Freedom IS Free

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

VertigoGal said:


I generally agree with your other points, but this is just bigotry. The state is not the moral authority, thank you very much. Your religion may not recognize gay marriage, but other people shouldn't be subject to that.

(haha, this thread is turning into a gay marriage thead :wink: )

Oh yes, I'm a bigot because I don't agree with gay marriage.

I do not refer to the state as a big facist regime. A US state is run by the people. The people of the state decide the individual laws there. If the collective can't be a moral authority than you do not recognize what society really is.
 
VertigoGal said:
Just like the collective moral authority that said segregation was a-okay way back when.

The thought it was ok back then. They did. It was wrong.

People thought the Crusades were alright too. It was wrong.

But people will look back on the gay marriage issue and not think that people were wrong for wanting to defend what they thought was right. I am of course referring to those that believe that marriage is only between a man and a woman. It is not hateful to defend my conception of marriage. So don't even try to compare gay marriage and segregation.
 
Of course they're different issues, but your concept of a "collective moral authority" can't only apply part of the time. It wasn't okay for your first 2 examples because "it was wrong" but it's okay to have a collective moral authority concerning gay marriage because your opinion is "right."

All this BS about defending yourself is nuts, gays aren't hurting you. No one's trying to take away your right to think they aren't moral. To be honest, the state shouldn't even be granting marriages in the religious sense, they should be granting civil unions. Churches (*separate* from the state) can marry or refuse to marry whoever they like.
 
Sonoftelepunk said:
But people will look back on the gay marriage issue and not think that people were wrong for wanting to defend what they thought was right. I am of course referring to those that believe that marriage is only between a man and a woman.

Ah, but when people hear this argument and yet fail to find any logical reasons as to why they don't agree with it being legal (and yes, I'm being frank here-I really do have yet to see a logical reason against legalizing gay marriage), then those people will have some questions about why they were so opposed to the concept.

:up: to VertigoGal's post, too.

Angela
 
VertigoGal said:


All this BS about defending yourself is nuts, gays aren't hurting you. No one's trying to take away your right to think they aren't moral. To be honest, the state shouldn't even be granting marriages in the religious sense, they should be granting civil unions. Churches (*separate* from the state) can marry or refuse to marry whoever they like.

I didn't say that gay people hurt me. I said that I am defending my conception of marriage. So let's see, that leaves the bulk of your message null.

The US Constitution does not say that there is freedom from religion, It says freedom of religion. And yes, being athiest is considered on equal footing with those that believe in God in the eyes of government. Now, before you say "but Teh GOVErnmEnt is All pRo-God n STuff!11!", I will tell you that the government is more representative of a religious discourse because most of the country is Christian or otherwise believes in God.

All that said, The state should be granting marriages because it is not using it so much in the sense of a religious union as a civil union with a different name. A marriage is just a secular of a word as civil union is.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

Sonoftelepunk said:
Oh yes, I'm a bigot because I don't agree with gay marriage.

That sounds about right.

Bigot.

Melon
 
Sonoftelepunk said:
I didn't say that gay people hurt me. I said that I am defending my conception of marriage. So let's see, that leaves the bulk of your message null.

Indeed. I defend my concept of marriage too, in an ideal world where heteros are not allowed to divorce, birth control of any kind is banned (including the rhythm method), and if you and/or your spouse (because, after all, fornication is banned too) look lustfully at each other, you belong in hell. Don't forget that hole in the sheet too.

Ah...the good old days of medieval Europe.

Melon
 
financeguy said:


I am not singling out Vienna (I love the city) but let us not pretend that there are not racist attitudes among some of its inhabitants. Again, just in the interests of fairness.

Excuse me, you´re right. I forgot to say rich.

Rich people are very welcome.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

Sonoftelepunk said:
You want oppressed poor? Go to India.

To India?

Poor, yes. But oppressed? I would say that some people in India (except those at the lower end of the caste system) enjoy at least as much personal freedom like Americans.

Ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

whenhiphopdrovethebigcars said:


To India?

Poor, yes. But oppressed? I would say that some people in India (except those at the lower end of the caste system) enjoy at least as much personal freedom like Americans.

Ridiculous.

The lower end of the caste system is the largest block of India's poor. Not only poor, but a social system that essentially says you should remain there.
 
I have not been able to post anyresponses here for a couple of days, as I have been busy with work, family, etc.
And after reading and re-reading my original post, I can see maybe i did not make myself as clear as I might have given some time to ponder more clearly my own thoughts.....so I will add some more comments here.

When I say "I feel oppressed by my own government" I say so after the fact that "my own government spends 75% of the federal budget ( my tax money) on the military, leaving the rest to be split up (25%) on education, police, roads etc.
75% !!! on new fighter planes and new means to kill people.
I do not think that killing more and more people is a good way to win friends and influence people. There are 37 million people in the U.S. at or well below the poverty level, and all of the U.S. social programs get cut more and more everytime the federal budget is up for legislation.

This is absolutely disgusting in my opinion.
And when one says anything about the enomormous military budget...one gets the "well freedom isn't free" line...I say that is complete bullshit.

We Americans THINK we have free speech here in the media, but we do not. In comparison to Canada we fall very short in the TV media as for as "free speech" goes. For instance, after 10 PM EST in Canada, you can turn on any commercial TV station and see the Sopranos un-censored albeit with commercials , you can see "The Osbournes" completely un-censored.
You want soft porn? after 10 PM on regular TV, you may have that, too.

IF I want the news, I cannot rely on the national news from American broadcasters..so afraid of asking ANY relevent questions...I must watch The BBC news...amazing what real freedom of the press is.

