French Polls

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

80sU2isBest

Rock n' Roll Doggie Band-aid
Joined
Nov 12, 2000
Messages
4,970
One in three French backs Saddam
By Charles Bremner and Alan Hamilton

ILL-FEELING between Britain and France over the invasion of Iraq has plumbed new depths with the desecration of that most sacred of memorials, a war cemetery.
The defilement of Commonwealth war graves in northern France coincided with a poll for The Times which found that 54 per cent of Britons no longer regarded France as a close ally because of its opposition to the war.

Relations will be further rent by a second poll, in Le Monde, showing that only a third of the French felt that they were on the same side as the Americans and British, and that another third desired outright Iraqi victory over ?les anglo-saxons?.

Eleven thousand Allied soldiers lie buried in well-tended peace at Etaples, on the Channel coast near Le Touquet, victims of the struggle by Anglo-Saxons to liberate the French from the German invaders during the First World War.

Last week the obelisk raised in their memory was defiled by red-painted insults such as ?Rosbeefs go home?; ?May Saddam prevail and spill your blood?; and, in a reference to the long-dead casualties beneath the manicured turf, ?They are soiling our land?.

Local gendarmerie have launched an inquiry, but have so far found no clues. They say there had been no significant demonstrations against the war in that area of France.

The graffiti have been scrubbed off, but the incident has provoked outrage among British politicians, war graves staff and the few remaining relatives of those buried at Etaples. French politicians have joined the condemnation.

Bruce George, Labour chairman of the Commons Defence Committee, said: ?Remembering what sacrifice these men made for the liberation of France, I cannot believe any mature, sane person would be so stupid as that.?

David Uffold, 63, a Shropshire farmer, is the only surviving relative of Rifleman Frederick Uffold of the London Regiment, who is buried at Etaples. ?I find it sickening that anyone would vandalise the cemetery,? he said. ?It is the last place they should be protesting about Iraq. These fellows were drafted in to fight for France. I can?t see any connection between the men buried at Etaples and the war in Iraq.?

Peter Francis, of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, said he was disgusted that a place remembering those who died defending freedom in world wars long ago should be dragged into a current political debate.

French politicians did their best to portray the desecration as an isolated act, but it nonetheless underlined anti-American and anti-British emotions running through France over what is seen there as a bungled invasion rapidly turning into a humanitarian disaster.

President Chirac?s spokesman said: ?We are indignant and shocked by the desecration of the graves of soldiers who fought for our liberty.? Jean-Pierre Raffarin, the Prime Minister, said: ?The Americans are not the enemy; just because we are against this war, it does not mean that we want the victory of dictatorship over democracy.?
 
This was done by some pretty ignorant F##kers.....
My grandfather was in WWII , luckily the questions I ask him , he can still remember,there's not too many of those guys left now.
Those men saved the world , and with very little complaints afterwards, they just came home and went back to work...
 
Maybe it is time the US re-examines its long-term relationship with France....









this is not a call for a boycot of all things French
 
Last edited:
Ouch. This isn't the first time the U.K. and France have had strains in their relationship. Maybe it's time to examine our relationship, but I hope the end result of the examination is a renewal of a 225-year old alliance rather than the trashing of it. I still have no plans to stop using French products. In fact I'm trying to get a skating tape from French TV. The moderator of one of my skating lists is French. I'm not signing off of it just because some of the people are French. Most of the people on it are either Russian or Bulgarian. There are also a fair number of Americans, Canadians and Brits on it. It's got nothing to do with politics.
 
I don't want to point fingers, but it seems to me that the French are bringing most of these bad feelings on themselves. Renaming food and even not using American or French products is one thing. It's childish, but fairly harmless. Desecrating grave sites and defacing statues and monuments is a whole other.
 
Maybe it is time the US re-examines its long-term relationship with France....

I honestly hope you're being sarcastic.

This is ridiculous. I would think that most people in this forum would realize that polls mean nothing. Any poll can be tilted to reflect what you would like it to reflect. Or are you basing this on the acts of a few people who did the vandalism. Or are you all pissed off that France didn't back the US. Who cares? Why is everyone attacking the French they aren't the only country to oppose this war. A large number of this world opposed this war. Has France done some questionable things? Yes, but so has every other nation. The US is getting way too sucked into this "if you're not with me than you're against me" bu**sh**. The Bush administration is single handingly destroying so many foreign affair relationships it's not even funny. It makes me sick that everyone is falling for it too.
 
The statement was not meant to be reactionary or necessarily result in a break in relations with France. There does, however, seem to be some underlying differences and I think it is healthly if the differences were discussed rather than ignored.
 
