G. W. Bush may be a good prez but I think he's a nutcase some of the time - Page 4 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-08-2002, 12:07 AM   #46
War Child
 
Matthew_Page2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 873
Local Time: 06:58 PM
A couple of things:
Melon, I gave up trying to rationally discuss Ronald Reagan with anyone years ago. Let's put it this way; If Hillary Clinton had hired a psychic to help Bill with his foreign policy decisions... Well, I can imagine what people would have said.
Many Republicans have a huge blind spot when it comes to Reagan. Many Democrats have a huge blind spot when it comes to Clinton. Rational discussion of the merits of either President is darn near impossible.
For instance, both Dems and Republicans seem to have this bizarre misconception that Clinton was a liberal President. Weird.

Lemonite, we actually agree on Sharon.

U2Bama, Amen on George Mitchell. The former Senate Majority leader from my home state of Maine did wonderful things in both the Middle East and Northern Ireland. Exactly what I would expect from a good Democrat...

MAP

[This message has been edited by Matthew_Page2000 (edited 01-07-2002).]
__________________

__________________
Matthew_Page2000 is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 12:29 AM   #47
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
80sU2isBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,970
Local Time: 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon:
Amusing, yet again.
Melon, you said "amusing, yet again" to me, referencing the fact that you said "amusing" to me earlier in this thread. However, you never answered my response to your first "amusing". And why not? Because you realized after reading my response that (1)your argument that "all politicians are corrupt" had no place in this discussion because we were discussing 2 presidents and 2 presidents only and (2)that I did care to elaborate and provide backing for the whole "selling secrets to the Chinese" scandal and that (3)The Gulf War was NOTHING like the Afghanistan war and that Bush has not ignored domestic issues. Therefore, I would suggest that before you start throwing out the term "how amusing", that you answer people first.

[This message has been edited by 80sU2isBest (edited 01-07-2002).]
__________________

__________________
80sU2isBest is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 12:44 AM   #48
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 80sU2isBest:
Melon, you said "amusing, yet again" to me, referencing the fact that you said "amusing" to me earlier in this thread. However, you never answered my response to your first "amusing". And why not?
Actually, I didn't respond to your first "amusing," because I haven't read this entire thread. I'm impatient with my 56K modem.

Quote:
Because you realized after reading my response that (1)your argument that "all politicians are corrupt" had no place in this discussion because we were discussing 2 presidents and 2 presidents only and (2)that I did care to elaborate and provide backing for the whole "selling secrets to the Chinese" scandal and that (3)The Gulf War was NOTHING like the Afghanistan war and that Bush has not ignored domestic issues. Therefore, I would suggest that before you start throwing out the term "how amusing", that you answer people first.
Nope. That's not the reason. But I'll have to find your response so I can actually read it. I use "amusing" quite a bit, actually.

Melon

------------------
"He had lived through an age when men and women with energy and ruthlessness but without much ability or persistence excelled. And even though most of them had gone under, their ignorance had confused Roy, making him wonder whether the things he had striven to learn, and thought of as 'culture,' were irrelevant. Everything was supposed to be the same: commercials, Beethoven's late quartets, pop records, shopfronts, Freud, multi-coloured hair. Greatness, comparison, value, depth: gone, gone, gone. Anything could give some pleasure; he saw that. But not everything provided the sustenance of a deeper understanding." - Hanif Kureishi, Love in a Blue Time
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 12:48 AM   #49
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:58 PM
Urgh...this thread takes forever to load. Besides, anything else I have to say is in here:
http://forum.interference.com/u2feed...ML/000981.html

To be honest, I tend to argue more partisan, subconsciously, just for the sake of arguing methinks. What I think is written above in that link. If it departs from my previous writings in here, then so be it.

Melon

------------------
"He had lived through an age when men and women with energy and ruthlessness but without much ability or persistence excelled. And even though most of them had gone under, their ignorance had confused Roy, making him wonder whether the things he had striven to learn, and thought of as 'culture,' were irrelevant. Everything was supposed to be the same: commercials, Beethoven's late quartets, pop records, shopfronts, Freud, multi-coloured hair. Greatness, comparison, value, depth: gone, gone, gone. Anything could give some pleasure; he saw that. But not everything provided the sustenance of a deeper understanding." - Hanif Kureishi, Love in a Blue Time
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 03:51 AM   #50
War Child
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 940
Local Time: 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by 80sU2isBest:
Quote:
Originally posted by Salome:
even though Clinton has made more mistakes than I probably will in my entire life at least (for some reason) he enjoyed some respect in the rest of the world
To be honest, I don't care who respected him in the rest of the world. The man was the President of The United States. his job was to look out for his people, not win some popularity contest.