I love freedom, and liberty..but I do not need any government to give that to me...I have both already, as does everybody in the world, no matter where you live. The government can only opress you from realizing the full potential of freedom that you already have....can never give freedom to you.

I, as an American, am sick of being lied to by my government, and am sick of my taxes being used to kill and destroy, when there is so much poverty and desperation in the world.
The "war on terror " cannot be won with bullets and bombs..there's no way.
It CAN be won with running water, health care, and electricity and a HOME to use all the above in.

75% of the budget to actually IMPROVE life for all, everywhere, seems like a great way to win friends and influence people to me. And I will do all *I* can as an American to influence my government to change it's ways.

P.S To immigrate to Canada, you need 1500 dollars (U.S.) paperwork filled out, chest xrays a medical exam (because the Canadian govt. gives healthcare to it's citizens, they want to insure you are not extremely sick upon entering)
Once in country and have these papers filled out, you can get a work permit (or get a work permit first if you don't have the 1500 dollars..they allow that)

There are a few more steps....not hard at all.
How do I know this? I was going to immigrate a few years ago, but decided to renig due to family concernes here in the U.S. OH and you can file for dual citizenship as well.....
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

nbcrusader said:


The lower end of the caste system is the largest block of India's poor. Not only poor, but a social system that essentially says you should remain there.

referring to political oppression, not to poverty and the social system in India which is surely a tuff thing. There is a stable government, and in other states people are more politically oppressed, but I wouldn´t say that of India.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

whenhiphopdrovethebigcars said:


referring to political oppression, not to poverty and the social system in India which is surely a tuff thing. There is a stable government, and in other states people are more politically oppressed, but I wouldn´t say that of India.

There is a social oppression of the poor in India. Though the Caste system is officially illegal, it is still widely practiced. And I do believe that there is a degree of political oppression..in that a member of the 'untouchable' caste, could never reach a political job. That may just be a societal hinderance...I don't know.
 
neverman, I don't really understand your perception of freedom. You're against censorship, which, although restrictive, is in place to prevent parents having to worry about their kids seeing porn. However, you're all for national health care and university programs which result in fewer economic freedoms, but are in place to prevent you having to worry about paying for those things. Is there a difference between personal and economic freedoms?

Or maybe you'd like the tax rate to stay the same, and simply have it spent on something other than fighter jets, in which case I'd agree with you. :wink:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

melon said:


That sounds about right.

Bigot.

Melon

Saying that is just as valid a point as saying that you're a bigot for not agreeing with everything everyone else believes.

I suppose it's at a point here where having your own opinion means you are a bigot. Way to promote facism, jerk.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

Sonoftelepunk said:
Saying that is just as valid a point as saying that you're a bigot for not agreeing with everything everyone else believes.

I suppose it's at a point here where having your own opinion means you are a bigot. Way to promote facism, jerk.

I will pray for your amoral, blackened soul.

Melon
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Freedom IS Free

BonoVoxSupastar said:
Now we can read hearts?:rolleyes:

Such is the claim of the Antichrist.

Pray that he does not claim to read your heart as well. Be on the vanguard against Satan!

Melon
 
"Divine revelation, not reason, is the source of all truth." - Tertullian of Carthage (A.D. 150-225)

Ancient Greece understood that the Earth was round and revolved around the Sun, but "divine revelation" said otherwise. After all, "reason" is the product of Satan.

St. Augustine insisted that "divine revelation" was so powerful as to supercede Jesus or even the New Testament, if necessary.

A Deo et Rege.

St. Augustine stipulated, through his worship of "divine revelation" that although the earthly city was the very opposite of the heavenly city, it was a reality that people must face. Christians could not reject their city entirely, but must bend it to fit a Christian pattern. The city that someday would rise from the ruins of Rome must be based upon Christian principles. Warfare, economic activity, education, and the rearing of children should all be conducted in a Christian spirit. Although the City of Man was ever evil, imperfect, and of no consequence in comparison to the City of God, it was not about to disappear and be replaced by the Kingdom of God on earth. The church could not neglect the state, but must guide it to protect human beings from their own sinful natures. The state must employ repression and punishment to restrain people, who were inherently sinful, from destroying each other and the few good men and women that God had elected to save from hell. It was in "warfare" and terror this perversion of Jesus' Church would excel.

Adversus solem ne loquitor. Amantes sunt amentes.

"Beware of mathematicians and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine, "DeGenesi ad Litteram"

Melon
 
Last edited:
VertigoGal said:
neverman, I don't really understand your perception of freedom. You're against censorship, which, although restrictive, is in place to prevent parents having to worry about their kids seeing porn. However, you're all for national health care and university programs which result in fewer economic freedoms, but are in place to prevent you having to worry about paying for those things. Is there a difference between personal and economic freedoms?

Or maybe you'd like the tax rate to stay the same, and simply have it spent on something other than fighter jets, in which case I'd agree with you. :wink:
[/QUOTE
The way the Canadian system works is best..there are 2 sales taxes, one which pays for the healthcare....so, depending on how much you buy, is how much you pay for your healtcare. Our tax system in the states favors the top 1 or 2 % or the wealthiest citizens...this needs to stop...this is a govt. by the elite for the elite lately it seems. And yes, I'd love to see money spent on something other than instruments of death and destruction. I also think personal and economic freedoms do go hand in hand together.
As Bono wrote " The rich stay healthy..the sick stay poor..." Unfortunately, that seems to ring true. We can change that to where all people can stay healthy and fed.....someday it MIGHT happen...I hope :) Thanks for the excellent question ..causing me to even question myself..much appreciated. OH and about the censorship issue.......PARENTS should be in place to prevent kids from seeing porn. PARENTS should make sure the kids don't seeit..imho
 
Back
Top Bottom