And again the blame is put on Bush and the U.S. - not on an "ally" that would rather stand with the Russians and Chinese because of their dirty money and weapons deals Iraq.
 
womanfish:

you're right, it's sad but true.. every nation prefers to complain what the other did wrong instead of looking what they did and really feeling ashamed (Every big nation i can think of did their part to make the situation worse) :(

Seems like a "great human tradition" guildy? just the other ones :(

Klaus
 
It just made me really realize it when I read a newspaper column a few days ago. This guy was born in France, then moved to a French speaking area of Canada. He said it's really scary to think that after having allys in the U.S., U.K., Australia for so long, that now it seems that the French (and in some ways Canada) would rather be allys with Russia and China. He even went so far as to say that it's not just about not "backing" your allys, but it seems they are almost supporting or rooting for the enemy. When I read the article posted above, it made it even more clear.
 
Last edited:
womanfish:
Yes you're right :(
The only reason i can think of why this change happens is that lots of countries become affraid of the last superpower because they decided not to listen to anyone and do what they want to do.
So many Europeans start to think that the only way to force the US to care about international laws is to find allies who are powerfull enough that G.W. will listen (China+Russia for example)

Klaus

p.s. this is NOT my opinion, i just wanted to show you the opinion of average people on european streets
 
It seems to me that some talks between the U.S, the U.K, and France, and maybe Russia and Germany also, would be productive. Rather than not talk about this at all, talks about shared interests would be in the best interests of both France and the U.S. Even if one-third of the French people support Position X on the war, what about the other two-thirds? What's their opinion? What do they want? Talks would be great. Lack of talks might be really bad news.
 
womanfish said:
now it seems that the French (and in some ways Canada) would rather be allys with Russia and China.

I'm sorry, but since when are we (Canadians) allying ourselves with these countries? What, we aren't even allowed, as an f'n sovereign country to (horror upon horrors) disagree with the US? It's not the first time in history either, if you remember the Cuban crisis in the 60s. Canada isn't even on the security council, it has not allied itself with anybody, and said that it would not support a war unless that 2nd resolution was passed. 70%+ of Canadians don't support the war, and our Prime Minister clearly spoke for the majority. To now imply we're allied with these new evildoers is really stretching it.
 
It is definitely time to exam where this country is going in the future. Alliances have come and gone, new ones are made, and old ones fade away. This one seems to be near the end.

Peace
 
I'm appalled by the previous statement.
Maybe we should examine where we are coming from. What a :censored: pile of shit this administration has lead us into. Condemnation from most of the world, especially countries with high Islamic communities. Loss of allies of over 225 years, for :censored: what?
I'm done now. The voices in here (with exceptions) have become so strident and arrogant, it is impossible to get a dissentling voice in edgewise (no pun intended).

edited to say
Maybe this forum should be callled WARMONGERS and the rest of us will stay out (apparent from the number of dissenting voices comfortable enough to still post hear).

Sorry if I am sounding strident, but I've had enough of the holier than thou attitudes of some posters.
 
Last edited:
Scarletwine said:
I'm appalled by the previous statement.
Maybe we should examine where we are coming from. What a :censored: pile of shit this administration has lead us into. Condemnation from most of the world, especially countries with high Islamic communities. Loss of allies of over 225 years, for :censored: what?
I'm done now. The voices in here (with exceptions) have become so strident and arrogant, it is impossible to get a dissentling voice in edgewise (no pun intended).

edited to say
Maybe this forum should be callled WARMONGERS and the rest of us will stay out (apparent from the number of dissenting voices comfortable enough to still post hear).

Sorry if I am sounding strident, but I've had enough of the holier than thou attitudes of some posters.

Since you start your post referring to my post, and there is no new paragraph, I guess I am one of the strident and arrogent. I am sure it is not a personal attack, since you were obviously attacking my post, and not slinging insults my way.

Don't be upset over the vandalism of the replica of the Statue of Liberty. Don't be upset over the vandalism of the 9/11 memorial in Paris. Don't be upset over the vandalism at the cemetary, where soldiers from foreign countries gave their lives to liberate that country.

France, has been acting in their own self-interests on this issue, as we have. If our paths do not follow the same road, it is time to move on. That is all I was saying, and I did not say it nastily, or with malice, or with anything that deserved the response it received above.

As to members, not posting here, I garentee you, that the ARROGANT WARMONGERS you have labeled, have disappeared in larger numbers because of some of the BIASED UNSUBSTANTIATED LIES that are posted about our servicemembers, our military, and our President.
 