I think you would find in a Clinton/Bush argument, the Americans here would be split roughly 50/50 between the two, as you would expect, but non Americans would probably be 90/10 in favour of Clinton.
Remember 80's that for non Americans here we don't reaaally (respectfuly) care about their tax plans, just about their foreign policy and international movements, and Clinton was lightyears ahead of Bush. Way way way better.
__________________
TylerDurden is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 12:47 PM   #51
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
80sU2isBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,970
Local Time: 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon:
Nope. That's not the reason. But I'll have to find your response so I can actually read it. I use "amusing" quite a bit, actually.
Melon
oooops. sorry.
__________________
80sU2isBest is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 05:24 PM   #52
Paper Gods
Forum Administrator
 
KhanadaRhodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a vampire in the limousine
Posts: 60,609
Local Time: 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Lemonite:
80's, I agree with you as always,

And to the rest of ya'll yambags, Give it up.. Bush Won the Election!
so, it's all right for you to mention clinton's affair, not to mention the 2000 election, but it's not all right for me to? WAIT i forgot! how stupid of me...i'm a democrat, you're a republican, therefore anything you do is right. silly me. hold on while i pop out another kid and make you some spaghetti. can i rub your feet? can i scrub the floor for you again?

------------------
when you stop taking chances, you'll stay where you sit. you won't live any longer, but it'll feel like it.
ME!
__________________
KhanadaRhodes is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 05:36 PM   #53
Paper Gods
Forum Administrator
 
KhanadaRhodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a vampire in the limousine
Posts: 60,609
Local Time: 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 80sU2isBest:
To be honest, I don't care who respected him in the rest of the world. The man was the President of The United States. his job was to look out for his people, not win some popularity contest.
we aren't some individual country floating along by ourselves on some planet. what we need are allies. it would've really sucked if some countries who hated us had decided to bomb the hell out of us in 1998 (kinda like what happened on 9/11) cuz they didn't like us. i may be alone on this, but i think a president who tries to make EVERYONE like him is a good thing.

------------------
when you stop taking chances, you'll stay where you sit. you won't live any longer, but it'll feel like it.
ME!
__________________
KhanadaRhodes is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 05:40 PM   #54
I'm a chauvinist leprechaun
 
Lemonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Notre Dame, IN, 46556
Posts: 1,072
Local Time: 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by KhanadaRhodes:
so, it's all right for you to mention clinton's affair, not to mention the 2000 election, but it's not all right for me to? WAIT i forgot! how stupid of me...i'm a democrat, you're a republican, therefore anything you do is right. silly me. hold on while i pop out another kid and make you some spaghetti. can i rub your feet? can i scrub the floor for you again?

Sweetie, Actually you could make me a Mayonnaise Sandwich and slice it into thirds with the Crust cut off.. Read the post please.. I did not mention Clinton's affair.. I do mention the election though, but they're set actions.. Things that are written down.. I'm not really complaining.. being a sore loser of sorts.. An example'd be like me Saying ..'Oh clinton didn't have an affair'.. It's the same sort of tact..
__________________
Lemonite is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 05:48 PM   #55
Paper Gods
Forum Administrator
 
KhanadaRhodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a vampire in the limousine
Posts: 60,609
Local Time: 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Lemonite:
Sweetie, Actually you could make me a Mayonnaise Sandwich and slice it into thirds with the Crust cut off.. Read the post please.. I did not mention Clinton's affair.. I do mention the election though, but they're set actions.. Things that are written down.. I'm not really complaining.. being a sore loser of sorts.. An example'd be like me Saying ..'Oh clinton didn't have an affair'.. It's the same sort of tact..
true, you didn't, but you...oh fuck i forgot what i was gonna say. and no, you can eat the crust! *sighs*

------------------
when you stop taking chances, you'll stay where you sit. you won't live any longer, but it'll feel like it.
ME!
__________________
KhanadaRhodes is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 05:54 PM   #56
I'm a chauvinist leprechaun
 
Lemonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Notre Dame, IN, 46556
Posts: 1,072
Local Time: 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by KhanadaRhodes:
true, you didn't, but you...oh fuck i forgot what i was gonna say. and no, you can eat the crust! *sighs*


