s height rather than the substance of the arguments.

The biggest blow to the climate catastrophists is not any scientific problem, but the hypocrisy of Gore and his Hollywood cheering section, whose profligate energy use cannot be mitigated in the popular mind through “carbon offsets,” even if such offsets worked as advertised. Liberals in the 1960s and 1970s never comprehended how damaging “limousine liberalism” was to their cause. They seem even more oblivious to the self-inflicted wounds of “Gulfstream liberalism.” Whatever the intricacies of climate science, middle-class citizens understand that Gore wants them to use less energy and pay more for it, while he and his Hollywood pals use as much as they want and buy their way out of guilt, like a medieval indulgence. In the companion book to An Inconvenient Truth, Gore writes that “a good way to reduce the amount of energy you use is simply to buy less. Before making a purchase, ask yourself if you really need it.” Gore decided that he does need it — for all four of his homes and his pool house.

The ultimate sign that climate change is more about politics than science is the repeated “go-slow” statements of Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders. If climate change is really the greatest threat in mankind’s history, with the catastrophic tipping point less than 10 years away, why go slow in crafting legislation to save the planet? Perhaps Pelosi and other congressional Democrats have paid attention to the overwhelming consensus of economists — one climate consensus that Gore resolutely ignores — that serious greenhouse-gas emission cuts fail every conceivable cost-benefit test. Faced with the climate-policy equivalent of HillaryCare, Pelosi would prefer to save her majority rather than save the planet.

— Steven F. Hayward is F.K. Weyerhaeuser Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the Pacific Research Institute’s annual Index of Leading Environmental Indicators.
__________________

__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:13 AM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 08:39 PM
Quote:
Whatever the intricacies of climate science, middle-class citizens understand that Gore wants them to use less energy and pay more for it, while he and his Hollywood pals use as much as they want and buy their way out of guilt, like a medieval indulgence.

Touché!
__________________

__________________
INDY500 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:19 AM   #3
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,640
Local Time: 08:39 PM
Re: Gore on the Rocks

Quote:
Originally posted by AEON
I have always disagreed with Adam about mixing music and politics, sports and politics...etc. This is a good article about the danger of mixing science and politics.

Politics effects everyone and everything, the idea that it should be separate from certain aspects of life or that only certain people are elgible I always found ridiculous.
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:24 AM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
trevster2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,330
Local Time: 11:09 PM
This article is bullshit partisan garbage. It's not just Al Gore bringing up this topic. It's the entire science community with the exception of a handful of bought off quack scientists.

Governments around the world are already legislating laws to become more efficient and greener. The costs of not addressing climate change in the future are far greater than the initial costs of addressing it in the present. Will our actions today stop the increase in temperature? Probably not, but it will certainly mitigate the effects.

The U.S used to be the country the world looked to for answers. But thanks to divisive politics, no one expects anything from them on perhaps the greatest challenge facing mankind. Jeez, even our Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper is trying to enact green policies (albeit watered down ones) and he didn't even believe in any of it or even talk about the environment until a couple of months ago.

How sad that a handful of people still refuse to see the win-win in all of this.
__________________
trevster2k is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:26 AM   #5
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,640
Local Time: 08:39 PM
BTW Steven F. Hayward wrote 'The Age of Reagan" he's an Ultra Ultra rightwing journalist. He has absolutely no scientific background, in fact he has a reputation of denying science.
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 03-22-2007, 12:26 PM   #6
The Fly
 
Dwight Schrute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 57
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Oh no, Al Gore is an alarmist! That must mean that there's no such thing as global warming (even though we have no scientific data to back that statement up)! Lets just carry on with our wasteful ways.
__________________
Dwight Schrute is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 12:40 PM   #7
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,471
Local Time: 09:39 PM
yeah, the article has no scientific credibility whatsoever.

it's more concerned with Al Gore's increasing potential as a presidential candidate than anything else.

just look at the Hollywood jabs. now that the right has failed at all aspects of governance -- not to mention war! -- is this all they have left? is this the new enemy, hollywood people?

grow up.

it's amazing how slanted the article is. a "devastating" article? that article was posted in here, and while some of the scientists disagreed with some of his points, they all thought he's got the big picture right and they lauded his efforts to publicize the topic.

"devastating"? hardly.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 12:57 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Jeannieco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A HEART THAT IS BROKEN IS A HEART THAT IS OPEN
Posts: 4,954
Local Time: 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511
yeah, the article has no scientific credibility whatsoever.

it's more concerned with Al Gore's increasing potential as a presidential candidate than anything else.

just look at the Hollywood jabs. now that the right has failed at all aspects of governance -- not to mention war! -- is this all they have left? is this the new enemy, hollywood people?

grow up.

it's amazing how slanted the article is. a "devastating" article? that article was posted in here, and while some of the scientists disagreed with some of his points, they all thought he's got the big picture right and they lauded his efforts to publicize the topic.

"devastating"? hardly.
__________________
Jeannieco is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:42 PM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 10:39 PM
This thread needs more David Suzuki

__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:49 PM   #10
Blue Crack Supplier
 
elevated_u2_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm here 'cus I don't want to go home
Posts: 31,690
Local Time: 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Canadiens1160
This thread needs more David Suzuki

EVERY thread needs more DS!!

Ah David Suzuki, environmentalist and car manufacturer...
__________________
elevated_u2_fan is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:50 PM   #11
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,271
Local Time: 09:39 PM
I think the American conservatives haven't yet caught on that this is another losing issue for them. They've in fact already lost, they just don't know it yet. It's a bit like gay marriage: time will defeat their views because of changing social values and it's basically a question of waiting them out.

In Canada, even our Conservatives are quickfast developing environmental policies ever since the former Conservative PM Mulroney told them point blank they would lose if they did not adjust their views on this issue. The US right is just lagging behind, as is usually the case.

So they can print these ridiculous articles from now until kingdom come and the fact still remains that after decades of work by environmental scientists, they have finally crossed that barrier and the public has largely embraced them or is well on the way. There is no more going back.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:52 PM   #12
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
redhotswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Waiting for this madness to end.
Posts: 5,846
Local Time: 09:39 PM
The only people making global warming a partisan issue are the conservatives.

I'm disappointed in this thread. I came here expecting a new ALcoholic drink.
__________________
redhotswami is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 01:59 PM   #13
Blue Crack Supplier
 
elevated_u2_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm here 'cus I don't want to go home
Posts: 31,690
Local Time: 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by redhotswami
I'm disappointed in this thread. I came here expecting a new ALcoholic drink.
I KNOW!!

It's like the "Bono's Gaming Problem" thread in EYKIW; I totally thought it was about his gambling addiction...
__________________
elevated_u2_fan is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:21 PM   #14
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,271
Local Time: 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by redhotswami
The only people making global warming a partisan issue are the conservatives.

More accurately, it's American conservatives. A look at Europe or Canada will show you that their conservatives have woken up and smelled the coffee, for the most part.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:30 PM   #15
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by redhotswami
The only people making global warming a partisan issue are the conservatives.
I agree.
__________________

__________________
verte76 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com