Oh, I don't know that anyone is proposing a drastic change in international relations, to last over the long haul. Heck, Colin Powell was just in Turkey today. We've had alot of disagreement with the Turks as well over the past few months but this meeting was very constructive. Turkey OKed humanitarian shipments from their country and this is certainly a positive thing. I agree that this administration has screwed up big time in some of our relationships but I think the overall relationships with these countries can survive one policy disagreement. Alot of riding on how post-war Iraq is dealt with. If we play our cards right in Iraq, they'll have open, honest, fair democratic elections, elect their leaders, which will in all likelihood include religious leaders, and it will be our turn to accept the new leaders of Iraq and welcome Iraq into the family of nations. This is crucial. We cannot afford to screw up with this. If the Iraqis are pleased with the outcome of the action then things should be OK. If we do screw up we're :censored: :censored: :censored:
 
No it actually wasn't at you. But a couple of other posters.

We are accepting surrendering Iraqi soldiers, arming Iraqi (possible) dissenters, but can't tolerate a few off the wall dissendents in France. Of course thaey are upsetting but first we had a WWII vet handing back his medal given to him by France. Give me a break.
As to the attacks against my gov't, I'd argue that they are not unsubstantiated, or lies, or whatever. We shall have to disagree.
 
Dreadsox said:


As to members, not posting here, I garentee you, that the ARROGANT WARMONGERS you have labeled, have disappeared in larger numbers because of some of the BIASED UNSUBSTANTIATED LIES that are posted about our servicemembers, our military, and our President.
Exatly. I was thinking about that today, how many of the people opposing the war in this forum don't really seem to be concerned about peace, but more with bashing the president wth unsubstantiated statments like "Bush doesn't care about killing civilians" and crap like that. That serves no purpose but to demonize the man.
 
If I were a VET, and French people were desecrating the graves of my comrades who fought and died to liberate their country, at this point, my medal would be in the mail too.

Peace
 
I will agree, desecrating graves is *not* cool and no one should have to tolerate that. Personally I am not sure I'd put my medal in the mail because not all French people are doing this madness and I'm sure not all of them approve of this at all. I can understand the anger, the hurt, and the pain at such appalling acts being committed. I still don't want to blame France, the country. The government and some of its supporters, yes. All of the people, no.
Crash-time. :yes:
 
anitram said:


I'm sorry, but since when are we (Canadians) allying ourselves with these countries? What, we aren't even allowed, as an f'n sovereign country to (horror upon horrors) disagree with the US? It's not the first time in history either, if you remember the Cuban crisis in the 60s. Canada isn't even on the security council, it has not allied itself with anybody, and said that it would not support a war unless that 2nd resolution was passed. 70%+ of Canadians don't support the war, and our Prime Minister clearly spoke for the majority. To now imply we're allied with these new evildoers is really stretching it.


Hey, I didn't say it. It was a French Canadian. Don't shoot the messenger.

And Scarletwine - you need to calm down. If any of your rant was towards me, which I don't understand why it would be, I ask you to think about this. I love France, I love to visit France, I find the people there much nicer than many Americans have a stereotype of, I don't call my French Fries Freedom Fries, I don't boycott French goods (I just had French wine and French cheese last night). But when it comes to people in France saying they would rather have Iraq win than the U.S. and Britain and Australia and there are French who are desecrating graves of soldiers that liberated their ancestors, then yes , it bothers me and should bother any American or Brit.

Also my other problem is this:

the top 4 trade nations with Iraq (in order)
1. France
2. Russia
3. Australia
4. China

Top 3 Creditor Nations of Iraq (in order)
1.France
2.Russia
3.China

3 Countries with the largest oil contracts and oil field construction contracts with Iraq.

-France
-Russia
-Germany

My gut tells me that France chose money over allies and that is a shame.

I know countries have their own political and economic interests, but sometimes you have to concede to help an ally. That's just my opinion. I don't think of myself as a warmonger, because I am quite critical of military action at any time, but it looks like anyone who thinks that force was the only unfortunate answer, has now been labeled.

And to add one thing - as strained as relations are right now, I also think that within not too long, things will get back to the way they were. And I can continue to feel comfortable visiting France. :)
 
Last edited:
Man Inside The Child said:
i think it's more like one in three is against america and the aggressive spreading of american imperialism.

You said it - against America. Allies aren't "against" eachother...
 
EVERYONE in here needs to calm down.

Please remember that persons on both sides of this debate have their good points. We need to not call names and make assumptions, but consider all arguments independently and on their own merits. I'm talking to EVERYONE: pro- and anti-war, American and otherwise.

If this thread doesn't move past MUTUAL mudslinging ASAP, it will be closed.

If you cannot live together in here, you cannot live together out there, let me tell ya. --Bono
 
The Wanderer said:
I hope the French will be as vocal next time the Chinese and Russians kill some Tibetans or Chechnyans...

I don't know about the French (too much Iraq war pictures in the news consume the time which would be needed for other news) :(

But for Germany: German foreign minister Joschka Fischer urged Russia to stop human rights violations in chechnya for example. He also spoke about human rights violations in China but i didn't see the full story so i don't know if it was about tibet or not.

Klaus
 
Back
Top Bottom