Whoa.. But I do understand, us Republicans feel the same way towards you democrats.. Stereotypically, the Democrats are teh nastiest out there, Whether it be in the Media... Take Bill Maher.. though He may be just one f#cked up individual, or Judie woodrupth.. or however her name is spelt.. and Shoo.. Yes i did write shoo.. Gore was pretty nasty.. It jsut happens, when the issues are soo intense, that sometimes we Resort to Degrading comments and personal attacks to try and Mulve up an issue by linking a position with say.. an affair or something of the sort.. But when I start ripping on people.. I do tryto have a valid point in the first place so it gives me some sort of Credence to be making such a claim, More for villainy, and to keep the forum interesting, and Well.. some people just need a nice warm sh#t dropped on their Monitors when they read responses to a post. (Shakes the Hand of Dearest Khanada followed by .. perhaps a nice warm embrace)
__________________
Lemonite is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 06:30 PM   #57
Acrobat
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queen Lurker
Posts: 323
Local Time: 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Lemonite:

Whoa.. But I do understand, us Republicans feel the same way towards you democrats.. Stereotypically, the Democrats are teh nastiest out there, Whether it be in the Media... Take Bill Maher.. though He may be just one f#cked up individual, or Judie woodrupth.. or however her name is spelt.. and Shoo.. Yes i did write shoo.. Gore was pretty nasty.. It jsut happens, when the issues are soo intense, that sometimes we Resort to Degrading comments and personal attacks to try and Mulve up an issue by linking a position with say.. an affair or something of the sort.. But when I start ripping on people.. I do tryto have a valid point in the first place so it gives me some sort of Credence to be making such a claim, More for villainy, and to keep the forum interesting, and Well.. some people just need a nice warm sh#t dropped on their Monitors when they read responses to a post. (Shakes the Hand of Dearest Khanada followed by .. perhaps a nice warm embrace)
That's nice Lemonite, to start ripping people (thereby ripping their character) based on their political stance - for the sole purpose of playing the villian, or just to get a rise out of people and "keep the forum more interesting" as you put it.

Nice one, mate.

This forum is plenty interesting as it is without people (and you aren't the sole culprit here) ripping into others and judging their character because they don't stack up to your political prowress.

It's pretty fucking sad to see both sides thrashing each other just for fucks's sake of it all. Whatever. It gets real old real fast seeing republicans bashing democrats, and democrats bashing republicans. If any of you (and you know who you are) want to better represent the party you respect, then you'd refrain from the arrogant insults and have a bit more self control when formulating a rebuttal.

__________________
adam's_mistress is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 06:52 PM   #58
Acrobat
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 317
Local Time: 01:58 AM
For Clinton having an affair, who cares. Most people do I guess.

And for Bush, two weeks ago he didn't knew what was Argentina's capital (that's no joke at all.. he said "Santiago") and sent a message to the new President (the actual one) stating : "Congratulations. This is democracy", or something like this... geez... does he knows the President of Argentina wasn't elected by the people ? mmmmmm.. suspicious. But he carries well high the flag.

------------------
United Nations : www.un.org - UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) : www.unicef.org
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) : www.unesco.org

Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (EZLN) : www.ezln.org
"The one who governs with weapons is surely poor in ideas" - Marcos

Solidarités : <A HREF="http://www.solidarites.org

Parti" TARGET=_blank>www.solidarites.org

Parti</A> pour une Alternative Progressiste : www.parti-rap.org
__________________
Holy John is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 07:08 PM   #59
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
80sU2isBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,970
Local Time: 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by KhanadaRhodes:
we aren't some individual country floating along by ourselves on some planet. what we need are allies. i may be alone on this, but i think a president who tries to make EVERYONE like him is a good thing.
And we HAVE allies. Mexico, Canada, Germany, Britain, Israel, the list goes on and on. But you can't please everyone. So, we need a leader that will stick to what he knows is right; what is best for the country he represents.
__________________
80sU2isBest is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 07:50 PM   #60
ONE
love, blood, life
 
FizzingWhizzbees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the choirgirl hotel
Posts: 12,614
Local Time: 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Lemonite:

It jsut happens, when the issues are soo intense, that sometimes we Resort to Degrading comments and personal attacks to try and Mulve up an issue by linking a position with say.. an affair or something of the sort..
Personally I'd say personal attacks weaken your original point. Nobody respects someone more because they're able to launch into a stream of insults at any opportunity. What is respected is having a sound understanding of the issues at hand and being able to justify your position on its own merits without insulting someone articulating a different view.

Why do we need to be confrontational anyway? Why does politics have to be about opposite groups arguing then one group "winning" at the expense of other groups? Why can't we be more inclusive and respect that people have different needs and meeting the needs of one group at the expense of others isn't a success. Especially when the same groups keep winning...
__________________

__________________
FizzingWhizzbees is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com